Delhi Court March 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Safatulla Khan vs the State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 1171/2026SAFATULLA KHAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankit Tondon, Advocate via video-conferencing.versusTHE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Ms. Richa Dhawan, APP for the State. SI Vishwas, P.S.: Chandni Mahal.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 02.04.2026CRL.M.A. 10022/2026By way of the present application filed under section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the petitioner seeks modification of order dated 27.03.2026 to the limited extent that theorder records in paras 5.2. and 5.3. thereof that the petitioner wouldnot leave the State of Delhi without permission of this court and that he would report to the I.O./SHO at P.S.: Chandni Mahal, Delhi once a week as detailed in that order.2. Mr. Ankit Tondon, learned counsel for the petitioner submits, that itcan been seen from a bare perusal of paras 4 and 6 of the interim bail petition, the petitioner had ...
Sadguru Engineers and Allied Services Pvt Ltd vs National Highways and ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3936/2026SADGURU ENGINEERS AND ALLIED SERVICES PVT LTD.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Utsav Saxena and Mr. Chaitanya Poonia, AdvocatesversusNATIONAL HIGHWAYS AND INFRASTRUCTUREDEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED & ORS......Respondents Through: Mr. Gopal Singh and Mr. Yoshit Jain, Advocates for R-1 & R-2 Mr Ankur Mittal, CGSC with Mr Rajat Mohan Dwivedi, GP, Ms Rabaica Jaiswal, Advocates for R-3 Mr. Akhil Mittal CGSC and Mr. Rajat Mohan Dwivedi GP for UOICORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORAORDER% 27.03.20261. This petition has been filed with the following prayers:-a) Issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ,order or direction quashing and setting aside the impugned re-tendering process initiated under Tender ID 2026_NHIDC_892399_1 (Tender Ref. No. NHIDCL/Assam/NH37/JJ/Pkg1234) published on the Government e-Procurement System dated 02.01.2026, togeth...
Smt Sunita Kadam & Ors. vs Shri Dev Kumar Maurya
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RFA 254/2025 SMT SUNITA KADAM & ORS. .....Appellants Through: NoneversusSHRI DEV KUMAR MAURYA .....Respondent Through: NoneCORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAORDER% 27.03.20261. Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure,1908 (CPC) has been filed against the judgment dated 30.11.2024 whereby the Application under Order IX Rule 9 CPC filed by the Plaintiff/Appellant, has been dismissed.2. None is present on behalf of the parties.3. In any case, the present Appeal under Section 96 CPC is notmaintainable against the Order IX Rule 9 CPC. Accordingly, the Appeal stands dismissed.NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, JMARCH 27, 2026NThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/03/2026 at 17:35:45...
Rati Lal Yadav vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of decision: 27th March, 2026 Uploaded on: 30th March, 2026 + W.P.(C) 3973/2026 RATI LAL YADAV .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Aditya, Mr. Vipin Kumar, Mr. Anjani Kumar Mishra, Mr. Kailash Kumar Jha, Ms. Pralika Chakraborty, Mr. Fareeduddin, Ms. Srejal Mishra, Advs.versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ORS.....Respondents Through: Ms. Shilpa Ohri ASC for MCD. Ms. Gurleen Kaur Waraich SPC with Ms. Ritu Bhardwaj GP, Mr. Jaideep Singh Waraich, Advs. and SI Ramesh Chand Ps Kotwali Ms. Vaishali Gupta and Ms. Rashi Aggarwal, Advs.CORAM:JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGHJUSTICE MADHU JAINPrathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present petition has been filed by the Petitioner- Mr. Rati LalYadav under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, seeking directions to the Respondents to allow the Petitioner to peacefully vend at his designated spot i.e., on the Footpath/Open Space, in front o...
M/S Shanti Refrigeration Ind. Pvt.Ltd. vs M/S Rajasthan Metals & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 2285/2026 M/S SHANTI REFRIGERATION IND. PVT.LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Lalit Kumar and Ms. Manisha Ranjan, Advocates.versusM/S RAJASTHAN METALS & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Sougata Ganguly, Mr. Deepak K Bansal, Mr. Rukban Tyagi and Ms. Yogita Bansal, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 27.03.2026 CRL.M.A. 9327/2026 (exemption) Exemption granted, subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CRL.M.A. 9328/2026 (condonation of 04 days delay in re-filing) For the reasons stated in the application, which is duly supported by affidavit, the delay is condoned.2. The application is allowed and disposed-of.CRL.M.C. 2285/2026 & CRL.M.A. 9326/2026 (stay)3. By way of the present petition filed under section 528 of the BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the petitioner impugns the proceedings in Criminal Complaint bearing No. 16388/2019 filed under sec...
