Delhi Court March 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Gnct of Delhi Through Commissioner of Police vs Kishor Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-28-2026
$~4 (02.03.2026)* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 28th March, 2026 + W.P.(C) 6255/2016 GNCT OF DELHI THROUGH COMMISSIONER OF POLICE .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Neeraj, SPC with Mr. Sahaj Garg, Adv.versusKISHOR KUMAR .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANJ U D G M E N T (ORAL)AMIT MAHAJAN, J.1. This matter has been listed today on account of declaration of holiday on 02.03.2026 by notification No. 64/G-4/Gen1.-I/DHC dated 27.02.2026.2. The present Petition is filed assailing order dated 26.02.2016(hereinafter impugned order) passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter Tribunal) in O.A. No. 3526/2013, whereby the Original Application filed by the Respondent/ Mr. Kishore Kumar was allowed.3. Briefly stated, the Respondent was working as SHO at SarojiniNagar Police Station. The Respondent was issued an Explanation Notice dated 27.01.2...
Uem India Pvt. Ltd. vs Ongc Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-28-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURTOF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on: 19.03.2026Judgment pronounced on: 28.03.2026+ O.M.P. (COMM) 393/2018, I.A. 12438/2018, I.A. 9666/2020 & I.A. 2738/2022 UEM INDIA PVT. LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Gaurav Pachnanda, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Samir Malik, Ms. Snehal Kaila, Ms. Yachana Gupta, Mr. Udbhav Gady & Mr. Krishan Kumar, Advs.versusONGC LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Abhishek Puri, Ms. Surbhi Gupta & Mr. Sahil Grewal, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGANJUDGMENT1. This petition is filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short the Act) for setting aside of the award dated 14.12.2017.2. The brief facts are that the petitioner M/s UEM India PrivateLimited, a registered company was the successful bidder in a tender invited by Oil and Natural Gas Corporation (ONGC) for installation of one Effluent Treatment Plant (for short ETP) and three ETP-cum Water Injection Plants at four sites in Assam ...
Ram Nath vs M/S Hindustan Unilever Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-28-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIReserved on: 20.02.2026 Date of decision: 28.03.2026 Uploaded on: 28.03.2026 + W.P.(C) 7000/2015 RAM NATH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Avadh Bihari Kaushik, Adv.versusM/S HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LTD. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sandeep Prabhakar, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Vikas Mehta, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHAIL JAINJUDGMENTSHAIL JAIN, J.1. The present writ petition has been filed by the Petitioner/Workman,Shri Ram Nath, under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, seeking setting aside of the order dated 29.11.2014 (hereinafter referred to as the Impugned Order) passed by the learned Presiding Officer, Labour Court-IX, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in LCA No. 01/2014, whereby the claim of the Petitioner under Section 33C (2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ) for computation and recovery of alleged dues was dismissed as not maintainable on the ground that the entitlement itself...
Ranjeet vs Naresh Industries
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-28-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on : 16.03.2026Pronounced on : 28.03.2026Uploaded on : 28.03.2026 + W.P.(C) 13267/2018 RANJEET .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Tarkeshwar Nath and Mr. Harshit Singh, Advocates with petitioner- workman in person.versusNARESH INDUSTRIES .....Respondent Through: Mr. Gulshan Chawla, Ms. Kanupriya Chawla, Mr. Manish Kumar, Mr. Prashant Kumar, Mr. Aditya Singh, and Ms. Bhavya Khera, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIJUDGMENT1. The present writ petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is directed against the Award dated 13.07.2018 passed by the Labour Court whereby the claim application of the workman/petitioner was dismissed.2. The facts in a nutshell are that the workman/petitioner filed a directindustrial dispute before the Labour Court seeking reinstatement with continuity of service alongwith full back wages. In the claim application, it was claimed that the workman had joined the mana...
Nirmala @ Bharpai vs Government of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-28-2026
$~1 (02.03.2026)* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 10765/2018, CM APPL. 42471/2019 NIRMALA @ BHARPAI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Pardeep Kumar, Advocate.VersusGOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, SC for GNCTD Services with Mr. N.K. Singh, Ms. Aliza Alam and Mr. Mohnish Sehrawat, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULAORDER% 28.03.2026 [As per to Notification No. 64/G-4/Gen1.-I/DHC dated 27th February, 2026, matters listed on 2nd March, 2026 (on account of Holi), are to be taken up on 28th March, 2026.]1. This writ petition arises out of a claim for grant of family pension inrespect of late Shri Guru Dutt Sharma and constitutes a second round of litigation between the parties. The dispute essentially relates to the question as to who was the legally wedded spouse of the deceased employee, basis which the Petitioner (Nirmala @ Bharpai) seeks entitlement to the family mention. The matter, therefore, tu...
