Delhi Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Param Natt vs Kuldeep Singh & Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~15, 16 and 17* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(OS) 1955/2015 PARAM NATT .....Plaintiff Through: Ms. Aastha Dhawan and Mr. Avichal Mishra, Advocates.versusKULDEEP SINGH & ORS .....Defendants Through: Mr. Kunal Kher and Mr. Manuj Gautam, Advocates for D-1 & D-3. Mr. U.A. Rana and Mr. Himanshu Mehta, Advocates for D-2. Ms. A. Dhingra and Mr. Akash Yadav, Advocates for D-4 to D-6. + TEST.CAS. 68/2015 & I.A. 14729/2015 RAJINDER SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. U.A. Rana & Mr.Himanshu Mehta, Advocates.versusSTATE OF DELHI & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Kunal Kher and Mr. Manuj Gautam, Advocates for R-2 and R-4. Ms. Aastha Dhawan and Mr. Avichal Mishra, Advocates for R-3. + TEST.CAS. 76/2015 & I.A. 14286/2019 SHRI PRABJOT SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kunal Kher and Mr. Manuj Gautam, Advocates.versusSTATE & OTHERS .....Respondents Through: Mr. U.A. Rana & Mr.Himanshu Mehta, Advocates for R-4. Ms. Aastha Dhawan and Mr. Avichal M...
CLIX Capital Services Pvt Ltd vs V and L Diagnostic Centre Llp & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ARB.P. 194/2026 CLIX CAPITAL SERVICES PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Himanshu Nehra, Mr. Puneet Raj, Mr. Ravi Shankar Garg, Ms. Akanksha Maheshwari, AdvocatesversusV AND L DIAGNOSTIC CENTRE LLP & ORS. .....Respondents Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASADORDER% 02.02.2026 I.A. 2292/2026 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. ARB.P. 194/2026 & I.A. 2293/20261. The present Petition has been filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an Arbitrator to adjudicate upon the disputes which have arisen between the parties.2. Learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner seeks permission towithdraw the present Petition, on the ground that the Petitioner has not served the notice mandated under Section 21 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to the Respondents.3. Permission, as prayed for, is granted.4. Liberty is granted to the Petitione...
Manish Kumar & Ors. vs State Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 843/2026 MANISH KUMAR & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Sumit Sharma, Advocate alongwith Petitioners (VC).versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP for State with ASI Rajiv Kumar, PS Burari. Mr. Tushar Bukkle, Advocate alongwith R2 in person.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 02.02.2026 CRL.M.A. 3332/2026 (for exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CRL.M.C. 843/20261. Issue notice. Mr. Hitesh Vali, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, accepts notice on behalf of the State. Mr. Tushar Bukkle, learned counsel, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No. 2 complainant.2. The petitioners have filed this petition under Section 528 of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [BNSS] (corresponding to Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [CrPC]) seeking quashing of FIR No. 931/2023 dated 24.07.2023, lodg...
Anil Kumar vs Central Bank of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ LPA 50/2026 & CM APPL. 7041/2026 ANIL KUMAR .....Appellant Through: Mr. Om Prakash, Advocate with Appellant in person.versusCENTRAL BANK OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anuj Jain, Advocate.CORAM:HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIAORDER% 02.02.2026 CM APPL. 7040/2026 (for exemption)1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The application stands disposed of. CM APPL. 7041/2026 (for delay in re-filing the appeal)3. This is an application seeking condonation of 16 days delay in re- filing the appeal moved on behalf of the appellant.4. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. The delay of 16 days in re-filing the appeal is hereby condoned.5. The application stands disposed of. LPA 50/20266. This Letters Patent Appeal is preferred by the Appellant beingaggrieved by the judgment dated 14.11.2025 (Impugned Judgment) LPA...
Mohan Yadav @ Mohan Singh & Ors. vs State & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 02nd February, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 853/2026 & CRL.M.A. 3367/2026 MOHAN YADAV @ MOHAN SINGH & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Siddharth Negi with Mr. Bilal Chaudhary, Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Mr. Atul Sharma, Mr. Kaushik Kalita, Advocates with petitioners in person.versusSTATE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Raj Kumar, APP for the State with SI Inderjeet, PS Jaitpur. Mr. Hemraj Murmu with Mr. Prakash Yadav, Advocates for respondent No.2 with respondent No.2 in person.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINJ U D G M E N T (oral)1. Petitioners herein seeks quashing of FIR No. 65/2021 dated along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties.2. Petitioner No.1 got married to respondent No.2 on 18.01.2020, as per Hindu rites and customs.3. However, on account of some matrimonial discord and temperamental differences, parties could not live together a...
