Delhi Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Pankaj Yadav vs Press Information Bureau Government of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 8505/2024 PANKAJ YADAV .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhishek Grover and Ms.Mallika Gupta, AdvocatesversusPRESS INFORMATION BUREAU GOVERNMENT OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Ms. Pratima N Lakra CGSC with Mr.Shailendra Kumar Mishra, Advocate.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 02.02.20261. Though, submissions have been made by learned counsel for therespondent that the period of suspension stood expired and the petitioner is entitled to apply afresh; and if he files a fresh application, the same can be considered in accordance with extant regulations, however, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the impugned order dated 08.06.2023 is bereft of any reason and the petitioner, as of now, may not fulfil the criteria for registration as a cardholder of the Press Information Bureau (PIB).2. The order dated 08.06.2023 is extracted as under:- No.F .24015/08/2023-PRS Government of India PRESS INFOR...
Murari Kumar Singh vs Sunita Mitra
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RFA 398/2024, CM APPL. 35496/2024 CM APPL. 46265/2024 MURARI KUMAR SINGH .....Appellant Through: None.versusSUNITA MITRA .....Respondent Through: Mr. S.C. Sagar, Advocate.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAORDER% 02.02.20261. None is present on behalf of the Appellant.2. Learned counsel for the Respondent submits that the Possession of the property has already been taken over.3. Appeal is dismissed in default of Prosecution. NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J FEBRUARY 2, 2026/vaThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/02/2026 at 13:10:26...
Eastern International Hotels Limited vs Union of India Through the Sec ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 8126/2025 & CM APPL. 35476/2025 EASTERN INTERNATIONAL HOTELS LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Ruby Singh Ahuja, Ms. Aakriti Vohra, Mr. Jappanpreet Hora, Ms. Megha Dugar, Advs.versusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE SECRETARY & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Shashank Garg, Sr Adv. Along with Ms. Aadya Antya Adv. for R-2.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 02.02.20261. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks liberty to withdraw the instant petition.2. Liberty, so prayed for, is granted.3. Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J FEBRUARY 2, 2026/P/KSRThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/02/2026 at 12:48:24...
Subrat Kumar Bai, Ex Cpl 743068-S & Anr. vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~43 & 44* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 12315/2023 SUBRAT KUMAR BAI, EX CPL 743068-S & ANR. .....Petitioners UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Nidhi Banga, SPC with Mr. Sandeep Chaudhary, Adv. for UOI. + W.P.(C) 12320/2023 SUJIT KUMAR NAYAK, EX CPL 776649-A .....Petitioner UNION OF INDIA & ORS ......Respondents Through: Ms. Avshreya Pratap Singh Rudy, (CGSC), Mr. Ankit Khatri, Ms. Usha Jamnal, Ms. Nyasa Sharma, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORAORDER% 02.02.20261. The subject matter of these petitions shall lie before the Armed Forces Tribunal (hereinafter, AFT).2. The petitions stand transferred to the AFT.3. The petitions shall be transmitted forthwith.4. The petitions on transfer, shall be listed before the concerned Court after taking the orders of the Honble Chairman of AFT on 02.03.2026.5. Accordingly, the petitions along with pending applications, if ...
Vikas Prakash Gupta vs Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India and An ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~J* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment pronounced on: 02.02.2026 + W.P.(C) 8974/2025 and CM APPL.38317/2025 VIKAS PRAKASH GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Satyajit Sarna, Mr. Sudev Juneja, Mr. Mohit Negi and Mr. Debarchan De, Advocates.versusINSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY BOARD OF INDIA AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Amrita Singh, Mr. Prasang Sharma and Mr. Sanket Khandelwal, Advocates for R-1. Mr. Rakesh Kumar, CGSC along with Mr. Sunil, Advocate for UOI.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTAJUDGMENT1. The petitioner has filed the present petition, assailing the Order dated25.04.2025 passed by the Disciplinary Committee of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (respondent no.1) in IBBI/DC/284/2025, whereby the registration of the petitioner, a registered Insolvency Professional bearing Registration No. IBBI/IPA-001/IPP00501/2017-2. The background of the matter is that National Company LawTribunal, Chennai Bench (Adjudicating Authority), vide Order d...
