Delhi Court March 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
G a Advisiory Pvt Ltd vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax Ceantra ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-10-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 1126/2026 CM APPL. 5546/2026 G A ADVISIORY PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Appearance not given.versusPRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CEANTRA DELHI 4 & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Shlok Chandra, Sr. Std. Counsel with Ms. Naincy Jain, Ms. Madhavi Shukla, Jr. SCs and Mr. Udit Dad, Advocate.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMARORDER% 10.03.20261. While accepting the fact that while giving appeal effect, an order hasbeen passed on 16.02.2026 and petitioners all the grievances stand addressed, learned counsel for petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition. Permission granted.2. The present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.3. The pending application stands dismissed. DINESH MEHTA, J VINOD KUMAR, J MARCH 10, 2026/ddThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the Q...
Noorul Shams vs State (Govt of Nct of Delhi ) & Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-10-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 1444/2026 NOORUL SHAMS .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Sana Ansari and Mr. I Ahmed, Advocates alongwith petitioner (in- person)versusSTATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ) & ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Richa Dhawan, APP for the State. Respondent No.3 (in-person)CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 10.03.2026 CRL.M.A. 5784/2026 (exemption) Exemption granted, subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed-of. CRL.M.A. 5785/2026 (condonation of delay in re-filing) By way of the present application filed under section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 (BNSS), the petitioner seeks condonation of about 195 days delay in re-filing the present petition.2. For the reasons stated in the application, which is duly supported by affidavit, the delay is condoned. CRL.M.C. 1444/2026 Page 1 of 33. The application is allowed and disposed-of. CRL.M.C. 1444/20264. By way of the present petition f...
Vasu Polymers India Pvt. Ltd. vs Smt. Geeta Khullar
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-10-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RFA(COMM) 131/2026 & CM APPL. 14548/2026, CM APPL. 14549/2026, CM APPL. 14550/2026 VASU POLYMERS INDIA PVT. LTD. .....APPELLANT Through: Mr. Kislay Komal, AdvocateversusSMT. GEETA KHULLAR .....RESPONDENT Through: NemoCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBREHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAULORDER% 10.03.20261. Learned counsel for the appellant, on instructions, made a motion for withdrawal of the appeal.2. The appeal, accordingly, stands disposed of as withdrawn.3. It shall be open for the appellant to initiate the proceedings for recovery in the light of cause of action narrated in the plaint before appropriate Court at Himachal Pradesh.4. Needless to clarify that we have not gone into the merits of the matter.5. Admissible Court Fee be refunded to the appellant in accordance with law, if so claimed.6. Pending applications also stand disposed of accordingly. NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE, J AJAY DIGPAUL, J MARCH 10, 2026/ay/stThis ...
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-10 vs Amit Sankhwal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-10-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 173/2026 CM APPL. 14235/2026 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-10 .....Appellant Through: Mr. Siddhartha Sinha, SSC and Ms Easha Gurung, JSC.versusAMIT SANKHWAL .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMARORDER% 10.03.2026 CM APPL. 14236/2026 (Delay of 585 days in filing appeal) CM APPL. 14237/2026 (for Exemption) CM APPL. 14238/2026 (for Exemption) CM APPL. 14239/2026 (Delay of 47 days in re-filing appeal)1. These interlocutory applications have been filed seeking exemption from filing certified copies; condonation of delay of 47 days in re-filing and delay of 585 days in filing the appeal.2. Normally, we could have granted indulgence and at least issued notices but before issuing notice on the application seeking condition of 585days delay in the appeal, we have cursorily looked at the impugned orderdated 29.12.2023 passed by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (herein...
Dr. P.S. Sarangi & Ors vs Govt. of Nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-10-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 10.02.2026Judgment pronounced on: 10.03.2026Judgment uploaded on: 10.03.2026+ W.P.(C) 1265/2018 & CM APPL. 9919/2025 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Petitioners Through: Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, SC GNCTD-Services, Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh, Ms. Aliza Alam and Mr. Mohnish Sehrawat, Advs.versusDR. YOGINDER GUPTA AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Mr. Anshuman Mehrotra, Mr. Arjun Panwar, Mr. Amrit Koul, Ms. Muskaan Dutta and Mr. Prahil Sharma, Advs. for R-1. Mr. Vardhman Kaushik, Adv. for R-2. Mr. Ujjal Banerjee, Mr. Rohan J. Alva, Mr. Anmol Sehgal, Mr. Anant Sanghi, Advs. for R-3 to 23. Mr. S.B. Upadhyay, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Kumud Lata Das, Mr. Nishant Kumar, Mr. Harshajay Singh, Mr. Siddhant Narayan and Ms. Pooja Rathore, Advs. for impleaded Respondents Dr. R.N. Das, Dr. Anupma Singh and Dr. Dinesh Chawla. Ms. Meghna De and Ms. L.. Gangmei, Advs. for applicant in CM APPL.9919/2025. + W.P.(C) 5221/2018 D...
