Delhi Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shahid Yousuf vs National Investigation Agency
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~25 & 26* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI(25)+ CRL.A. 608/2023(26) CRL.A. 609/2023 SHAHID YOUSUF SYED AHMAD SHAKEEL .....Appellants Through: Mr.Nitai Hinduja, Proxy Counsel for Mr.Jawahar Raja, Adv.versusNATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY .....Respondent Through: Mr.Akshai Malik, SPP (NIA) along with Mr.Khawar Saleem, Ms.Diptasree Bag, Advs. with Mr.Pankaj Agarwal, DSP (NIA)CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJAORDER% 02.02.20261. The learned counsel for the appellant(s) prays for leave to withdraw the present appeals with liberty to avail of legal remedies as may be available to the appellant(s) in accordance with law.2. The appeals are disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. NAVIN CHAWLA, J RAVINDER DUDEJA, J FEBRUARY 2, 2026/rv/ikThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the...
Praveen Kumar Gupta vs Govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 8959/2025 PRAVEEN KUMAR GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhishek Grover, Adv.versusGOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr Raghvendra Upadhyay, Ms Purnima Jain, Mr Swaraj Maurya and Mr Ankit Jaiswal, Advocates.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 02.02.20261. The sole reason assigned by the concerned Sub-Registrar in impugnedorder dated 13.06.2025 is that the sale agreement is presented on the basis ofArbitrator Award and Award is not registered.2. The Court vide order dated 08.07.2025 noted that the requisite stamp duty has been paid on the Arbitral Award dated 05.04.2013.3. It is also the contention of the petitioner that before passing such an order, the Sub-Registrar has not afforded any opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.4. The Court, thus, finds that the impugned order dated 13.06.2025suffers from violation of principles of natural justice as the same has been passed witho...
Birmati Devi vs the State Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 3467/2025 BIRMATI DEVI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sahil Rana, Advocate with petitioner in person.versusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondent Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP with SI Bijendar, PS-Sultanpuri.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 02.02.20261. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [BNSS] [corresponding to Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure [CrPC]], seeking quashing of FIR No. 1288/2006 dated 12.08.2006, registered at Police Station Sultan Puri, District North West, Delhi, under Sections 420/120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, [IPC] and all proceedings emanating therefrom, on the ground of settlement.2. Issue notice. Ms. Manjeet Arya, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, accepts notice on behalf of State. Learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of respondent No. 2.3. The impugned FIR was registered at the instance of respon...
Nargis Hoda Firdaus vs Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 6376/2025 & CM APPL. 29120/2025, CM APPL. 29121/2025 NARGIS HODA FIRDAUS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Nishant Anand, Ms. Gunjan Bansal, Mr. Tarun Choudhary Advs.versusJAMIA MILLIA ISLAMIA, NEW DELHI .....Respondent Through: Advocate Pritish Sabharwal, SCCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 02.02.2026 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition. Hence, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. JASMEET SINGH, J FEBRUARY 2, 2026 / (MS) This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/02/2026 at 12:47:02...
Rajan Singh @ Abhishek vs the State Govt of Nct Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 2474/2025 RAJAN SINGH @ ABHISHEK .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Puja B. Soni, Advocate/ DHCLSC)versusTHE STATE GOVT OF NCT DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Priyanka Dalal, APP for State Insp. Rajveer Singh/SHO, PS Vikas Puri and Insp. Sunny Kumar, ATO/Rajinder NagarCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINORDER% 02.02.20261. Applicant is stated to be in custody since 12.01.2016. Apparently, he has undergone incarceration for more than ten years.2. It is a dacoity, coupled with three murders.3. When the matter was taken up by this Court on 16.01.2026, a requestwas made to learned Trial Court to send a report whether the matter can be taken up on day-to-day basis and also to apprise the tentative period within which the matter in question can be disposed of.4. Report has been received in sealed cover from the learned Trial Courtand such report indicates that learned Trial Court has already recorded all witnesses, except three...
