Delhi Court March 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Yad Ram vs Delhi Transport Corporation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ LPA 163/2026, CM APPL. 19269/2026, CM APPL. 19270/2026 &CM APPL. 19271/2026YAD RAM .....Appellant Through: Mr. Ranjit Sharma & Mr. S.S. Sekhawat, Advocates.VersusDELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION .....Respondent Through: Mr. Udyan Tiwary, Mr. Akshat Tiwary & Mr. Nitesh Kumar, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIAORDER% 27.03.20261. The Office has reported delay of 1019 days in filing theaccompanying Appeal and further delay of 23 days in re-filing the same.2. Heard the learned Counsel for the Appellant and perused theApplication, being CM No.19269/2026, seeking condonation of delay.3. The Judgment under challenge in the present Appeal was rendered bythe learned Single Judge on 21.04.2023 in W.P.(C) No.1910/2010. The only ground mentioned in the Application seeking condonation of delay of 1019 days is that the Appellant is the sole bread-earner of the family and having l...
Icorn Global Private Limited vs National Council of Educational Resear ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3946/2026, CM APPL. 19253/2026 & CM APPL. 19254/2026 ICORN GLOBAL PRIVATE LIMITED .....PetitionerThrough: Dr. K. S. Chauhan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Ravi Prakash, Mr. Ajit Kumar Ekka and Ms. Shriya Sethi, Advs.versusNATIONAL COUNCIL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH ANDTRAINING & ANR. .....RespondentsThrough: None.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 27.03.20261. It is submitted that pursuant to Notice Inviting Tender (NIT), thepetitioner stood as the lowest bidder. Without any reason, the same has been scrapped and vide order dated 12.03.2026, the equipments are being purchased from third party. Work order dated 12.03.2026 is not the subject matter of the instant writ petition.2. The petitioner, therefore, prays for liberty to file a properlyconstituted writ petition, including to challenge the order dated 12.03.2026.3. With that liberty, the instant petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.PURUS...
Shima Qadiri vs Union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3897/2026 SHIMA QADIRI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Raja Choudhary, Mr. Dhruv Tiwari, Ms. Anushika Mishra, Advocates.versusUNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Avshreya Pratap Singh Rudy, Adv. (CGSC), Mr. Ankit Khatri, Adv. Ms. Usha Jamnal, Adv. and Ms. Nyasa Sharma, Advs.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 27.03.20261. The prayer made in the instant petition is for directions to therespondents to decide the pending application for medical Visa in favour of the petitioners husband within a time-bound manner.2. Ms. Avshreya Pratap Singh Rudy, on instructions, submits that therespondents will make all possible endeavours to decide the petitioners application within a maximum period of two months. She, however, submits that the exercise will require the security clearance etc.3. Let all the departments cooperate with the concerned authority in theearly disposal of the pe...
Narmada & Ors. vs Ms Kalpana
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RFA 287/2026, CM APPL. 19461/2026, CM APPL. 19462/2026 &CM APPL. 19463/2026NARMADA & ORS. .....Appellants Through: Appearance not givenversusMS KALPANA .....Respondent Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAORDER% 27.03.20261. Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of CivilProcedure, 1908 (CPC) has been filed to challenge the judgment dated 16.11.2024 whereby the Suit of possession of the Appellants has been decreed, but has been dismissed for mense profits.2. It is submitted that no evidence could be led on this aspect by theAppellants and their evidence was closed thereafter.3. An Application for leading the evidence on mesne profits along withthe affidavit of a witness was filed, but again the witness could not be produced and the evidence was closed.4. Since the witness was not forthcoming at that time, no evidencecould be led and, therefore, the relief ...
Deepak and Ors vs State (Govt of Nct of Delhi) and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 2250/2026, CRL.M.A. 9206/2026 DEEPAK AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Ashwani Kumar Ojha, Adv. with petitioners in personversusSTATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP for the State with Mr. Dinesh Kumar and Mr. Gourav Singh, Advs. with Chetan Panwar, PS.: Chhawla, Delhi Mr. Archit ojha, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 present in person.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 27.03.20261. By virtue of the present petition under Section 528 of the BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), the petitioners seek quashing of the FIR No.795/2020 dated 02.09.2020 registered at PS.: Chhawla, Delhi under Sections 323/341/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and all proceedings emanating therefrom since the petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 have settled their all disputes and are living together amicably in view of the Reconciliation Deed dated 21.02.2026 (Reconciliation) ...
