Delhi Court March 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Arjun@ Bonta vs the State Govt of Nct Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 3812/2025 ARJUN@ BONTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shankar, Advocate.versusTHE STATE GOVT OF NCT DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Aashneet Singh, APP with SI Mahender Koli, P.S. Bhalswa Dairy.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 30.03.20261. By way of the present application under Section 483 of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the applicant seeks regular bail in connection with FIR No. 503/2024 dated 30.06.2024, registered at Police Station Bhalswa Dairy, District Outer North, New Delhi, for the offences punishable under Sections 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [IPC].2. I have heard Mr. Shankar, learned counsel for the applicant, and Mr. Aashneet Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.3. By order dated 08.10.2025, the Investigating Officer was directedto inform the complainant/victim of the pendency of the present proceedings. In the order of the learned Sessions Court dated ...
The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd (Stcl) vs Kuldeep Kumar Ips
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RFA 762/2024 THE STATE TRADING CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD (STCL) .....Appellant Through: Mr. Tarkeshwar Nath, Mr. Harshit Singh, Advocates.versusKULDEEP KUMAR IPS .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sarad Kumar Sunny and Adv Madhav Binzani.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAORDER% 30.03.2026 CM APPL. 19940/2026 (under Section 151 CPC on behalf of the Petitioner for Withdrawal of the Appeal)1. An Application has been filed on behalf of the Appellant for withdrawal of the Appeal.2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the Appellant on instructions that the matter is settled between the parties and he wants to withdraw the present Appeal.3. In view of the submissions made, the Application is allowed and stands disposed of accordingly. RFA 762/20244. In view of the observations made in CM APPL.19940/2026, the present Appeal is permitted to be withdrawn.5. The Appeal stands disposed of accordingly along with the pending Application(...
Sonu Singh vs State of Gnct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 3870/2025 SONU SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Bibek Tripathi, Mr. Ajay Kumar Shrivastav, Mr. Manoj Kumar and Mr. Sudhakar Tiwari, AdvocatesversusSTATE OF GNCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State with SI Prahlad, PS Special CellCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIAORDER% 30.03.20261. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 320/2024 ofPolice Station Special Cell for offence under Section 22/29 of NDPS Act. 1.1. This bail application came up for the first hearing on 10.10.2025 before the predecessor bench and thereafter continued getting adjourned before different benches. Along with 179 such old pending bail applications, this application also was transferred to this bench. 1.2 Today is the first hearing before me.2. After addressing partly, learned counsel for accused/applicant, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to file afr...
Crocs Inc & Anr. vs Sagar Doijode Trading as Questsole & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(COMM) 1125/2025 CROCS INC & ANR. .....Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Gaurav Gogia, Advocate.versusSAGAR DOIJODE TRADING AS QUESTSOLE & ORS. .....Defendants Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELAORDER% 08.04.2026 I.A. 9546/20261. This is an application under Section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870 readwith Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, filed on behalf of the plaintiffs, seeking refund of Court Fees in favour of the Constituted Attorney of the plaintiffs.2. Learned counsel for the plaintiffs submits that the inter-se disputes were amicably settled between the parties and vide the order/judgment dated 30.03.2026, the Suit was decreed and disposed of.3. He states that while decreeing the Suit, this Court had also directed therefund of Court Fees in terms of Section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870. Learned counsel for the plaintiffs submits that the present application has been filed seeking per...
Lovekesh Sindhi @ Lucky vs State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 4010/2025 LOVEKESH SINDHI @ LUCKY .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajeev Mohan, Mr. Vijay Sharma, Mr. Sachit Sharma and Mr. Hemant Goyal, AdvocatesversusSTATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State with SI Prahlad, PS Special CellCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIAORDER% 30.03.20261. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 320/2024 ofPolice Station Special Cell for offence under Section 22/29 of NDPS Act. 1.1. This bail application came up for the first hearing on 17.10.2025 before the predecessor bench and thereafter continued getting adjourned before different benches. Along with 179 such old pending bail applications, this application also was transferred to this bench. 1.2 Today is the first hearing before me.2. After addressing partly, learned counsel for accused/applicant, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to file afresh...
