Delhi Court March 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sudipta Basu vs Rupa Basu
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 2126/2024 & CM APPL. 16063/2024 SUDIPTA BASU .....Petitioner Through: Petitioner-in-person. (through VC)versusRUPA BASU .....Respondent Through: Ms. Shivangi Nanda and Mr. Arsh Rampal, Adv. (through VC)CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 09.03.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. The petitioner, appearing in person through video conferencing,submits that he seeks to withdraw the present petition and prays that the same be disposed of as withdrawn.3. Keeping in view the submissions made by the petitioner, the presentpetition is disposed of as withdrawn. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, JMARCH 9, 2026/sds/iskThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/03/2026...
Chand Babu vs Dda & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2757/2025 & CM APPL. 13156/2025 CHAND BABU .....PetitionerThrough: Mr. Vipul Kumar Adv. with petitionerversusDDA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Ankita Sarangi, Adv. for MCD Mr. Tushar Sanu, Mr. Pravin. Bansal, Mr. Ritik Anmol Advs .for DDACORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 09.03.20261. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia seeking the following prayers:- (a) issue a Writ in the nature of MANDAMUS and/ or any other appropriate Writ/ Order/ Direction of like nature thereby directing the respondent No. 1 to forthwith take appropriate action against the unauthorized and illegal construction carried out by the Respondent No.2 in the property in question i.e. TERRACE OF FLAT NO.203, MIG FLATS (METRO APARTMENTS), JAHANGIRPURI, DELHI-110033 and to thereafter demolish the same;(b) issue a Writ in the nature of PROHIBITION and/ or anyother appropriate Writ/ Order/...
Tata Sons Private Limited & Anr. vs Jdm Fruit Products Private Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(COMM) 252/2025, I.A. 7386/2025, I.A. 197815/2025 I.A.TATA SONS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. .....Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Dhruv Anand, Mr. Rohil Bansal and Mr. Chirayu Prahlad, Advocates.versusJDM FRUIT PRODUCTS LIMITED .....Defendant Through: Mr. Ashutosh Kumar, Mr. Devanshu Khanna and Mr. Partheshwar Singh, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELAORDER% 09.03.2026 CS(COMM) 252/2025 and I.A. 14456/2025 (For releasing/de-sealing the properties seized by the LC)1. This is an application under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure,1908, on behalf of defendant seeking releasing/de-sealing of the properties seized and sealed by the Local Commissioner while execution of Commission on 25.03.2025.2. Having regard to the discussions and deliberations qua the presentapplication, the defendant had placed before this Court various options of the packaging material, which were stated to adequately address the i...
Gautam Bhatia vs Vinayak Enterprises
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(COMM) 255/2023, I.A. 8165/2023, CC(COMM)2/2024, I.A.GAUTAM BHATIA .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Unmukt Gera and Avinash K. Sharma, Advocates.versusVINAYAK ENTERPRISES .....Defendant Through: Mr. Deepak Agarwal, Mr. Abhay Tayal and Mr. Sumit Kumar Agarwal, Advocates. Mr. Vinay Yadav, CGSC with Ms. Kamna Behrani, Mr. Ansh Kalra, Mr. Neeraj Paulose Raj, Advocates for D-2/Registrar of TM.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELAORDER% 09.03.20261. Learned counsel for the parties submit that the dispute between theparties, insofar as the Suit as also the Counter Claim are concerned, has been amicably resolved. The Said settlement terms have been reduced into writing vide the Settlement Agreement dated 06.02.2026 under the aegis of the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre.2. The terms of the Settlement have been enumerated in para 1 to para 9 ofthe Settlement Agreement.3. In terms of the para 2, whi...
Khajan Singh (Deceased) Through His Legal Heirs vs Airports Authority ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2069/2020 & CM APPL. 7248/2020, CM APPL. 7250/2020KHAJAN SINGH (DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LEGAL HEIRS.....Petitioner Through: NoneversusAIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mrs Anjana Gosain, Adv, Ms. Shreya Manjari, Adv for R1 Mr. Siddharth Panda with Mr. Ritank Kumar and Mr. Anil Pandey, Advs. for R2 Mr. Sanjay Katyal, SC, Mr. Nitish Kumar Danda, Advs. for DDA Ms. Ritu Chaudhary, Mr. Aman Mudga, Advs. forR4CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 09.03.20261. On 07.05.2024, this Court noted that the petition needs to be amendedand recorded the counsel for the petitioners request for grant of time for doing so.2. Despite the time granted, there is no application which has been filedseeking amendment of the prayer clause in the present petition.3. Additionally, there is nobody appearing on behalf of the petitionertoday.4. For the said reasons, the petition is dismissed ...
