Delhi Court March 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ramanand Mahto vs Ashwath Quippo Infra Projects Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-03-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ARB.P. 251/2026 & I.A. 3409/2026RAMANAND MAHTO .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Bansal, Adv. (ThroughVC)M: 9810959432Email: [email protected] QUIPPO INFRA PROJECTS PVT.LTD. .....Respondent Through: NoneCORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNAORDER% 25.04.20261. The present petition has been filed under Section 11(6) of theArbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Arbitration Act), seeking appointment of a Sole Arbitrator, for adjudication of disputes between the parties, arising out of the Work Order dated 10th January, 2019, executed between the parties.2. Office Noting shows that the respondent has been served by theRegistry, through E-mail as well as the ordinary mode.3. None appears for the respondent, despite service, when the matter iscalled out.4. Accordingly, this Court proceeds with the matter.5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the aforesaid WorkOrde...
Gurcharan Singh vs the State Govt of Nct Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-03-2026
$~P-1 to 4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on 28.02.2026 Pronounced on 03.03.2026 Uploaded on 03.03.2026+ BAIL APPLN. 423/2026 RAJVEER SINGH .....Petitioner versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT DELHI .....Respondent+ BAIL APPLN. 426/2026 GURMEET SINGH .....Petitioner versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT DELHI .....Respondent + BAIL APPLN. 427/2026 GURCHARAN SINGH .....Petitioner versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT DELHI .....Respondent+ BAIL APPLN. 443/2026 SHRI WALAYATI SINGH .....Petitioner versus STATE NCT OF DELHI .....RespondentAppearances: Mr. Tanveer Ahmed Mir, Senior Advocate with Mr. Priyank Kher, Mr. Neeraj Kumar Sharma, Mr. Diwansh Tanwar and Ms. Divani Khanna, Advocates for petitioner in Item Nos. 1 to 3. Mr. N. Hariharan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ashwin Vaish, Mr. Akshay Soni, Mr. Prakeet Bhalla, Ms. Malika Chadda, Ms. Punya Rekha Angara, Mr. Aman Akhtar, Ms. Sana Singh, Mr. Arjan Singh Mandla, Ms. Vasundhara Raj Tyagi and Ms. Vasundhara N., Advocates f...
Gurmeet Singh vs the State Govt of Nct Delhi .
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-03-2026
$~P-1 to 4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on 28.02.2026 Pronounced on 03.03.2026 Uploaded on 03.03.2026+ BAIL APPLN. 423/2026 RAJVEER SINGH .....Petitioner versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT DELHI .....Respondent+ BAIL APPLN. 426/2026 GURMEET SINGH .....Petitioner versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT DELHI .....Respondent + BAIL APPLN. 427/2026 GURCHARAN SINGH .....Petitioner versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT DELHI .....Respondent+ BAIL APPLN. 443/2026 SHRI WALAYATI SINGH .....Petitioner versus STATE NCT OF DELHI .....RespondentAppearances: Mr. Tanveer Ahmed Mir, Senior Advocate with Mr. Priyank Kher, Mr. Neeraj Kumar Sharma, Mr. Diwansh Tanwar and Ms. Divani Khanna, Advocates for petitioner in Item Nos. 1 to 3. Mr. N. Hariharan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ashwin Vaish, Mr. Akshay Soni, Mr. Prakeet Bhalla, Ms. Malika Chadda, Ms. Punya Rekha Angara, Mr. Aman Akhtar, Ms. Sana Singh, Mr. Arjan Singh Mandla, Ms. Vasundhara Raj Tyagi and Ms. Vasundhara N., Advocates f...
Rajveer Singh vs the State Govt of Nct Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-03-2026
$~P-1 to 4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on 28.02.2026 Pronounced on 03.03.2026 Uploaded on 03.03.2026+ BAIL APPLN. 423/2026 RAJVEER SINGH .....Petitioner versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT DELHI .....Respondent+ BAIL APPLN. 426/2026 GURMEET SINGH .....Petitioner versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT DELHI .....Respondent + BAIL APPLN. 427/2026 GURCHARAN SINGH .....Petitioner versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT DELHI .....Respondent+ BAIL APPLN. 443/2026 SHRI WALAYATI SINGH .....Petitioner versus STATE NCT OF DELHI .....RespondentAppearances: Mr. Tanveer Ahmed Mir, Senior Advocate with Mr. Priyank Kher, Mr. Neeraj Kumar Sharma, Mr. Diwansh Tanwar and Ms. Divani Khanna, Advocates for petitioner in Item Nos. 1 to 3. Mr. N. Hariharan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ashwin Vaish, Mr. Akshay Soni, Mr. Prakeet Bhalla, Ms. Malika Chadda, Ms. Punya Rekha Angara, Mr. Aman Akhtar, Ms. Sana Singh, Mr. Arjan Singh Mandla, Ms. Vasundhara Raj Tyagi and Ms. Vasundhara N., Advocates f...
Broadcast Engineering Consultants India Limited vs Airport Authority o ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-03-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ARB.P. 335/2026BROADCAST ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS INDIALIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Shruti Sharma, Ms. Shreya Sharma, Mr. Nishant Kandpal, Mr. Aman Kumar Singh & Ms. Arunima Singh, Advs.versusAIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Harish Malik, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGANORDER% 25.04.20261. This matter is taken up today as 03.03.2026 was declared holiday videNotification No. 64/G-4/Gen1.-I/DHC dated 27.02.2026.2. The present petition is filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration andConciliation Act, 1996 (for short the Act) for appointment of an arbitrator.3. The brief facts are that the petitioner was the successful bidder in thetender invited by the respondent for Supply, Installation, Testing and Commissioning (SITC) of Biometric Access Control System (ACS) at 43 airports across the country. By a Letter of Acceptance dated 23.12.2016, the bid of the petitioner wa...
