Delhi Court March 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Azam Khan vs State Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 974/2026 AZAM KHAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Deepak Jangra, AdvocateversusSTATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Anand V. Khatri, ASC for the State with Mr. Aditya Khatri and SI Ankit Sharma, P.S. Fatehpur BeriCORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 27.03.2026 CRL.M.A. 9177/2026 (exemption)1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. Application stands disposed of.CRL.M.A. 9178/2026 (Delay of 22 days)3. By way of the present application, the applicant seeks condonation ofdelay of 22 days in re-filing the present petition.4. In view of the reasons stated in the application, the delay of 22 days inre-filing the present petition stands condoned.5. Application stands disposed of.W.P.(CRL) 974/20266. The present petition has been filed seeking following reliefs:a. Issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, orderof direction thereby direc...
Mahesh @ Vikra vs State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 995/2026 & CRL.M.A. 9361/2026 MAHESH @ VIKRA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anup Kumar Das with Ms.Ishita Singh and Ms. Prachi Sharma, Advocates.versusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel (Crl.) for State with Mr. Abhinav Kumar Arya and Mr. Aryan Sachdeva, Advocates with SI Rohit, PS Uttam Nagar.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINORDER% 27.03.20261. Petitioner is aggrieved by order dated 23.03.2026 whereby his requestfor grant of parole has not been acceded to, primarily, for the reason that as per the rule position, there has to be a gap of four weeks between the last parole/furlough availed and the proposed one.2. It is now informed by learned counsel for the petitioner that such periodof gap of four weeks is to expire on 03.04.2026 and, therefore, without prejudice to his rights and contentions, he does not press the present petition and submits that petitioner woul...
M/S Shanti Refrigeration Ind. Pvt.Ltd. vs M/S Rajasthan Metals & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 2276/2026 M/S SHANTI REFRIGERATION IND. PVT.LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Lalit Kumar and Ms. Manisha Ranjan, Advocates.versusM/S RAJASTHAN METALS & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Sougata Ganguly, Mr. Deepak K Bansal, Mr. Rukban Tyagi and Ms. Yogita Bansal, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 27.03.2026 CRL.M.A. 9300/2026 (exemption) Exemption granted, subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CRL.M.A. 9301/2026 (condonation of 04 days delay in re-filing) For the reasons stated in the application, which is duly supported by affidavit, the delay is condoned.2. The application is allowed and disposed-of.CRL.M.C. 2276/2026 & CRL.M.A. 9299/2026 (stay)3. By way of the present petition filed under section 528 of the BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the petitioner impugns the proceedings in Criminal Complaint bearing No. 16379/2019 filed under sect...
Vishesh Duggal vs State of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 2256/2026 VISHESH DUGGAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. A.S. Kulshrestha, Mr. Lalit Kumar, Mr. Srajan S. Kulshrestha and Mr. Siddhant Tanwar, Advocates. Petitioner in-person.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Kiran Bairwa, APP for the State. HC Praveen K., P.S.: Amar Colony. Respondent No.2 in-person.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 27.03.2026CRL.M.C. 2256/2026By way of the present petition filed under section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the petitioner seeks quashing of case FIR No. 0239/2025 dated 25.04.2025 registered under sections 115(2)/126(2)/351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS) at P.S.: Amar Colony, Delhi.2. The petition is premised on Memorandum of Understanding dated28.10.2025, whereby the petitioner and respondent No. 2 have resolved the matter amicably.CRL.M.C. 2256/2026 Page 1 of 33. The petition is also sup...
Manik Gupta & Ors. vs the State of Nct Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 2251/2026 MANIK GUPTA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Piyush Raghav, Advocate alongwith petitioners in personversusTHE STATE OF NCT DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Digam Singh Dagar, APP for the State with SI Bhawna Sharma Mr. Dinesh K. Malhotra and Ms. Riya Verma, Advocates for R-2 alongwith R-2 in personCORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 27.03.20261. By way of the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of theFIR bearing No. 375/2021 dated 21.09.2021, registered at Police Station Mansarovar Park, Shahdara, Delhi, for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 498A/406/323/354/509/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter IPC') and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961.2. Issue notice. The learned APP accepts notice on behalf of the State.3. All the petitioners are present before this Court and have beenidentified by their counsel...
