Delhi Court March 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rattanindia Finance Pvt Ltd vs Nestiva Healthcare Pvt Ltd & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-03-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ARB.P. 1500/2025 RATTANINDIA FINANCE PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Puneet Raj Banderwal, Adv.versusNESTIVA HEALTHCARE PVT LTD & ORS. .....Respondents Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJANORDER% 25.04.2026 [This matter is being taken up today, in view of notification dated 27.02.2026, whereby on account of holiday declared on 03.03.2026, all the matters listed on the said date were directed to be listed on 25.04.2026]1. Mr. Puneet Raj Banderwal, learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition on the ground that the matter stands settled.2. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn. VIKAS MAHAJAN, J APRIL 25, 2026 N.S. ASWALThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/04/2026 at 11:14:33...
Extramarks Education India Pvt Ltd vs G D Goenka Public School & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-03-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of decision: 25.04.2026 + ARB.P. 1619/2024 EXTRAMARKS EDUCATION INDIA PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Zeeshan Hashmi Ms. Mitali Yadav and Mr. Ankit Parashar, Advocates.versusG D GOENKA PUBLIC SCHOOL & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Swayamprabha Saraswati, Advocate.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHANSHANKAR % JUDGEMENT (ORAL)1. In view of Notification No. 64/G-4/Genl.-I/DHC dated 27.02.2026, the present matter which was previously listed on 03.03.2026, has been listed today.2. The present Petition has been filed under Section 11 of theArbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [Act], seeking appointment of a Sole Arbitrator for adjudication of disputes inter se the parties arising out of the Agreement dated 04.01.2016 [Agreement].3. The material on record reflects that the Agreement stipulates a dispute resolution mechanism, which contemplates reference of disputes thereunder, inter se the parties, to Arbitratio...
Arjun vs the State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-03-2026
$~P-5 to 9* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIReserved on: 26.02.2026Pronounced on: 03.03.2026Uploaded on: 03.03.2026 + BAIL APPLN. 3605/2025 CHHOTE SINGH .....PetitionerversusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent + BAIL APPLN. 3613/2025 BIJENDER SINGH ALIAS BINDRI .....PetitionerversusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent + BAIL APPLN. 3619/2025 ARJUN .....PetitionerversusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent + CRL.M.C. 5282/2025 MULAYAM SINGH & ORS. .....PetitionersversusSTATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents + CRL.M.C. 5316/2025 RINKU SINGH & ORS. .....PetitionersversusSigned By:PARUL BAIL APPL. 3605/2025, 3613/2025 & 3619/2025, CRL.M.C. 5282/2025 & 5316/2025 Page 1 of 11 THE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Appearance: Dr. Manish Aggarwal, Mr.Amit Ambawat, Ms. Namrata Sharma, Ms. Shilpa Kumari and Ms.Riya Sharma, Advocates In Items BAIL APPLN. APPLN. 3619/2025. Mr. Alok Kumar, Advocate for Petitioner in CRL.M.C. 5282/2025 and fo...
Chhote Singh vs the State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-03-2026
$~P-5 to 9* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIReserved on: 26.02.2026Pronounced on: 03.03.2026Uploaded on: 03.03.2026 + BAIL APPLN. 3605/2025 CHHOTE SINGH .....PetitionerversusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent + BAIL APPLN. 3613/2025 BIJENDER SINGH ALIAS BINDRI .....PetitionerversusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent + BAIL APPLN. 3619/2025 ARJUN .....PetitionerversusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent + CRL.M.C. 5282/2025 MULAYAM SINGH & ORS. .....PetitionersversusSTATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents + CRL.M.C. 5316/2025 RINKU SINGH & ORS. .....PetitionersversusSigned By:PARUL BAIL APPL. 3605/2025, 3613/2025 & 3619/2025, CRL.M.C. 5282/2025 & 5316/2025 Page 1 of 11 THE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Appearance: Dr. Manish Aggarwal, Mr.Amit Ambawat, Ms. Namrata Sharma, Ms. Shilpa Kumari and Ms.Riya Sharma, Advocates In Items BAIL APPLN. APPLN. 3619/2025. Mr. Alok Kumar, Advocate for Petitioner in CRL.M.C. 5282/2025 and fo...
Antonnette Promilla Fernanadez vs State Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-03-2026
$~P-11* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIReserved on: 13.02.2026Pronounced on:03.03.2026Uploaded on: 03.03.2026 + CRL.M.C. 7253/2025 ANTONNETTE PROMILLA FERNANADEZ .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravi Sharma, Ms. Srishti Sharma, Mr. Pulkit Luthra & Mr. Harshit Luthra, Advocates alongwith Petitioner in Person.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP for State with SI Harish Kumar, P.S. S.B. Dairy. Mr. Devansh Gupta, Advocate for R-2.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANJUDGMENT1. The petitioner1, by way of this petition under Section 528 of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita [BNSS] (corresponding to Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [CrPC]), seeks quashing of FIR No. 109/2019 dated 07.03.2019 registered at Police Station Shahbad Dairy, District Outer North, Delhi, under Section 308 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [IPC], on the ground of a compromise between her and respondent No.2 - complainant.By order dated 13.02.2...
