Delhi Court March 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
R P Goyal vs Directorate of Enforcement
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
$~60 to 64 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 657/2022, CRL.M.As. 2840/2022, 19865/2022 DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anupam S. Sharma, Mr. Vashisht Rao, Ms. Amisha P Dash, Ms. Riya Sachdev and Mr. Abhiyant Singh, Advocates. versus RAJESH KUMAR AGGARWAL .....Respondent Through: Mr. Pankush Goyal and Mr. Kartikay Kumar, Advocates. 61 CRL.M.C. 1477/2022, CRL.M.A. 6411/2022ASSISTANT DIRECTOR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Special Counsel with Mr. Vivek Gurnani, Mr. Pranjal Tripathi and Mr. Kanishak Maurya, Advocates.versusSHRI MALVINDER MOHAN SINGH .....Respondent Through: Mr. Shiven Verma, Advocate. 62 W.P.(CRL) 96/2022, CRL.M.A. 1054/2022 RP GOYAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ujjwal Jain and Mr. Geetansh Bharti, Advocates (Through VC)versusDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT .....Respondent Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Special Counsel with Mr. Vivek Gurnani, Mr. Pranjal Tripathi and Mr.This is a digitally signed orde...
Ocus Skyscrapers Realty Private Limited & Anr. vs Bp Beer Bash Private ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ARB.P. 206/2026 & I.A. 2543/2026 OCUS SKYSCRAPERS REALTY PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Lokesh Bhola & Ms. Sanjana Manchanda, Advs.versusBP BEER BASH PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. .....Respondents Through:CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN ORDER % 09.03.2026 1. The present petition is filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short the Act) for appointment of an arbitrator. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents on instructions has no objection for referring the matter to arbitration. 3. Accordingly, the petition is allowed by appointing Ms. Laxmi Kant Gaur, District Judge (Retired) (Mobile No.: 8800881765), with the consent of the parties, as the sole arbitrator for adjudication of the disputes which have arisen between the parties. 4. The fees of the learned Arbitrator will be governed by Schedule IV of the Act. Before entering upon reference...
Rp Goyal vs Directorate of Enforcement
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
$~60 to 64 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 657/2022, CRL.M.As. 2840/2022, 19865/2022 DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anupam S. Sharma, Mr. Vashisht Rao, Ms. Amisha P Dash, Ms. Riya Sachdev and Mr. Abhiyant Singh, Advocates. versus RAJESH KUMAR AGGARWAL .....Respondent Through: Mr. Pankush Goyal and Mr. Kartikay Kumar, Advocates. 61 CRL.M.C. 1477/2022, CRL.M.A. 6411/2022ASSISTANT DIRECTOR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Special Counsel with Mr. Vivek Gurnani, Mr. Pranjal Tripathi and Mr. Kanishak Maurya, Advocates.versusSHRI MALVINDER MOHAN SINGH .....Respondent Through: Mr. Shiven Verma, Advocate. 62 + W.P.(CRL) 96/2022, CRL.M.A. 1054/2022 RP GOYAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ujjwal Jain and Mr. Geetansh Bharti, Advocates (Through VC)versusDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT .....Respondent Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Special Counsel with Mr. Vivek Gurnani, Mr. Pranjal Tripathi and Mr.This is a digitally signed or...
Vijay Bhel & Ors. vs Suresh Chand Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of Decision:09th March, 2026 + CM(M) 259/2025 & CM APPL. 7677/2025 VIJAY BHEL & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Yash Tewari, Adv.versusSURESH CHAND GUPTA .....Respondent Through: Ms. Shalini Kapoor, Ms. Divyanshi Saxena and Mr. Udit Bhatiani, Advs. with respondent-in-person.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER (Oral)Rajneesh Kumar Gupta, J.1. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners under Article 227of the Constitution of India, 1950, assailing the impugned order dated 27th November, 2024, passed by the learned Trial Court in RC ARC No. the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for setting aside ex-parte order dated 22nd July, 2024 has been dismissed.3. Heard. Record perused.4. At the outset, learned counsel for the respondent submits that therespondent has no objection if the impugned ex- parte order dated 22nd July, 2024 is set...
Rahul vs the State Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 872/2026, CRL.M.A. 6735/2026RAHUL .....PetitionerThrough: Mr. Ashok Kumar Sabharwal, Mr. Rajinder Singh, Mr. Satish Kumar and Mr. Shobhit S., Advocates.versusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shoaib Haider, APP for the State. SI Madan Lal, P.S.: Anand Prabat.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 09.03.2026 By way of the present petition filed under section 428 read with section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR No.538/2025 dated 22.09.2025 registered under sections 118(1)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 at P.S.: Anand Parbat, Central District, Delhi. Mr. Shoaib Haider, learned APP for the State submits, on instructions of the Investigating Officer, that chargesheet has been drawn-up and the petitioner has been placed in Column No.12. Mr. Shoaib Haider, learned APP submits that in view thereof, the ...