Lovelesh Singhal Proprietor Shivani Overseas vs Central Board of Indir ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of decision: 02nd February, 2026 + W.P.(C) 1426/2026 LOVELESH SINGHAL, PROPRIETOR, M/S SHIVANI OVERSEAS NO.66 3RD FLOOR, POCKET-13, SECTOR-24, ROHINI, DELHI-110085. CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS: HOUSE NO. 88, UGF, RAJDHANI ENCLAVE PITAM PURA, DELHI-110034. .....PETITIONER Through: Mr. A.K. Babbar, Mr. Surendra Kumar, Mr. Atul Babbar, Mr. Bharat Kumar Tripathi & Mr. Rahul Chauhan, Advs.Versus1. CENTRAL BORAD OF INDIRECT TAXES & CUSTOMS SUBSTITUTED FOR CENTRAL BOARD OF EXCISE & CUSTOMS, GST POLICY WINGS, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI. . REPSONDENT NO.12. COMMISSIONER OF THE CENTRAL TAXES, DELHI WEST, 6TH FLOOR, GST BHAWAN, NANGAL RAY A, JANAKPURI NEW DELHI. . RESPONDENT NO.2 BOBAL W.P.(C) 1426/2026 Page 1 of 123. SUPERINTENDENT/ APPRAISER/SENIOR INTELLIGENCE OFFICER GROUP-01, 6TH FLOOR, GST BHAWAN, NANGAL RAY A, JANAK PURI, NEW DELHI-110046. RESPONDENT NO.3 Through: Ms. Anushree Narain, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr. Naman Choula and ...
Sonia Khurana and Anr vs Union Bank of India
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 1344/2026, CM APPL. 6674/2026 SONIA KHURANA AND ANR .....Petitioners Through: Adv. Amit S Amist, Adv. Mithila Sharma, Adv.Shubham, Adv. Rishabh Singh Randhawa, Advs.versusUNION BANK OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Santosh Kumar Rout Standing Counsel for UBICORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 02.02.2026 CM APPL. 6673/2026 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of. W.P.(C) 1344/20261. This is a writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of theConstitution of India seeking the following prayer(s):- a) Issue an appropriate writ in the nature of mandamus or any other writ order and/or direction directing the respondent to provide complete details of the fixed deposits to the Petitioner.2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks to withdraw the present petition with liberty to approach the competent Court by filing a petition for succession certificat...
Kamlesh Prasd vs Sahadeo Ram
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of decision: 2nd February, 2026 + RFA 84/2026, CM APPL. 5355/2026 (stay), CM APPL.5358/2026 (delay in refiling) KAMLESH PRASAD S/o sh. Telhoo Ram .....Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Kumar Sharma, Advocate.versusSAHADEO RAM S/o sh. Biletan Ram .....Respondent Through: NoneCORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAJ U D G M E N T (oral) CM APPL. 5356/2026 (Exemption), CM APPL. 5357/2025 (Exemption)1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The Applications stand disposed of. RFA 84/2026:3. Regular First Appeal under Section 96(2) of the Code of CivilProcedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as CPC), has been filed on behalf of the Appellant, to challenge the ex parte Judgment and Decree dated 28.08.2024 and also the Order dated 22.09.2025 of the learned District Judge-01, New Delhi whereby the Application under Order IX Rule 13 CPC seeking set-aside of the ex parte decree, has been dismissed. Signature Not Verified R...
Sanjay Kumar vs Chief Manager, Punjab National Bank
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 4473/2012 SANJAY KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: NoneversusCHIEF MANAGER, PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK.....Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Arora, Adv, Mr. Niraj Kumar & Mr. Sourabh Mahla, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAORDER% 02.02.20261. None has been appearing on behalf of the Petitioner for the last three dates.2. None is present on behalf of the Petitioner.3. The Petition is dismissed in default and for non-prosecution. NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J FEBRUARY 2, 2026/RSThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/02/2026 at 12:33:01...
At&T Global Services India Pvt Ltd and Anr vs Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~100 & 101* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3413/2017 and CM APPL. 14921/2017, CM APPL. AT&T GLOBAL SERVICES INDIA PVT LTD AND ANR .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Adv with Mr. Rishi Agrawala, Mr. Karan Luthra and Ms. Shruti Arora, Advs. UNION OF INDIA .....Respondent + W.P.(C) 4134/2017 and CM APPL. 18077/2017, CM APPL. EQUANT NETWORK SERVICES INTERNATIONAL LTD AND ANR .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Dharitry Phookan, Mr. Ronmi Risom, Advocates along with Mr. Manoj Singh, Authorised Representative. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR .....RespondentsCORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 02.02.20261. These two petitions assail show cause notices and consequentialdemand notices issued by the Union of India, whereby, the petitioners were directed to pay penalties for providing certain services without obtaining a license under Section 4 of Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 (Telegraph Act).2. The petitioners case is that they were engaged by ...
- ‹ Prev
- 464
- 465
- 466
- 467
- 468
- 469
- 470
- 471
- 472
- 474
- Next ›
- Last »