Delhi Court March 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Gaurav Mendiratta vs M/S Zoomcar India Pvt Ltd & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ FAO (COMM) 65/2026, CM APPL. 14183/2026 & CM APPL. 14184/2026 GAURAV MENDIRATTA .....Appellant Through: Mr. Yash Singhal, Adv.versusM/S ZOOMCAR INDIA PVT LTD & ORS. .....Respondents Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBREHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAULORDER% 09.03.20261. On instructions, the prayer for withdrawal is made. The appeal standsdisposed of as withdrawn.2. Liberty to take recourse to such remedy as is permissible and as andwhen available in law.3. In case if claim for refund of court fees is made, the same beadjudicated in accordance with law.NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE, JAJAY DIGPAUL, JMARCH 9, 2026/ar/yrThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/03/2026 at 10:28:02...
Capital University Sikkim 9767 vs Pharmacy Council of India
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2872/2026 & CM APPL. 13985/2026CAPITAL UNIVERSITY SIKKIM 9767.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Sharawat Sr. Advocate with Mr. Chandrashekhar Singh & Mr. Ayush Aanand AdvocatesversusPHARMACY COUNCIL OF INDIA.....Respondent Through: Mr Ajay Kumar Singh AdvocateCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 09.03.20261. Since the petitioner has not filed any application for 2026-27, thelearned senior counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks to withdraw the present petition.2. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.JASMEET SINGH, JMARCH 9, 2026 / (MS)This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/03/2026 at 13:45:46...
Tamizhaga Vaazhvuirmai Katchi vs Election Commission of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2881/2026 with CM APPL. 14003/2026 TAMIZHAGA VAAZHVUIRMAI KATCHI .....Petitioner Through: Dr. G. Siva Bala Murugan, Mr. Gandhi Kumar and Mr. P. V. Hari Krishnan, AdvocatesversusELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Vashishtha, Mr. Ashish Shukla and Mr. Siddhartha Goswami, AdvocatesCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 09.03.20261. The present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to therespondent/ Election Commission of India (hereinafter ECI) to allot a common free symbol to the petitioners political party as per Paragraph 10B of Election Symbols (Reservation & Allotment) Order, 1968 for the upcoming 2026 legislative assembly election in the State of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry.2. Mr. Sanjay Vashishtha, counsel appearing on behalf of therespondent/ ECI has handed over a communication dated 31st January, 2026, in terms of which certain deficiencies were found in the ap...
Mohd Arif & Anr. vs State of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 1676/2026, CRL.M.A. 6792/2026 MOHD ARIF & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Naved Khan, Advocate with petitioner in person.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the State with Ms. Vanshika Singh and Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, Advocates. SI Arpit Gill, PS-Daryaganj. Mr. Sandeep Bhalla, Advocate for R-2 with R-2 in person.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 09.03.20261. By virtue of the present petition under Section 528 of the BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.328/2025 dated 15.10.2025 registered under Sections 281/125(b) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS) and Sections 3/181 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 at PS.: Darya Ganj, and all proceedings emanating therefrom, in view of the Settlement Agreement dated 17.02.2026 arrived at between the petitioner no.1 and the respondent nos.2. It may be n...
Sunil Katyal vs Tushar Dev & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2925/2026 & CM APPL. 14118/2026 SUNIL KATYAL .....Petitioner Through: Appearance not given.versusTUSHAR DEV & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Saurabh Seth, Ms. Neelam Preet Kaur, Mr. Abhiroop Rathore, Mr. Kabir Dev, Mr. Sukhvir Singh, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK CHAUDHARYHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RENU BHATNAGARORDER% 09.03.2026 CM APPL. 14117/2026 (Exemption)1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The application stands disposed of.W.P.(C) 2925/20263. The present writ petition has been filed under Article 226 readwith Article 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 seeking quashing the Impugned Order dated 18.09.2024 (hereinafter referred to as Impugned Order) passed by the Learned Debt Recovery Tribunal-II, New Delhi (hereinafter DRT) in Securitization Application bearing T.S.A. No. 121/2022 titled Tushar Dev. v. Karvy Financial Services Limited.4. The learned counsel fo...
Alfisha Arif & Ors. vs University of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2866/2026ALFISHA ARIF & ORS......Petitioner Through: Mr. Umesh Kumar, Mr. Shantanu Sagar, Mr. Abhishek Kumar Gond, Mr. Boby Deval Kumar, Mohd Atif, Advs.versusUNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS......Respondent Through: Mr. Mohinder JS Rupal, Mr. Hardik Rupal, Ms. Aishwarya Malhotra, Ms. Tripta Sharma Advs for R1 Mr Preet Pal Singh, Ms. Tanupreet Kaur, Ms. Pooja, Ms. Simran, Ms. Medha Sharma, Mr. Gaurav, Advs. for R6CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 09.03.2026CM APPL. 13976/2026Allowed subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of.W.P.(C) 2866/20261. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia seeking the following prayers:- 1. Direct the Respondent No. 1, 2 & 4 to forthwith conduct examination of LB-601 Advocacy Professional Ethics and Accountancy for Lawyers for Petitioner No. 1 in supplementary exams.2. Direct the Respondent No. 1, 2 & 5 to forthwit...
Carlsberg India Private Limited vs Sona Beverages Private Limited
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 210/2026 & I.A. 5781/2026 CARLSBERG INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sandeep Chilana, Adv. (throughVC).versusSONA BEVERAGES PRIVATE LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Deepak, Adv. (through VC).CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGANORDER% 09.03.20261. This petition is filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration &Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of period for concluding the arbitration proceedings.2. Learned counsel for the respondent has no serious objection to theprayer made.3. In view of the above, the time period for conclusion of theproceedings is extended by nine months.4. This petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.AVNEESH JHINGAN, JMARCH 9, 2026JKThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the ...
Ankur Sarkar and Ors. vs Nikhil Kumar, Ias, Chief Secretary (Health)
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 360/2026 ANKUR SARKAR AND ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Hetvi Patel & Mr. Mohammad Tanvir Ali, Advs.versusNIKHIL KUMAR, IAS, CHIEF SECRETARY(HEALTH) .....Respondent Through: NoneCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 09.03.20261. Through the present Petition, the Petitioners have soughtinitiation of contempt proceedings against the Respondent for disobedience of order dated 18.07.2025, passed in W.P.(C)2. The interim order dated 18.07.2025 reads as under:1. Issue notice.2. Notice is accepted by Ms.Aliza Alam, the learned counsel for therespondents.3. Let a counter affidavit be filed within a period of four weeks.Rejoinder thereto be filed within a period of four weeks thereafter.4. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that though thepetitioners are still working with the respondents on a contractual basis, however, they are not being paid any sa...
Division Railway Manager & Ors. vs Rishi Hitkari
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2918/2026 and CM APPLs.14098/2026, 14099/2026, 14100/2026 DIVISION RAILWAY MANAGER & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Gaurav Mishra, Adv.versusRISHI HITKARI .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTAORDER% 09.03.20261. Arguments heard.2. Judgment is reserved.SACHIN DATTA, JMARCH 9, 2026This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/03/2026 at 13:16:48...
Sh Amit Kumar & Ors. vs the State Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 09th March, 2026 + W.P.(CRL) 718/2026 & CRL.M.A. 6798/2026 SH AMIT KUMAR & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Linkon Goswami & Mr. Nitin Goswami, Advs.versusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel Mr. Mohit Anish, Adv. for R-2CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINJ U D G M E N T (oral)1. Petitioners herein seek quashing of FIR No.452/2023 datedSections 498A/406/34 IPC, along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties.2. Petitioner No.1 got married to respondent No.2 on 24.02.2014, as perHindu rites and customs. They were blessed with a baby girl from the abovesaid wedlock.3. However, on account of some compatibility issues, the parties startedliving separately. On account of such matrimonial discord, a complaint was lodged by respondent No.2, which resulted into registration...
- ‹ Prev
- 362
- 363
- 364
- 365
- 366
- 368
- 369
- 370
- 371
- 372
- Next ›
- Last »