M/S Agilus Diagnostics Limited vs Institute of Gastro and Kidney Care ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-03-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ARB.P. 330/2026 M/S AGILUS DIAGNOSTICS LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Dheeraj Kumar Nag, Advocate.versusINSTITUTE OF GASTRO AND KIDNEY CARE PVT LTD......Respondent Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHANSHANKARORDER% 25.04.20261. In view of Notification No. 64/G-4/Genl.-I/DHC dated27.02.2026, the present matter which was previously listed on 03.03.2026, has been listed today.2. The present Petition has been filed under Section 11(6) of theArbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking the appointment of an Arbitrator in terms of Pathology Service Understanding Agreement dated 26.08.2021 executed between the parties.3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner, oninstructions, seeks to withdraw the present Petition.4. Leave, as sought for, is granted.5. Accordingly, the present Petition stands dismissed aswithdrawn.HARI...
Sitaram Aggarwal vs Punjab National Bank and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-03-2026
$~4 (03.03.2026)* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of Decision: 25th April, 2026. + W.P.(C) 213/2020 SITARAM AGGARWAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. R. Vasudevan, Mr. N.C Gupta, Advocates with Petitioner in person.versusPUNJAB NATIONAL BANK AND ANR. .....RespondentsThrough: Mr. Rajesh Kumar Gautam, Mr. Anant Gautam, Mr. Deepanjal Choudhary, Ms. Azal Aekram, Mr. Aman Gahlot, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULAJUDGMENTSANJEEV NARULA, J. (Oral):[As per to Notification No. 64/G-4/Gen1.-I/DHC dated 27th February, 2026, matters listed on 3rd March, 2026 (on account of Holi), are to be taken up on 25th April, 2026.]1. The Petitioner, a former officer of Punjab National Bank [PNB],seeks a direction that he be treated as a pension optee under the Punjab National Bank (Employees) Pension Regulations, 1995 [1995 Regulations]. The Petitioner states that he had opted for pension on 30 th September, 1994 when PNB first invited options under its proposed pension ...
Archian Foods Private Limited vs Deep Waters & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-03-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(COMM) 238/2025 & I.A. 6995/2025 ARCHIAN FOODS PRIVATE LIMITED .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Nikhil Sonker and Mr. Shivendra Pratap Singh, Advocates.versusDEEP WATERS & ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Lalltaksh Joshi and Ms. Minu Kumari, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGHORDER% 25.04.20261. Matter is taken up today as 03.03.2026 was declared holiday videNotification No. 64/G-4/Genl.-I/DHC dated 27.02.2026.2. This suit is instituted on behalf of the Plaintiff inter alia seeking adecree of permanent injunction restraining the Defendants and all others acting on their behalf from using, soliciting, manufacturing, selling, offering for sale, importing, exporting and advertising in any manner, including on the internet and e-commerce platform and/or directly or indirectly dealing in impugned goods being flavored/non-flavoured non-alcoholic beverages drinks/ beverages, soft drinks and beverages inclu...
Busy Infotech Pvt Ltd vs Acmaey Accounting Solutions Pvt Ltd & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-03-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(COMM) 478/2025 & I.A. 12352/2025 BUSY INFOTECH PVT LTD .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Naman Tandon and Mr. Abhay Aren, Advocates.versusACMAEY ACCOUNTING SOLUTIONS PVT LTD & ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Kunal Khanna, Mr. Samanyu Bhatnagar, Mr. Aditya Vats Sharma, Mr. Anuj Dhar, Ms. Rishabha Gupta and Mr. Kaulik Mitra, Advocates for D-1 and D-2. Mr. Arjun Mookerjee, Mr. Shivam Tiwari, Mr. Debarshi Dutta and Mr. Mrinal Ojha, Advocates for D-3. Mr. Aditya Mathur and Ms. Anuparna Chatterjee, Advocates for D-4. Mr. Varun Pathak, Mr. Akhil Shandilya and Ms. Nivedita Sudheer, Advocates for D-5. Mr. Deepak Gogia, Mr. Aadhar Nautiyal and Ms. Shivangi Kohli, Advocates for D-6.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELAORDER% 25.04.20261. The matter was not taken up on 03.03.2026 in view of Notification No.64/G-4/GENL./DHC/27.02.2026 and is listed today.2. Having regard to the fact that the plaintiff and the contesting defendantn...
Leena Menghaney vs Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-03-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C)-IPD 93/2021 & CM APPL. 36977/2017 LEENA MENGHANEY .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Devyani Nath, Advocate.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Nitinjya Chaudhary, CGSC with Mr. Rahul Mourya, Advocate for R-1 to R-3. Ms. Tusha Malhotra and Ms. Chahat Bhatia, Advocates for R-4.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGHORDER% 25.04.20261. Matter is taken up today as 03.03.2026 was declared holiday vide Notification No. 64/G-4/Genl.-I/DHC dated 27.02.2026.2. Learned Counsel for Petitioner submits that patent in question bearing No. 286321 has expired on 31.03.2026 and hence, this writ petition becomes infructuous.3. Writ petition along with pending application is disposed of as infructuous with no expression on merits. JYOTI SINGH, J APRIL 25, 2026/VP/AKThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The...
- ‹ Prev
- 379
- 380
- 381
- 382
- 383
- 385
- 386
- 387
- 388
- 389
- Next ›
- Last »