Navrang Bng Energy Private Limited vs Oil and Natural Gas Corporation ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision : 27.03.2026+ W.P.(C) 3891/2026 CM APPL. 19085/2026 CM APPL. 19086/2026NAVRANG BNG ENERGY PRIVATELIMITED .....PetitionerThrough: Mr. Atul Sharma, Mr. Ashutosh Jain, Ms. Aditi Sharma and Ms. Shreya Kak, Advs.versusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLIMITED & ANR. .....RespondentsThrough: Mr. Chetan Sharma, ASG, Mr. Abhimanyu Garg, Mr. Amit Gupta, Mr. R. V. Prabhat, Mrs. Preety Makkar, Mr. Shubham Sharma, Mr. Yash Wardhan Sharma, Mr. Naman, Advs. for R-1 Mr. Abhishek Gupta, CGSC with Mr. Ratan Prakash, GP, Mr. Dhananjay Singh, Mr. Kumar Kartikeya and Mr. Chanakya Kene, Advs. for UOICORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORAV. KAMESWAR RAO , J. (ORAL)CM APPL. 19086/2026 (for exemption)Signature Not Verified W.P.(C) 3891/2026 Page 1 of 4 1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. ...
Deepmala vs the State Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 27th March, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 2273/2026 & CRL.M.A. 9288/2026DEEPMALA.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Naeem Ahmed, Advocate. Petitioner in person.versusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR......Respondent Through: Mr. Raj Kumar, APP for the State with SI Jag Mohan and SI Rajat. Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate for R-2. Respondent in person.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINJ U D G M E N T (oral)1. Petitioners herein seek quashing of FIR No. 167/2017 datedtherefrom, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties.2. Petitioner herein is daughter-in-law of respondent No.2.3. Petitioner got married to Mr. Vijay Anand in the year 2009. There wassome matrimonial discord between them. As per the allegations appearing in FIR, on 31.03.2017, petitioner trespassed into the house of respondent No.2/complainant, the possession of which had been received by her as per the order of Civil Court and through bailiff.4. Char...
Narender @ Narender Lal vs the State Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 2295/2026 & CRL.M.A. 9365/2026NARENDER @ NARENDER LAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Manjit Saini and Mr. Vikas Jain, AdvocatesversusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, APP for State with SI Yamini Vats, PS Patel Nagar Counsel (Appearance not given) with R-2CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 27.03.20261. By way of the present petition under Section 528 of the BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [BNSS] (corresponding to Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [CrPC]), the petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No. 456/2025 dated 08.11.2025, registered under Sections 64(2)/69/123 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 [BNS] at Police Station Patel Nagar, District Central, Delhi, on the ground of settlement between the parties.2. Issue notice. Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, learned AdditionalPublic Prosecutor, accepts notice on behalf of the State. Learned ...
Ramesh @ Kaku & Ors. vs the State (Nct of Delhi) & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 27th March, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 2259/2026 & CRL.M.A. 9222/2026 RAMESH @ KAKU & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Priyanka Dagar and Mr. Rakesh Kumar, AdvocatesversusTHE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar Gautam, APP for State/R-1 with SI Sohit, Bindapur and IO-SI Udham Respondents-in-personsCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINJ U D G M E N T (oral)1. Petitioners herein seek quashing of FIR No. 774/2014 datedproceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties.2. As per allegations appearing in FIR, respondent No. 3 Sandesh Thakur,who was employee of respondent No. 2, had some scuffle with the accused persons (petitioners herein) and on hearing his shouts, complainant Kunal Batra and his father Surinder Batra came outside. They were also beaten up with danda, rod and baseball bats. In view of the nature of injuries received by Sur...
Sondevi vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of decision: 27th March, 2026 Uploaded on: 30th March, 2026 + W.P.(C) 3962/2026 SONDEVI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Aditya, Mr. Vipin Kumar, Mr. Anjani Kumar Mishra, Mr. Kailash Kumar Jha, Ms. Pralika Chakraborty, Mr. Fareeduddin, Ms. Srejal Mishra,versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ORS.....Respondents Through: Ms Puja S Kalra, Adv. Mr Gaurav Sharma (SPC), Ms. Manpreet Kaur, Mr. Anant A. Pavgi, Ms. Vaishali Gupta and Ms. Rashi Aggarwal, Advs.CORAM:JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGHJUSTICE MADHU JAINPrathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present petition has been filed by the Petitioner- Mrs. Sondeviunder Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, seeking directions to the Respondents to allow the Petitioner to peacefully vend from the vending site i.e., on the Footpath/Open Space, Opposite MTNL Exchange Office, Tughalakabad Institutional Area, Vayusenabad, Central Zon...
- ‹ Prev
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- Next ›
- Last »