Delhi Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Oyoworkspaces India Pvt Ltd vs Mountblue Technologies Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 204/2026 OYOWORKSPACES INDIA PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Samarth Mehrotra, Adv.versusMOUNTBLUE TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD .....Respondent Through: Ms. Vrinda Bhandari & Ms. Pragya Barsaiyan, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGANORDER% 27.02.20261. This petition is filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration &Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of period for concluding the arbitration proceedings.2. Learned counsel for the respondent has no serious objection to theprayer made.3. In view of the above, the time period for conclusion of theproceedings is extended by two months and the period from 15.08.2025 till date is regularized.4. This petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.AVNEESH JHINGAN, JFEBRUARY 27, 2026ChThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code s...
Union of India and Others vs Brig. Sushil Kumar Kaushik
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision : 27.02.2026 + W.P.(C) 2620/2026 & CM APPL. 12747/2026UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Sandeep Kumar Mahapatra,CGSC.versusBRIG. SUSHIL KUMAR KAUSHIK .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORAV. KAMESWAR RAO, J. (ORAL)1. This writ petition lays a challenge to the order dated 29.10.2025passed by the Armed Forces Tribunal, Principal Bench (Tribunal) in OA No. 5206/2024 (O.A, for short) filed by the respondent herein, whereby,the Tribunal has allowed the OA by stating in paragraph no.21 of the orderas under:-21. In view of the above, it is directed that the entire assessment of the IO in the impugned CR of 2019 be set aside and the applicant be afforded a Special Promotion Board (AFMS) based on his changed profile. The said board be conducted within three months from the date of the order and a r...
Nitin Kumar vs the State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 875/2026 & CRL.M.A. 6747/2026 NITIN KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr.Rohit Boora, AdvocateversusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP for the State with ASI Rajesh Kumar STF/North WestCORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 27.02.20261. Learned counsel for the applicant at this stage seeks permission towithdraw the present bail application.2. The bail application alongwith pending applications, if any, isdismissed as withdrawn.3. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith.DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, JFEBRUARY 27, 2026/rr/rThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/03/2026 at 10:13:22...
Aditya Birla Capital Limited vs Shree Ganesh Metalloy Ltd and Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2627/2026 ADITYA BIRLA CAPITAL LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravi Gupta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Mahip Datta Parashar, Advs.versusSHREE GANESH METALLOY LTD AND ORS..Respondents Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK CHAUDHARYHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RENU BHATNAGARORDER% 10.03.2026 CM APPL. 14427/2026 (seeking modification of order dated 27.02.2026)1. Heard learned Senior Counsel for the applicant/petitioner.2. For the reasons as stated in the application, paragraph 4 and 5 ofthe Order dated 27.02.2026 are modified to be read as under:4. In view of the same, the petitioner is permitted to move a detailed application with regard to their urgency before the learned Debts Recovery Tribunal II, Delhi (hereinafter DRT - II).5. As soon as the application is filed, we expectthat the learned DRT-II, Delhi to consider and decide the said application expeditiously without granting any unnecessary adjournments.3. ...
Dr Arathy Gopal vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ LPA 101/2026 & CM APPLs. 13701-02/2026 DR ARATHY GOPAL .....Appellant Through: Dr.Amit George, Adv. with Mr.Saurabh Bhargavan and Mr.Nikhil S. Nair, Advs.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Nemo.CORAM:HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIAORDER% 27.02.20261. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant.2. On being pointed out that since intra-court appeal has been filedagainst an interlocutory order, which effectively does not decide any issue and therefore, the very maintainability of the appeal is at stake, learned counsel for the appellant seeks to withdraw the appeal with the liberty to file an appropriate application before learned Single Judge in the pending writ petition.3. The appeal is, thus, dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayedfor.4. We may, however, observe that if any fresh application is filedseeking interim relief, the same shall...
