Delhi Court March 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Saeed Khan Shergul Khan vs Union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 10969/2022 and CM APPL.32032/2022 SAEED KHAN SHERGUL KHAN .....Petitioner Through: Dr. Harshvir Pratap Sharma, Sr. Adv., Mr. Akul Krishnan, Ms. Mamta Sharma, Advs. (through v/c)versusUNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTAORDER% 09.03.20261. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition.2. The same is accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. Pending application also stands disposed of. SACHIN DATTA, J MARCH 9, 2026/clThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/03/2026 at 17:30:23...
Jan Prasad Adhikari vs National Green Tribunal and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 7859/2019 & CM APPL. 32672/2019 JAN PRASAD ADHIKARI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Akhil Sachar, Ms. Sunanda Tulysan, Ms. Shweta Pattnaik, Ms. Kashish Maheshwari, Mr. Vidit Verma, Advocates.versusNATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Santhosh Krishnan, Advocate for R-1 & 2.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULAORDER% 09.03.20261. This petition arises from an order by which the National GreenTribunal brought the Petitioners service to an end on the footing that he had incurred a disqualification attached to public employment and had, in writing, admitted the underlying fact. The Petitioner says the order is unsustainable because no regular inquiry preceded it, the admission relied upon was not voluntary, and the action came years after the event said to justify it. The Respondents contend that once the Petitioners own signed statement disclosed a disqualifying circumstance, and he was again ...
M/S Ttk Healthcare Limited vs Sharad Tandon and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 9869/2023, CM APPLs 37955/2023, 43768/2023 M/S TTK HEALTHCARE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Raja Ram Iyer and Mr. B. Vignesia, Advocates.versusSHARAD TANDON AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Nikhil Singhvi and Mr. Sanyam Kumar, Advocates for respondent no.1. Mr. Anubhav Gupta, Panel Counsel, GNCTD with Mr. Karti, Advocate.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIORDER% 09.03.20261. By way of present petition filed under Article 226/227 of theConstitution of India, the petitioner seeks to assail the order dated 16.06.2023 passed by the learned Authority under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 whereby the petitioner has been directed to pay a sum of Rs.3,24,579/-, which is imposed by the Authority under Section 20(3)(i) of the Minimum Wages Act towards penalty.2. Briefly stated, the respondent no.1 had approached the learned Authority being aggrieved by the action of the petitioner in failing to pay the minimum wages for th...
Braham Prakash vs Deputy Commissioner (South-West) & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 2904/2024, CM APPL. 38663/2024 & CM APPL. 38664/2024 BRAHAM PRAKASH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anil K. Aggarwal, Adv. (through VC)versusDEPUTY COMMISSIONER (SOUTH-WEST) & ANR. .....Respondents Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 09.03.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the present petition may be disposed of as withdrawn.3. Keeping in view the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J MARCH 9, 2026/sds/iskThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/03/2026 at 10:07:12...
Adil & Ors. vs State of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 4404/2024 ADIL & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Lokesh Solanki, Adv.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for the State with Ms. Puja Mann, Adv. along with SI Garima.CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 27.03.2026 CRL.M.A. 9397/20261. By way of the present application, the petitioners seek restoration of the petition, which was dismissed for non-prosecution, vide order dated 09.03.2026.2. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the prayer made in the application is allowed and the petition is restored to its original number.3. Application stands disposed of. CRL.M.C. 4404/20244. By way of the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIRbearing No. 172/2012, registered at Police Station Ranjit Nagar, West, New Delhi for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 287/304A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter 'I...
Western Digital Technologies Inc. & Anr. vs Daichi International & Anr ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIReserved on: 19 December 2025 Pronounced on: 9 March 2026 + FAO(OS) (COMM) 146/2024, CM APPL. 39898/2024 & CM APPL. 39900/2024 WESTERN DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES INC. & ANR. .....Appellants Through: Mr. Pravin Anand, Mr. Saif Khan, Mr. Shobhit Agarwal, Ms. Shayal Anand, Mr. Prajjwal Kushwaha and Ms. Meghana Kudligi, Advs.versusGEONIX INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED, THROUGH ITS DIRECTORS, MR. GAURAV JAIN MR. SAURABH JAIN & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Rashi Bansal, Mr. Saurabh Lal and Ms. Deepti Thapa, Adv. Mr. R.V. Sinha and Mr. A.S. Singh, Advs. for R-2 and 3. + FAO(OS) (COMM) 147/2024, CM APPL. 40344/2024 & CM APPL. 40346/2024 WESTERN DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES INC. & ANR. .....Appellants Through: Mr. Pravin Anand, Mr. Saif Khan, Mr. Shobhit Agarwal, Ms. Shayal Anand, Mr. Prajjwal Kushwaha and Ms. Meghana Kudligi, Advs.versusDAICHI INTERNATIONAL & ANR. .....Respondents FAO(OS) (COMM) 146/2024 and connected matters Page 1 ...
