Delhi Court March 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Karan & Anr. vs the State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 7070/2025 & CRL.M.A. 29671/2025 KARAN & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Sunil Tiwari, Advocate with Petitioners in person.versusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP. Mr. Omkar with R2/Complainant in person.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 30.03.20261. The petitioners have filed this petition under Section 528 of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [BNSS] (corresponding to Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [CrPC]) seeking quashing of FIR No. 19/2021 dated 20.01.2021, registered at Police Station D.B.G Road, District Central, New Delhi, under Sections proceedings emanating therefrom, on the ground of settlement.2. Issue notice. Mr. Hitesh Vali, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, accepts notice on behalf of the State. Mr. Omkar, learned counsel, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No. 2 complainant.3. The petition is taken up for disposal with...
International Visa Services Pvt Ltd Formerly Known as Ivs Lanka Pvt Lt ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment Reserved on: 18.02.2026Judgment delivered on: 30.03.2026Judgment uploaded on: 30.03.2026+ W.P.(C) 5/2026 & CM APPL. 13/2026 INTERNATIONAL VISA SERVICES PVT LTD FORMERLY KNOWN AS IVS LANKA PVT LTD .....PetitionerversusUNION OF INDIA .....Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case For the Petitioner : Mr. Samar Bansal, Mr. Siddharth Nath, Mr. Asjad Hussain and Mr. Anunay Chowdhary, Advs. For the Respondent : Mr. Shashank Dixit, CGSC, Mr. Arnav Mittal, GP and Mr. Kunal Raj, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORAJUDGMENTMANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J.1. The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia challenges the disqualification of the Petitioner, from participating in the tender process for outsourcing consular services [CPV services] in Sri Lanka, communicated through an e-mail dated 29.12.2025, with reference to Signed By:MOHIT W.P.(C)...
Rihana Begum vs Keshar
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RFA 1193/2025 RIHANA BEGUM .....Appellant Through: Mr. Deepak Kohli and Mr. Mohd. Shariq, AdvocatesversusKESHAR .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAORDER% 30.03.2026 CM APPL. 20224/20261. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. Application is disposed of. CM APPL. 20223/20263. Application under Section 151 of CPC has been filed on behalf of the Appellant seeking early hearing of the Appeal.4. The matter is already listed for 22.05.2026.5. Considering the heavy position of the Board, the next date of hearing cannot be preponed.6. Application is dismissed. RFA 1193/2025, CM APPL. 82513/2025, 82514/2025 & 82515/20257. List on the date fixed, i.e. 22.05.2026.NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.MARCH 30, 2026/R This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from...
ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Sh. Subodh Jaiswal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of decision: 30th March, 2026 + RFA(COMM) 727/2025 & CM APPL. 82632/2025, CM. APPL. ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE MR. GUTAM BHATNAGAR 7 MERCANTILE HOUSE, 15 KG MARG, NEW DELHI 110001 .....APPELLANT Through: Mr. Sandeep Jha, AdvocateVersusSH. SUBODH JAISWAL S/O SH. ANIRUDH PRASAD CHAUDHARY R/O HOUSE NO. 122, J-EXTN. LAXMI NAGAR DELHI-110092. .....RESPONDENT Through: Mr. Rohini Kumar, Mr. Kapil Dev Yadav and Mr. Shubhanshu Kumar Dwivedi, AdvocatesCORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAULJUDGMENT (ORAL)NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE, J.CM APPL. 82630/2025 & CM APPL. 82633/20251. These applications are listed for condonation of delay moved under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 seeking to condone the delay of 248 days in filing the present appeal under Section 13 (1A) of Signing Date:07.04.2026 RFA(COMM) 727/2025 Page 1 of 7 the Commercial Courts Act, 2...
M/S Sierra Appliances Pvt Ltd vs M/S Stellar Constellation Project Pvt ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 13/2026 & I.A. 37/2026 M/S SIERRA APPLIANCES PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Amardeep Singh, Adv.versusM/S STELLAR CONSTELLATION PROJECT PVT LTD .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ajit Kumar Singh & Ms. Laxmi Singh, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGANORDER% 30.03.20261. This petition is filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of period for concluding the arbitration proceedings.2. This Court vide order dated 11.07.2022 appointed Sh. G P Thareja,Additional District Judge (Retd.) as the sole arbitrator. The issues were framed on 23.03.2023 and thereafter the matter was fixed for recording of evidence. Sh. G. P. Thareja, the sole arbitrator appointed passed away on 07.09.2023. This Court vide order dated 12.08.2024 appointed Mr. Abhishek Jaju as the sole arbitrator and extended the period for six months from the date the new arbitrator entered into...
