Delhi Court March 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Union of India and Ors vs Bhagwan Singh Chahar and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-10-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2970/2026, CM APPL. 14343/2026 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Tanveer Ahmed Ansari, Senior Panel Counsel.versusBHAGWAN SINGH CHAHAR AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Appearance not given.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 10.03.20261. The learned Central Administrative Tribunal, by way of theImpugned Order dated 30.01.2025, has relied upon the judgmentrendered by this Court in W.P.(C) 6973/2024 captioned Union of India & Ors. v. Rakesh Pal Singh & Ors. and has directed the Petitioners to extend to the Respondents the same benefits as have already been granted to similarly placed employees while considering their claims under the ACP and MACP Schemes.2. Para 5.6 of the Impugned Order reads as under:It is noticeable that vide record of proceeding dated 15.04.2024, the Honble High Court in WP (C) No. 6973/2024 (Rakesh Pal Singh) (supra), the learned co...
Dr Birinder Pal Singh Bajwa vs National Medical Commission of India & ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-10-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 19569/2025 DR BIRINDER PAL SINGH BAJWA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kunal Kher, Adv.versusNATIONAL MEDICAL COMMISSION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. T. Singhdev (Adv), Mr. Abhijit Chakravarty (Adv) for R-1.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 10.03.2026 CM APPL. 14282/2026 (for withdrawal of the petition) For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and disposed of. W.P.(C) 19569/2025 In terms of the prayer made in the aforesaid application, the petition stands disposed of. The earlier date fixed i.e. 04.05.2026 stands cancelled. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J MARCH 10, 2026/P This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/03/2026 at 13:50:32...
Ex-Surgeon Commander Bhaskar Roy vs Shri Devender Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-10-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on: 13th January, 2026 Pronounced on: 10th March, 2026 + RFA 1163/2025, CM APPL. 80707/2025 EX-SURGEON COMMANDER BHASKAR ROY S/o Late Col. Nirmal Chandra Roy, Kolkata-700045 (West Bengal). ...... Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjeev Gupta and Mr. Mrinal Kishor, Advocates.versusSHRI DEVENDER SINGH Advocate, Supreme Court New Lawyers Chambers No.430, Supreme Court of India, New Delhi. ...... Respondent Through: Appearance not given.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAJ U D G M E N TNEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.CM APPL. 80707/2025 (For condonation of delay of 30 days):1. This is an application filed by the Appellant seeking condonation of delay of 30 days in re-filing the Appeal.2. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay of 30 days in re- filing the appeal is condoned.3. The application stands disposed of. RFA 1163/2025:4. Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908(hereina...
Anju & Ors vs Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-10-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ FAO 203/2018 ANJU & ORS .....Appellants Through: Mr. Rohit Nagar, AdvocateversusUNION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Ms. Nidhi Banga, Senior Panel Counsel (through VC)CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIORDER% 10.03.20261. The present appeal has been filed under Section 23 of the RailwayClaims Tribunal Act, 1987 assailing the impugned judgment dated 02.02.2018 passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal, Principal Bench, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal) in OA (IIU) No. 40/2017 titled Anju & Ors. v. Union of India, whereby the claim application filed by the appellants came to be dismissed.2. Briefly stated, the claim application came to be filed in the context ofthe death of one Govind. It was claimed that the deceased had undertaken a journey on 11.03.2016 from Ghaziabad to Nangloi after purchasing a valid journey ticket and fell near Sahibabad due to a sudden jerk in the train. He was taken to the hospit...
Ajay Kumar Tripathi @ Akshay vs State Gnct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-10-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 4327/2025 AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI @ AKSHAY .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Chetan Bhardwaj and Ms. Priyal Bhardwaj, Advocates.versusSTATE GNCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Alok Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Yasir Rauf Ansari, ASC for the State. SI Akash Kumar, P.S.: Bhajan Pura.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 10.03.2026 CRL.M.A. 7043/2026 By way of the present application filed under section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 (BNSS), the petitioner seeks advancement of the date of hearing in the matter, which is otherwise posted on 01.04.2026.2. For the reasons stated in the application, which is duly supported by affidavit, the application is allowed.3. The matter is taken-up for hearing today.4. The application stands disposed-of. W.P.(CRL) 4327/2025 Page 1 of 4 W.P.(CRL) 4327/20255. By way of the present petition filed under Article 226 of theConstitution of India read with section 5...
