Delhi Court March 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Aniket Kumar vs Komal Prasad
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ TR.P.(C.) 132/2025 & CM APPL. 44924/2025 ANIKET KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Neeraj Sood, AdvocateversusKOMAL PRASAD .....Respondent Through: Mr. Raghu Nath Dubey, Advocate (VC)CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMAORDER% 28.03.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present matter was listed on 02.03.2026. On account of 02.03.2026 being declared as a holiday vide notification no. 64/G-4/Genl.-I/DHC dated 27.02.2026, the same is being taken up for hearing today.3. The present petition under Section 24 of the CPC, read with Section 15 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, seeks the following prayers: -(a) Call for the records in the file case titled Komal Prasad vs Shri Aniket Kumar pending before the registered as CS (COMM) Shahdara, Karkarduma Courts, Delhi;(b) Transfer the Case titled Komal Prasad vs Shri Aniket Kumarregistered as CS (COMM) 103/2025 Pending before the Ld Ms Kiran Bansal, DJ (COMM)-02,...
Kamala Kishore vs Suncity Projects Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-02-2026
$~15 & 16* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 28th March, 2026 + EX.P. 51/2024, EX.APPL.(OS) 1384/2025, EX.APPL.(OS) 436/2026 & EX.APPL.(OS) 437/2026 KAMALA KISHORE .....Decree Holder Through: Ms. Bhanita Patowary and Ms. Khushi, Advs. for Mr. Rishabh Kishore, Son of DH M: 9582865605 Email: [email protected] Ms. Moni Cinmoy, Mr. Abhinav and Mr. Akash, Advs. for Daughter of the DH M: 9868088168 Email: [email protected] PROJECTS PVT. LTD. .....Judgement Debtor Through: Mr. Siddharth Mittal, Mr. Abhijeet Varshney, Mr. Siddhant Tyagi and Mr. Sumit K. Sharma, Advs. with Mr. Arihant Jain, JD in person Mr. Arihant Jain, AR of JD M: 9999752059 Email: [email protected]+ EX.P. 52/2024, EX.APPL.(OS) 1052/2025, EX.APPL.(OS) KAMALA KISHORE .....Decree Holder Through: Ms. Bhanita Patowary and Ms. Digitally Signed EX.P. 51/2024 & Other Connected Matter Page 1 of 5 Khushi, Advs. for Mr. Rishabh Kishore, Son of DH M: 9582865605 E...
Anil Dutt Sharma vs Lt. Governor of Nct of Delhi. & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 9523/2025 with CM APPL. 66168/2025 ANIL DUTT SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Manoj Kr. Dwivedi, Mr. Bhupesh Kr. Pathak and Mr. Ashutosh Kr. Sharma, Advocates.versusLT. GOVERNOR OF NCT OF DELHI. & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Kapil Dutta, Advocate for MCD.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 28.03.2026 The present matter has been taken up today, i.e., 28th March, 2026 as 2nd March, 2026 was declared a holiday.1. A detailed order was passed in the present writ petition on 10th July, 2025.2. Submissions of the counsel for the respondent/MCD were noted wherein it is stated that the petitioner has been filing petitions with ulterior motives and approximately 50 of the said petitions have been dismissed.3. Noting the aforesaid submissions, the petitioner was directed to file an affidavit giving details of the petitions filed by the petitioner in a tabulated form before this Court. Paragraph 5 of the said order is...
Cellectis vs the Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ C.A.(COMM.IPD-PAT) 6/2023 & I.A. 10451/2024 CELLECTIS .....Appellant Through: Ms. Vindhya S. Mani and Ms. Ardra Goodwin, Advocates.versusTHE ASSISTANT CONTROLLER OF PATENTS AND DESIGNS .....Respondent Through: Mr. Nitinjya Chaudhry, CGSC with Mr. Rahul Mourya, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGHORDER% 28.03.20261. Matter is taken up today as 02.03.2026 was declared holiday in light of Notification No. 64/G-4/Genl.-I/DHC dated 27.02.2026.2. This appeal is filed on behalf of the Appellant under Section 117A ofthe Patents Act, 1970 (1970 Act) laying a challenge to order dated 23.11.2022, whereby Patent Application bearing No. 10437/DELNP/2015 was refused on the ground that it fell within the scope of Section 3(i) of 1970 Act and therefore, claims 1-11 were not tenable.3. By judgment dated 28.02.2025, Court allowed I.A. 10451/2024 foramendment of complete specification in respect of the claims filed before the Responde...
Sanjeet Rajore vs Union of India
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 16827/2025 with CM APPL. 69154/2025 SANJEET RAJORE .....Petitioner Through: None.versusUNION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Ms. Iram Majid, Ms. Nasreen Khatoon and Mr. Saboor Ali, Advocates for UoI.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 28.03.2026 The present matter has been taken up today, i.e., 28th March, 2026 as 2nd March, 2026 was declared a holiday.1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking directions for setting aside the Auction Notice dated 27th October, 2025, and subsequent E- auction process proposed to be held on 7th November, 2025.2. Notice was issued in the writ petition on 6th November, 2025.3. Counsel for the respondent submits that since no interim protection was granted to the petitioner, the auction process has been completed. He submits that in view thereof, the present writ petition has become infructuous.4. None appears on behalf of the petitioner.5. It appears that the petitioner is ...