Wushu Association of India (Wai vs Union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ LPA 167/2026, CM APPL. 19373/2026, CM APPL. 19374/2026, CMAPPL. 19375/2026 & CM APPL. 19376/2026WUSHU ASSOCIATION OF INDIA (WAI) .....Appellant Through: Mr. Lakshay Yadav, Adv.versusUNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Mr. Sanjiv Kumar Saxena, Mr. Mukesh Kumar Tiwari, Ms. Reba Jena Mishra and Ms. Poonam Shukla, Advs. UOI. Mr. Vipin K. Saini, Mr. Lakshay Saini, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIAORDER% 27.03.20261. Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. After arguing at some length, when it was pointed out to the learnedcounsel for the appellant that appropriate remedy which should be pursued by the appellant would be to file the affidavit in reply on its plea before the learned Single Judge in the pending writ petition, namely W.P.(C) No. counsel for the appellant states that the appellant may be permitted to withdraw this appeal with the libert...
M/S Shanti Refrigeration Ind. Pvt.Ltd. vs M/S Rajasthan Metals
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 2279/2026 M/S SHANTI REFRIGERATION IND. PVT.LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Lalit Kumar and Ms. Manisha Ranjan, Advocates.versusM/S RAJASTHAN METALS .....Respondent Through: Ms. Sougata Ganguly, Mr. Deepak K Bansal, Mr. Rukban Tyagi and Ms. Yogita Bansal, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 27.03.2026 CRL.M.A. 9309/2026 (exemption) Exemption granted, subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CRL.M.A. 9310/2026 (condonation of 04 days delay in re-filing) For the reasons stated in the application, which is duly supported by affidavit, the delay is condoned.2. The application is allowed and disposed-of.CRL.M.C. 2279/2026 & CRL.M.A. 9308/2026 (stay)3. By way of the present petition filed under section 528 of the BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the petitioner impugns the proceedings in Criminal Complaint bearing No. 16392/2019 filed under sections 138/141...
Neha Gulati & Anr. vs National Housing Bank
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3925/2026 & CM APPL. 19204/2026 NEHA GULATI & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Geet Rajan Ahuja, Ms. Purnima Chanana and Mr. Ishrafil Ansari, Advocates.versusNATIONAL HOUSING BANK .....Respondent Through: Mr. Chetan Sharma, ASG with Mr. Som Raj Choudhury, Ms. Shrutee Aradhana, Mr. Naman Singh, Advocates with Mr. P.V. Naidu,AGM/ AR.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULAORDER% 27.03.20261. This petition assails the Transfer Order dated 27th February, 2026,whereby the Petitioners have been transferred from the Head Office at New Delhi to the Mumbai Regional Office. The principal grievance raised is that the impugned transfers are contrary to the Respondents Transfer and Job Rotation Policy, inasmuch as the Petitioners had not completed the prescribed minimum tenure at the present station and, according to them, did not fall within the ordinary zone of transfer. It is further contended that the transfer orde...
Raghav Mittal vs State of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 1210/2026, CRL.M.A. 9404/2026, 9406/2026RAGHAV MITTAL .....Petitioner Through: Dr. Monika Arora and Mr. Subhrodeep Saha , Advocates.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for State with Inspector Ajay Katewa and Inspector Naresh Kumar. Mr. Pranjal K. Bhushan, Advocate for complainant with complainant in person.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIAORDER% 27.03.20261. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 251/2024 ofPS K. N. Katju Marg for offence under Section 103(1)/3(5) BNS.2. Broadly speaking, allegation against the accused/applicant is that healong with few others conspired and one of them stabbed the deceased to death. The CCTV footage allegedly captures the incident. That CCTV footage has been shown to me today in court.3. As per prosecution, one eyewitness Vansh Jain is to be examined buthas not been summoned for 02....
M/S Shanti Refrigeration Industries Pvt Ltd and Ors vs M/S Rajasthan M ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 2281/2026M/S SHANTI REFRIGERATION INDUSTRIES PVT LTD ANDORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Lalit Kumar and Ms. Manisha Ranjan, Advocates.versusM/S RAJASTHAN METALS .....Respondent Through: Ms. Sougata Ganguly, Mr. Deepak K Bansal, Mr. Rukban Tyagi and Ms. Yogita Bansal, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 27.03.2026 CRL.M.A. 9315/2026 (exemption) Exemption granted, subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CRL.M.A. 9316/2026 (condonation of 04 days delay in re-filing) For the reasons stated in the application, which is duly supported by affidavit, the delay is condoned.2. The application is allowed and disposed-of.CRL.M.C. 2281/2026 & CRL.M.A. 9314/2026 (stay)3. By way of the present petition filed under section 528 of the BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the petitioner impugns the proceedings in Criminal Complaint bearing No. 16378/2019 filed under sect...
- ‹ Prev
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- Next ›
- Last »