Delhi Court March 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Vinod Kumar vs State Nct Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 220/2026 VINOD KUMAR .....PetitionerThrough: Mr. Raman Jangra, Mr. Jagbir, Mr. Amit Kumar, Ms. Neha, Mr. Mohit Sharma, Ms. Shubhra Chandu Sharma & Mr. Prateek, Advocates. versusSTATE NCT DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, APP for State. Mr. Himanshu Nehra, Advocate for Complainant alongwith Complainant in Person.CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN ORDER % 27.03.20261. By way of the present bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [BNSS], the petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with FIR No. 397/2025, dated 29.09.2025, registered at Police Station Shahdara, Delhi, under Sections 75/351(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and Section 10 of the Protection of Children From Sexual Offence Act, 2012 [the POCSO Act]. 2. The petitioner is the step-father of the prosecutrix, who was 11 years old at the time of the incident...
Ravi Singh Chauhan vs State of Nct Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 289/2026 RAVI SINGH CHAUHAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Chahar, Ms. Sumita Mann, Mr. Naveen Saini, Mr. Deepak Jain and Mr. Himanshu Nagpal, Advocates versusSTATE OF NCT DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP for the StateCORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA ORDER % 27.03.2026 1. By way of the present application, the applicant is seeking grant of regular bail in case arising out of FIR bearing no. 542/2021, registered at Police Station Prashant Vihar, Delhi, for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 302/201/120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter IPC).2. Briefly stated, the facts of the present case are that on 18.08.2021, an information regarding an unidentified male dead body lying in the vacant DDA ground, Sector-12, Rohini, near Japani Park, was received at Police Station Prashant Vihar which was recorded vide DD No. 26A. The police had reach...
Mahesh Kumar Sunny and Others vs State Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 670/2026 & CRL.M.A. 4444/2026 MAHESH KUMAR SUNNY AND OTHERS .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Chitra Goswami, Advocate alongwith petitioners in personversusSTATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Digam Singh Dagar, APP for the State with Insp. Sudhir Rathi R-2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA ORDER % 27.03.2026 1. By way of the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR bearing no. 531/2023, registered at Police Station Narela Industrial Area, Delhi, for commission of offence punishable under Sections 498A/406/34/376/377 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter IPC). 2. Issue notice. The learned APP accepts notice on behalf of the State. 3. All the petitioners and respondent no. 2 are present before this Court and have been identified by their counsel and Investigating Officer (IO) from Police Station Narela Industrial Area, Delhi. 4. The learned cou...
K@K vs State Govt. of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 417/2026 K@K .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Gaurav Chauhan and Mr. Sumit Verma, AdvocatesversusSTATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP for the StateCORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA ORDER % 27.03.2026 1. By way of the instant application, the applicant seeks grant of regular bail in case arising out of FIR bearing no. 134/2022, registered at Police Station Jahangirpuri, Delhi for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 302/34/109 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter IPC).2. Status Report and Nominal Roll has not been received.3. Briefly stated, the case of the prosecution is that on 19.01.2022, three Children in Conflict with Law (CCLs) had gone to A-Block School, Jahangirpuri, for COVID vaccination; however, due to non-availability of the vaccine, they proceeded to Ramleela Park, Main BJRM Hospital Road, near Khatta, K-Block, Jahangirpuri, New...
M/S Delight Enterprises vs Punjab National Bank & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
$~102 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1059/2025(Disposed of) M/S DELIGHT ENTERPRISES ....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ayush Jain, Mr. Yashovardhan Upadhyay, Mr. Yogesh Dagar and Mr. Vishwas Verma, Advs. versus PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr Santosh Kumar Rout, Adv. Ms Nisha Sharma and Ms Tanya Chowdhay, Advs. for R2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH ORDER % 04.05.2026 CM APPL. 29760/2026 1. At request of Mr. Rout, learned counsel for the respondent No. 1. 2. The Branch Manager shall remain present in the Court with the original file of the petitioner on the next date of hearing. 3. List on 05.05.2026.JASMEET SINGH, J MAY 4, 2026/ASThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/05/2026 at 12:07:19...
