Delhi Court March 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Technocrats Advisory Pvt. Ltd. vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 4093/2026 CM APPL. 20067/2026 TECHNOCRATS ADVISORY PVT. LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhishek Shivpuri & Mr. Rahul Bhatt, Advs.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Puneet Rai, SSC with Mr. Ashvini Kr. & Mr. Rishabh Nangia, JSCs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMARORDER% 30.03.20261. By way of the present writ petition, the petitioner has sought directionfor expedient disposal of appeal, bearing Appeal No. NFAC/2017- 18/10023605, which was filed on 29.04.2021.2. In view of the fact that the petitioners case does not fall in any of thecategories for early disposal categorized vide the circular dated 07.03.2024 issued by CBDT, no direction for expeditious disposal can be issued.3. Petition is therefore dismissed.4. Needless to observe that petitioner shall be free to move anapplication for early hearing before the Appe...
Union of India & Ors. vs Ex Lme Kailash Baghel
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision : 30.03.2026 + W.P.(C) 4096/2026, CM APPL. 20070-20072/2026 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr Shashank Dixit CGSC with Mr Kunal Raj, Adv.versusEX LME KAILASH BAGHEL .....Respondent Through: NoneCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORAMANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J. (ORAL)CM APPL. 20070/2026 (exemption)1. Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions.2. The application is disposed of.CM APPL. 20072/20261. This is an application filed on behalf of petitioner for taking on recordadditional documents.2. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed.3. The application is disposed of.W.P.(C) 4096/20264. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 and 227 of theConstitution of India against the order dated 02.05.2023 [impugned order]Signature Not Verified W.P.(C) 4096/2026 Page 1 of 9passed by th...
Ankit Kumar Bindra & Anr. vs State of Govt Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 2339/2026, CRL.M.A. 9515/2026 ANKIT KUMAR BINDRA & ANR. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Tarun Kumar Makhija and Ms. Manisha, Advocates with Petitioners in person.versusSTATE OF GOVT NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for State with SI Krishn Pal Singh PS Mukherjee Nagar Mr. Ayush Kumar, Advocate for R-2 with R-2 in person.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 30.03.2026 Crl.M.A. No. 9515/2026 (Exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of.CRL.M.C. 2339/20261. The petitioners have filed the present petition under Section 528 ofthe Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [BNSS] (corresponding to Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [CrPC]), seeking quashing of FIR No. 464/2018 dated 28.08.2018 registered at Police Station Mukherjee Nagar under Sections 498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [IPC], alongwith a...
Amit Kumar Das vs Nancy Yadav & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 1027/2026 AMIT KUMAR DAS .....Petitioner Through: Mr.Azhar Qayum, Adv. with petitioner in person.versusNANCY YADAV & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr.Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel (Crl.) with Ms.Priyam Agarwal, Mr.Abhinav Kr. Arya, Mr.Aryan Sachdeva, Advs. forR-1Mr.Akash Nagar, Dr.Suresh Chand Nagar, Mr.Sujata Sarkar, Advs. for R-2 with R-2 in person (VC).CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJAORDER% 30.03.20261. The present Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 ofthe Constitution of India read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking issuance of a Writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus, directing the respondent nos. 2 to 5 to produce respondent no. 1, namely, Ms. Nancy Yadav before this Court.2. On advance notice of this petition, Ms. Nancy Yadav hasappeared before us virtually. She submits that she does not wish to reside with th...
Manas Kumar Dubey & Ors. vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3994/2026 & CM APPL. 19595-19596/2026 MANAS KUMAR DUBEY & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Hitendra N. Rata and Ms. Laxmi, Advocates.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Dhananjai Rana, CGSC.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULAORDER% 30.03.20261. After advancing submissions at considerable length, counsel for thePetitioner, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the present petition, with liberty to avail other appropriate remedies in accordance with law by the Central Administrative Tribunal.12. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn, with libertyas prayed for.3. In the event any proceedings are initiated before the CAT, the sameshall be decided in accordance with law. It is clarified that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case or on the maintainability of the said proceedings.SANJEEV NARULA, JMARCH 30, 2026/hcCATThis i...