Tarun Solanki & Ors. vs State Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 2260/2026 TARUN SOLANKI & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Mrinal Bharat Ram, Advocate alongwith petitioners in personversusSTATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Digam Singh Dagar, APP for the State Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate for R-2 alongwith R-2 in personCORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 27.03.2026CRL.M.A. 9223/2026 (exemption)1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. Application stands disposed ofCRL.M.C. 2260/20263. By way of the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of theFIR bearing No. 313/2024, registered at Police Station Neb Sarai Delhi, for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter IPC').4. Issue notice. The learned APP accepts notice on behalf of the State.5. All the petitioners are present before this Court and have beenidentified by their counsel...
Mohd. Yusuf vs Vijay Rani & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 641/2026, CM APPL. 19226/2026 & CM APPL. 19227/2026 MOHD. YUSUF .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anuroop P.S., Advocate.versusVIJAY RANI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 27.03.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw thepresent petition with liberty to file an appeal against the impugned orders.3. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of as withdrawn withliberty as prayed for in accordance with law. All the pending applications, if any, are also disposed of.RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, JMARCH 27, 2026/MR/ikThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/03/2026 at 16:47:45...
Amrender Singh vs the State Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 2269/2026 AMRENDER SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Yogesh Kumar, Advocate with petitioner in person.versusTHE STATE GOVT. OF NCTOF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP with SI Rajesh Kumar, PS: Nihar Vihar. R-2 present in person.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 27.03.2026 CRL.M.A. 9282/2026 (for exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of.CRL.M.C. 2269/20261. The petitioner has filed this petition under Section 528 of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [BNSS], which corresponds to Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [CrPC], seeking the quashing of FIR No. 784/2016, dated 09.10.2016, registered at Police Station Nihal Vihar under Sections 323 and 377 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [IPC], alongwith all proceedings arising therefrom, on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled.2. Issue notice....
Mamta Anand Alias Sangeeta Anand vs Ravinder Kaur
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.APP.(C) 8/2026 MAMTA ANAND ALIAS SANGEETA ANAND .....AppellantversusRAVINDER KAUR .....RespondentCORAM:JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGHJUSTICE MADHU JAINORDER% 27.03.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. None appears for the Appellant. The present appeal has been filed bythe Appellant under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, inter alia, challenging the impugned order dated 6th September, 2022 and 10th February, 2026 passed in Contempt Petition no. 428/2016 titled Ravinder Kaur v. Mamta Anand & Anr. by the ld. Single Judge.3. Vide the impugned order dated 6th September, 2022, the Court held theAppellant guilty of contempt, and on the aspect of sentence, the matter was adjourned. The relevant portion of the impugned order reads as under: [...]8. From the aforesaid sequence of dates and perusal ofthe aforesaid various orders passed, there is no manner of doubt that the Respondent No.1...
M/S Shanti Refrigeration Ind. Pvt.Ltd. vs M/S Rajasthan Metals & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 2278/2026 M/S SHANTI REFRIGERATION IND. PVT.LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Lalit Kumar and Ms. Manisha Ranjan, Advocates.versusM/S RAJASTHAN METALS & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Sougata Ganguly, Mr. Deepak K Bansal, Mr. Rukban Tyagi and Ms. Yogita Bansal, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 27.03.2026 CRL.M.A. 9306/2026 (exemption) Exemption granted, subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CRL.M.A. 9307/2026 (condonation of 04 days delay in re-filing) For the reasons stated in the application, which is duly supported by affidavit, the delay is condoned.2. The application is allowed and disposed-of.CRL.M.C. 2278/2026 & CRL.M.A. 9305/2026 (stay)3. By way of the present petition filed under section 528 of the BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the petitioner impugns the proceedings in Criminal Complaint bearing No. 16385/2019 filed under sect...
- ‹ Prev
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- Next ›
- Last »