Delhi Court March 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Satya Prakash & Anr. vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 10373/2025 SATYA PRAKASH & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Satya Prakash in personversusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Adv. for R- 1/ MCD Ms. Shahana Farah (Addl. Standing Counsel) with Mr. Abhigyan, Ms. Reya Paul, Ms. Amruta Padhi, Ms. Nidhi Singh, Advs. for R-2/DDA Mr. Anubhav Gupta, Panel Counsel (Civil) for R-3/ GNCTDCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 09.03.20261. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia seeking the following prayer(s):- It is therefore, prayed that this Honble Court may kindly be pleased to issue writ of mandamus to the Respondent No.1 to 3 to dismantle the unauthorized construction of the godown and further to release the public land measuring about 1200 sq. yards forming part of Khasra No.30/9 in the revenue estate of Village Nangli Poona, Delhi- 110036 in the interest of justice. 2. For the r...
Mohd. Saleem & Ors vs Union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 783/2020 MOHD. SALEEM & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Pawan Reley, Mr. Akshay Lodhi, Ms. Simran Singh, Mr. Tanish Rawat and Mr. Utkarsh, Advs.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Satya Ranjan Swain, CGSC with Mr. Kautilya Birat, Adv. for R-1/UOICORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 09.03.20261. The Petitioners before this Court pray for issuance of writ in thenature of Certiorari to quash the order dated 04.04.2019 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal [hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal], whereby their Original Application (OA) came to be dismissed2. A Limited Departmental Competitive Exam (LDCE) wasconducted in the year 2005 for the post of Loco Pilot (Goods). The Petitioners, along with several other candidates, participated in the said examination. The Petitioners, however, failed to qualify, whereas 323 candidates were provi...
Rachna Mehndiratta & Ors. vs Girdhari Lal
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 1465/2022 & CM APPL. 56153/2022 RACHNA MEHNDIRATTA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: None.versusGIRDHARI LAL .....Respondent Through: Mr. Dinesh Garg, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 09.03.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. As no one has appeared on behalf of the petitioners, let the matter be called again at 02:30 PM. RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J MARCH 9, 2026/sds/ik At 02:40 P.M.3. As no one has appeared on behalf of the petitioners, despite the matter being called twice, the present petition is dismissed in default. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J MARCH 9, 2026/sds/ikThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/03/2026 at 10:08:05...
Novartis Ag and Anr. vs Novasys Life Sciences Private Limited
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(COMM) 758/2025 NOVARTIS AG AND ANR. .....Plaintiffs Through: Ms. Mamta R. Jha, Ms. Pragya Jain, Ms. Anjeeta Rani, Ms. Diksha and Mr. Aneesh Raj, Advocates.versusNOVASYS LIFE SCIENCES PRIVATE LIMITED .....Defendant Through: Ms. Asha Pal, Director of Defendant.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELAORDER% 09.03.2026 I.A. 5765/2026 (Under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the CPC)1. This is a joint application under Order XXIII Rule 3 read with Section151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as CPC), filed on behalf of plaintiffs as also the defendant seeking decreeing the Suit in terms of the settlement arrived at between the parties.2. Ms. Asha Pal appears for the defendant and claims to be the Director of the defendant. Ms. Pal has also appended an affidavit to the said application disclosing her status as Director of defendant.3. Ms. Mamta R. Jha, learned counsel for the plaintiffs submits that theparties have...
Ashok Kumar Sureka vs Rajiv Bajpai & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(OS) 847/2023 ASHOK KUMAR SUREKA .....Plaintiff Through: None.versusRAJIV BAJPAI & ORS ......Defendants Through: Mr. PN Puri, Advocate for D-1. Mr. Anshuman & Mr. Vaibhav Sood, Advocates. Inspector Athurv and Mr. Ramniwas Yadav, CRPF.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASADORDER% 09.03.20261. The present matter has been listed before Court vide Order dated 25.02.2026 passed by the Ld. Joint Registrar. The Order dated 25.02.2026 reads as under: CS(OS) 847/20231. Matter is listed for marking of exhibits qua the documents of defendants on behalf of plaintiff.2. Today also, no one is appearing for plaintiff.3. Perusal of previous ordersheets reveals that plaintiff is not appearing since last five dates.4. In view of the same, list the matter before the Hon'ble Court for further directions on 09.03.2026.2. Today also, there is no appearance on behalf of the Plaintiff.3. In view of the above, the Suit is dismissed for...
