Delhi Court March 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ashok Arora vs Registrar of Co-Operative Societies & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2933/2026 & CM APPL. 14141/2026 ASHOK ARORA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Krishan Kumar and Mr. Anubhav Kumar, Advs.versusREGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES & ORS......Respondents Through: Mr Sameer Vashisht, Standing Counsel (Civil) GNCTD with Ms. Vaishali Gupta, Adv.CORAM:JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGHJUSTICE MADHU JAINORDER% 09.03.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present petition has been filed by the Petitioner- Ashok Aroraunder Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, assailing the orderdated 3rd October, 2025 passed by Financial Commissioner, Delhi (hereinafter, impugned order) in Revision Petition No. 100 of 2025. Vide the impugned order, the revision petition filed by the Petitioner has been dismissed.3. A perusal of the said impugned order would show that the FinancialCommissioner has dismissed the revision petition on the ground that the Petitioner was r...
Sanjay Kumar Shah vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 721/2026 SANJAY KUMAR SHAH .....Petitioner Through: Mr.Pujya Kumar Singh, Mr.Rahul Bharti, Mr.Amit Kumar, Advs. with petitioner in person.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr.Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel (Crl.) with Ms.Priyam Agarwal, Mr.Abhinav Kr. Arya, Mr.Aryan Sachdeva, Advs. Insp.Vijay Kumar Yadav, PS- R.K.Puram. Ms.Sarita in personCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLAHONBLE MS.JUSTICE SHAIL JAINORDER% 09.03.20261. The present Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 ofthe Constitution of India read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking issuance of a Writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus, directing the respondents to produce Ms.Sarita, sister of the petitioner.2. The learned Standing Counsel has handed over a Status Reportdated 08.03.2026. The same is taken on record.3. Pursuant to the advance notice of this petition, Ms.Sarita, whois m...
Archana Chopra vs Anuj Guglani and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment delivered on: 09.03.2026 + FAO(OS) 27/2026&CM APPL. 13876/2026 ARCHANA CHOPRA .....Appellant Through: Mr. Gyanendra Kumar, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Soumya Dasgupta, Ms. Sugandh Virmani & Ms. Shambavi Dwivedi, Advs.versusANUJ GUGLANI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjiv Bahl, Mr. Eklavya Bahl & Mr. Apoorva Bahl, Advs./R1CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK CHAUDHARYHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RENU BHATNAGARJUDGMENTCM APPL. 13877/2026(Exemption)1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The application stands disposed of.FAO(OS) 27/20263. The present appeal has been filed under Section 10(1) of theDelhi High Court Act, 1966, assailing the Judgment and Order dated 15.01.2026 passed by the learned Single Judge in I.A. NO. 8202 of 2025 in C.S. (OS) No. 3398 of 2015, whereby, the application filed by the appellant under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as, CPC),...
Sh. Khushvir Singh vs the State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 881/2026 & CRL.M.A. 6782/2026 SH. KHUSHVIR SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Manish Batra, Mr. Pawan Kumar Kashyap, Advocates.versusTHE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP for State.CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 09.03.20261. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant seekspermission to withdraw the present application.2. In view of the above, the present application along with pendingapplication stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach the learned Trial Court on the same grounds as urged in the present application.3. It is clarified that the present matter was not heard on merits.4. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith.DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, JMARCH 09, 2026/vcTDThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the ...
Murlidhar & Anr. vs Delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2862/2026 MURLIDHAR & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Deepika Sachdeva, Adv.versusDELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY .....Respondent Through: Adv Tushar Sannu. Adv Pravin Bansal, Adv Ritik AnmolCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 09.03.2026CM APPL. 13967/2026Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of.W.P.(C) 2862/20261. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of Indiaseeking mutation/conversion of 1/4th share of the petitioners in property bearing No. BM-27 (West), Shalimar Bagh, Delhi-110052 in favour of the petitioners.2. Ms. Sachdeva, learned counsel for the petitioners, states that thepetitioners have filed an application before the respondent for the updation of records in respect of the aforesaid property which is pending since 2022.3. Mr. Bansal, learned counsel for the respondent, states that for thepurpose of processi...
