Delhi Court March 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mohan Lal Choudhary vs State Through Sho Special Cell
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 09.03.2026 + BAIL APPLN. 3276/2025 MOHAN LAL CHOUDHARY .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sumit Sharma, Mr. Narender and Ms. Neha Ghugtyal, Advocates.versusSTATE THROUGH SHO SPECIAL CELL .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for the State with Inspector Sanjeev Kumar, PS Special Cell. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL)1. The applicant/accused seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 154/2023 of Police Station Special Cell for offence under Section 18 & 29 of the NDPS Act.2. Broadly speaking, the allegation against the accused/applicant is thaton the basis of a secret information, a raiding team was constituted which intercepted the truck owned and being driven by the accused/applicant and the said truck was found to contain 41.260 kg of opium, which is a commercial quantity. According to prosecution, the said contraband was being transported in his truck by the accused/applicant from Manipur to BAIL ...
Shamsher Ansari vs the State Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 2910/2025 SHAMSHER ANSARI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Nasimuddin, Advocate.versusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel (Criminal) with Mr. Priyam Agarwal and Mr. Abhinav Kumar Arya, Advocates with SI Shivam Bisht, PS-Khajuri Khas for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLAHONBLE MS.JUSTICE SHAIL JAINORDER% 09.03.20261. This Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of theConstitution of India read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, praying for issuance of a Writ of Habeas Corpus directing the respondent nos. 1 to 4 to produce Mr. Md. Basit Ansari, the missing brother of the petitioner.2. The learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of therespondent nos. 1 to 4 has handed over a copy of the Status Report dated 09.03.2026, which details the efforts made by the respondents to trace out the whereabouts of the ...
Sh Subhash Chand Sethi (Deceased Through Legal Heirs) vs Sh Vijay Shan ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RC.REV. 267/2025 & CM APPL. 54360/2025 SH SUBHASH CHAND SETHI (DECEASED THROUGH LEGAL HEIRS) .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Jaspreet Singh Rai, Ms. Jia Kapur and Ms. Bhawana Pandey, Advocates.versusSH VIJAY SHANKAR .....Respondent Through: Ms. Kamlakshi Singh, Ms. Divya Chauhan, Ms. Radhika Raghuvanshi and Ms. Paraamba Raghuvanshi, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMAORDER% 09.03.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present petition under Section 25-B(8) of the Delhi Rent ControlAct, seeks the following prayers: a. Allow the present Revision and grant leave to defend to the Petitioner herein to defend the eviction petition bearing no. Subhash Chand Sethi. b. Set aside the impugned order dated 29.05.2025 passed by the Court of Ms. Upasana Satija, SCJ-CUM-RC (central), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in eviction petition filed under section 14(1)(e) read with section 25-B of Delhi Rent Control Act,1958,...
Deepak Kumar Gupta vs M/S Garuda Polyflex Foods Private Limited
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 1695/2025 DEEPAK KUMAR GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: None.versusM/S GARUDA POLYFLEX FOODS PRIVATE LIMITED .....Respondent Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 09.03.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. As no one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner, let the matter be again called at 02:30 PM. RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J MARCH 9, 2026/sds/ik At 02:40 P.M.3. As no one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner, despite the matter being called twice, the present petition is dismissed in default. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J MARCH 9, 2026/sds/ikThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/03/2026 at 10:08:02...
Crocodile International Pte. Ltd. vs La Chemise Lacoste and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RFA(OS)(COMM) 18/2024 & CM APPL. 56314/2024Judgment reserved on: 08.01.2026Judgment pronounced on:09.03.2026CROCODILE INTERNATIONAL PTE. LTD. .....Appellant Through: Mr. Saif Khan, Mr. Shobhit Agarwal, Mr. Prajjwal Kushwaha and Ms. Shayal Anand, Advs.versusLA CHEMISE LACOSTE AND ANR ....Respondents Through: Mr. Chander M Lall, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Nancy Roy and Ms. Prakriti Varshney, Advs. + RFA(OS)(COMM) 10/2025 & CM APPL. 26249/2025 LACOSTE .....Appellant Through: Mr. Chander M Lall, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Nancy Roy and Ms. Prakriti Varshney, Advs.versusCROCODILE INTERNATIONAL PTE. LTD. & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Saif Khan, Mr. Shobhit Agarwal, Mr. Prajjwal Kushwaha and Ms. Shayal Anand, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKARHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLAJUDGMENT% 09.03.2026OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J.Facilitative Index S. Particulars Pg. No. No.1. Introduction 3Signed By:ANUBHAV RFA(OS)(COMM) 18/2024 ...