United India Insurance Co Ltd vs Shakil Ahmed & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of decision: 09th March 2026 + MAC.APP. 264/2014 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD .....Appellant Through: Ms. Shikha Sapra, Adv.versusSHAKIL AHMED & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Manish Maini, Adv. for R-1.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYALJUDGMENTANISH DAYAL, J: (ORAL)1. This appeal has been preferred assailing the impugned award passed byMotor Accidents Claims Tribunal [MACT], East District, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in Petition No. 611/2010 on 28 th September 2013 awarding compensation to the tune of Rs. 46,211/-, alongwith interest at the rate of 7.5% from the date of filing of petition to respondent no.1/claimant for injuries sustained by him.2. The accident took place on 5 th August 2010 at about 06:00 p.m whenrespondent no.1/claimant was going towards Dhobhi Ghat Vivek Vihar on his bicycle. When he reached near Kasturba Nagar Chowk Vivek Vihar, Delhi a Maruti car bearing no. DL-7CB-0560 (hereinafter, offending vehicle...
Hero Fincorp Limited vs Best Hawk Infosystems Private Ltd & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of Decision: 09.03.2026 + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 406/2025 & I.A. 27734/2025 (For Early Hearing) HERO FINCORP LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Harsh Sinha and Ms. Anushka Verma, AdvocatesversusBEST HAWK INFOSYSTEMS PRIVATE LTD & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Senior Advocate with Ms. Ridhima Goyal, Mr. Saif Uddin Khan and Ms. Kavya, AdvocatesCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHANSHANKAR % JUDGEMENT (ORAL)HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J.1. The present Petition has been filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 19961 seeking the following reliefs: ..(a) Pass appropriate orders directing the attachment of the bankaccounts and the credit balance lying therein in respect of the bank accounts of Respondent No. 1/ BEST HA WK INFOSYSTEMS PRIVATE LTD., having PAN numnber AAECB3642C: The ActSigning Date:11.03.2026 O.M.P. (I) (COMM.) 406/2025 ...
Mission Save Constitution vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 54/2024 MISSION SAVE CONSTITUTION .....Petitioner Through: None.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Dr.B.Ramaswamy, CGSC for UOI. Ms. Beenashaw N. Soni, Standing Counsel for MCDCORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 09.03.20261. None for the petitioner despite the matter is called out in second round. None had appeared for the petitioner on last date i.e. 16.10.2025, as well.2. Accordingly, the petition, along with pending applications, stands dismissed for want of prosecution. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J MARCH 9, 2026 aksThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/03/2026 at 10:46:38...
Prasun Pandey vs the State Govt. of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 3789/2025 PRASUN PANDEY .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Amol Kokane, Advocate.versusTHE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Shubhi Gupta, APP for the State.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 09.03.2026 By way of the present petition filed under section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the petitioner seeks regular bail in case FIR No.0141/2021 dated 08.09.2021 registered under sections 420/406/120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) at P.S.: Economic Offences Wing, Delhi.2. The allegation against the petitioner is that he alongwith his father(Ravinder Kumar Pandey) and brother (Pranjal Pandey) was running a chit fund/committee scheme in his local area, under which they collected various sums of money from the residents of that area and other persons, against the promise to pay back the money with high rates of return. Monies are stated to have been paid by the co...
Manjeet Kaur vs Govt of Nct of Delhi and Another
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 15203/2025 MANJEET KAUR .....Petitioner Through: None.versusGOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANOTHER .....Respondents Through: Mr Sanjay Kumar Pathak standing Counsel with Mr Sunil Kumar Jha & Mr Mohd Sueb Akhtar, Advocates for LAC. (M:9793585441)CORAM:JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE MADHU JAINORDER% 09.03.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The Petitioner has filed the present petition seeking compensation regarding Khasra No.253 (1-19) also written as 255/2, 256(0-4) and 268(3- 12), which is stated to be acquired vide Award No.2 of the year 1991.3. Vide order dated 6th October, 2025, the Petitioner was directed to placeon record the copy of the award, which is the basis for seeking the compensation. Moreover, even the order dated 23rd December, 2025 records that the same has not been placed on record.4. The matter is listed today for dismissal.5. None appears for the Petitioner. A copy of the award has also...
- ‹ Prev
- 373
- 374
- 375
- 376
- 377
- 379
- 380
- 381
- 382
- 383
- Next ›
- Last »