Delhi Court March 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Nec Corporation vs Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-28-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment delivered on: 28.03.2026 + C.A.(COMM.IPD-PAT) 486/2022 NEC CORPORATION .....AppellantversusASSISTANT CONTROLLER OF PATENTS AND DESIGNS ....Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case For the Appellant : Mr. Vineet Rohilla, Mr. Rohit Rangi, Ms. Vaishali Joshi and Ms. Gurneer Chawla, Advocates. For the Respondent : Mr. Rohan Jaitley, CGSC with Mr. Varun Pratap Singh, Mr. Dev Pratap and Mr. Yogya Bhatia, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIAJUDGMENTTEJAS KARIA, J INTRODUCTION1. This is an Appeal filed under Section 117A(2) of the Patents Act,1970 (Act) seeking quashing and setting aside of order dated 21.06.2022 (Impugned Order) passed by the Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs (Respondent / Controller) under Section 15 of the Act refusing the Patent Application No. 201717010986 filed on 28.03.2017 titled as VIDEO CODING DEVICE, VIDEO DECODING DEVICE, VIDEOSignature Not Verified C.A.(COMM.IPD-PAT) 486/2022 P...
Baby Kriva Through Her Mother vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-28-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 14614/2025 BABY KRIVA THROUGH HER MOTHER .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Counsel (appearance not given)versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr.Ripudaman Bhardwaj, CGSC.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 28.03.2026 This matter has been taken up today, as 02.03.2026 was declared holiday.1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that nothing further requires to be adjudicated as the petition has been rendered infructuous.2. Accordingly, the petition stands dismissed as has been rendered infructuous. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J MARCH 28, 2026 aksThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/03/2026 at 17:51:59...
Bombay Metal Works (P) Limited vs Tara Singh Prop. R.S. Industries (Re ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-28-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment delivered on: 28.03.2026 + C.O.(COMM.IPD-CR) 17/2024 BOMBAY METALS (P) LIMITED .....PetitionerversusTARA SINGH PROP. R.S. INDUSTRIES (REGD) AND ANR .....Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case For the Petitioner : Mr. Sachin Gupta, Ms. Prashansa Singh, Ms. Mahima Chanchalani, Mr. Rohit Pradhan, Ms. Diksha Tekriwal & Mr. Ajay, Advocates. For the Respondents : Ms. Nishi Ranjan Singh, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1A and 1B.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIAJUDGMENTTEJAS KARIA, J1. This is a Petition filed under Section 50 of the Copyright Act, 1957 (Act) seeking removal / rectification of Copyright Registration Nos. A- matter was originally filed before the Copyright Board, Delhi and,C.O.(COMM.IPD-CR) 17/2024 Page 1 of 14 thereafter, transferred to Calcutta High Court and, finally, transferred to this Court pursuant to the Order dated 18.07.2024 passed by the Supreme Court in Transfer Petition (C) No. 465/2024. FAC...
Shri Shakir Ali & Anr. vs the Government of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-28-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 12252/2025, CM APPL. 49947/2025 and CM APPL. 70227/2025 SHRI SHAKIR ALI & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: None.versusTHE GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Appearance not given.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 28.03.2026 This matter has been taken up today, as 02.03.2026 was declared holiday.1. None is present on behalf of the petitioners despite the matter being called out in second round.2. The instant petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution along with all pending applications. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J MARCH 28, 2026 NcThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/03/2026 at 17:55:56...
Brij Bihari Giri vs Hari Mohan Meena
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-28-2026
$~1(SDB)* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 1260/2025& CM APPL.75401/2025 BRIJ BIHARI GIRI .....Petitioner Through: None.versusHARI MOHAN MEENA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Vikas Chopra, Standing Counsel for MCD with Mr. Neeraj Kumar & Ms. Khushi, Advs. Ms. Prabhsahay Kaur, Standing Counsel, with Mr. Ajay Kadian, Director LM, Mr. Durganand Minch, DD. Mr. Bhagvan Swaroop Shukla, CGSC with Mr. D. Tripathi, Adv.CORAM:JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORAORDER% 28.03.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. None appears for the Petitioner.3. This contempt petition was filed against one Mr. Hari Mohan Meena who is stated to be committing continued contempt by promoting unauthorised construction in Zone O i.e., Jaitpur Extension 2, Delhi.4. Certain photographs have also been placed on record in this contemptpetition. Let a copy of this contempt petition be served upon Ms. Prabhsahay Kaur, ld. Counsel for the Delhi Deve...