Parag Jain vs State Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 1627/2026 PARAG JAIN .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Isha khanna, Ms. Ruchika Malik and Ms. Stuti Gupta, Advocates alongwith petitioner in personVersusSTATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, APP for the State with SI Shweta, PS: Krishna Nagar, Delhi R-2 in personCORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 27.02.2026CRL.M.A. 6626/2026 (exemption)1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. Application stands disposed ofCRL.M.C. 1627/2026 & CRL.M.A. 6698/20263. By way of the present petition, the petitioner seeks quashing of FIRbearing no. 65/2021, dated 18.03.2021, registered at Police Station Gandhi Nagar, New Delhi, for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 498A/406/34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter IPC).4. The petitioner and respondent no. 2 are present before this Court andhave been identified by their counsels and concerned Inve...
Sheela Devi and Ors vs Govt of Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 1629/2026 SHEELA DEVI AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Vivekanand Ray, Advocate alongwith petitioners in personversusGOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....RespondentsThrough: Mr.Digam Singh Dagar, APP for the State with SI Deepak, PS Bindapuri R-2 to 4 present in personCORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 27.02.20261. By way of the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of theFIR bearing No. 1115/2015, registered at Police Station Bindapur, Delhi, for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 342/354B/323/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter IPC').2. Issue notice. The learned APP accepts notice on behalf of the State.3. All the petitioners are present before this Court and have beenidentified by their counsel and Investigating Officer (IO) concerned, Police Station, Bindapur, Delhi.4. Brief facts of the case are that the marriage between the pet...
Hindustan Construction Company Limited vs Nhpc Limited
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 206/2026 & I.A. 5538/2026HINDUSTAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANYLIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anmol Kumar, Mr. Manmeet Singh Nagpal & Ms. Chestha Dalal, Advs.versusNHPC LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Pratyush Shrivastava, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGANORDER% 27.02.20261. This petition is filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration &Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of period for concluding the arbitration proceedings.2. Learned counsel for the respondent has no serious objection to theprayer made.3. In view of the above, the time period for conclusion of theproceedings is extended till 31.12.2026 as prayed for.4. This petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.AVNEESH JHINGAN, JFEBRUARY 27, 2026ChThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown ...
Pay 10 Services Private Limited vs Union of India Ad Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 710/2026 & CM APPL. 7763/2026 PAY 10 SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Dayan Krishan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Nakul Batra, Ms. Palak and Mr. Sreedhar, Advocates.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Proxy counsel for UOI (appearance not given) Mr. Kunal Makhija, Advocate for R3 Mr. Ramji Srinivasan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vinod Kanna, Ms. Shefali Munde and Mr. Arjun Bhatia, AdvocatesCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIAORDER% 27.02.20261. Matter taken up on mentioning at the end of the board.2. Learned senior counsel for petitioner, on instructions, seekspermission to withdraw this writ petition so that petitioner may seek appropriate remedy in accordance with law.3. As requested, the petition and the accompanying application aredismissed as withdrawn.GIRISH KATHPALIA, JFEBRUARY 27, 2026/asThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order ca...
Kamlesh vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Another
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2846/2026 KAMLESH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sudhir Kumar Ojha, Adv.versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OFDELHI AND ANOTHER .....Respondents Through: Ms. Namrata Mukim, SC (MCD) with Ms. Niharika Singh and Ms. Sakshi Saxena, Advs. for MCD. Mr. Sandeep Tyagi, SPC (UOI).CORAM:JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGHJUSTICE MADHU JAINORDER% 27.02.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present petition has been filed by the Petitioner-Mrs. Kamleshunder Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, seeking directions to the Respondents to restore Petitioners patra tehbazari shop situated beside Omaxe Mall, Bapu Market, Chandni Chowk, Delhi (hereinafter, patra shop)3. The case of the Petitioner is that she has been running her patra shopin Chandni Chowk area since 2007. According to her, during COVID-19 the business activities were stopped and consequently her patra shop was also closed. Thereaf...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Next ›
- Last »