Delhi Court March 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Save India Foundation & Anr. vs Ministry of Home Affairs & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 986/2026 & CRL.M.A. 9253/2026 INTERIMORDERSSAVE INDIA FOUNDATION & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Umesh Chandra Sharma, Mr. Vikas Sharma, Ms. Chhaya Sharma, Mr. Yogesh Aggarwal, Mr. Mohit Kumar, Mr. Neeraj Chauhan, Mr Peeyush Kaushik, Mr. Lalit Goyal, Ms. Khushbu Khatri, Advs.versusMINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ripudaman Bhardwaj CGSC with Mr Amit Kumar Rana GP for UOI. Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel with Mr. Abhinav Arya, Mr. Aryan Sachdeva, Advs. and Insp. Hira Lal, ASI Shiva Nand, PS Nihal Vihar for the State.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJAORDER% 27.03.2026 CRL.M.A. 9254/2026 (exemption)1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.W.P.(CRL) 986/20262. This Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of theConstitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Habeas Corpus,directing the respondents to handover t...
Lalit Agrawal & Ors. vs New Delhi Municipal Council & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3900/2026 & CM APPL. 19121/2026 LALIT AGRAWAL & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Subhash C. Jindal, Advocate (through VC)versusNEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Udit Dedhiya, Mr. Sanjay Sharma, Ms. Apurva Sachdev and Mr. Preyansh Gupta, Advocates forNDMC.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 27.03.20261. The present writ petition has been filed seeking quashing of thedemand-cum-attachment notice dated 16th March, 2026 issued under Section 100 of the NDMC Act against the premises of the petitioner at 28, Hanuman Road, New Delhi-110001. A further direction is sought to the respondents to pass a fresh assessment order after granting an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioners.2. Earlier, the petitioners had filed a writ petition being W.P.(C)impugned order dated 6th November, 2020 and directing the respondent/NDMC to pass a fresh assessment order takin...
Saurabh Malik & Anr. vs Komita Singh
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ LPA 165/2026 & CM APPLs. 19322-25/2026 SAURABH MALIK & ANR. .....Appellants Through: Mr.Suresh Kumar Sahni, Adv. with Mr.Satwik Parikh, Adv.versusKOMITA SINGH .....Respondent Through: Mr.Manish Kaushik, Adv. with Mr.Mishal Johari, Mr.Ankit Batra and Mr.Mainak Sarkar, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIAORDER% 27.03.20261. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.2. The order under challenge in this Letters Patent Appeal is dated08.01.2026 passed by learned Contempt Judge in CONT.CAS(C) 1366/2025.3. By the impugned order, a direction has been issued to the appellantsthat they shall specifically disclose the contents of the bank locker, which is the subject matter of the contempt petition.4. It has been argued by the learned counsel for the appellants that anydisclosure of the contents of the bank locker is likely to cause prejudice to the case pending in the p...
Medhavi Foundation vs Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3837/2026 & CM APPL. 18831/2026 MEDHAVI FOUNDATION .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Gautam Narayan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Noor Shergill, Ms.Anuja Pethia, Mr. Aditya Abhyankar, Ms. Asmita Singh, Mr. Rishabh Nigam, Mr. Rishabh Govila, Ms. Kshirja Agarwal, Ms. Amisha Aggarwal, Advocates.versusUNION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr Ripudaman Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr Amit Kumar Rana, Adv.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 27.03.20261. Mr. Ripudaman Bhardwaj, learned CGSC, on instructions, submitsthat the petitioners representation against the order of blacklisting is pending before the Inter-Ministerial Committee. The same would take about two weeks time for its conclusion.2. The Court finds that the impugned decision is in contravention of theprinciples laid down by the Supreme Court in M/s. Kulja Industries Ltd. v. Chief Gen. Manager W.T.Proj. BSNL & Ors., (2014) 14 SCC 731 as well as vari...
Tej Pal Singh vs Govt of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3948/2026 TEJ PAL SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. S. C. Singhal and Mr. Parth Mahajan, Advs.versusGOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Pramod Kumar and Mr. Simram Aggarwal, Advs.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 27.03.2026CM APPL. 19257/2026 (exemption)1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. Application stands disposed of.W.P.(C) 3948/20261. The instant petition seeks a direction for the repair/maintenance of adrain/nala in Manglapuri, Ward No. 119, Palam Dabri Road and to ensure that no water percolates into the adjoining building at any time. A further prayer for directions to the respondents to periodically repair and clean the drain/nala.2. The provisions under Section 152 of the Bharatiya Nagarik SurakshaSanhita, 2023 [BNSS] would clearly indicate that the concerned District Magistrate or the Sub-Divisional Magistrate is fully empowered to...