Rohit Pandey vs Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
$~37 to 39* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of Decision: 30.03.2026 IN THE MATTERS OF: + W.P.(C) 11301/2025 REEPAK KANSAL .....Petitioner UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Adv P.S Singh CGSC, Adv Shivangi Sharma, Adv Mrityunjay Kumar Singh, Adv Rajneesh k Sharma, Advs. for R-1&2. Roy, Advocates for R-3. + W.P.(C) 18145/2025 DR. ADISH C AGGARWALA .....Petitioner 17:02:39 Page 1 of 6 KUMAR KAURAV UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr Amit Tiwari CGSC Ms Ayushi Srivastava Mr Ayush Tanwar Adv Mr Kushagra Malik Adv. for UoI. Roy, Advocates for LLC/R-3. + W.P.(C) 18178/2025 ROHIT PANDEY .....Petitioner UNION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr Amit Tiwari CGSC Ms Ayushi Srivastava Mr Ayush Tanwar Adv Mr Arpan Narwal Mr Kushagra Malik Adv. for UoI. Roy, Advocates for LLC/R-3. 17:02:39 Page 2 of 6 KUMAR KAURAVCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVJUDGEMENTPURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J. (ORAL)1. The grievance raised in these...
Harbir Singh & Anr. vs State Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 7489/2025 HARBIR SINGH & ANR. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Dinesh Kumar, Mr. Saurabh Malik, Mr. Vikas Kumar, Mr. Amrendra Nath Shukla, Advocates.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP with SI Lokendra. Mr. Prem Singh, Advocate for R2.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 30.03.20261. The petitioners have filed this petition under Section 528 of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [BNSS] (corresponding to Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [CrPC]) seeking partial quashing of FIR No. 69/2017 dated 06.03.2017, registered at Police Station Swaroop Nagar, District North-West, New Delhi, under Sections 498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [IPC], and all proceedings emanating therefrom, on the ground of settlement.2. Issue notice. Mr. Hitesh Vali, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, accepts notice on behalf of the State. Mr. Prem Singh, learned cou...
Pradeep Khandelwal vs Commissioner of Customs
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 16274/2025 & CM APPL. 80054/2025 PRADEEP KHANDELWAL .....Petitioner Through: Appearance not given (Through VC)versusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS .....Respondent Through: Mr. R. Ramachandran, Sr. Standing CounselCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBREHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAULORDER% 30.03.2026 It is claimed that the petition and the application itself have rendered infructuous. Since the statement is coming, on instructions, from the counsel for the petitioner, the petition, accordingly, stands disposed of as withdrawn. The pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE, J AJAY DIGPAUL, J MARCH 30, 2026 gs/yr This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/04/2026 at 12:16:42...
Kishan @ Gattu vs the State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 4063/2025 KISHAN @ GATTU .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankit Sharma, Advocate via video-conferencing.versusTHE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Ms. Shubhi Gupta, APP for the State.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 30.03.2026 CRL.M.A. 9620/2026 (exemption) Exemption granted, subject to just exceptions. Let requisite compliances be made within 01 week. The application stands disposed of. CRL.M.A. 9619/2026 By way of the present application filed under section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the petitioner seeks advancement of the date of hearing in the matter, which is otherwise posted on 09.04.2026.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits, that the victim has been examined before the learned Trial Court. Counsel accordingly seeks advancement of date of hearing in the matter.3. For the reasons stated in the application, and in view of the submissions made, the present a...
M/S Surgi Aid Pharma vs M/S Instromedix India Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 5/2025 M/S SURGI AID PHARMA .....Petitioner Through: None.versusM/S INSTROMEDIX INDIA PVT LTD .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 30.03.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. As nobody has appeared on behalf of the parties, let the matter be called again at 02:30 P.M. RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J MARCH 30, 2026/nd/abk At 02:55 P.M.3. At this stage, it is already 02:55 P.M., nobody has appeared on behalf of the petitioner.4. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed in default. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J MARCH 30, 2026/nd/abkThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/04/2026 at 11:16:35...
- ‹ Prev
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- Next ›
- Last »