Shri Raju @ Mohd Hanif vs Shri Chandresh & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-10-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ MAC.APP. 103/2014 SHRI RAJU @ MOHD HANIF .....Appellant Through: Mr. Mayank Khurana, Adv.versusSHRI CHANDRESH & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Adv. for Insurance Company.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYALORDER% 10.03.20261. This appeal has been filed on behalf of Raju@Mohd. Hanif seeking enhancement of compensation awarded by the MACT vide award dated 02nd March 2013 in Case No.173/2010 and Case No.174/2010.2. This in relation to the accident which occurred on 10th November 2009near Tilak Nagar Flyover, when Wasim and Raju stopped their Mahindra Champion due to a puncture in rear tyre. While replacing the same, they were allegedly hit by an offending vehicle (motorcycle driven rashly and negligently by respondent no.1/Chandresh) causing injuries to both. The petitions were, therefore, consolidated.3. No written statement was filed by respondent no.1.4. The Insurance Company admitted that the vehicle was insu...
State (Govt of Nct of Delhi) vs Om Prakash & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-10-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment Reserved on: 25.02.2026Judgment pronounced on: 10.03.2026+ CRL.A. 742/2016 STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) .....Appellant Through: Mr. Ajay Vikram Singh, APP for StateVersusOM PRAKASH & ANR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Satish Tamta, Sr. Advocate alongwith Ms. Manavi Joshi, Ms. Nisha Narayanan and Ms. Sonika Rathore, AdvocatesCORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE CHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHAJUDGMENTCHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHA, J.1. This appeal under Section 378(1) of the Code ofCriminal Procedure, 1973 (the Cr.P.C.), has been filed by the respondent/ State in Criminal Appeal 80 and 81 of 2014 on the file of Additional Sessions court, Patiala House courts aggrieved by Signature Not Verified CRL.A. 742/2016 Page 1 of 15 the judgment dated 01.11.2014 by which accused no. 1 (A1) and accused no. 2 (A2)/the respondents herein, have been acquitted by reversing the finding of guilt of the accused persons for the offences punishable under Sections 186, 353 a...
Saroj Rani & Anr. vs Bank of Baroda
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-10-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RFA(COMM) 725/2025 & CM APPL. 82175/2025, CM APPL. SAROJ RANI & ANR. .....APPELLANT Through: Mr. Sanjay Rathi, Mr. Phillip Massey, Mr. Deepak Kumar Srivastava, Mr. Anurag Sharma and Mr. Shivam Bajpai, AdvocatesversusBANK OF BARODA .....RESPONDENT Through: Mr. Arun Aggarwal, Mr. Lovelesh Kukreja, Mr.Areen Gulati and Ms.Kajal Ashok Mishra, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBREHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAULORDER% 10.03.20261. The settlement agreement arrived at between the parties on 28th January, 2026, duly executed, is placed on record.2. A joint request is made that the settlement agreement dated 28th January, 2026 is to be acted upon.3. The counsel for the respondent states that, in any case, within a periodof four weeks from today, a no objection qua the no dues in favour of the appellant shall be issued. He would further state the execution proceedings of the same shall also be requested to be dispo...
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd vs Shashi Nathani Deoli ( Kavita) & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-10-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on : 19th January 2026 Pronounced on: 10th March 2026 Uploaded on : 11th March 2026 + MAC.APP. 983/2013 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD .....Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, AdvocateversusSHASHI NATHANI DEOLI ( KAVITA) & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. S.D. Singh, Mr. Kamla Prasad, Mrs. Meenu Singh, Mr. Siddharth Singh, Mr. Mana Saini, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYALJUDGMENTANISH DAYAL, J1. This appeal has been filed by the Insurance Company assailing theimpugned award dated 27th August 2013 passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal [MACT], Karkardooma Courts, Delhi (hereinafter, Tribunal) in M.A.C. Petition No.85-A/2013 awarding Rs. 19,82,200/- with interest at 7.5% from the date of filing of petition.2. Appellant/Insurance Company has challenged the impugned award on the calculation of loss of dependency, considering that By:MANISH KUMAR MAC.APP. 983/2013 Page 1 of 18respondent no.1/wife of deceased sho...
Parveen Kumar vs Export Inspection Council & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-10-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 4788/2017 PARVEEN KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Petitioner (in-Person).versusEXPORT INSPECTION COUNCIL & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. L.R. Khatana, Advocate for R-1 to 4. Mr. Nirvikar Verma, SPC with Mr. Varun Kumar, Advocate for UOI.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULAORDER% 10.03.20261. This writ petition arises out of a service dispute which, beneath thevolume of accusation and counter-accusation, turns on a much narrower question: whether the Petitioners dismissal from service for failing to join at Tuticorin after a temporary posting order dated 11th April, 2014 can be sustained in law, having regard to the sequence of leave requests, the charge memorandum dated 5th June, 2014, the departmental inquiry that followed,and the appellate order affirming the penalty. The challenge is to the orderdated 5th April, 2016 by which the Petitioner was dismissed from service and the order dated 21st February, 2017 by...
- ‹ Prev
- 354
- 355
- 356
- 357
- 358
- 360
- 361
- 362
- 363
- 364
- Next ›
- Last »