Deepak Arora & Ors. vs State & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 992/2026 DEEPAK ARORA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Tushar Rohmetra with Mr. Anubhav Sharma, Advocates. Petitioners in-person.versusSTATE & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel for the State with SI Gautam, and SI Lal Chand, P.S.; Shahbad Dairy. Respondents Nos. 2 and 3 via video- conferencing.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 27.03.2026CRL.M.A. 9357/2026Exemption granted, subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed-of.W.P.(CRL) 992/2026By way of the present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the petitioners seek quashing of case FIR No.882/2024 dated 12.12.2024 registered under sections 318(4)/316(2)/61(2)/351(2)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS) at P.S.: Shahbad Dairy, Delhi, on consent.2. The petition is premised on Memorandum of...
Dipanshu Dhingra vs State Bank of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3909/2026 DIPANSHU DHINGRA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Suryansh, Mr. Vivek, Mr. Akash, Mr. Avinsah, Advs.versusSTATE BANK OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Ms. Jaya Tomar, AdvocateCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK CHAUDHARYHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RENU BHATNAGARORDER% 27.03.2026CM APPL. 19146/20261. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. Accordingly, the present application is disposed of.W.P.(C) 3909/2026 & CM APPL. 19147/2026 (Stay)3. The present writ petition has been filed under Article 226 readwith Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the Judgmentdated 25.02.2026 passed by the learned Debt Recovery Tribunal-II, Delhi, in Transfer Application being T.A. No. 1738/2022 titled as State Bank of India v. Shri Dipanshu Dhingra, whereby, the Debt Recovery Tribunal-II has directed the Petitioner to pay an amount of Rs 15,12,333.71/- along with cost, expenses and interest @ 10.45% fr...
Kapil Kumar & Anr. vs State Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 2243/2026 KAPIL KUMAR & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Brahm Kumar Pandey with Mr. Pradeep Kr. Yadav, Advocates. Petitioners in-person.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Kiran Bairwa, APP for the State. SI Shubhanshu, P.S.: Kalyanpuri. R-2 in-person.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 27.03.2026 CRL.M.A. 9192/2026 (exemption) Exemption granted, subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed-of.CRL.M.C. 2243/2026By way of the present petition filed under section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the petitioners, who are the former husband and father-in-law of the complainant/respondent No. 2, seek quashing of case FIR No. 289/2018 dated 05.06.2018 registered under sections 498-A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) at P.S.: Kalyanpuri, Delhi.CRL.M.C. 2243/2026 Page 1 of 32. The petition is premised on dated 11.02.2021 ar...
Krishna Sharma & Ors. vs State Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 2239/2026 KRISHNA SHARMA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Premlata and Ms. Pooja Sharma, AdvocatesversusSTATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for the State with Ms. Puja Mann, Advocate, SI Yogesh Kumar, P.S. Sadar Bazar Mr. Lalit Gupta, Ms. Ishita Nautiyal, Advocates for R-2 alongwith Respondent No. 2 in person.CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 27.03.20261. By way of the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of theFIR bearing No. 762/2024, registered at Police Station Sadar Bazar, Delhi, for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter IPC') and proceedings emanating therefrom.2. Issue notice. The learned APP accepts notice on behalf of the State.3. All the petitioners and respondent no. 2 are present before this Courtand have been identified by t...
Kanhaiya and Anr vs State and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 27th March, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 2270/2026 & CRL.M.A. 9283/2026KANHAIYA AND ANR.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Pramod Kumar, Mr. Om Prakash Singh, Ms. Piyushi Garg and Ms. K. Tiwari, Advocates. Petitioners in person.versusSTATE AND ANR.....Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar Gautam, APP for the State with SI Lokesh Kr. Mr. Ajay Kumar Yadav, Ms. Piyushi Garg, Mr. Vipin Kumar and Mr. Anurag Tomar, Advocates for R-2 & 3. Respondents in person.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINJ U D G M E N T (oral)1. Petitioners herein seek quashing of FIR No. 0550/2021 datedconsequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties.2. The incident is of 18.09.2021. Since the complainant and his wife hadtalked ill about the wife of one accused-Kanhaiya, there was altercation andSigned By:SONIA CRL.M.C. 2270/2026 1during the scuffle which ensued, accused-Kanhaiya and his co-accused-Dilip...
- ‹ Prev
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- Next ›
- Last »