Mohd Juned @ Ashraf @ Fori vs State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
$~10&11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 471/2026 MOHD JUNED @ ASHRAF @ FORI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. S N Qureshi, Advocate. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP. 11 + BAIL APPLN. 487/2026 &CRL.M.A. 3712/2026 SAMEER CHAUDHARY .....Petitioner Through: Mr. S N Qureshi, Advocate. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN ORDER % 27.03.2026 1. Both the applicants seek anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 397/2025 dated 23.12.2025, registered at Police Station Seelampur, for commission of offences under Sections 109(1)/3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (corresponding Sections 307/34 IPC). 2. When their applications were taken up by this Court on 06.02.2026, they were directed to join investigation and it was also ordered that upon their assisting the investigating agency, let no coercive process be t...
Sameer Chaudhary vs State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
$~10&11* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 471/2026MOHD JUNED @ ASHRAF @ FORI .....Petitioner+ BAIL APPLN. 487/2026 &CRL.M.A. 3712/2026SAMEER CHAUDHARY .....PetitionerCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINORDER% 27.03.20261. Both the applicants seek anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 397/2025dated 23.12.2025, registered at Police Station Seelampur, for commission of offences under Sections 109(1)/3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (corresponding Sections 307/34 IPC).2. When their applications were taken up by this Court on 06.02.2026,they were directed to join investigation and it was also ordered that upon their assisting the investigating agency, let no coercive process be taken against them.3. Learned APP for the State submits that both the applicants havealready joined the investigation and at present, they are not required for any investigational purpose. It is submitted that when they were interrogated about the weapon of the...
Mishry Holding Limited vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 1695/2024 & CM APPL. 6990/2024MISHRY HOLDING LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Arav Kapoor, Mr. Prateek Regmi and Ms. Akshita Gupta, Advocates.versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI& ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, SC for MCD with Mr. Parvin Bansal, Advocate forMCD.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 27.03.20261. After some hearing, counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw thepresent writ petition with liberty to challenge the revised Assessment Orderdated 16th April, 2024 as well as the show-cause notice dated 7th August, 2023 passed by the respondent/ MCD before the Appellate Tribunal, MCD (hereinafter ATMCD).2. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of as withdrawnwith the aforesaid liberty.3. Vide order dated 3rd December, 2024, the respondent/ MCD wasdirected to file an affidavit to the effect that if the petitioner succeeds in the writ petition, t...
Ravi Diwakar vs State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 539/2026RAVI DIWAKAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Chahar, Ms. Sumita Mann, Mr. Naveen Saini, Mr. Deepak Jain and Mr. Himanshu Nagpal, AdvocatesversusSTATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP for the StateCORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 27.03.20261. By way of the present application, the applicant is seeking grant ofregular bail in case arising out of FIR bearing no. 542/2021, registered at Police Station Prashant Vihar, Delhi, for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 302/201/120B/34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter IPC).2. Briefly stated, the facts of the present case are that on 18.08.2021, aninformation regarding an unidentified male dead body lying in the vacant DDA ground, Sector-12, Rohini, near Japani Park, was received at Police Station Prashant Vihar which was recorded vide DD No. 26A. The police had reached the spot and had fo...
Kamla Dhuriya & Anr. vs Govt of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 1552/2026 & CRL.M.A. 6300/2026 KAMLA DHURIYA & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Naresh Kumar, Advocate. Petitioner No.2 in-person. Petitioner No.1 via video conferencing.versusGOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Richa Dhawan, APP for the State. Mr. Rajiv Raheja, and Ms. Preeti Arora, Advocates via video- conferencing for Respondents Nos. 2 to 7. Respondents No. 2 to 7 in-person via video-conferencing. Insp. Sanjeev Kumar, P.S. Spl. Cell.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 27.03.2026 By way of the present petition filed under section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the petitioners seek quashing of case FIR No. 58/2001 dated 16.03.2001 registered under sections 420/468/471 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) at P.S.: Kanjhawala, Delhi.2. The FIR names 08 accused persons, 05 of whom are stated to havepassed-away, as detailed in the list of dates and...
- ‹ Prev
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- Next ›
- Last »