Delhi Court March 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bansur Mahavidhyalaya & Anr. vs National Council for Teacher Education ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-10-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 19683/2025 BANSUR MAHAVIDHYALAYA & ANR. ....Petitioners Through:versusNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anuj Kapoor and Shivom Sethi, Advs. Mr. Mohinder JS Rupal, Mr. Hardik Rupal, Mr. Aishwarya Malhotra, Ms. Tripta Sharma, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 10.03.2026 CM APPL. 14456/20261. This is an application under section 151 of the CPC, 1908 seeking liberty to withdraw the main writ petition.2. The learned counsel for the petitioners seek to withdraw the petitionin terms of the Order dated 20.02.2026 passed in W.P(C) 875/2026 titled Chaudhary Teachers Training College v. National Council for Teacher Education and Anr,. with liberty to file afresh.3. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. JASMEET SINGH, J MARCH 10, 2026/ASThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Orde...
Bentley Systems Inc & Anr. vs Mr Vikas Murlidhar Bhalerao
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-10-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(COMM) 1166/2024 & I.A. 49149/2024 BENTLEY SYSTEMS INC & ANR. .....Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Swastik Bisarya, Advocate.versusMR VIKAS MURLIDHAR BHALERAO .....Defendant Through: Mr. Manish Kumar and Mr. Vikas Murlidhar, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGHORDER% 10.03.20261. This suit is instituted on behalf of the Plaintiffs seeking a decree ofpermanent injunction restraining the Defendant and all others acting on its behalf from copying, reproducing, storing, installing and/or using pirated/unlicensed software program(s) of Plaintiff No. 1 including but not limited to Openflows WaterGems and its various versions or any other software program(s) developed by the Plaintiffs, amounting to copyright infringement, amongst other reliefs.2. During the pendency of the suit parties were referred to the DelhiHigh Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre, where they have amicably resolved their inter se disputes and a Sett...
Jullundur Engineering Company vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-10-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ARB.P. 17/2026, I.A. 33/2026 & I.A. 34/2026 JULLUNDUR ENGINEERING COMPANY .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankit Singh & Mr. Karan Negi, Advs.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Farman Ali, CGSC with Mr. Rahul Bhaskar & Ms. Usha Jamnal, Advs. & Ms. Rupali Sinha, GP for R- 1&2. Ms. Shweta Bharti, Ms. Tejaswini Chandrasekhar, Ms. Vanshika Gupta & Mr. Nayan Mittal, Advs. for R-3.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGANORDER% 10.03.20261. The present petition is filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short the Act) for appointment of an arbitrator.2. Learned counsel for respondent no.3 submits that it is not a necessaryparty. 2.1 In view of the decision of the Supreme Court in ASF Buildtech (P) Ltd. v. Shapoorji Pallonji & Co. (P) Ltd. (2025) 9 SCC 76, this matter need not be gone into at this stage.3. Learned counsel for the respondent nos.1 and 2 o...
Municipal Corporation of Delhi Trough Its Commissioner vs Bhupender Pa ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-10-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ LPA 724/2025, CM APPL. 75349/2025 & CM APPL. 75350/2025 MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI TROUGH ITS COMMISSIONER .....Appellant Through: Mr.Anand Prakash, SC for MCD with Ms.Varsha Arya and Mr.Darsh Bansal, Advs.versusBHUPENDER PAL AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr.Jawahar Raja, Mr.Ishaan Goel, and Mr.Nitai Hinduja, Advs.CORAM:HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIAORDER% 10.03.2026 CM APPL. 75351/2025 (Delay)1. The present application has been filed on behalf of the appellant-MCD seeking condonation of delay of 301 days in filing the instant appeal.2. Having heard the learned counsel for the appellant-MCD and perused the averments made in the present application, the same stands allowed and the delay of 301 days in filing the instant appeal is hereby condoned.3. The application stands disposed of. LPA 724/2025, CM APPL. 75349/2025 & CM APPL. 75350/20254. Heard learned counsel for the parties.5. Th...
Vinkal Prashar vs State (Nct of Delhi) and Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-10-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 4054/2025 VINKAL PRASHAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Chiraag Salhotra and Ms. Sapna Seth, Advocates. Petitioner in person via video- conferencing.versusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel for the State. SI Divya Mann, P.S.: CWC Nanakpura. Mr. Ashish C., Advocate for R-2. Respondent No. 2 in person via video-conferencing.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 10.03.2026 By way of the present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the petitioner, who is the former husband of the complainant/respondent No.2, seeks quashing of case FIR No.91/2024 dated 29.11.2024 registered under sections 498-A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) at P.S.: Crime (Women) Cell Nanak Pura, Special Police Unit for Women & Children, Delhi on consent.2. The petitioner and respondent...
