Delhi Court March 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Praveen Kuamr vs Government of Nct & Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-02-2026
$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 112/2018 PRAVEEN KUAMR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Pritam, Proxy counsel for Mr. P.S.Rana, Advocate (VC)versusGOVERNMENT OF NCT & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anubhav Guptam, Panel counsel for GNCTD with Mr. Kartik Sharma, Advocate for R-1 Mohd. Nayeemuddin, Advocate for R-2 and 3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA ORDER % 28.03.2026 1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. 2. The present matter was listed on 02.03.2026. On account of 02.03.2026 being declared as a holiday vide notification no. 64/G-4/Genl.-I/DHC dated 27.02.2026, the same is being taken up for hearing today. 3. The present petition under Section 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, seeks the following prayers: - It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble court may kindly initiate civil contempt proceedings and issue an appropriate direction against the contemnor since no - compliance ...
Power Grid Corporation of India Limited vs Spml Infra Limited
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-02-2026
$~28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 101/2026, I.A. 2099/2026 & I.A. 2100/2026 POWER GRID CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. S. B. Upadhyay, Sr. Adv with Mr. Pranay Kishore Mishra and Mr. Abhinav Kathuria, Advs. versus SPML INFRA LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rahul Kumar Yadav, Adv.CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN ORDER % 28.03.2026 1. This matter has been taken up today as 02.03.2026 was declared holiday vide Notification No. 64/G-4/Genl.-I/DHC dated 27.02.2026. 2. This petition is filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of period for concluding the arbitration proceedings. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent has no serious objection to the prayer made. 4. In view of the above, the time period for conclusion of the proceedings is extended by nine months as prayed for. 5. This petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.AVNEESH ...
Kcc Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. vs Government of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-02-2026
$~31* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 162/2026KCC BUILDCON PVT. LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Prakash Singh and Mr. Abhimanyu Sharma, Advs.versusGOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Lalltaksh Joshi and Ms. Inu Kumari, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGANORDER% 28.03.20261. This matter has been taken up today as 02.03.2026 was declaredholiday vide Notification No. 64/G-4/Genl.-I/DHC dated 27.02.2026.2. This petition is filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration &Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of period for concluding the arbitration proceedings.3. Learned counsel for the respondent has no serious objection to theprayer made.4. In view of the above, the time period for conclusion of the proceedingsis extended by one year as prayed for.5. This petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.AVNEESH JHINGAN, JMARCH 28, 2026/PaThis is a digitally signed order. Th...
M/S Hcil-Adhikarya-Arss(Jv) vs Rail Vikas Nigam Limited
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-02-2026
$~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 130/2026 & I.A. 2943/2026 M/S HCIL-ADHIKARYA-ARSS(JV) .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shubham Jain, Adv.versusRAIL VIKAS NIGAM LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Saurabh Mishra, Mr. Shrimay Mishra and Mr. Abhinav Pandey, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN ORDER % 28.03.2026 1. This matter has been taken up today as 02.03.2026 was declared holiday vide Notification No. 64/G-4/Genl.-I/DHC dated 27.02.2026. 2. This petition is filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of period for concluding the arbitration proceedings. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent has no serious objection to the prayer made. 4. In view of the above, the time period for conclusion of the proceedings is extended by six months. 5. This petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.AVNEESH JHINGAN, J MARCH 28, 2026/PaThis is a digitally signed order. The ...
Gonu Ram, Proprietor of Ms Riddhi Trading Company vs National Insuranc ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 177/2026 & I.A. 4414/2026GONU RAM, PROPRIETOR OF MS RIDDHI TRADINGCOMPANY .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sidharth Joshi, Mr. Ambareen and Ms. Sonam, Advs.versusNATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD .....Respondent Through: Mr. Yogesh Malhotra and Mr. Sushant Kishore, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGANORDER% 28.03.20261. This matter has been taken up today as 02.03.2026 was declaredholiday vide Notification No. 64/G-4/Genl.-I/DHC dated 27.02.2026.2. This petition is filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration &Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of period for concluding the arbitration proceedings.3. Learned counsel for the respondent has no serious objection to theprayer made.4. In view of the above, the time period for conclusion of the proceedingsis extended by six months.5. This petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.AVNEESH JHINGAN, JMARCH 28, 2026/PaTh...
Jitendra Madhup vs Shwetajeet Madhup
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 154/2020 JITENDRA MADHUP .....PetitionerversusSHWETAJEET MADHUP .....RespondentCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMAORDER% 28.03.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present matter was listed on 02.03.2026. On account of 02.03.2026being declared as a holiday vide notification no. 64/G-4/Genl.-I/DHC dated 27.02.2026, the same is being taken up for hearing today.3. The present petition under Section 2(b) read with Section 10 read withSection 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, seeks the following prayers: - a) allow the present petition and hold the respondent/mother in contempt of the order dated 30.09.2019 passed by the Ld. Family Court and ;b) direct the respondent/mother to facilitate the strict compliance of the order dated 03.10.2018 and 30.09.2019 passed in HMA No. 855 of 2017 by the Ld. Principal Judge, Family Court, South, Saket in its true letter and spirit and;c...
