Delhi Court March 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jb Singhal and Sons vs Office of Principal Chief Commissioner GST Nort ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 18522/2025 JB SINGHAL AND SONS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Varun Pandit, Mr. Saahil Mongia and Ms. Aditi Singhal, AdvocatesversusOFFICE OF PRINCIPAL CHIEF COMMISSIONER GST NORTH DELHI ZONE .....Respondent Through: Mr. R. Ramachandran, Sr. Standing CounselCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBREHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAULORDER% 30.03.20261. Our order dated 5th December, 2025, in the light of the prayer made in the petition, is self-explanatory.2. In the aforesaid background, we deem it appropriate to accept thisstatement made by the counsel for the respondent, who is assisted by the Superintendent of the respondent, that in case if the petitioner appears day after tomorrow before the said Authority, the issue shall be resolved.3. As regards the process of refund and the payment of interest isconcerned, the said authority shall had regard to the request of the petitioner that it has updated the entire bank d...
Om Parkash & Sons vs Laxman Dass Naresh Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RFA 623/2010 & CM APPL. 18899/2011 OM PARKASH & SONS .....AppellantversusLAXMAN DASS NARESH KUMAR .....RespondentCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMAORDER% 30.03.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present appeal under Section 96 of the CPC seeks the following prayers:-It is, therefore, most respectfully, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to set aside the judgment and decree dated ,10.03.2010 passed by the court of Sh. S.C. Malik, ADJ (Central) , Delhi in suit No. 139/08 titled as ''M/s Om Parkash & Sons Vs. M/s Laxman Dass Naresh Kumar'', in the interest of justice.3. None appears on behalf of the appellant despite service.4. There has been no appearance on behalf of the appellant on the previous dates of hearing as well i.e. 11.12.2024, 17.12.2024, 10.02.2025, 08.05.2025 and 06.11.2025.5. Report with regard to court notice issued to the appe...
Tabin vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors. & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 517/2026 TABIN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rachit Gupta, Advocate with petitioner in-person.versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ORS. & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Kumar Shashwat Singh Sawna, Standing Counsel for MCD with Mr. Vishal Singh, Advocate for MCD Mr. Chiranjiv Kumar, Dr. Dharma Deshna, Mr. Mukesh Sachdeva, Advocates for R-2 with SI Subhash. Mr. G.S. Oberoi, ASC for DDA with Mr. Ankur Sharma, Advocate. Mr. Arjun Mahajan, Standing Counsel with Ms. Monika Batra, Mr. Apoorv Upmanyu, Mr. Ravikant Kumar, Advocates for DDA. Ms. Tanvi Madan, Advocate for R-4 & 5. ASI Devender Singh, Pairvi Officer Traffic & SI Subhash, Dariya Ganj Circle.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 30.03.20261. This order may be read in continuation of the order passed by this Court on 15th January, 2026.2. A status report has been filed by the respondent no.1/ MCD, however W.P.(C) 517/2026 Page 1 of 2the same is l...
Naeem vs the Commissioner MCD & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 18629/2025 NAEEM .....Petitioner Through: Mohd. Zohaib, Advocate.versusTHE COMMISSIONER MCD & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vikas Chopra, Standing Counsel with Mr. Neeraj Kumar, Mr. Anitar Mishra & Ms. Khushi, Advocates. Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Singh, SPC for R-3 & 4. Mr. Rohit Jain & Mr. Gaurav Jain, Advocates for R-5.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 30.03.20261. The present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to therespondent/ MCD to demolish the unauthorized and illegal construction carried out by the respondent no.5 at House No. 1416, Gali Gondni Wali, Kalan Mahal, Daryaganj, Delhi-110002 (hereinafter, subject property).2. A status report has been filed on behalf of the respondent/ MCD,wherein it is stated that after following due process of law, demolition orderdated 29th December, 2025 was passed by the respondent/ MCD. Pursuant thereto, one RCC panel was demolished at the roof of t...
Mohd Saad @ Mohd Shad vs State Govt. Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 8842/2025 MOHD SAAD @ MOHD SHAD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Arun Kumar, Mr. Mohit Singh, Advocates.versusSTATE GOVT. NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, APP with SI Manohar Singh. Mr. Madhur Tyagi, Advocate with R2 in person.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 30.03.20261. The petitioner has filed this petition under Section 528 of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [BNSS] (corresponding to Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [CrPC]) seeking quashing of FIR No. 561/2025 dated 08.05.2025, registered at Police Station Sadar Bazar, District North, New Delhi, under Section 118(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 [BNS], and all proceedings emanating therefrom, on the ground of settlement.2. Issue notice. Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, accepts notice on behalf of the State. Mr. Madhur Tyagi, learned counsel, accepts notic...
Lt Col Vinod Kumar Aggarwal vs Rakesh Aggarwal
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RFA 612/2010 LT COL VINOD KUMAR AGGARWAL .....AppellantversusRAKESH AGGARWAL .....RespondentCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMAORDER% 30.03.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present appeal under Section 96 read with Order XLI of the CPC seeks the following prayers:- call for the records of the Suit no. 109A/06 titled as "Lt. Col. Vinod Kumar Aggarwal (Retd.) v. Rakesh Kumar" ,b). set aside the impugned order dated 08.04.2010 passed by the Court of Sh. B. R. Kedia, Additional District Judge, Central-06, Delhi, in Suit no. 109A/06 titled as "Lt. Col. Vinod Kumar Aggarwal (Retd.) v. Rakesh Kumaf; c). grant costs of the appeal in favour of the appellants and against the respondent; d) pass any other or further order(s) as may this Honble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.3. None appears on behalf of the appellant despite service.4. There has been no app...
