Delhi Court March 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sondevi vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of decision: 27th March, 2026 Uploaded on: 30th March, 2026 + W.P.(C) 3962/2026 SONDEVI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Aditya, Mr. Vipin Kumar, Mr. Anjani Kumar Mishra, Mr. Kailash Kumar Jha, Ms. Pralika Chakraborty, Mr. Fareeduddin, Ms. Srejal Mishra,versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ORS.....Respondents Through: Ms Puja S Kalra, Adv. Mr Gaurav Sharma (SPC), Ms. Manpreet Kaur, Mr. Anant A. Pavgi, Ms. Vaishali Gupta and Ms. Rashi Aggarwal, Advs.CORAM:JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGHJUSTICE MADHU JAINPrathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present petition has been filed by the Petitioner- Mrs. Sondeviunder Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, seeking directions to the Respondents to allow the Petitioner to peacefully vend from the vending site i.e., on the Footpath/Open Space, Opposite MTNL Exchange Office, Tughalakabad Institutional Area, Vayusenabad, Central Zon...
Sh Sidhant vs Central Bank of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3952/2026&CM APPL. 19298/2026 SH SIDHANT .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Naginder Benipal, Mr. Udit Vaghela, Mr. Jaskaran Singh, Mr. Arjun Baliyan, Advs.versusCENTRAL BANK OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Santosh Kumar Rout, SC for R-1/ Central Bank Of India Mr. Brijesh Yadav, SPC with Mr. Nikita, Mr. Sandeep Yadav, Mr. Anirudh Nagar, Mr. Rahul Yadav, Mr. Kunal Chaudhary, Mr. Amarjeet Singh, Advs. for R-2/UOICORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 27.03.2026CM APPL. 19267/2026Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of.W.P.(C) 3952/20261. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia seeking the following prayers:- A. Issue a writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction calling for the records and quashing the freeze instructions/liens issued by Respondent No. 3 and executed by Respondent No. 1 inr...
Sushil Kumar Sahni vs Ms. Komita Singh & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ LPA 164/2026 & CM APPLs. 19317-20/2026 SUSHIL KUMAR SAHNI .....Appellant Through: Mr.Suresh Kumar Sahni, Adv. with Mr.Satwik Parikh, Adv.versusMS. KOMITA SINGH & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr.Manish Kaushik, Adv. with Mr.Mishal Johari, Mr.Ankit Batra and Mr.Mainak Sarkar, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIAORDER% 27.03.20261. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.2. Learned counsel for the appellant has stated that the appellant was notoriginally a party to the proceedings of the contempt case. He has rather been ordered to be impleaded during pendency of the contempt case. He has further stated that he is not bound by the order in respect of which the contempt petition has been moved for the reason that he was not a party to those proceedings and therefore, no contempt proceedings could be initiated against the appellant.3. All these aspects can be looked i...
Saurabh Malik & Anr. vs Komita Singh
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ LPA 160/2026 & CM APPLs. 19137-39/2026 SAURABH MALIK & ANR. .....Appellants Through: Mr.Suresh Kumar Sahni, Adv. with Mr.Satwik Parikh, Adv.versusKOMITA SINGH .....Respondent Through: Mr.Manish Kaushik, Adv. with Mr.Mishal Johari, Mr.Ankit Batra and Mr.Mainak Sarkar, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIAORDER% 27.03.20261. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.2. Learned counsel for the appellant confines his prayer to waive off thecost of Rs.20,000/- as ordered by learned Single Judge in the impugnedorder with a further request that the appellant may be permitted to raise allthe pleas which may be available to them before the learned Single Judge.3. Having regard to the facts and circumstances and having heard thelearned counsel for the parties, we dispose of this appeal with the request to the learned Single Judge to expedite the proceedings of the contempt case...
Raju vs Smt. K. Palaniammal & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of Decision: 27thMarch,2026 + CM(M) 646/2026, CM APPL. 19284/2026 & CM APPL. 19285/2026 RAJU .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Lavisha Arora, Advocate.versusSMT. K. PALANIAMMAL& ORS. .....Respondents Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER (Oral)Rajneesh Kumar Gupta, J.1. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 227of the Constitution of India, 1950, assailing the impugned order dated 23rd February, 2026, passed by the learned trial court in CS No. 323/2017, whereby an application under Order XVIII Rule 17 of CPC filed by the petitioner/defendant for setting aside the order dated 06th September, 2023 whereby the right of the petitioner to cross-examine the respondents witness has been closed, has been dismissed.3. Heard. Record perused.4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner has argued that the petitioner wasn...