Ajay vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision : 02.02.2026 + W.P.(C) 12317/2021 AJAY .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Saahila Lamba and Ms. Nidhi Sharma, Advocates.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr Ruchir Mishra, Mr Sanjay Kumar Saxena, Mr Mukesh Kumar Tiwari, Ms Reba Jena Mishra and Ms Poonam Shukla, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORAV. KAMESWAR RAO, J. (ORAL)1. The petitioner has filed this petition with the following prayers:- (i) Issue a writ of certiorari quashing order dated 20.07.2021 issued by the respondents;(ii) Issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to reinstate the petitioner in service with all consequential benefits;2. The order dated 20.07.2021 (impugned order) which is underchallenge by the petitioner is primarily an order of termination of the petitioner from the service as Constable in Railway Protection Force, who was posted in Lucknow Division...
V3S Infratech Ltd and Ors. vs Anurag Singh & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 3864/2025 & CRL.M.A. 16882/2025 V3S INFRATECH LTD AND ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Shafiq Khan & Ms. Anjani Suri, Advocates. [M:-9910000574]versusANURAG SINGH & ORS. .....Respondents Through: None.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 02.02.2026 Mr. Shafiq Khan, learned counsel for the petitioners, seeks permission to withdraw this petition, as it has been rendered infructuous. The petition, alongwith pending application, is dismissed as withdrawn in terms of the aforesaid submission. PRATEEK JALAN, J FEBRUARY 2, 2026 pv/KA/ This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/02/2026 at 12:00:39...
U.O.I & Ors vs Sanjay Kaushik & Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~71, 74 & 78* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3136/2006 & W.P.(C) 3137-3139/2006 KIRAT RAM & ORS. .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 4377/2007 & CM APPL. 8202/2007 U.O.I & ORS .....Petitioners SANJAY KAUSHIK & ORS .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 4668/2008 & CM APPL. 9007/2008 V.S.DAHIYA & ORS. .....RespondentsCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 02.02.20261. Learned counsel representing the Petitioners submits that in compliance of the order passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, the Respondents who were working as LaboratoryAssistants have been granted revised pay scale of 4,000-6,000, with effect from 01.01.1996, as per recommendations of Vth Central Pay Commission and the Respondents have already demitted office after attaining the age of superannuation.2. They submit that while leaving the question of law open, the writ petitions may be disposed of as the Petitioners do not...
Hraadyesh Kumar vs State Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 8397/2023&CRL.M.A. 3393/2026 HRAADYESH KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kshitij Kumar, Advocate.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Raj Kumar, APP with SI Jitendra.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINORDER% 02.02.20261. Petitioner takes exception to order dated 16.12.2022 passed by concerned Magisterial Court which was upheld by the Court of Sessions on 14.07.2023.2. However, the petitioner has now moved application (CRL. M.A. 3393/2026) seeking withdrawal of his petition (CRL. M.C. 8397/2023).3. It is informed that on the basis of one Mediation Agreement dated 12.03.2025 between the parties, petitioner is no longer interested in pursuing with his present petition and seeks to withdraw the petition.4. The copy of the Mediation Agreement has also been attached along with the application.5. In view of the above, while allowing the abovesaid application, the main petition stands disposed of...
Jeet Singh Through Lrs & Ors. vs Government of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 7706/2025 & CM APPL. 71708/2025 JEET SINGH THROUGH LRS & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Eitesh Dabas, Advocate.versusGOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Nitika Bhutani, Advocate for R1. Mr. Sonal Anand with Mr. Aayush Sai and Ms. Surbhi Singh, Advocates for R2. Ms. Arti Bansal, Advocate for DDA.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 02.02.20261. The present petition was filed by Mr. Jeet Singh, who now hasexpired. The petition is being prosecuted by his legal heirs. It is the case of the petitioners that they are absolute and rightful owner of residential Khasra No.36/12/2, 13/2, 18 Gali No.19, B-Block situated at Village Mubarakpur Dabas also known as Dabas Hot/Metha Panni, Delhi.2. According to the petitioners, in absence of a proper approach road ofpublic gali extending till the boundary of the petitioners property, the premises is rendered useless and inacc...
- ‹ Prev
- 454
- 455
- 456
- 457
- 458
- 460
- 461
- 462
- 463
- 464
- Next ›
- Last »