Assistant Director vs Shri Malvinder Mohan Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
$~60 to 64* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHICRL.M.C. 657/2022, CRL.M.As. 2840/2022, 19865/2022 DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anupam S. Sharma, Mr. Vashisht Rao, Ms. Amisha P Dash, Ms. Riya Sachdev and Mr. Abhiyant Singh, Advocates. RAJESH KUMAR AGGARWAL .....Respondent Through: Mr. Pankush Goyal and Mr. Kartikay Kumar, Advocates. + CRL.M.C. 1477/2022, CRL.M.A. 6411/2022ASSISTANT DIRECTOR .....PetitionerSHRI MALVINDER MOHAN SINGH .....Respondent Through: Mr. Shiven Verma, Advocate.W.P.(CRL) 96/2022, CRL.M.A. 1054/2022RP GOYAL .....PetitionerMr. Himanshu Gupta and Mr. Rohan, Advocates for Applicant/BPSL.CRL.M.C. 1702/2023, CRL.M.A. 6507/2023CRL.M.C. 499/2023, CRL.M.A. 1967/2023CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 09.03.20261. A common question which entails in the present batch of matters iswhether the accused is entitled to be supplied with the unrelied documents.2. In this backdrop, this Court passed the following ...
Tata Sons Private Limited & Anr. vs Jdm Fruit Products Private Limited
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(COMM) 252/2025 TATA SONS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Rohil Bansal & Mr. Chirayu Prahlad, Advs. (through VC)versusJDM FRUIT PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED .....Defendant Through: None.CORAM:JOINT REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL), SUDHIR KUMAR SIROHI (DHJS)ORDER% 25.04.2026The matter has been taken up in terms of notification no. 64/F-4/Genl.-I/DHC dated 27.02.2026 as 03.03.2026 was declared holiday.The suit has already been decreed and disposed of vide orderof the Hon'ble Court dated 09.03.2026. Therefore no further order is required to be passed in this matter.SUDHIR KUMAR SIROHI (DHJS) JOINT REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL) APRIL 25, 2026/jr Click here to check corrigendum, if anyThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/04/2026 at 12:44:50...
Fiitjee Ltd., & Anr. vs Benneet and Coleman & Co. & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(OS) 973/2002 and I.A. 4918/2002, I.A. 10062/2002 and I.A.FIITJEE LTD. & ANR. .....Plaintiffs Through:versusBENNEET AND COLEMAN & CO. & ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Ashish Verma and Mr. Akhil Ranganathan, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJANORDER% 09.03.20261. The present matter has been placed before this Court by the learnedJoint Registrar vide his order dated 16.02.2026.2. Perusal of the last order shows that the matter was at the stage ofsummoning of witnesses, however, no steps were taken by the plaintiffs for summoning of witnesses.3. Record further reflects that even on the previous date, there was noappearance on behalf of the plaintiffs, nor any steps with regard to leading further evidence were taken by the plaintiffs.4. This Court has perused the previous three orders dated 15.12.2025,19.01.2026 and 16.02.2026. On the said dates, there was no appearance on beha...
Huma Saad vs the Institute of Chartered Accountant of India and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5118/2023 HUMA SAAD .....Petitioner Through: Ms Hina Bhargava, Mr Sarthak Sharma, Ms Nitasha Gupta , Ms Amrita Dhawan Advocates.versusTHE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANT OF INDIA AND ANR .....RespondentsThrough: Mr. Deepin Deepak Sahni, Advocate for R-1.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 09.03.20261. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that since respondentno.2 has expired, the petition has been rendered infructuous.2. In view thereof, the petition stands dismissed as has been renderedinfructuous.PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J MARCH 9, 2026 aksThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/03/2026 at 10:43:17...
Smt Manju Through Her Next Friend vs S(CCL-Driver) & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ MAC.APP. 266/2023 SMT MANJU THROUGH HER NEXT FRIEND .....Appellant Through: None.versusS(CCL-DRIVER) & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Garv Singh, Adv. for Insurance Company.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYALORDER% 09.03.20261. No one appears on behalf of appellant.2. Even on the last date, no one had appeared on behalf of appellant.3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.4. Order be uploaded on the website of this Court. ANISH DAYAL, J MARCH 9, 2026/MK/spThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/03/2026 at 13:17:31...
- ‹ Prev
- 365
- 366
- 367
- 368
- 369
- 371
- 372
- 373
- 374
- 375
- Next ›
- Last »