Rajesh Kumar Meena & Ors. vs Dedicated Freight Corridor Corporation of ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 8123/2024 RAJESH KUMAR MEENA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Saurabh Agrawal, Ms. Komal M., Ms. Laxita Upadhyay and Mr. Ashutosh Rana, Advocates.versusDEDICATED FREIGHT CORRIDOR CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. .....Respondent Through: Mr. V.S.R. Krishna, Advocate.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULAORDER% 09.03.2026 CM APPL. 13972/2026 (for directions)1. By this application, the Petitioners seek interim directions permitting them to participate in the promotion process from Grade N5 to Grade E0 pursuant to Circular No. 06/2026 dated 29th January, 2026.2. The relief sought cannot be granted at an interlocutory stage.Eligibility for participation in a promotional process is governed by the applicable promotion policy and the governing circular. A direction permitting participation dehors the prescribed conditions would, in substance, amount to judicial re-writing of the eligibility criteria. Such a course is ordinaril...
Seagate Technology LLC vs Daichi International
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIReserved on: 19 December 2025 Pronounced on: 9 March 2026 + FAO(OS) (COMM) 146/2024, CM APPL. 39898/2024 & CM APPL. 39900/2024 WESTERN DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES INC. & ANR. .....Appellants Through: Mr. Pravin Anand, Mr. Saif Khan, Mr. Shobhit Agarwal, Ms. Shayal Anand, Mr. Prajjwal Kushwaha and Ms. Meghana Kudligi, Advs.versusGEONIX INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED, THROUGH ITS DIRECTORS, MR. GAURAV JAIN MR. SAURABH JAIN & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Rashi Bansal, Mr. Saurabh Lal and Ms. Deepti Thapa, Adv. Mr. R.V. Sinha and Mr. A.S. Singh, Advs. for R-2 and 3. + FAO(OS) (COMM) 147/2024, CM APPL. 40344/2024 & CM APPL. 40346/2024 WESTERN DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES INC. & ANR. .....Appellants Through: Mr. Pravin Anand, Mr. Saif Khan, Mr. Shobhit Agarwal, Ms. Shayal Anand, Mr. Prajjwal Kushwaha and Ms. Meghana Kudligi, Advs.versusDAICHI INTERNATIONAL & ANR. .....Respondents FAO(OS) (COMM) 146/2024 and connected matters Page 1 ...
Prem Kumar Shishodia vs State of Nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 12178/2021 with CM APPL. 38056/2021, CM APPL. 11450/2022 and CM APPL. 11451/2022 PREM KUMAR SHISHODIA .....Petitioner Through: None.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu and Ms. Pulak Gupta Joshi, Advocates for MCD.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 09.03.20261. In the status report filed by the respondent/MCD, it is stated that noobjection certificate for the installation of lift and connecting bridge in respect of Flat No.64 to 71, Block-A, Prayag Apartment, Plot No.B-1, Vasundhara Enclave, Delhi has been issued by the respondent/MCD on 28th September, 2021.2. None appears on behalf of the petitioner.3. None had appeared on behalf of the petitioner even on the last date of hearing on 23rd September, 2025.4. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.5. Consequently, all pending applications stand disposed of. AMIT BANSAL, J MARCH 9, 2026 RzuThis is a digitall...
Dhiraj Goel vs Reserve Bank of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 13873/2023 & CM APPL. 54800/2023 DHIRAJ GOEL .....Petitioner Through: None.versusRESERVE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Niraj Kumar, Sr. Central Govt. Counsel with Mr. Chaitanya Kumar, Adv. for R-1 and R-4/UOI. Ms. Sangeeta Sondhi and Mr. Amit Patra, Advs. for R- 2 and R- 3. (through VC)CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 09.03.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. Learned counsel for the respondent nos. 2 and 3 submits that the loan account with the petitioner has been settled and no dues certificate has also been issued to the petitioner.3. As no one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner, let the matter be again called at 02:30 PM. At 02:35 P.M.4. As no one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner, despite the matter being called twice, the present petition is dismissed in default. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of....
- ‹ Prev
- 368
- 369
- 370
- 371
- 372
- 374
- 375
- 376
- 377
- 378
- Next ›
- Last »