Seven Colour Developers Pvt Ltd & Anr. vs Rpsb Group
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 1905/2026 SEVEN COLOUR DEVELOPERS PVT LTD & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Sudhir Tewatia, AdvocateversusRPSB GROUP .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIAORDER% 27.03.2026CRL.M.A. 9398/2026 (for withdrawal of petition)1. Matter taken up on mentioning after lunch.2. This application seems to have been filed in terms with discussionrecorded in order dated 16.03.2026. The application is allowed.CRL.M.C. 1905/20263. As requested, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Date of14.07.2026 stands cancelled.GIRISH KATHPALIA, JMARCH 27, 2026rsThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/03/2026 at 15:29:52...
Lavkush Jogi vs Indian Council of Agricultural Research & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 4275/2022LAVKUSH JOGI.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Aayush Agarwala, Ms. Mukti Heliwal, Advs.versusINDIAN COUNCIL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH & ORS......Respondents Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 27.03.20261. The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the presentpetition.2. Hence the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn.JASMEET SINGH, JMARCH 27, 2026/spThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/04/2026 at 12:30:03...
Nishant Garoliya (Minor), Through Natural Guardian/Father vs Sainik Sc ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3469/2026NISHANT GAROLIYA (MINOR), THROUGH NATURALGUARDIAN/FATHER .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anurag, Ms. Sonal Gupta, Mr. Divyansh Kumar, Advs.versusSAINIK SCHOOLS SOCIETY & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Chetan Sharma, ASG Ms. Avshreya Pratap Singh Rudy, CGSC with Mr. Abhishek Mahajan, SPC with Mr. Amit Gupta, SPC with Mr. Ankit Khatri, Ms. Usha Jamnal, Ms. Nyasa Sharma, Advs. for R1 Mr. Akshit Mohan, Adv. and Government Pleader for Union of India Mr. Sanjay Khanna, SC with Ms. Pragya Bhushan, Ms. Vilakshana Dayma, Ms. Anshu Kumari, Mr. Saurabh Pandey Advs. for R2/NTACORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 27.03.20261. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia seeking the following prayers:- i. Issue a writ of mandamus directing the Respondents to permit the Petitioner to register and participate in the counseling process for admission to Class VI for academic year ...
Prem Sheela Kumari vs Govt of Nct of Delhi Department of Revenue & Anr ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3310/2024 Date of decision: 27.03.2026IN THE MATTER OF:PREM SHEELA KUMARI .....Petitioner (Through: Mr.Prafulla, Ms. Divya, Mr. Ankur Rana , Mr Kuldeep Singh, Advocates.)versusGOVT OF NCT OF DELHI DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE &ANR......Respondents(Through: Ms. Vaishali Gupta, Panel Counsel (Civil ) GNCTD, Mr. Kartik Sharma, Advocates for R-1 and 2.)CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVJUDGEMENTPURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J. (ORAL)1. The instant petition is for the following reliefs:-a) To quash the order dated 03.11.2023 issued by the competent authority chaired by the Group of ministers undersigned by SDM-II(HQ).b) Direction to the Respondent authority to release the compensation of exgratia of Rs 1 crore to the family of late Dr. Raja Ram Singh, Vice Principal/HoS, Gbsss, C Block, Sangam Vihar, Delhi expired on 29.05.2021 due to illness (covid-19) in terms of the cabinet decision no. 2835 dated 13th May, 2...
Shanabhoga M B vs Agricultural and Processed Food Products Export Deve ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ Date of Decision: 27.03.2026% LPA 153/2026SHANABHOGA M B .....Appellant Through: Mr. Shivam Jasra and Mr. Kartik Jasra, Mr. Nakul Khanna, Ms. Shivangi Tripathi, Advs.versusAGRICULTURAL AND PROCESSED FOOD PRODUCTSEXPORT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (APEDA)& ORS......Respondent Through: Mr. Awanish Kumar, Adv. for R-1 Ms. Radhika Bishwajit Dubey, CGSC with Ms. Gurleen Kaur Waraich, Mr. Kritarth Upadhyay, Mr. Amulya Dev Mishra, Advs. for R-3CORAM:HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIADEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ. (ORAL)CM APPL. 18443/2026 (for delay)1. Having heard learned counsel representing the parties and perused theaverments made in the instant application, the application is allowed and delay of 2 days in filing the present appeal is condoned.2. The application stands disposed of.LPA 153/20261. This intra-court appeal has been instituted challenging the order dated08.01.2026 passed by the learned S...
- ‹ Prev
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- Next ›
- Last »