Ajay Gupta vs MCD and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 210/2026 with CM APPL. 961/2026 and CM APPL. 19746/2026 AJAY GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Dheeraj Sharma, Advocate.versusMCD AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Kapil Dutta, Standing Counsel for R-1. Mr. Manoj Sharma & Mr. Kapil Kaushik, Advocates for R-2.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 30.03.20261. In view of the remedial actions taken on behalf of the private respondent no.2, counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present writ petition.2. The present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.3. Pending applications stand disposed of. AMIT BANSAL, J MARCH 30, 2026 atThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/04/2026 at 16:09:06...
Karan Singh vs Govt of Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 8328/2017 & CM APPL. 34263/2017 KARAN SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Aagney Sail, Adv. (through V/C)versusGOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, SC with Ms. K.K. Kiran Pathak, Mr. Mohd Sueb Akhtar and Ms. Joohu Kumari, Advs.CORAM:JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE MADHU JAINORDER% 30.03.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. Ld. Counsel appearing for the Petitioners submits that the issue whichwas raised in this case would not survive in view of the judgment in Indore Development Authority v. Manohar Lal & Ors., (2020) 8 SCC 129. rendered by the Supreme Court.3. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of in terms of the said judgmentin Indore Development Authority (supra). Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.MADHU JAIN, J.MARCH 30, 2026/ys/ss This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be r...
Amarjeet Singh vs Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
$~32 to 37, 39, 47, 48, 50 & 51* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of decision: 30th March, 2026 Uploaded on: 2nd April, 2026 + W.P.(C) 4001/2026 & CM APPL. 19603/2026 MAHENDER KAUR & ORS. .....Petitioners + W.P.(C) 4002/2026 & CM APPL. 19604/2026 KARNAIL SINGH & ORS. .....Petitioners + W.P.(C) 4003/2026 & CM APPL. 19606/2026 GURMEET SINGH .....Petitioner + W.P.(C) 4014/2026 & CM APPL. 19648/2026 PREM KAUR .....Petitioner + W.P.(C) 4018/2026 & CM APPL. 19653/2026 JEET KAUR & ORS. .....Petitioners + W.P.(C) 4028/2026 & CM APPL. 19679/2026 AMARJEET SINGH .....Petitioner + W.P.(C) 4036/2026 & CM APPL. 19689/2026 KARNAIL SINGH & ORS. .....PetitionersW.P.(C) 4001/2026 & connected matters Page 1 of 14 + W.P.(C) 4085/2026 & CM APPL. 20018/2026 GURBAKSH SINGH .....Petitioner + W.P.(C) 4086/2026 & CM APPL. 20019/2026 KARNAIL SINGH & ORS. .....Petitioners + W.P.(C) 4121/2026 & CM APPL. 20130/2026 GURNAM SINGH &...
Union of India & Ors. vs Ex Jwo Vijay Shankar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision : 30.03.2026 + W.P.(C) 4061/2026 CM APPL. 19946-19947/2026 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Uma Prasuna Bachu, SPCversusEX JWO VIJAY SHANKAR .....Respondent Through: NoneCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORAMANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J. (ORAL) CM APPL. 19947/2026 (exemption)1. Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions.2. The application is disposed of. W.P.(C) 4061/20263. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia against the order dated 10.03.2025 [impugned order] passed by the Armed Forces Tribunal Principal Bench, New Delhi [Tribunal] in Original Application [O.A.] No. 1152 of 2021 titled as Ex JWO Vijay Shankar v. Union of India & Ors., wherein the Respondent has been granted the benefit of the disability element of pension for Primary Hypertension assessed at 30% for life, rounded off to...
Feroz Khan and Ors vs Anil Jain
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIReserved on: 26th February, 2026 Pronounced on: 30th March, 2026 Uploaded on: 30th March, 2026 + RFA (COMM) 162/2025, CM APPL. 16990/2025 & CM APPL. FEROZ KHAN AND ORS. ...Appellants Through: Mr. Gaurav Dalal, Adv.versusANIL JAIN ...Respondent Through: Mr. Tejveer Singh Bhatia & Mr. Sanjog Singh Arneja, Advs. (M: 8888887663)CORAM:JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE MADHU JAINJUDGMENTMADHU JAIN, J.1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present appeal has been filed by the Appellants under Section 13of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 read with Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, inter alia, assailing the Impugned Judgment and Decree dated 1st June, 2024 passed by the ld. District Judge (Commercial Court - 05), Tis Hazari Courts, West Delhi, in CS (COMM.) No. 116/2019 titled Sh. Anil Jain v. Sh. Feroz Khan & Ors. (hereinafter, Impugned Judgment and Decree).3. Vide the Impugned Judgment, the suit preferre...
- ‹ Prev
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- Next ›
- Last »