Sonu vs State of Nct Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-28-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 3208/2024 SONU .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Narender Hooda, Senior Advocate with Mr. Siddharth Batra, Mr. Chinmay Dubey, Ms. Shivani Chawla, Mr. Rhythm Katyal and Ms. Archana Yadav, Advocates.versusSTATE OF NCT DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State with SI Rajesh Kumar.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIAORDER% 01.04.2026 CRL.M.A. 9924/2026 (for recalling of order dated 28.03.2026)1. Learned senior counsel for applicant on instructions seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to file fresh anticipatory bail application on same grounds as raised in BAIL APPLN. 3208/2024.2. As requested, the present application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as sought. GIRISH KATHPALIA, J APRIL 1, 2026/ryThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded f...
Sandha Global Information Technology Pvt Ltd vs State of Nct of Delhi ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-28-2026
$~P-1* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIReserved on: 19.02.2026Pronounced on: 28.03.2026Uploaded on: 28.03.2026 + CRL.M.C. 5847/2025 SANDHA GLOBAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Harshal Arora, Advocate.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP for State. Mr. Vivek Nagar, Advocate for R2 to 4.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANJUDGMENT1. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [BNSS] (corresponding to Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [CrPC]), seeking quashing of FIR No. 561/2024 dated 24.12.2024, registered at Police Station Najaf Garh, District Dwarka, New Delhi, under Sections consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the ground that the parties have amicably settled their disputes.2. I have heard Mr. Harshal Arora, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Hitesh Vali, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, and Mr. ...
Satish Kishan Karpe vs Shalu Goyal
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-28-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 1585/2025 & CM APPL. 52168/2025 SATISH KISHAN KARPE .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rishabh Jain, Advocate.versusSHALU GOYAL .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 28.03.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. In view of the Notification bearing No. 64/G-4/Gen1.-I/DHC dated 27th February, 2026, the present matter is taken up today, i.e., 28th March, 2026.3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that thepresent petition has become infructuous, as the dispute between the parties have been settled and the main suit has already been disposed of. Accordingly, it is prayed that the present petition may be disposed of as withdrawn.4. Keeping in view the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J MA...
Sanjay vs Prabhu Dayal & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-28-2026
$~6 and 7* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 1673/2025, CM APPL. 54441/2025, CM APPL. 54442/2025 & CM APPL. 54443/2025 SANJAY .....Petitioner 7. + CM(M) 1674/2025, CM APPL. 54444/2025, CM APPL. 54445/2025 & CM APPL. 54446/2025 SHANKAR KUMAR THAKUR .....PetitionerCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 28.03.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. In view of the Notification bearing No. 64/G-4/Gen1.-I/DHC dated 27th February, 2026, the present matter is taken up today, i.e., 28th March, 2026.3. As no one has appeared on behalf of the parties, let the matter be called again at 02:30 P.M. MARCH 28, 2026/v At 02:45 P.M.4. At this stage, it is already 02:45 P.M., no one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner despite the matter being called twice.5. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed in default. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. MARCH 28, 2026/v/isk...
Deepika @ Deepa vs State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-28-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 28.03.2026 + BAIL APPLN. 3488/2024 DEEPIKA @ DEEPA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shrikant Sharma, AdvocateversusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Raghvinder Varma, APP for State with SI Ashok, PS Rajouri Garden CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL)1. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 293/2024 of Police Station Nangloi for offence under Section 370/371/419/201/120B/34 IPC & Section 81 of Juvenile Justice Act.1.1 This bail application came up for the first hearing on 26.09.2024 before the predecessor bench and thereafter continued getting adjourned before different benches. In the meanwhile, one of the predecessor benches even granted interim bail to the accused/applicant and after availing the same, she surrendered, though belatedly. Along with 179 such old pending bail applications, this application also was transferred to this bench.BAIL APPLN. 3488/2024 Page 1...
- ‹ Prev
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- Next ›
- Last »