Amit Sehrawat Alias Sunny Alias Bidi vs the Statenct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-10-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 4258/2025 AMIT SEHRAWAT ALIAS SUNNY ALIAS BIDI .....Petitioner Through: Dr. Sarita Kumari, Advocate.versusTHE STATENCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Rupali Bandhopadhya, ASC for the State.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 10.03.2026 Dr. Sarita Kumari, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition. The present petition is accordingly disposed-of as withdrawn. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed-of. ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J MARCH 10, 2026 ss This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/03/2026 at 13:55:44...
Sanjay Mandal (in Jc) vs State Govt of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-10-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 5041/2025 SANJAY MANDAL (IN JC) .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravi Ranjan Mishra and Ms. Nidhi Mishra, AdvocatesversusSTATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar Gautam, APP for State with SI Rishi Kumar, PS Crime BranchCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINORDER% 10.03.20261. Applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 120/2024, registered at Police Station Crime Branch for offences under Section 21/61/85 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act).2. Learned counsel for applicant submits there is no conscious recovery and the applicant has been implicated merely on the basis of bald statement made by co-accused which has no evidentiary value.3. As per specific case of prosecution, on the basis of one secretinformation, one Saurabh @ Gaurav was apprehended on 14.06.2024 and from his search 160 grams of smack (heroin) was recovered. When he was interrogated, he revealed that...
Sh Ankur Garg vs Delhi Technological University Through Its Vice Chanc ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-10-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIReserved on: 7th January, 2026. Pronounced on: 10th March, 2026. Uploaded on: 13th March, 2026. + W.P.(C) 19665/2025, CM APPL. 82079/2025 SH ANKUR GARG .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Puneet Rathi and Mr. Md. Shahrukh Qureshi, Advocates.versusDELHI TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY THROUGH ITS VICE CHANCELLOR .....Respondent Through: Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, SC for GNCTD with Mr. N.K. Singh, Ms. Aliza Alam and Mr. Mohnish Sehrawat, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULAJUDGMENTSANJEEV NARULA, J.:1. The present writ petition raises a claim for regularisation by acontractual employee engaged by Delhi Technological University (University) as Junior Office Assistant, and a connected challenge to the decision of the University to proceed with regular recruitment to the post presently occupied by him on contract. The petition, in essence, seeks to convert a long-standing contractual engagement into a right to absorption, and to halt a recruitment...
South Delhi Municipal Corporation vs Union of India and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-10-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 6388/2016 & CM APPL. 31024/2021 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION .....Petitioner Through:versusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Standing Counsel with Mr. Yash Narain, Advocate for R-2.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKARHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLAORDER (ORAL)% 10.03.2026C. HARI SHANKAR, J.1. There is no appearance on behalf of the petitioner today despite the matter having been called out twice. There was no appearance yesterday either despite the matter having been called out twice.2. We had specifically noted in the order passed yesterday that if there will be no appearance on behalf of the petitioner today, we would dismiss the writ petition for default and non-prosecution.3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed in default and fornon-prosecution. C. HARI SHANKAR, J OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J Signature Not Verified MARCH 10, 2026/pa Signed By:GUNN W.P.(C) 6388/2016...
Rajender Verma vs Ashok Malik
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-10-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RFA 216/2010 RAJENDER VERMA .....Appellant Through: None.versusASHOK MALIK .....Respondent Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMAORDER% 10.03.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present appeal under Section 96 of the CPC seeks the following prayers:-It is, therefore, prayed that the Honble court may be pleased to set aside the impugned order dated 18.09.2009, passed by the court of Sh. Kamlesh Kumar, AD & SJ (Central)-17, Delhi. and be further pleased to direct the revival and trial of suit No. 522 of 2008 on merits, in the interest of justice. Any other or further order which this Honble court may deem fit; and proper may also kindly be passed in favour of the appellant.3. None appears on behalf of the appellant today.4. There was no appearance on behalf of the appellant on the previous dates of hearings on 29.11.2024, 04.12.2024, 11.12.2024, 17.12.2024, 10.02.2025, 16.04.2025 and 29.10.2025 as...
- ‹ Prev
- 352
- 353
- 354
- 355
- 356
- 358
- 359
- 360
- 361
- 362
- Next ›
- Last »