Delhi Court March 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Deep Narayan Saraswat vs State of Nct of Delhi and Another & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 751/2026 & CRL.M.A. 7179/2026 DEEP NARAYAN SARASWAT .....Petitioner Through: Sh.Deepak Maharaj, Ms. Premlata, Sh.Nikhil Maharaj, Sh.Sunil Mehra, Advs. Petitioner in person.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr.Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel (Crl.) with Ms.Priyam Agarwal, Mr.Abhinav Kr. Arya, Mr.Aryan Sachdeva, Advs. Insp.Satvinder, ASI Sunil, PS- Mohan Garden. Ms.Akansha Batra, in person.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJAORDER% 30.03.20261. The present Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 ofthe Constitution of India, read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking issuance of a Writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus, directing the respondents to produce before this Court the wife of the petitioner, namely, Ms. Akansha Batra.2. Ms. Akansha Batra has appeared before us in person. Shesubmits that t...
Ajit Kumar Singh Through Smt. Poonam Singh Wife and Pairokar vs Union ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision : 30.03.2026 + W.P.(C) 3064/2026 CM APPL. 14864/2026AJIT KUMAR SINGH THROUGH SMT. POONAM SINGHWIFE AND PAIROKAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Arjun Pawar and Mr. Prahil Sharma, AdvocatesversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Swati R.K., CGSC with Ms. Dumni Soren, GP, and Mr. Mohnish Balu, Advocate alongwith Mr. Amit Kumar Singh, DC (Law)CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORAV. KAMESWAR RAO, J. (ORAL)1. This petition has been filed with the following prayers:-i. Issue a Writ of Certiorari for quashing of Orderdated May, 2025 whereby Internal Complaint Committee was re-constituted; the Findings and Opinion of the ICC dated 26.05.2025; Remarks of the IG, Ftr HQ BSF, Punjab vide letter dated 26.05.2025;order for convening ROE dated 30.07.2025;chargesheet dated 12.01.2026 issued against the Petitione1'l order dated 12.01.2026 for conve...
Jai Singh and Others vs the State Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
$~50 & 51* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 1750/2026, CRL.M.A. 7145/2026 JAI SINGH AND OTHERS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Pradeep Chaudhary, AdvversusTHE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondent Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP with Mr. Abhimanyu Arya, Adv. Mr. Mohit Bansal, Mr. Neeraj Khatana, Advs. SI Harsh Vardhan+ CRL.M.C. 1787/2026, CRL.M.A. 7345/2026 BHIM SEN AND OTHERS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mohit Bansal, Mr. Neeraj Khatana, Advs.versusTHE STATE AND ANOTHER .....Respondent Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP with Mr. Abhimanyu Arya, Adv. Mr. Pradeep Chaudhary, Adv SI Rohtash Kr. DCC ASI Vikram SinghCORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 30.03.20261. The present petitions are filed under Section 528 of the BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [BNSS] (corresponding to Section 482CRL.M.C. 1750/2026 & CRL.M.C. 1787/2026 Page 1 of 7 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [CrPC]) seeking quashing of two cross-FIRs, being F...
Miss Srishti Choudhary Through Legal Guardian & Ors. vs Government of ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3336/2022 & CM APPL. 9726/2022, CM APPL. 48888/2024MISS SRISHTI CHOUDHARY THROUGH LEGAL GUARDIAN& ORS. ....Petitioners Through: Mr. Anshuman Chowdhury, Mr. Shivam Chaudhary, Mr. Harsh Khabar, Advs.versusGOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Dhruv Rohatgi, Ms. Chandrika Sachdev, Advs. for GNCTD Dr. Meenakshi Kalra, Mr. Kamal, Mr. Mayank Dhiyania, Ms. Sakshi Gupta, Ms. Anjali Choudhary, Ms. Vrinda Taneja, Advs. for R2CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 30.03.20261. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner and learnedcounsel for the respondents are agreeable that the Deputy Director of the concerned Zone of Directorate of Education shall call the representative of the petitioner and the representative of the respondent No. 3 school with their record and after hearing the parties shall form an opinion regarding the following: i. Whether the increase in Tuition F...
Rohit Kumar vs the State Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 756/2026 ROHIT KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Yashvi Garg, Ms. Alka Pruthi, Mr. Ashu Kumar, Mr. Rishabh Gupta, Mr. Shivam, Mr. Manmohan Jha, Mr. Kawalpreet Singh, Mr. Dinesh Kumar Madesiya, Mr. Jai Subhash Thakur, Advs.versusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr.Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel (Crl.) with Ms.Priyam Agarwal, Mr.Abhinav Kr. Arya, Mr.Aryan Sachdeva, Advs. SI Ram Singh, SI Lal Chand, PS-SB Diary. Ms.Priyanka, in person.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJAORDER% 30.03.20261. The present Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 ofthe Constitution of India read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking issuance of a Writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus, directing the respondent to produce the sister of the petitioner, namely, Ms. Priyanka before this Court.2. Ms. Priyanka has appeared in person before this...