Sanjay Kumar vs Govt. of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-10-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 17957/2024 & CM APPL. 76384/2024 SANJAY KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Dr. L. S. Chaudhary, Mr. Anurag Singh Tomar, Mr. Ajay Chaudhary and Mr. Bharat Chaudhary, Advs.versusGOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Dhruv Rohtagi, Adv. for RCS. Mr. Sagar Khanna, SO (Office of RCS) (M: 9654209558) Mr. Nitin Mittal, Adv. for R4.CORAM:JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE MADHU JAINORDER% 10.03.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present petition has been filed by the Petitioner under Articles 226and 227 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, assailing the impugned orderdated 9th December, 2024 passed by the Delhi Co-operative Tribunal (hereinafter, DCT) in Appeal No. 099/2024/DCT titled Sanjay Kumar v. RCS and Ors.3. Vide the impugned order, the DCT has rejected the prayer for interim relief filed by the Petitioner for staying the recovery proceedings against the Petitioner pursuant ...
Kislay Thakur vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-10-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision : 10.03.2026 + W.P.(C) 18276/2025 KISLAY THAKUR .....Petitioner Through: Md. Azam Ansari and Mr. Afjal Ansari, Advs.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. N. Balraj, SPC, Mr. Deepansh Sharma, GP, Ms. Meghna Rao, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORAV. KAMESWAR RAO, J. (ORAL) CM APPL. 14519/2026 (early hearing)1. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed.2. The application is disposed of. The writ petition is taken up for hearing. W.P.(C) 18276/2025, CM APPL. 14518/20263. This petition has been filed with the following prayers:-(A) Issue a writ of certiorari by quashing and setting aside the respondents order dated 09.10.2025 being Annexure P-1 withdrawing the offer of appointment of the petitioner with urgent directions to the respondents to appoint the petitioner forthwith in service with all consequential benefits ...
Pradeep Kumar vs the State Govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-10-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 4736/2025 PRADEEP KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ujjwal Jha with Mr. Amit Sharma and Mr. Rohan Gupta, Advocates.versusTHE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR......Respondents Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar Gautam, APP for the State with SI Sumit, PS Mohan Garden and ASI Pardeep.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINORDER% 10.03.20261. After hearing arguments for some time, learned counsel for theapplicant, without prejudice to his rights and contentions, seeks to withdraw the present application with liberty to file application afresh, while also mentioning all the relevant particulars with respect to previous involvements of the applicant.2. The application is, accordingly, disposed of as not pressed.3. Liberty, as prayed, is granted.4. All rights and contentions are left open. MANOJ JAIN, J MARCH 10, 2026 st/saThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order ...
Shiv Lal vs State( Govt of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-10-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 4910/2025 SHIV LAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. R.R. Jangu and Mr. K.R. Jangu, Advocates.versusSTATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Ms. Priyanka Dalal, APP for the StateCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINORDER% 10.03.20261. After hearing arguments for some time, learned counsel for theapplicant, without prejudice to his rights and contentions, does not press the present application. He, however, seeks direction to prosecution to examine material recovery witnesses, without any further delay. He submits that next date of hearing before the learned Trial Court is 09.04.2026 and the prosecution be directed accordingly.2. Learned Addl. P.P. for the State submits that it will be ensured that the material recovery witnesses are produced before the learned Trial Court for recording of their evidence on the next date of hearing.3. In view of the above, the present application is disposed of, as not pressed.4....
Divya Chaudhary Mother of the Minor Inesh vs Directorate of Education ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-10-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 18939/2025 DIVYA CHAUDHARY MOTHER OF THE MINOR INESH .....Petitioner Through: Appearance not givenversusDIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION ORS & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Mohit Mudgal, Mr. Sandeep Yadav, Advs. for R-3CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 10.03.20261. Since respondent No. 2 has provided the Transfer Certificate, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition.2. Hence, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. JASMEET SINGH, J MARCH 10, 2026/spThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/03/2026 at 16:25:11...
- ‹ Prev
- 351
- 352
- 353
- 354
- 355
- 357
- 358
- 359
- 360
- 361
- Next ›
- Last »