Udai Singh Sisodia vs Arvindar Singh Sahney and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
$~100.* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 361/2026 UDAI SINGH SISODIA .....Petitioner Through: Ms. S. Jaanani, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Deepak Goyal, Adv.versusARVINDAR SINGH SAHNEY AND ORS .....Respondent Through: Ms. Vineeta Meharia, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Amit Meharia, Ms. Tannishtha Singh, Mr. Sambhav, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIAORDER% 09.03.2026CM APPL. 13924/20261. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The application stands disposed of.CONT.CAS(C) 361/2026 & CM APPL. 13925/20261. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.2. The proceedings of this contempt petition have been institutedalleging disobedience of an order dated 28.05.2025 passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court whereby the order under challenge therein was stayed with a further direction that the appellant therein shall calculate the differential of pension that may be payable in terms of the impugne...
Rajesh Kumar Sen vs Govind Mohan and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 370/2026 RAJESH KUMAR SEN .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Saahila Kaur Lamba, Advocate.versusGOVIND MOHAN AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vinay Yadav, CGSC alongwith Mr. Vipul Kumar, Ms. Kamna Behrani, Mr. Ansh Kalra, Advocates for respondents.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTAORDER% 09.03.20261. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging wilfuldisobedience/non-compliance with the directions contained in the orderdated 03.12.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.(C) No. 14296/2025. The operative directions therein are as under: 8. Thus, there is a clear finding of the Medical Board that the petitioner has sustained injuries due to a fall from a height on 19 July 2012 on Government bona fide duty, as a result of which he sustained 87% permanent disability. That finding has been returned consequent to an investigation by a Court of Inquiry. The Medical Board has also clarified that the injury was...
Sartaz & Ors. vs the State Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 1677/2026 SARTAZ & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Tahir Ali, Mr. Mo Arshad, Ms. Sameeha Siddiqui, Advocates along with petitioners in person.versusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Digam Singh Dagar, APP for State Counsel (appearance not given) for R- 2 along with respondent no.2 in person.CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 09.03.2026 CRL.M.A. 6799/2026 (exemption)1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. Application stands disposed of.CRL.M.C. 1677/20263. By way of the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of theFIR bearing No. 317/2022, registered at Police Station Sarai Rohilla, Delhi, for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 323/324/341/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter IPC') and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom, on the basis of settlement arrived at between the parties.4. ...
Sh Nitin Kumar Bhatia vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2891/2026 SH NITIN KUMAR BHATIA .....Petitioner Through:versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sagar Kumar, Standing Counsel for MCD.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 09.03.20261. The present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction that therespondent/MCD should not construct sewer/nala inside the house of the petitioner, i.e., House No. 315, Village Gopalpur, Delhi-110009.2. Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent/MCD, on advancenotice, submits that the property of the petitioner has encroached upon the public street and therefore, MCD is removing the said encroachment inorder to construct the sewer/nala.3. In response to this, counsel appearing on behalf of the petitionersubmits that the petitioners property is selectively being targeted for being demolished on account of encroachment.4. The aforesaid contention is rebutted by counsel appearin...
Union of India and Ors vs Vinod Kumar Asol
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2883/2026 & CM APPL. 14006/2026 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Himanshu Pathak, SPC with Mr. Chetan Sharma, Adv.versusVINOD KUMAR ASOL .....Respondent Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 09.03.20261. The only prayer made in the present writ petition is to issuedirections to the learned Central Administrative Tribunal to dispose of M.A. No. 2896/2024 in O.A. No. 18/2024.2. It is claimed by the Petitioners that an interim order had beenpassed in the subject original application and the application to vacate the same, that is, M.A. No. 2896/2024, has not been decided for a considerable time.3. Keeping in view the aforesaid position, the writ petition isdisposed of while requesting the learned Tribunal to either take up theconcerned application for modification/ vacation of the interim orderor to hear the subject original application ...
- ‹ Prev
- 358
- 359
- 360
- 361
- 362
- 364
- 365
- 366
- 367
- 368
- Next ›
- Last »