Mahender Kaur & Ors. vs Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
$~32 to 37, 39, 47, 48, 50 & 51* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of decision: 30th March, 2026 Uploaded on: 2nd April, 2026 + W.P.(C) 4001/2026 & CM APPL. 19603/2026 MAHENDER KAUR & ORS. .....Petitioners + W.P.(C) 4002/2026 & CM APPL. 19604/2026 KARNAIL SINGH & ORS. .....Petitioners + W.P.(C) 4003/2026 & CM APPL. 19606/2026 GURMEET SINGH .....Petitioner + W.P.(C) 4014/2026 & CM APPL. 19648/2026 PREM KAUR .....Petitioner + W.P.(C) 4018/2026 & CM APPL. 19653/2026 JEET KAUR & ORS. .....Petitioners + W.P.(C) 4028/2026 & CM APPL. 19679/2026 AMARJEET SINGH .....Petitioner + W.P.(C) 4036/2026 & CM APPL. 19689/2026 KARNAIL SINGH & ORS. .....PetitionersW.P.(C) 4001/2026 & connected matters Page 1 of 14 + W.P.(C) 4085/2026 & CM APPL. 20018/2026 GURBAKSH SINGH .....Petitioner + W.P.(C) 4086/2026 & CM APPL. 20019/2026 KARNAIL SINGH & ORS. .....Petitioners + W.P.(C) 4121/2026 & CM APPL. 20130/2026 GURNAM SINGH &...
Gurmeet Singh vs Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
$~32 to 37, 39, 47, 48, 50 & 51* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of decision: 30th March, 2026 Uploaded on: 2nd April, 2026 + W.P.(C) 4001/2026 & CM APPL. 19603/2026 MAHENDER KAUR & ORS. .....Petitioners + W.P.(C) 4002/2026 & CM APPL. 19604/2026 KARNAIL SINGH & ORS. .....Petitioners + W.P.(C) 4003/2026 & CM APPL. 19606/2026 GURMEET SINGH .....Petitioner + W.P.(C) 4014/2026 & CM APPL. 19648/2026 PREM KAUR .....Petitioner + W.P.(C) 4018/2026 & CM APPL. 19653/2026 JEET KAUR & ORS. .....Petitioners + W.P.(C) 4028/2026 & CM APPL. 19679/2026 AMARJEET SINGH .....Petitioner + W.P.(C) 4036/2026 & CM APPL. 19689/2026 KARNAIL SINGH & ORS. .....PetitionersW.P.(C) 4001/2026 & connected matters Page 1 of 14 + W.P.(C) 4085/2026 & CM APPL. 20018/2026 GURBAKSH SINGH .....Petitioner + W.P.(C) 4086/2026 & CM APPL. 20019/2026 KARNAIL SINGH & ORS. .....Petitioners + W.P.(C) 4121/2026 & CM APPL. 20130/2026 GURNAM SINGH &...
Nishan Singh & Ors. vs Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
$~32 to 37, 39, 47, 48, 50 & 51* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of decision: 30th March, 2026 Uploaded on: 2nd April, 2026 + W.P.(C) 4001/2026 & CM APPL. 19603/2026 MAHENDER KAUR & ORS. .....Petitioners + W.P.(C) 4002/2026 & CM APPL. 19604/2026 KARNAIL SINGH & ORS. .....Petitioners + W.P.(C) 4003/2026 & CM APPL. 19606/2026 GURMEET SINGH .....Petitioner + W.P.(C) 4014/2026 & CM APPL. 19648/2026 PREM KAUR .....Petitioner + W.P.(C) 4018/2026 & CM APPL. 19653/2026 JEET KAUR & ORS. .....Petitioners + W.P.(C) 4028/2026 & CM APPL. 19679/2026 AMARJEET SINGH .....Petitioner + W.P.(C) 4036/2026 & CM APPL. 19689/2026 KARNAIL SINGH & ORS. .....PetitionersW.P.(C) 4001/2026 & connected matters Page 1 of 14 + W.P.(C) 4085/2026 & CM APPL. 20018/2026 GURBAKSH SINGH .....Petitioner + W.P.(C) 4086/2026 & CM APPL. 20019/2026 KARNAIL SINGH & ORS. .....Petitioners + W.P.(C) 4121/2026 & CM APPL. 20130/2026 GURNAM SINGH &...
MD Adil vs Govt of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 19802/2025 with CM APPL. 19749/2026 and CM APPL. MD ADIL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. D.S. Chauhan, Mr. Praveen Kumar & Mr. Mohit Bidhuri, Advocates.versusGOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Puneet Dhawan, SPC with Mr. Kush Sharma, Advocate for R-3. Mr. Sagar Kumar, Advocate for R-2. Mr. Ali Choudhary & Mr. Shahil Akhtar, Advocates for R-4 & 5.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 30.03.2026 CM APPL. 20204/2026 (seeking condonation of delay)1. This application has been filed by the respondents no.2 and 3 seeking condonation of delay of 60 days in filing the status report.2. For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed and the delay in filing the status report is condoned. W.P.(C) 19802/20253. The present writ petition has been filed seeking directions torespondents no. 1 to 3, to take action against respondents no. 4 and 5, for carrying out construction o...
- ‹ Prev
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- Next ›
- Last »