Delhi Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Highway Engineering Consultant vs National Highways Authority of I ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2807/2026, CM APPL. 13580/2026, CM APPL. 13581/2026 and CM APPL. 13582/2026M/S HIGHWAY ENGINEERING CONSULTANT .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Nandadevi Deka, Mr Shashwat Pratyush, Ms Shubhra Sharma and Mr. Sourav Sharma Advocates.versusNATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA & ANR......Respondents Through: Mr. Santosh Kumar Advocate Standing Counsel and Mr. Adithya Ramani Advocate for R-1. Ms Arunima Dwivedi CGSC with Ms Swati Jhunjhunwala adv, Mr Amit Dutta Adv, Ms Monalisha Pradhan, Advs. for UoI.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 27.02.20261. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks liberty to withdrawthe instant writ petition in view of the order dated 25.02.2026 passed by National Highways Authority of India.2. The petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, JFEBRUARY 27, 2026/P/AMGThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-ver...
Shambhu Saw vs State of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 1641/2026 & CRL.M.A. 6659/2026 SHAMBHU SAW .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sowjhanya Shankaran, Advocate.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Ms. Priyanka Dalal, APP with SI Rameshwar.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINORDER% 27.02.20261. Petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.192/2017 dated 22.06.2017,registered at P.S. Hazrat Nizamuddin Railway Station, for commission of offence under Section 392 IPC, along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom. Subsequently, in the charge-sheet, offences under Sections 394/411/34 IPC and Sections 147/179 of Indian Railways Act were added.2. After hearing arguments for some time, learned counsel for thepetitioner, on instructions from petitioner, who is present in court, does not press the present petition while reserving all her rights and contentions.3. In view of the above, the petition is disposed of as not pressed.4. A...
Gaurav Rastogi & Ors. vs State of Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 1617/2026, CRL.M.A. 6571/2026 GAURAV RASTOGI & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Gautam Panjwani and Mr. Mayank Rana and Ms. Ishpreet Kaur, Advocates with petitioners in person (Through VC).versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Richa Dhawan, APP with the Investigating Officer. Respondent No.2 in person.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 27.02.20261. By virtue of the present petition under Section 528 of the BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.21/2021 dated 16.07.2021 registered at PS.: Crime (Women) Cell Nanakpura, Delhi under Sections 498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and all proceedings emanating therefrom, in view of the Settlement Deed dated 16.09.2025 [Annexure A3] arrived at between the petitioner no.1 and the respondent no.2 before the Mediation Centre, Saket Courts, Delhi, and is accompanied by their ...
Manoj Kumar vs State (Nct of Delhi) & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 697/2026, CRL.M.A. 6580/2026-Exp MANOJ KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ashish Pradhan, Advocate (Through VC)versusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Rupali Bandopadhya, ASC with SI Vikas, PS-KalyanpuriCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 27.02.20261. By virtue of the present petition under Article 226 of theConstitution of India read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), the petitioner seeks issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing registration of FIR and fair investigation for cognizable offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdrawthe present FIR since the FIR has been registered yesterday.3. As such, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.SAURABH BANERJEE, JFEBRUARY 27, 2026/N...
Deepu and Anr vs the Govt. of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 703/2026, CRL.M.A. 6610/2026 DEEPU AND ANR .....Petitioners Through: Mohammed Yusuf, AdvocateversusTHE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anand V. Khatri, ASC with SI Manish, PS-BhajanpuraCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 27.02.2026 CRL.M.A. 6610/2026 (for exemption)1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The application stands disposed of.W.P.(CRL) 703/20263. By virtue of the present petition under Article 226 of theConstitution of India read with Sections 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), the petitioners seek issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondent no.1 to provide protection to their lives and liberty against respondent no.3, i.e., father of the petitioner no.1.4. Issue Notice. Learned ASC for State accepts Notice.5. At the outset, learned ASC for the State submits that address give...
Khandela Sah - Siksha B.a. B.ED. Mahavidyalaya vs National Council for ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2774/2026KHANDELA SAH - SIKSHA B.A. B.ED. MAHAVIDYALAYA.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Gaurav Arora Adv.VersusNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION & ANR......RespondentsThrough: Mr. Anuj Kapoor, Mr. Nandeesh Nanda, Mr. Shivom Sethi, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 27.02.2026CM APPL. 13485/2026Allowed subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of.W.P.(C) 2774/20261. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia seeking the following prayers:- (a) quash the Refusal Order dt. 28.01.2026, whereby, the Respondent No.2 has Refused the application of the Petitioner Institution submitted for transition of its B.A. B.Ed./ B.Sc. B.Ed. course to I.T.E.P., for the academic session 2026-27; without following the mandatory procedure; and(b) direct the Respondent No.2 to restore, reconsider & decidethe aforesaid application of Petitioner Institution, submittedfo...
M/S Athaang Dichpally Tollway Private Limited vs the National Highways ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 208/2026, I.A. 5583/2026 & I.A. 5584/2026M/S ATHAANG DICHPALLY TOLLWAY PRIVATELIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Saurabh Bindal, Mr. Akshita Salampuria & Mr. Akanksha Batra, Advs.versusTHE NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA& ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ajay Gaind and Mr. Abhay Gaind, Advs. for R-1. Mr. Namit Suri & Mr. Preetpal Singh, Advs. for R-2.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGANORDER% 27.02.20261. This petition is filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration &Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of period for concluding the arbitration proceedings.2. Learned counsel for the respondents has no serious objection to theprayer made.3. In view of the above, the time period for conclusion of theproceedings is extended by one month w.e.f. 08.03.2026 as prayed for.4. This petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.AVNEESH JHINGAN, JFEBRUARY 27, 202...
Kamlesh vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Another
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2846/2026 KAMLESH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sudhir Kumar Ojha, Adv.versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OFDELHI AND ANOTHER .....Respondents Through: Ms Namrata Mukim, Standing Counsel,MCD with Ms. Sakshi Saxena and Ms. Niharika Singh, Advs.(M:98990106515)CORAM:JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGHJUSTICE MADHU JAINORDER% 01.04.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.CM APPL. 20490/2026 (exemption) in W.P.(C) 2846/20262. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of.REVIEW PET.142/2026 in W.P.(C) 2846/20263. The present review petition has been filed by the Petitioner seekingreview of the order dated 27th February, 2026.4. Vide order dated 27th February, 2026, the Court had directed that sincethere was no photograph to show that the Petitioner was operating any patra shop near Omaxe Mall, Bapu Market, Chandni Chowk, Delhi, the writ petition was not liable to be entertained. Further, the ...
Naveen Vats vs Government of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2750/2026 & CM APPL. 13363/2026 NAVEEN VATS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sachin Chaudhary, Adv. along with Petitioner in Person. (M: 9311738762)versusGOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anubhav Gupta with Mr. Urvi Mohan, Advs.CORAM:JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGHJUSTICE MADHU JAINORDER% 27.02.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present petition has been filed by the Petitioner - Mr. Naveen Vatsunder Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, seeking directions to the Respondent No. 5 and Respondent No.6 to stop financial irregularities in the Respondent Society-ESIC Thrift and Credit Society Ltd.3. A brief background of the present case is that, the Petitioner was dulyelected as the Treasurer of the Respondent Society on 15 th March, 2024. The President and the Secretary of the Respondent Society are Mr. Mukesh Kumar and Mr. Govind Singh, wh...
Ms. Reshma vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2796/2026 MS. RESHMA .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Gracy Sachdeva and Mr. Ayush Singh, AdvocatesversusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI& ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Harshit Chopra, Ms. Swati Tiwari and Mr. Khushal Chand Agarwal, Advocates for R-1 Ms. Snehlata S. Surana, CGSC with Mr. Pradyumn Singh, Advocate forR-3/SHOMr. Anuj Kumar Garg, Advocate forR-4Ms. Prabhsahay Kaur, SC with Mr. Aditya Verma and Ms. Anmol Kaur, Advocate for STFCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 27.02.20261. The present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to therespondent no.1/MCD to demolish the illegal and unauthorised construction of following two properties: i. T/34, B-2, Khasra No. 8, Khirki Extension, Malviya Nagar, New Delhi. ii. J3/22, Khirki Extension, Malviya Nagar, New Delhi.W.P.(C) 2796/2026 Page 1 of 22. Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent no.1/MCD submitsthat show cause notices have b...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »