Delhi Court March 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jeetu @ Jindal Kumar vs State Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-28-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 1219/2026 & CRL.M.A. 4936/2026 JEETU @ JINDAL KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: None.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Digam Singh Dagar, APP for State.CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 28.03.2026 File taken up today as 02.03.2026 was declared a holiday in view of Notification No. 64/G-4/Genl-I/DHC dated 27.02.2026.1. No one present is present on behalf of the petitioner when the matterwas taken up.2. It seems that the petitioner herein is not interested to pursue thepresent matter any further.3. Accordingly, the present petition along with pending applicationstands dismissed for non-prosecution.4. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith.DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, JMARCH 28, 2026/vc/rThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The ...
Manoj Sharma vs Dharamwati
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-28-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 395/2026, CM APPL. 11448/2026 & CM APPL. 11449/2026 MANOJ SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Umesh Chand Shekhar, Mr. Neeraj Chauhan, Mr. Subhash Pal and Ms. Charu Sharma, Advocates.versusDHARAMWATI .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 28.03.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. In view of the Notification bearing No. 64/G-4/Gen1.-I/DHC dated 27thFebruary, 2026, the present matter is taken up today, i.e., 28th March, 2026.3. After some arguments, learned counsel appearing on behalf of thepetitioner seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the present petition. However, he prays that liberty may be granted to raise all his contentions as made in his application under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 at the stage of final arguments of the suit.4. Keeping in view the submissions made by the learned counsel for th...
Rahul Kumar vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-28-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision : 28.03.2026 + W.P.(C) 2709/2026 RAHUL KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. J Rajesh, Mr. Md Arsalan Ahmed, Mr. Yashwardhan Aggarwal and Mr. Ali Abbas Masoodi, Advs.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sayed Hussain Adil Taqvi, SPC, Mr Farman Ali CGSC, Ms Usha Jamnal and Ms Priya Rathi, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORAV. KAMESWAR RAO, J. (ORAL)1. The matter is taken up today as the date fixed, i.e. 02.03.2026 wasdeclared a holiday vide notification no. 64/G-4/Genl.-I/DHC dated 27.02.2026.2. This petition has been filed with the following prayers:-A. Issue a Writ of Certiorari for quashing of the letter dated 11.01.2025 whereby the Respondents have rejected the representation of the Petitioner for joining the subsequent batch of training; and Passed by the Deputy Inspector General, CISF RTC Deoli Rejecting The Petitioner...
Boxing Federation of India vs Indian Olympic Association & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-28-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2600/2025 and CM APPL. 12384/2025 BOXING FEDERATION OF INDIA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Parth Goswami and Mr. Ranjeet Pawar, Advocates.versusINDIAN OLYMPIC ASSOCIATION & ANR. .....RespondentsThrough: Mr. Ujjwal Chaudhary and Mr. Vikash Singh Advocates for R-1. Mr.Ruchir Mishrra, Mr.Sanjiv Kr Saxena, Mr.Mukesh Kr Tiwari, Ms. Reba Jena Mishra and Ms. Poonam Shukla, Advocates.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 28.03.2026 This matter has been taken up today, as 02.03.2026 was declared holiday.1. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty to withdraw thepetition.2. Liberty, as prayed, is granted. The petition, along with pendingapplication, stands dismissed as withdrawn.PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, JMARCH 28, 2026aksThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown abo...
Deepika Verma & Anr. vs Pramod Pathak
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-28-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 2013/2024, CM APPL. 13022/2024 & CM APPL. 13023/2024 DEEPIKA VERMA &ANR. .....Petitioners Through: None.versusPRAMOD PATHAK .....Respondent Through: Mr. Mohit Madan, Advocate (throughVC).CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 28.03.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. In view of the Notification bearing No. 64/G-4/Gen1.-I/DHC dated 27thFebruary, 2026, the present matter is taken up today, i.e., 28th March, 2026.3. No one has appeared on behalf of the petitioners.4. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the present petition hasbecome infructuous as the main suit has already been disposed of videjudgment dated 29th January, 2026.5. Let the matter be called again at 02:30 P.M.At 02:45 P.M.6. At this stage, it is already 02:45 P.M., no one has appeared on behalf ofthe petitioner despite the matter being called twice.7. Accor...
Mr Jitin Kamal Kanuga vs Foreigners Regional Registration Officer
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-28-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3837/2023 and CM APPL. 14905/2023 MR JITIN KAMAL KANUGA .....Petitioner Through: None.versusFOREIGNERS REGIONALREGISTRATION OFFICER .....RespondentThrough: Ms. Nidhi Raman, CGSC with Mr Akash Mishra and Mr. Arnav Mittal, Advocates.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 28.03.2026 This matter has been taken up today, as 02.03.2026 was declared holiday.1. None appears for the petitioner. None had appeared for the petitioneron 30.10.2025 as well.2. Accordingly, the petition, along with pending application, standsdismissed for want of prosecution.PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, JMARCH 28, 2026aksThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/03/2026 at 17:52:55...
Vishal Sharma vs State of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-28-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 2253/2026 & CRL. M.A. 9212/2026 VISHAL SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Jujhar Singh, Advocate with Petitioner in person.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, APP with Ms. Sangeeta, Adv. SI Harsh, P.S. Paharganj. Mr. Shreyas Malik and Mr. Dhruv Kumar, Advocates with R2 in person.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 28.03.20261. By way of the present petition under Section 528 of the BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [BNSS] (corresponding to Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [CrPC]), the petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No. 276/2020 dated 29.10.2020, registered at Police Station Pahar Ganj, District Central, New Delhi, under Sections 506/509 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [IPC], and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom.2. Issue notice. Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, learned AdditionalPublic Prosecutor, accepts notic...
Shahdab Alias Pulsar vs State of Nct Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-28-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 1217/2026 SHAHDAB ALIAS PULSAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vikas Singh with Ms. Nisha Dhaka and Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocates.versusSTATE OF NCT DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Shubhi Gupta, APP for the State with SI Ajay Chouhan, P.S.; Kalindi Kunj.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 28.03.2026 By way of the present petition filed under section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the petitioner seeks interim bail in case FIR No.474/2020 dated 04.11.2020 registered under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) at P.S.: Kalandi Kunj, South East Delhi, to attend the wedding ceremonies of his sister, which ceremonies are stated to have been scheduled between 17.03.2026 and 30.03.2026.2. Notice on this petition was issued yesterday i.e., 27.03.2026.3. Ms. Shubhi Gupta, learned APP for the State has handed-up a copy ofStatus Report under cover of Index dated 28.03.2026....
Dinesh Kumar vs Rajesh Dabas & Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-28-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ FAO 309/2018&CM APPL. 25924/2018 DINESH KUMAR .....Appellant Through: NoneversusRAJESH DABAS & ANR .....Respondent Through: NoneCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIORDER% 28.03.20261. In view of 02.03.2026 having been declared as a holiday, videnotification dated 27.02.2026, the matters listed on 02.03.2026 were directed to be taken up on 28.03.2026.2. None appears for the parties.3. There is no appearance on behalf of the appellant even on the previousdates of hearing.In view thereof, the present appeal is dismissed in default fornon-prosecution.MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, JMARCH 28, 2026snThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/04/2026 at 15:05:25...
Himani Walia vs the Government of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-28-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 4608/2024 and CM APPL. 18867/2024 HIMANI WALIA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Manoj Sharma and Mr. Piyush Kaushik, Advocates.versusTHE GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Dhruv Rohatgi, Panel Counsel for GNCTD with Ms. Chandrika Sachdeva and Mr. Dhruv Kumar, Advocates.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 28.03.2026 This matter has been taken up today, as 02.03.2026 was declared holiday.1. The instant petition is for the following reliefs:(a) issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondents to de-seal the portion/room located on the First Floor, lying sealed in the property of the Petitioner bearing no. M-24, Greater Kailash-I (M-Block Market), New Delhi-11 0 048; and(b) issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction in thenature of mandamus directing the Respondents to make an inventory of t...
- ‹ Prev
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- Next ›
- Last »