Vinay Shyam Masand vs State of Nct of Delhi & Anr. & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 2332/2026 &CRL.M.A. 9484/2026 VINAY SHYAM MASAND .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Shashi Kiran, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Joshmine Minj, Mr. Pankaj Srivastav and Mr. Nikhel Sharma, Advocates.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Richa Dhawan, APP for the State. Mr. Moti Prasad, Adv. for R2. WSI R.Kumari, P.S. NFC.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 30.03.2026 By way of the present petition filed under section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the petitioner seeks quashing of case FIR No.212/2023 dated 30.06.2022 registered under sections 376/420/354(C)/506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) at P.S.: New Friends Colony, South-East Delhi, on consent.2. The petition is premised on Compromise Deed dated 26.11.2025,whereby the petitioner and respondent No. 2 have resolved the matter amicably.3. The petition is also supported by affidavits of the petition...
Prateek Bahuguna & Ors. vs the State Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 30th March, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 2308/2026 PRATEEK BAHUGUNA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Manish Sehrawat, Advocate with petitioners in person.versusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for the State with ASI Naresh and ASI Puran Singh, PS Dabri. Respondent No.2 in person.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINJ U D G M E N T (oral)1. Petitioners herein seek quashing of FIR No. 371/2022 datedarising therefrom, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties.2. The marriage between complainant (respondent No.2 herein) andpetitioner No.1 was solemnized on 26.04.2018, as per Hindu rites and customs.3. However, on account of temperamental differences, the parties startedresiding separately and when a complaint was lodged by respondent No.2, it resulted into registration of the abovesaid FIR.4. Charge-sheet has already been filed.5. Learned counsel fo...
Ajay Kumar vs Bses Yamuna Power Limited & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 4130/2026 with CM APPL. 20147/2026, CM APPL.AJAY KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Archit Upadhayay, Mr. Shubham Mishra, Mr. Vaibhav Shahi, Mr. Rishav Ranjan, Mr. Kunal Shahi, Ms. Prashita Mishra and Mr. Nikhil Kumar, Advocates along with petitioner.versusBSES YAMUNA POWER LIMITED& ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Manish Kumar Srivastava, Mr. Moksh Arora and Mr. Santosh Ramdurg, Advocates. Mr. Shiven Varma, Advocate for R-2. Mr. Atul Kumar, Advocate for R-4.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 30.03.20261. The present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction torespondent no.1/BSES, restraining them from installing and energizing a high-capacity oil-type electricity transformer in front of the petitioners property bearing House No. 262, Khasra No. 316, Habura & Bichpatiya Mohalla, Village Dallupura, Delhi-110096.2. Earlier, the petitioner had filed a civil suit being Civil Suit No. 9/...
Resham Devi and Ors vs State of Gnct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 30th March, 2026 + W.P.(CRL) 1009/2026 & CRL.M.A. 9511/2026 RESHAM DEVI AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Lokesh Kumar Mishra, Mr. Nitin Kumar, Ms. Shreya Thakur & Mr. Nikhil, Advocates.versusSTATE OF GNCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Himanshu Sharma, Advocate for respondent no.2 along with respondent no. 2 in person Mr. Sanjay Lao Standing counsel with Mr. Priyan Agarval, Mr. Abhinav Arya & Mr. Aryan Sachdeva, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINJ U D G M E N T (oral)1. Petitioners seek quashing of FIR no. 0067/2026 registered at PoliceStation Kalyanpuri, Delhi for commission of offences under Section 316(4)/3(5) BNS (corresponding Sections 408/34 IPC) along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties.2. The facts in brief are that petitioner no. 3- Nandini, was working at GiriJewellery Mahal, which i...
Shri Balbir Singh Mann vs Government of Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 509/2026 and CM APPLs.19701/2026, 19700/2026 SHRI BALBIR SINGH MANN .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Monisha Acharya, Mr. Shivam Gupta and Mr. Anshil Tyagi, Advs.versusGOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS.....Respondents Through: Mr. Arjun Mahajan, SC, Ms. Monica Batra, Mr. Apoorv Upamanyu and Mr. Ravikant Kumar, Advs., DDA. Mr. Puneet Yadav, SC, MCD Mr. Manish Kumar Srivastava, Mr. Moksh Arora, Mr. Santosh Ramdurg and Mr. Amit Singh, Advs. for R-6.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTAORDER% 30.03.20261. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the presentpetition with liberty to file afresh.2. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn, withliberty, as prayed for.3. Pending application also stands disposed of.SACHIN DATTA, JMARCH 30, 2026/clThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR cod...
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Next ›
- Last »