Delhi Court March 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Smt Kalpna Singh vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2874/2026 SMT KALPNA SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. V.S. Dubey, Mr. Sushil Kumar, Mr. Mandeep Kumar, Advocates.versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI& ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Chirag Madan, ASC with Ms. Rachael Tuli & Mr. Ronit Bose, Advocates for R-1.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 09.03.20261. The present writ petition has been filed seeking directions to therespondent/ MCD to inspect the premises of the petitioners neighbours, i.e., Flats No. 29-C and 30-C, 1st F1oor, Pocket A-2 DDA Kondli Gharoli, Mayur Vihar Phase-3, 110096 (hereinafter subject properties), and take action in accordance with law.2. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the neighbours residingin the subject properties have unauthorizedly extended their balconies, which is hampering the smooth flow of vehicles in the area.3. In this regard, a complaint has been filed with the respondent/ MC...
Ashok vs the State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 883/2026 & CRL.M.A. 6785/2026 ASHOK .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Suraj Prakash Sharma, Advocate.versusTHE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP for State with Insp. Amit Solanki and SI Arvind Kumar.CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 09.03.20261. By way of the present application, the applicant is seeking interim bailfor a period of 45 days on the ground of pregnancy of his wife, in case arising out of FIR bearing no. 12/2026, registered at Police Station Crime Branch, Delhi, for the commission of offences punishable under Sections (hereafter NDPS Act).2. After addressing some arguments, the learned counsel appearing onbehalf of the applicant seeks permission to withdraw the present application with permission to file the application for interim bail after the child is born.3. In view of the above, the present application along with pendi...
Sundeep Ravinder vs State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 1678/2026, CRL.M.A. 6800/2026 & 6801/2026SUNDEEP RAVINDER .....Petitioner Through: Counsel for petitioner (appearance not given).versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for State with Inspector Madan Mohan.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIAORDER% 09.03.20261. Petitioner seeks quashing of case FIR No. 202/2023 of Police StationGreater Kailash for offence under Section 279/304A IPC on merits.2. After addressing partly, learned counsel for petitioner on instructionsseeks permission to withdraw this petition. As requested, the petition and accompanying applications are dismissed as withdrawn.GIRISH KATHPALIA, JMARCH 9, 2026/ryThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/03/2026 at 10:43:12...
Chiranjeev & Ors. vs State Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 09th March, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 1672/2026 & CRL.M.A. 6789/2026 CHIRANJEEV & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Sunil Mohan, Ms. Yogeshwari and Mr. Kunal Rudra Jaswal, ADvocatesversusSTATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Raj Kumar, APPCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINJ U D G M E N T (oral)1. Petitioners herein seek quashing of FIR No.396/2021 datedarising therefrom, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties.2. Petitioner No.1 got married to respondent No.2 on 21.12.2018, as perHindu rites and ceremonies.3. There is no child from such wedlock.4. However, on account of some matrimonial discord, the parties startedliving separately and a complaint was lodged by respondent No.2, which resulted into registration of abovesaid FIR.5. Charge-sheet has already been filed.6. Fact, however, remains that both the parties have been able to amicablysettle all their matri...
Goga Shengelia vs Commissioner of Customs New Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2885/2026 & CM APPL. 14010/2026 GOGA SHENGELIA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. D.S. Chadha and Ms. Prabjyoti K. Chadha, Advs.versusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS NEW DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Aditya Singla, SSC with Ms. Arya Suresh Nair, Mr. Dhananjay Gautam and Mr. Arvind Menon, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBREHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAULORDER% 09.03.20261. Since the revision is already pending, we are not inclined to causeinterference in exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction. The writ petition is disposed of.2. Liberty to the petitioner to move for expeditious disposal of revision.3. If such request is made, same be considered by the revisional authorityhaving regard to the fact that the issue is pending for about last two years in the matter of release of the seized good.NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE, JAJAY DIGPAUL, JMARCH 9, 2026/ar/yrThis is a digitally signed order. The authenti...
Metrro Waste Handling Pvt. Ltd. vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 211/2026 & I.A. 5786/2026 METRRO WASTE HANDLING PVT. LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Nidhi Mohan Parashar & Mr. Amar Bajpayee, Advs.versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, SC with Mr. Vaibhav Tripathi & Mr. Umesh Sisodia, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGANORDER% 09.03.20261. This petition is filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration &Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of period for concluding the arbitration proceedings.2. Learned counsel for the respondent has no serious objection to theprayer made.3. In view of the above, the time period for conclusion of theproceedings is extended by six months.4. This petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.AVNEESH JHINGAN, JMARCH 9, 2026/JKThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by sca...