Indian Oil Corporation Ltd vs Adarsh Nobel Corporation Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 27th March, 2026 + ARB.P. 93/2026 INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. .....Petitioner Through: None. versusADARSH NOBEL CORPORATION LTD. .....Respondent Through: Mr. A.K. Thakur, Mr. Rishi Raj, Mr. Sujeet Kumar, Mr. Ningthem Oinam, Advocates (M:9810141402) CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA MINI PUSHKARNA, J (ORAL): 1. The present petition has been filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Arbitration Act) seeking appointment of a sole arbitrator, for adjudication of disputes arising between the parties out of the Contract Agreement dated 06th January, 2018. 2. The facts, as culled out from the pleadings, are as follows: I. The petitioner, being engaged in the activities of refining, production, etc., of natural gas and petrochemicals, had awarded the work of Provision of Additional VR Tank at Paradip Refinery to the respondent, vide Letter of Award dated 29th Nove...
Rajesh @ Praveen vs State Gnct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
$~107 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 250/2026RAJESH @ PRAVEEN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Chetan Bhardwaj, AdvocateversusSTATE GNCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Rupali Bandhopadhya, ASC with Mr. Abhijeet Kumar with Inspector Rakesh Kumar, PS Neb SaraiCORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER % 27.03.2026 CRL.M.A. 9402/2026 (for early hearing) 1. This is an application for early hearing of the writ petition. 2. For the reasons stated and with consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the application is allowed and the writ petition is taken up for hearing. 3. The application accordingly stands disposed of. W.P.(CRL.) 250/2026 4. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution has been filed by the petitioner seeking a direction to the respondent to release him on parole for a period of four weeks in connection with FIR No. 231/2009 dated 08.09.2009, registered at Police Station Neb Sarai under Sections 302/201 of th...
Pankaj Verma vs State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 63/2025 PANKAJ VERMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. U.A. Khan and Mr. Tushar Upadhyaya, Advocates versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State with SI Dharmender, Special Cell CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA ORDER % 27.03.20261. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 106/2022 of Police Station Special Cell for offence under Section 21/61/85 of NDPS Act. 1.1 This application for the first time came up for hearing on 10.01.2025 before the predecessor bench. Thereafter, the application remained pending before different benches and finally alongwith 179 such old pending bail applications this application also was transferred to this bench. 1.2 Today is the first hearing before this bench. 2. After addressing partly, learned counsel for accused/applicant, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw this bail application with liberty file af...
Neh Srivastava vs State Gnct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on: 17.03.2026 Judgment pronounced on: 27.03.2026 Judgment uploaded on: 28.03.2026 + BAIL APPLN. 350/2026 NEH SRIVASTAVA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. K. K. Manan, Senior Advocate with Mr. O.N. Sharma, Ms. Neetu, Ms. Priti, Mr. Bharat Dagger, Ms. Ishika Tyagi, Mr. Manish Sharma and Mr. Gouransh Mehra, Advocates. versusSTATE GNCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP for the State with SI Mohit Parkash, EOW Mr. Madhav Khurana, Senior Advocate with Mr. Abhinav Sekhri and Ms. Shaurya Singh, Advocates for complainants. CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA JUDGMENT DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J 1. By way of the present application, the applicant seeks grant of regular bail in case arising out of FIR bearing no. 92/2020, registered at Police Station Economic Offences Wing (EOW), Delhi, for theBAIL APPLN. 350/2026 Page 1 of 12 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:ZEE...
Sukhvinder Preet Singh vs the State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 174/2026 SUKHVINDER PREET SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Himanshu Saxena, Mr. Avdesh Kumar and Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocates. versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, APP. ASI Rajesh Kumar. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN ORDER % 27.03.2026 1. By way of this application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with FIR No. 440/2025, dated 24.10.2025, lodged at Police Station Paschim Vihar West, under Section 18 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. 2. The prosecution has handed up a status report in Court, which is taken on record. 3. After some arguments, Mr. Himanshu Saxena, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw this application. 4. The application is dismissed as withdrawn. 5. It is clarified that this Court has not made any...
- ‹ Prev
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- Next ›
- Last »