Kusum Sharma (Deceased)Through Legal Heirs vs Vipin Nanda
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RC.REV. 80/2022 KUSUM SHARMA (DECEASED)THROUGH LEGAL HEIRS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Jagdev Singh, Mr. Arvind Mishra, Mr. Ankit Verma, Mr. Dipanshu Kumar, Mr. Raghav Singh, Mr. Sachin Saini, Advs.versusVIPIN NANDA .....Respondent Through: Mr. K.K. Malhotra, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMAORDER% 28.03.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present matter was listed on 02.03.2026. On account of 02.03.2026being declared as a holiday vide notification no. 64/G-4/Genl.-I/DHC dated 27.02.2026, the same is being taken up for hearing today.3. The present petition under Section 115 of the CPC, read with Section25B (8) of DRC Act, seeks the following prayers: -a) Set aside the impugned order and judgement dated 29.10.2021 passed by the Ld. ARC Delhi passing the leave to defend on the ground of bonafide requirement of the respondent.b) Dismiss the present leave to defend with costc) Any...
Alkem Laboratories Limited vs Novartis Ag & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ C.O.(COMM.IPD-PAT) 6/2025 & I.A. 9576/2025 ALKEM LABORATORIES LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. George Vithayathil, Advocate.versusNOVARTIS AG & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Mamta Rani, Mr. Abhay Tandon, Ms. Kriti Chulet and Mr. Sadaf K., Advocates for R-1. Ms. Nidhi Raman, CGSC with Mr. Om Ram and Ms. Nikita Singh, Advocates for R-2.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGHORDER% 28.03.20261. Matter is taken up today as 02.03.2026 was declared holiday in light of Notification No. 64/G-4/Genl.-I/DHC dated 27.02.2026.2. This petition is filed on behalf of the Petitioner under Section 64(1) ofthe Patents Act, 1970 read with Section 2(1)(c)(xvii) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 and Section 151 CPC for revocation of Indian Patent IN414518 and to direct Respondent No. 2 to remove the said patent from the Register of Patents.3. Learned counsel for Respondent No. 1 submits that the patent in question stands revoked and th...
Anuj Kumar Rathore vs Govt. of Nct of Delhi, Through Commissioner, Tra ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-02-2026
$~11-12* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 4000/2022 CHAALAK SHAKTI & ANR. .....Petitioners GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent 12. + W.P.(C) 9244/2023 with CM APPL. 35198/2023 ANUJ KUMAR RATHORE .....Petitioner GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI, THROUGH COMMISSIONER, TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT & ANR. .....RespondentsCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 28.03.2026 The present matters have been taken up today, i.e., 28th March, 2026 as 2nd March, 2026 was declared a holiday.1. None appears on behalf of the petitioners.2. None appeared on behalf of the petitioners on the last date of hearing as well.3. To be noted, notice is yet to be issued in the present writ petitions.4. In view thereof, the present writ petitions, along with all pendingW.P.(C) 4000/2022 and connected matter Page 1 of 2 applications are dismissed for non-prosecution. AMIT BANSAL, J MARCH 28, 2026 Rzu W.P.(C) 4000/2022 and connected matter Page 2 of 2...
Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Company, Inc. vs the Deputy Controller of Pate ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ C.A.(COMM.IPD-PAT) 31/2024 MITSUBISHI GAS CHEMICAL COMPANY, INC. .....Appellant Through: Mr. Kshitij Saxena, Mr. Saransh Vijayvargiya and Mr. Daksh Oberoi, Advocates.versusTHE DEPUTY CONTROLLER OF PATENTS AND DESIGNS .....Respondent Through: Mr. Jagdish Chandra, CGSC with Mr. Neeraj and Ms. Maanya Saxena, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGHORDER% 28.03.20261. Matter is taken up today as 02.03.2026 was declared holiday in light of Notification No. 64/G-4/Genl.-I/DHC dated 27.02.2026.2. This appeal is filed on behalf of the Appellant under Section 117A ofthe Patents Act, 1970 (1970 Act) laying a challenge to impugned orderdated 29.02.2024, whereby Respondent has refused Patent Application No. 202117021605 for invention titled CARBOXYLIC ACID ESTER COMPOUND, PRODUCTION METHOD THEREOF, AND FRAGRANCE COMPOSITION.3. To the extent necessary, the facts as pleaded in the appeal are thatAppellant filed patent application no. 202...
- ‹ Prev
- 379
- 380
- 381
- 382
- 383
- 384
- 385
- 386
- 388
- 389
- Next ›
- Last »