Shri Arun Gupta & Anr. vs the Commissioner MCD & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHICM APPL. 16623/2026IN+ W.P.(C) 2499/2024 SHRI ARUN GUPTA & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. K.K. Verma & Mr. Anuj Kapoor, Advocates.versusTHE COMMISSIONER MCD & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Pulak Gupta Joshi, Advocate forMCD.Ms. Avni Singh, Panel Counsel for GNCTD with Mr. Vaibhav Sharma, Advocate.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 18.03.2026 CM APPL. 16623/2026 (seeking modification)1. The present application has been filed by the petitioners seekingmodification of the order passed by this Court on 9th March, 2026.2. The petition was disposed of vide order dated 9th March, 2026, whilerecording that grievances as articulated in prayer clauses a and b had been satisfied.3. Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that prayerclause c in the present writ petition remains undecided and therefore, the writ petition should be re-opened so as to so that a decision in respect o...
Kuldeep vs the State of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 1680/2026, CRL.M.As. 6807-08/2026 KULDEEP .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vishal Kalra & Mr. Rohit Saraswat, Advocates with petitioner in person.versusTHE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP with Ms. Upasna Bakshi, Ms. Divya Bakshi, Advocates and the Investigating Respondent No.2 in person.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 09.03.20261. By virtue of the present petition under Section 528 of the BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), the petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.326/2022 dated 02.04.2022 registered at PS.: Burari under Sections 498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and all proceedings emanating therefrom, in view of the Mediation Settlement dated 27.05.2025 arrived at between the petitioner and the respondent no.2 before the Delhi Mediation Centre, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, which is accompanied by their respective proofs of identit...
Mubin Khan @ Mubin & Ors. vs Governemnt of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 1665/2026 MUBIN KHAN @ MUBIN & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Hamid Ali and Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Advocates along with petitioners in person.versusGOVERNEMNT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Digam Singh Dagar, APP for State with SI Deepak Kumar, PS: Jahangir Puri, Delhi Mr. OM Prakash, Advocate for R-2 along with respondent no. 2.CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 09.03.20261. By way of the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of theFIR bearing No. 1069/2014, registered at Police Station Jahangir Puri, Delhi, for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 498A/406/34/506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter IPC') and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom, on the basis of settlement arrived at between the parties.2. Issue notice. The learned APP accepts notice on behalf of the State.3. All the petitioners and respo...
Wing Commander Vivek Joshi (Retd) vs Government of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2894/2026 with CM APPL. 14029/2026 and CM APPL.WING COMMANDER VIVEK JOSHI (RETD) .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Disha Joshi & Mr. Ramandeep Singh, Advocates.versusGOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Astha Gupta, Advocate for R-1. Mr. Sunil Goel, Standing Counsel for MCD (through video-conferencing) with Ms. Dimple Agarwal, Mr. Himanshu Goel, Advocates for R-2. Mr. Yash Gupta & Ms. Madhu Sudhan Bhayana, Advocates for R-3.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 09.03.20261. The present writ petition has been filed challenging the removal orderdated 16th February, 2026 and a direction not to scrap the vehicle of the petitioner, Honda City 1.5, Red Colour bearing Registration No. HR26BF8934 and Chasis No. MAKGM252HANI07740.2. It is submitted that the petitioner is the owner of the aforesaid vehicle.3. The vehicle of the petitioner is registered with the RTO Gurugra...
Akash Pandey vs State Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 877/2026, CRL.M.A. 6761/2026 AKASH PANDEY .....Applicant Through: Mr. Vineet Jain, Adv. (ThroughVC)VersusSTATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR......Respondents Through: Mr. Raghuinder Verma, APP for the State with Mr. Ashish Mahani, Adv. Insp. Sumit Kumar (SHO), SI- Dharmendra Sharma, PS: Patel NagarCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 09.03.20261. By virtue of the present bail application under Sections 483 and 528of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), the applicant seeks grant of interim bail in FIR No.271/2019 dated 14.08.2019 under Sections 302/307/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) read with Sections 25/54 of the Arms Act, 1959 at PS: Patel Nagar, Delhi.2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicant seeks towithdraw the present bail application. However, he submits that the applicant be given timely treatment as he is suffering from chronic lower back ache....
- ‹ Prev
- 357
- 358
- 359
- 360
- 361
- 363
- 364
- 365
- 366
- 367
- Next ›
- Last »