Ministry of Railways vs Pr Sahare
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 4911/2011 and CM APPL. 9967/2011 MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS .....Petitioner Through: None.versusPR SAHARE .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 09.03.20261. None appears for the parties despite the matter having been called out in second round.2. None had appeared for the parties on 05.01.2026, 13.01.2026, 23.01.2026, 16.02.2026 and 23.02.2026.3. Accordingly, the petition, along with pending application, stands dismissed for want of prosecution. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J MARCH 9, 2026 aksThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/03/2026 at 10:43:14...
Rihan @ Gullu vs State (N)Ct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 3540/2025 RIHAN @ GULLU .....Applicant Through: Mr. M.L. Yadav, Mr. Piyush Saini and Mr. Harish Chandra, Advs.versusSTATE (N)CT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Raghuinder Verma, APP for the State with Mr. Ashish Mahani, Advocate with Insp. Harkesh Gaba and Insp. Mukesh Rana, PS.: Krishna Nagar.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 09.03.20261. After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicant seeks to withdraw the present bail application.2. Accordingly, the present application is dismissed as withdrawn. SAURABH BANERJEE, J MARCH 9, 2026/bhThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/03/2026 at 10:05:28...
Sunil Kumar Yadav vs the State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 4204/2025 SUNIL KUMAR YADAV .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravin Rao, Mr. Akshit Sawal, Mr. Ayan Sharma, Mr. Pallav Gupta Ms. Jannat Garg and Ms. Palak J., Advocates.versusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP for the State with SI Vipin. Mr. Shashi Shankar, Ms. Pooja Mohanani, Mr. Guneet Kaur Bhatia and Mr. Arnav Dhama, Advocates for R-2.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINORDER% 09.03.20261. Applicant seeks regular bail in a case arising out of FIR No.0431/2024 dated 03.06.2024, for commission of offences under Sections 498A/304B/34 IPC, registered at P.S. Wazirabad.2. As per prosecution story, an intimation about admission of GeetikaYadav (deceased/ victim) in Burari Hospital was received by the police on 01.06.2024. Injuries were, allegedly, on account of fall from the height (second floor), half an hour ago, and as per MLC, she had been brought to the hospital by her husband and family...
Irc Engineering Services India Private Limited vs Development Commissi ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 14427/2024 IRC ENGINEERING SERVICES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vasu Goyal, Advocate.versusDEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER MINISTRY OF MICRO SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTERPRISES & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr.Rohan Jaitley CGSC with Mr.Akshay Sharma, Mr. Dev Pratap Shahi, Mr.Varun Pratap Singh & Mr.Yogya Bhatia, Advocates for UOI. Mr. Adarsh Tripathi with Mr. Vikram Singh Baid & Mr. Ajitesh Garg, Advocates for R2.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 09.03.20261. Learned counsel who appears for the National Thermal PowerCorporation (NTPC)/respondent no.2 on instructions submits that NTPC and the petitioner have entered into a settlement agreement dated 21.01.2026 with respect to the main dispute between the said parties.2. In view of the aforesaid, the instant writ petition stands disposed of. Liberty is however granted to the petitioner to take appropriate recourse in accordance with...
Vardhman Properties Ltd. vs Commissioner of Service Tax & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
$~13 & 14* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3689/2008 VARDHMAN PROPERTIES LTD. .....Petitioner COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL GOODS & SERVICE TAX, DELHI EAST & ORS .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 7626/2009 RAJESH PROJECTS (INDIA) PVT. LTD. .....Petitioner COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX & ANR. .....RespondentsCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBREHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAULORDER% 09.03.20261. On 7th February, 2026, none appeared for the petitioners, as such, the matter was listed today for dismissal.2. Even today, none appeared for the petitioners.3. That being so, the writ petitions stand dismissed for want of prosecution.4. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE, J AJAY DIGPAUL, J MARCH 9, 2026/pr/sk...
- ‹ Prev
- 374
- 375
- 376
- 377
- 378
- 380
- 381
- 382
- 383
- 384
- Next ›
- Last »