R P Goyal vs Directorate of Enforcement
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
$~60 to 64* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHICRL.M.C. 657/2022, CRL.M.As. 2840/2022, 19865/2022 DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anupam S. Sharma, Mr. Vashisht Rao, Ms. Amisha P Dash, Ms. Riya Sachdev and Mr. Abhiyant Singh, Advocates. RAJESH KUMAR AGGARWAL .....Respondent Through: Mr. Pankush Goyal and Mr. Kartikay Kumar, Advocates.CRL.M.C. 1477/2022, CRL.M.A. 6411/2022ASSISTANT DIRECTOR .....PetitionerSHRI MALVINDER MOHAN SINGH .....Respondent Through: Mr. Shiven Verma, Advocate.W.P.(CRL) 96/2022, CRL.M.A. 1054/2022RP GOYAL .....PetitionerMr. Himanshu Gupta and Mr. Rohan, Advocates for Applicant/BPSL. + CRL.M.C. 1702/2023, CRL.M.A. 6507/2023CRL.M.C. 499/2023, CRL.M.A. 1967/2023CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 09.03.20261. A common question which entails in the present batch of matters iswhether the accused is entitled to be supplied with the unrelied documents.2. In this backdrop, this Court passed the following ...
Rachna Jain vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2982/2026, CM APPL. 14391/2026 & CM APPL. RACHNA JAIN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vinod Kumar Mantoo, Mr. Hem Kumar and Ms. Niharika Mantoo, Advocates.versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Shilpa Dewan, Advocate forMCD.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 09.03.20261. The matter has been listed as per the urgent mentioning and has beentaken up for hearing at 4:30 PM.2. The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:-3. Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that demolitionaction against the petitioners property took place on 18th September, 2023 and after that, no further Show Cause Notice or demolition orders have beenW.P.(C) 2982/2026 Page 1 of 2served upon the petitioner. He further submits that no Show Cause Notice/demolition order was received by the petitioner prior to 18th September 2023 as well.4. Ms. Sh...
Anil Kumar Wadhwa vs M2M Buildtech Pvt Ltd & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
$~1 & 2* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of Decision: 09.03.2026 + ARB.P. 149/2025ANIL KUMAR WADHWA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kushagra Bansal, AdvocateversusM/S M2M BUILDTECH PVT LTD & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Lalit Nayyar, Advocate forR-2 & 7.Mr. Vijay Kasana, Advocate forR-5 & 8.+ O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 72/2024ANIL KUMAR WADHWA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kushagra Bansal, AdvocateversusM2M BUILDTECH PVT LTD & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Lalit Nayyar, Advocate forR-2 & 7.Mr. Vijay Kasana, Advocate forR-5 & 8.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHANSHANKAR% JUDGEMENT (ORAL)ARB.P. 149/2025 & conncected matter Page 1 of 10HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J.ARB.P. 149/20251. The present petition has been filed under Section 11(6) of theArbitration and Conciliation Act, 19961, seeking the appointment of a Sole Arbitrator in terms of Clause 8 of the Memorandum of Understanding cum Agreem...
Raj Kumar Sharma and Ors vs Union of India Through Ministry of Commerc ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
$~4 & 5* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 11658/2019 SOMA DEVI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. A.K. Verma, Advocate.UNION OF INDIA & ORS .....Respondents+ W.P.(C) 2379/2021 & CM APPL. 6934/2021 RAJ KUMAR Sharma And Ors .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Kripa Shankar Prasad, Ms. Rashmi Narina, Ms. Indra Bhushan Prasad and Mr. Harsh Jain, Advocates.UNION OF INDIA THROUGH MINISTRY OF COMMERCE ANDINDUSTRY And Ors .....Respondents Mr. Himanshu Pathak, SPC with Mr. Chetan Sharma, Advocate for R-1.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULAORDER% 09.03.20261. The Petitioners were employees of the Export Inspection Council, astatutory organisation functioning under the Department of Commerce and Industry.2. The controversy in the present petitions concerns the Petitionersentitlement to switch over from the Contributory Provident Fund (CPF) Scheme to the General Provident Fund (GPF) Pension Scheme. An identical issue had earlier arisen before this Co...
- ‹ Prev
- 364
- 365
- 366
- 367
- 368
- 370
- 371
- 372
- 373
- 374
- Next ›
- Last »