Vineet Sorout vs State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-03-2026
$~P-10* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIReserved on 27.02.2026Pronounced on 03.03.2026Uploaded on 03.03.2026 + BAIL APPLN. 4593/2025 VINEET SOROUT .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhay Kumar, Mr. Shagun Ruhil and Mr. Karan Chopra, Advocates.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP. SI Sujata and SI Sachin, PS: Khajuri Khas. Mr. Vishal Chaudhary, Advocate for the prosecutrix alongwith the prosecutrix on VC.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN JUDGMNET1. By way of this application, the petitioner seeks anticipatory bail inconnection with FIR No. 401/2025, dated 09.10.2025, registered under Sections 376(2)(n)/506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [IPC], lodged at Police Station Khajuri Khas, Delhi.2. I have heard Mr. Abhay Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Ms. Manjeet Arya, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, and Mr. Vishal Chaudhary, learned counsel for the prosecutrix. Signed By:PARUL BAIL APPLN. 4593/2025 Page 1 of 113. The prosecution ...
Incyte Holdings Corporation & Ors. vs Natco Pharma Limited
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-03-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(COMM) 1316/2025, I.As. 30871/2025, 30872/2025, 30874/2025 INCYTE HOLDINGS CORPORATION & ORS. .....Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Hemant Singh, Ms. Mamta Jha, Mr. Abhay Tandon, Ms. Kriti Chulet and Ms. Sadaf Rahman, Advocates.versusNATCO PHARMA LIMITED .....Defendant Through: Mr. Afzal Badar Khan, Mr. Dominic Alvares, Ms. Amrita Majumdar and Mr. Sharad Besoya, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGHORDER% 25.04.20261. Matter is taken up today as 03.03.2026 was declared holiday vide Notification No. 64/G-4/Genl.-I/DHC dated 27.02.2026.2. This suit is instituted on behalf of the Plaintiffs inter alia seeking adecree of permanent injunction restraining the Defendant and all others acting on its behalf from using, manufacturing, stockpiling, importing, selling, offering for sale/supply either by way of promotion or by any other means, exporting and/or directly or indirectly dealing in Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API), pha...
Concept Capital Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd. vs Balvinder Singh Guraya HUF
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-03-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of decision: 25.04.2026 + ARB.P. 2073/2025 CONCEPT CAPITAL INFRA PROJECTS PVT. LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Cherry Gupta and Mr. Asim Naeem, Advocates.versusBALVINDER SINGH GURAYA HUF .....Respondent Through: Respondent in person.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHANSHANKAR % JUDGEMENT (ORAL)1. In view of Notification No. 64/G-4/Genl.-I/DHC dated 27.02.2026, the present matter which was previously listed on 03.03.2026, has been listed today.2. The present Petition has been filed under Section 11 of theArbitration and Conciliation Act, 19961, seeking appointment of a Sole Arbitrator for adjudication of disputes inter se the parties arising out of the Memorandum of Understanding dated 15.03.20162.3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner would seek to rely upon Clause 16 of the MoU, which reads as under:4. The dispute resolution Clause is stated to be Clause 16 of the MOU, which reads as follows:- 16. T...
Abhiyan Capital (India) Pvt.Ltd. vs Sharabati & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-03-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ARB.P. 2084/2025 ABHIYAN CAPITAL (INDIA) PVT.LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Priyaranjan Kumar, Adv.versusSHARABATI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJANORDER% 25.04.2026 [This matter is being taken up today, in view of notification dated 27.02.2026, whereby on account of holiday declared on 03.03.2026, all the matters listed on the said date were directed to be listed on 25.04.2026]1. Mr. Priyaranjan Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file fresh.2. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. VIKAS MAHAJAN, J APRIL 25, 2026 N.S. ASWALThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/04/2026 at 11:14:25...
Vikas Mishra vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-02-2026
$~34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 801/2026 with CM APPL. 3962/2026 VIKAS MISHRA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Joby P. Varghese and Mr. Jagmeet Singh Randhawa, Advocates (through VC)versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Shiven Varma, Advocate for GNCTD. Ms. Mansi Gupta, Advocate for MCD. Mr. Neeraj Kumar, Advocate for NDMC.CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL ORDER % 28.03.2026The present matter has been taken up today, i.e., 28th March, 2026 as 2nd March, 2026 was declared a holiday. 1. On the last date of hearing, counsel for the respondent no.1/MCD submitted that AIIMS falls within the jurisdiction of NDMC and not MCD. Hence, NDMC would be the concerned body that would issue the death certificate. 2. Taking into account the aforesaid submission, NDMC was impleaded as the respondent no.4 in the present petition. 3. Counter affidavit/status report has been filed on behalf of theW.P.(C) 801/2026 Page 1 of 2T...
- ‹ Prev
- 379
- 380
- 381
- 382
- 383
- 384
- 385
- 387
- 388
- 389
- Next ›
- Last »