Delhi Court March 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
India International Centre vs Amrit Mehta and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2889/2012 INDIA INTERNATIONAL CENTRE .....Petitioner Through: None.versusAMRIT MEHTA AND ANR .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 09.03.20261. None appears for the parties despite the matter having been called out in second round.2. None had appeared for the parties on 05.01.2026, 13.01.2026, 23.01.2026, 16.02.2026 and 23.02.2026.3. Accordingly, the petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J MARCH 9, 2026 aksThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/03/2026 at 10:47:21...
Parmanad @ Parveen vs State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 09.03.2026 + BAIL APPLN. 3959/2025 PARMANAD @ PARVEEN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Varun Deswal and Mr. Danish Khan, Advocates.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State with ACP Raj Kumar. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL)1. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 183/2024 of PS Crime Branch for offence under Section 20(B)(ii)(C)/29 NDPS Act and Section 209 BNS.2. Conduct of Delhi Police in this case is shocking, to say the least.Despite last detailed order (dated 16.01.2026), the concerned ACP (Mr. Satender Mohan, who filed the status report annexing tampered document) has opted not to appear. In his place, ACP Mr. Raj Kumar has come but submits that the concerned ACP Mr. Ajay Kumar has retired three months BAIL APPLN. 3959/2025 Page 1 of 5 pages Signature Not Verified GIRISH 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec4 5569af3962c6fb4835d435f9762...
Ravinder Kumar Malik vs Delhi Police Thr. the Commissioner of Police & ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3780/2011 RAVINDER KUMAR MALIK .....Petitioner Through: None.versusDELHI POLICE THR. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE & ORS .....Respondents Through: None.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 09.03.20261. None appears for the parties despite the matter having been called out in second round.2. None had appeared for the petitioner on 05.01.2026, 13.01.2026, 23.01.2026, 16.02.2026 and 23.02.2026.3. Accordingly, the petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J MARCH 9, 2026 aksThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/03/2026 at 10:47:45...
Riya Balhara Through Spa Holder Mr. Parvesh Kumar vs Eazyapp Tech Priv ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 1567/2025, CM APPLs.65947/2025, 65948/2025 RIYA BALHARA THROUGH SPA HOLDER MR. PARVESH KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anshul Sharma, Advocate.versusEAZYAPP TECH PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Dhanesh Relan and Mr. Paritosh Dhawan, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTAORDER% 09.03.20261. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition.2. Accordingly, the present petition stands dismissed-as-withdrawn. Pending applications also stand disposed of. SACHIN DATTA, J MARCH 9, 2026/atThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/03/2026 at 17:08:20...
M/S Hotsafe International vs Principal Commissioner of Goods and Servi ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 16257/2024 M/S HOTSAFE INTERNATIONAL .....Petitioner Through: None.versusPRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF GOODS AND SERVICE TAX NORTH DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocate for R-2CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBREHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAULORDER% 09.03.20261. Counsel for respondent states that the attachment of the bank accountas mentioned in the prayer clause a was vide impugned communication dated 5th July, 2024. The statutory period of attachment is already over. That being so, the petition has been rendered infructuous.2. None for the petitioner.3. We accept the submission of counsel for respondents and dispose of the petition as infructuous.4. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE, J AJAY DIGPAUL, J MARCH 9, 2026/pr/skThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scan...
Capital Foods Private Limited vs Ravi Pickles and Spices India Private ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(COMM) 1173/2025 CAPITAL FOODS PRIVATE LIMITED .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Dhruv Anand, Mr. Rohil Bansal and Mr. Chirayu Prahlad, Advocates.versusRAVI PICKLES AND SPICES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. .....Defendants Through: Ms. Apoorva Sharma, Advocate for D-1 and 2.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELAORDER% 09.03.2026 I.A. 5764/2026 (Under Order XXIII Rule 3 of The CPC)1. This is a joint application under Order XXIII Rule 3 read with Section151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as CPC), filed on behalf of plaintiff as also the defendant nos. 1 and 2, seeking decreeing the Suit in terms of the settlement arrived at between the parties.2. Learned counsel for the parties submit that the disputes between the parties have been amicably settled and the terms of settlement have been reduced into writing and enumerated in para 3 of the present application.3. The terms of the settlement contained i...
Punita Khatter vs Union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 17093/2025 & CM APPL. 70314/2025 PUNITA KHATTER .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rohan Thawani & Mr. Pratul Pratap Singh, Advs.versusUNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Brijesh Kumar Tamber, CGSC with Mr. Amit Acharya, Govt. Pleader for R1 & R2. Mr. Advitiye Tiwari, Mr. Tuhin Sinha, Advs. for R-3.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYALORDER% 09.03.20261. Mr. Brijesh Kumar Tamber, CGSC, appearing for respondent nos.1 &2, Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) and Registrar of Companies (ROC), has presented a counter affidavit with E-filing No.66026/2026 dated 7th February 2026, since the same was not on record.2. It is stated in the counter affidavit that an inspection was ordered against M/s Explorers Travels and Tours Pvt. Ltd. under Section 206(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 vide MCAs communication dated 23rd September 2024.3. The inspection has been concluded; report has been submitted to the R...
Sh Shahrukh vs the State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 4443/2025, CRL.M.A. 34386/2025, CRL.M.A. SH SHAHRUKH .....Applicant Through: Ms. Sakshi Singh, Adv.versusTHE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the State with Ms. Vanshika Singh and Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, Advocates with SI Akansh Sharma and HC Satish, SP.: Model Town.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 09.03.20261. By virtue of the present bail application under Section 482 read withSection 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), the applicant seeks grant of anticipatory bail in proceedings arising out of FIR No.80001532/2025 registered at PS.: Model Town under Sections 303(2)/3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS).2. At the outset, learned APP for the State draws the attention of thisCourt to the Status Report to submit that a supplementary charge-sheet has since been filed and custodial interrogation of the applicant is also no longer requir...
Vijay Kumar Tomar vs Shubhashri Tomar
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 1082/2010 VIJAY KUMAR TOMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Jitendra Maan, Advocate (through VC).versusSHUBHASHRI TOMAR .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 09.03.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the matter has already been settled between the parties and that the present petition may be disposed of as withdrawn.3. Keeping in view the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J MARCH 9, 2026/v/iskThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/03/2026 at 10:08:21...
Anil Kumar Singh vs the State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 4438/2025 ANIL KUMAR SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anshula Gupta, Advocate.versusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Shubhi Gupta, APP for the State.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 09.03.2026 CRL.M.A. 6819/2026 Exemption granted, subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CRL.M.A. 6818/2026 By way of the present application filed under section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the bail petition, with liberty to file afresh for the same relief before the learned Sessions Court. For the reasons stated in the application, which is duly supported by affidavit, the application is allowed. Application stands disposed-of.BAIL APPLN. 4438/2025 Page 1 of 2 BAIL APPLN. 4438/2025 In view of the above, the bail petition is disposed-of as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed-for. Pending applications, if any, also s...
- ‹ Prev
- 375
- 376
- 377
- 378
- 379
- 381
- 382
- 383
- 384
- 385
- Next ›
- Last »