Kotak Mahindra Prime Limited vs Shubham Kumar Mishra & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ARB.P. 1922/2025 KOTAK MAHINDRA PRIME LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajay Uppal, AdvocateversusSHUBHAM KUMAR MISHRA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNAORDER% 28.03.20261. None appears for the respondents despite service.2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner draws the attention ofthis Court to the Office Noting, wherein, it is clearly shown that both the respondents refused to receive the notice issued by this Court by way of Speed Post.3. Accordingly, the respondents stand served and this Court is proceeding to hear the matter on merits.4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner relies upon Schedule-I ofthe Agreement, wherein, there is a stamp showing place of arbitration, as Delhi. However, this Court notes that place of execution of Agreement is Allahabad. Further, the respondents are also based at Allahabad.5. Clearly, place of arbitration refers to only the ve...
Nitin Sarna vs Department of Transport
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 681/2026 NITIN SARNA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Nitin Sarna, petitioner through VCversusDEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT .....Respondent Through: Ms. Astha Gupta, Advocate for GNCTD.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 28.03.2026 The present matter has been taken up today, i.e., 28th March, 2026 as 2nd March, 2026 was declared a holiday.1. Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent submits that motorcycle of the petitioner has already been scrapped.2. In view thereof, the petitioner who appears in person, seeks additional compensation.3. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of while giving liberty to the petitioner to initiate appropriate proceedings in law to seek compensation. AMIT BANSAL, J MARCH 28, 2026 Vivek/-This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Se...
Rajesh Rai vs Delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ARB.P. 125/2026 RAJESH RAI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rohan Rai and Ms. Amisha Ray,versusDELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY .....Respondent Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Ms. Ankita Bhadoriya and Ms. Payal Rajput,CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJANORDER% 28.03.2026 [This matter is being taken up today, in view of notification dated 27.02.2026, whereby on account of holiday declared on 02.03.2026, all the matters listed on the said date were directed to be listed on 28.03.2026]1. By way of this petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration andConciliation Act (the Act) the petitioner seeks appointment of arbitration to adjudicate the disputes between the parties under the agreement E-Auction (January 2020) of Expandable Housing Plots Properties on as is where is basis.2. Clause 1.11 of the E-Auction document/agreement contains anarbitration clause which provides for an appointment of an Arbitrator for settling the disputes between the par...
Rajinder Pershad vs Nitin Goel & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(OS) 905/2025 & I.A. 31131/2025 RAJINDER PERSHAD .....Plaintiff Through: Ms. Amrit Kaur Oberoi, Ms. Suteekshna Dubey, Ms. Prashansa Srivastava, Advocates (M:9899347698)versusNITIN GOEL & ANR. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Amit Bajaj, Advocate for D-1 with D-1 in person (M:9213187809) Ms. Vidhi Gupta, Mr. Abhay Verma, Advocates for D-2 (M:9910170303)CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNAORDER% 28.03.20261. Ms. Amrit Kaur Oberoi, learned counsel for the plaintiff oninstructions from the plaintiff, i.e., Mr. Rajinder Pershad, who appears before this Court through Video Conferencing (VC), submits that the plaintiff wishes to withdraw the present suit.2. Accordingly, the present suit is dismissed as withdrawn.3. Pending application also stands disposed of. MINI PUSHKARNA, J MARCH 28, 2026/auThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR...
Manjur Ali vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 19446/2025 with CM APPL. 81112/2025 MANJUR ALI .....Petitioner Through: None.versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Meherunnisa Anand Jaitley and Mr. Sirish Gupta, Advocates for R- 1/MCD. Mr. Chiranjiv Kumar and Dr. Dharam Deshna and Mr. Mukesh Sachdeva, Advocates for R-2. Ms. Kritika Gupta and Ms. Vidushi Singhania, Advocates for R-3/DDA. Mr. Saifi Ahmad and Mr. Nihal Mohammed, Advocates for R-5.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 28.03.2026 The present matter has been taken up today, i.e., 28th March, 2026 as 2nd March, 2026 was declared a holiday.1. Mr. Pradeep Yadav, counsel appearing on behalf of the petitionersubmits that he has received a message from the petitioner not to appear in the matter as another Advocate would be appearing. However, no other Advocate appears on behalf of the petitioner when the matter is called out.2. Status reports are stated to have been filed on ...
- ‹ Prev
- 379
- 380
- 381
- 382
- 383
- 384
- 385
- 386
- 387
- 389
- Next ›
- Last »