Radha Bansal vs Indian Bank
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 11033/2024 RADHA BANSAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shailendra Ojha, Adv.versusINDIAN BANK .....Respondent Through: Mr. Santosh Kumar Rout, SCCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 02.02.20261. This is a writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking cancellation of sale certificate issued by the respondent bank in favour of the petitioner under SARFAESI Act, 2002.2. The facts are that on 26.06.2018, the petitioner, being the highestbidder in public auction, purchased the property bearing No. G-2/3, Ground Floor, Block-G, Pocket-2, Sector-16, Rohini, New Delhi for an amount of Rs. 32.50 lakhs.3. The petitioner vide letter dated 27.06.2018 was informed by the thatone Ms. Santosh Kumari has challenged the auction proceedings before the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) and the present auction would be subject to the decision of the pending proceedings. Thereafter, Ms. Kumari has approached ...
K. L. Manhas vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 9055/2024 K. L. MANHAS .....Petitioner Through: Petitioner in person.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr Satya Ranjan Swain, CGSC with Mr Kautilya Birat, Mr Ankush Kapoor & Mr Vishwadeep, Advocates for R-1 and 3. Mr. Buddy Ranganathan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Anupam, Mr. Nikhil, MS. Simran and Ms. Shivali, Advocates for R-2.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 02.02.20261. The petitioner in the instant petition prays for the following reliefs:-1) To respondents 1 to 3 to take appropriate action against respondent no. 4 against whom the petitioner had made the complaint dated 24.05.2024 (Annexure-P1 ) for causing financial losses and mental & physical harassment through its deceitful and illegal acts and de-panel arid blacklist the said respondent vendor firm in the interest of justice;2) To respondent no.4 to lift/remove the defective material, dumped at the house of the ...
Ritwick Dutta vs Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 12862/2023, CM APPL. 50673/2023 & CM APPL. RITWICK DUTTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Trideep Pais, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Abishek Jebaraj, Ms. A Reyna Shruti, Ms. Saloni Ambastha, Ms. Sakshi Jain, Ms. S. Abinaya, Advs.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vikrant N Goyal, Mr. Kunal Dixit, Advs. for UoI. Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, SPP for CBI.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 02.02.20261. The petition is for the quashment of the Look Out Circular [LOC] issued against the petitioner.2. As per the case set up by the petitioner, he is an advocate and hasundertaken multiple activities with regard to the protection of the environment. He also claims to be an office-bearer at the Legal Initiative for Forest and Environment- Trust (LIFE Trust) and that he is known for his professional work, leading to his serving as a resource person for various legal and academic institutions in India and...
Smt. Ritu Aggarwal & Ors. vs Shri Naresh Kumar Jain & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(OS) 631/2023 SMT. RITU AGGARWAL & ORS. .....Plaintiffs Through: Mr. N. S. Dalal, Ms. Nidhi Dalal, Mr. Alok Kumar, Ms. Rachana Dalal, Mr.Karan Mann, AdvocatesversusSHRI NARESH KUMAR JAIN & ANR. .....Defendants Through: Ms. Khushi Sharma, Mr. Kavindra Solanki and Mr. Nitin Kumar, AdvocatesCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASADORDER% 02.02.2026 I.A. 2693/20261. This Application has been filed by the Plaintiff under Order XXIII Rule 3 of CPC, seeking withdrawal of the present Suit in terms of the settlement arrived at between the parties vide Settlement Agreement dated 21.01.2026.2. The instant Suit is one for a decree of specific performance of theAgreement to Sell dated 17.06.2017 entered into between the Plaintiffs and the Defendants and for a direction to the Defendants to execute the Sale Deed in respect of the Suit Property which an agricultural land measuring 12 bighas in Khasra No. 488 (4-16), 489 (4-16) and 4...
Brahm Prakash Yadav vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 9642/2025 CM APPL. 6750/2026 BRAHM PRAKASH YADAV .....Petitioner Through: Mohd. Faisal, Adv.VersusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. ....Respondents Through: Ms. Shagun Shahi Chugh, Mr. Varun Chugh, Ms. Kavya Roy Choudhury, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORAORDER% 02.02.20261. This petition has been filed with the following prayers:Given the facts and circumstances stated above, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to: a) issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction to the Respondents to decide the case of the Petitioner in a time bound manner and in the meantime direct the Respondents to immediately (i) issue a Pension PaymentOrder (PPO) number/provisional PPO to the Petitioner (ii)issue CGHS card and other related medical facilities to the Petitioner and his family (iii) to reconsider the recom...
- ‹ Prev
- 455
- 456
- 457
- 458
- 459
- 461
- 462
- 463
- 464
- 465
- Next ›
- Last »