Bhim Sen and Others vs the State and Another
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
$~50 & 51* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 1750/2026, CRL.M.A. 7145/2026 JAI SINGH AND OTHERS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Pradeep Chaudhary, AdvversusTHE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondent Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP with Mr. Abhimanyu Arya, Adv. Mr. Mohit Bansal, Mr. Neeraj Khatana, Advs. SI Harsh Vardhan+ CRL.M.C. 1787/2026, CRL.M.A. 7345/2026 BHIM SEN AND OTHERS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mohit Bansal, Mr. Neeraj Khatana, Advs.versusTHE STATE AND ANOTHER .....Respondent Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP with Mr. Abhimanyu Arya, Adv. Mr. Pradeep Chaudhary, Adv SI Rohtash Kr. DCC ASI Vikram SinghCORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 30.03.20261. The present petitions are filed under Section 528 of the BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [BNSS] (corresponding to Section 482CRL.M.C. 1750/2026 & CRL.M.C. 1787/2026 Page 1 of 7 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [CrPC]) seeking quashing of two cross-FIRs, being F...
M/S. Serveshwar Food Products Pvt. Ltd vs Mr. Sachin Gupta Trading as ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(COMM) 200/2024, I.As. 5360/2024, 3602/2025 M/S. SERVESHWAR FOOD PRODUCTS PVT. LTD.....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Amit Jain, Mr. Raghav Bhalla, Ms. Ishita Suri and Mr. Sambhav Raina, Advocates.versusMR. SACHIN GUPTA TRADING AS M/S JAI BALAJI GRAH UDHYOG & ANR. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Animesh Rastogi, Mrs. Neha Rastogi and Mr. Shashank Pandey, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGHORDER% 30.03.20261. This suit is instituted on behalf of the Plaintiff for a decree ofpermanent injunction restraining the Defendants and all others acting on their behalf from manufacturing, exporting, selling, offering for sale, exhibiting, advertising, directly or indirectly dealing with goods being Namkeen, Snacks and other cognate and allied goods under thetrademark/label , which is deceptively similar to Plaintiffs trademark LACY and/or any other mark, which is identical/deceptively similar thereto, amongst other reliefs.2. ...
Mukesh Gandhi vs Deepak Sachdeva
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.REV.P. 149/2026 MUKESH GANDHI .....Petitioner Through: Counsel (appearance not given)versusDEEPAK SACHDEVA .....Respondent Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 30.03.2026 CRL.M.A. 7463/2026 (exemption) Exemption granted, subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed-of.CRL.REV.P. 149/2026CRL.M.A. 7464/2026By way of the present petition filed under section 442 read with section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 (BNSS), the revisionist impugns order dated 02.02.2026 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-05, South District, Saket Courts, New Delhi in appeal bearing CA No. 403/2024.2. Vid judgment dated 21.08.2024, the petitioner was convicted for theoffence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (N.I. Act); and vid sentencing order dated 30.08.2024, the petitioner was sentenced to a fine of Rs.30 lacs, with a default imprisonment of 06 months.C...
Biswajit Ghosh vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 392/2026 BISWAJIT GHOSH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mandeep Baisala, Mr. Atal Singh, Mr. Kavesh Bidhuri, Mr. Shobhit Anand, Mr. Sourabh Soni, Advs.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Abhishek Maratha, SPC, Mr. Sanjay Pal, GP and Ms. Nupur Sharma, Adv. SI Atul Sen, CISF, SI Kumar Gaurav, CISF, Inspector Sanjay Kumar, CISF and CT Rahul Singh, CISF.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTAORDER% 30.03.20261. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the presentpetition inasmuch as the necessary appointment has been made.2. The petition is accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.SACHIN DATTA, JMARCH 30, 2026/clThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/04/2026 at 10:17:11...
Surya Food and Agro Limited vs Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax Ci ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
$~43 & 44* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3927/2026, CM APPL. 19208/2026 & CM APPL. 19209/2026 + W.P.(C) 3930/2026, CM APPL. 19216/2026 & CM APPL. 19217/2026 SURYA FOOD AND AGRO LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Manuj Sabharwal, Mr. Drona Negi, Mr. Devvrat Tiwari and Mr. Manish Kumar, Advs.versusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX CIRCLE 22(2),DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Puneet Rai, SSC.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMARORDER% 30.03.20261. By way of present writ petitions, the petitioner has challenged theorder dated 05.03.2026 passed by the respondent no.1 under Section 154 ofthe Income Tax Act, 1961.2. After arguing for some time, Mr. Manuj Sabharwal, learned counselfor the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petitions.3. Permission granted.4. The writ petitions alongwith all pending applications are dismissed aswithdrawn.DINESH M...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »