Delhi Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Govt of Nct of Delhi vs Technical Staff Operation Theatre Association ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 6582/2025 & CM APPL. 29801/2025 GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI .....Petitioner Through: Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, SC GNCTD Services with Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh, Ms. Aliza Alam and Mr. Mohnish Sehrawat, Advs.versusTECHNICAL STAFF OPERATION THEATRE ASSOCIATION (REGD) AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Puneet Rathi, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 02.02.20261. Through the present writ petition, the Petitioner assailscorrectness of the order dated 20.07.2023 (clarified on 13.09.2024) [hereafter impugned order], passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) in O.A. No. 2188/2016.2. In the Original Application filed by the Respondents, grant ofpre-revised pay scale of 4,000-6,000 from 01.01.1996 to the Operation Theatre Assistants / CSSD, working under GNCTD has been ordered by the learned CAT based upon the judgment passed in O.A. No .2995/2014 (Dharambir Singh Ranga &am...
Smt. Baljit Kaur vs Delhi Development Authority & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ FAO 169/2021 SMT. BALJIT KAUR .....Appellant Through: Mr.Manish Kumar and Mr.Aviral S., AdvocatesversusDELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms.Kritika Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.1CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIORDER% 02.02.20261. The present appeal impugns the order dated 05.12.2020, where the appellants application under Orders XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of The Code of Civil Procedure,1908, came to be dismissed.2. This Court, vide order dated 11.08.2021, noting the fact situation,restrained the respondents from carrying out any further demolition and the appellant was further restrained from raising any construction in the subject property, till the next date of hearing. Subsequently, on CM APPL. No.order was sought, to the extent that respondent No.1 may be permitted tocomplete the demolition as well as to seal the subject property. However, during the course of the submissions, the prayer for f...
All India Pickleball Association vs Union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~J* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment pronounced on: 02.02.2026 + W.P.(C) 5736/2025 and CM APPLs.26168/2025, 31973/2025 ALL INDIA PICKLEBALL ASSOCIATION ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Advocate along with Mr. Gautam Narayan, Mr. Hemant Phalpher, Mr. R. A. Iyer, Ms. Disha Joshi and Mr. Sukrit Seth, Advocates.versusUNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Jayant Mehta, Sr. Advocate along with Ms. Arunima Dwivedi, CGSC, Mr. Aakash Pathak, GP, Ms. Pinky Pawar, Mr. Sainyam Bhardwaj, Advocates and Mr. Mohd. Zeeshan, Consultant for UOI. Mr. Rajshekhar Rao, Sr. Advocate along with Mr. Ashish Verma, Mr. Saksham Thareja, Mr. Nikhil Thakur and Mr. Kartikey Bhargava, Advocates for R-2. Mr. D. N. Goburdhan, Sr. Advocate along with Mr. Kunal Kohli, Ms. Shreyha Kohli, Advocates for proposed Respondent no.3.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTAJUDGMENT1. The petitioner is an association incorporated on 12.12.2008 for the purpose of promoting...
Yaksh Sharma vs Government of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 7714/2025 YAKSH SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sahil Sharma, Advocate.versusGOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sagar Kumar, SC for R-2.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 02.02.20261. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks liberty to withdraw the instant petition.2. Liberty, so prayed for, is granted.3. The instant petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J FEBRUARY 2, 2026 Nc/ksrThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/02/2026 at 13:15:35...
Anil Mithas vs Mrs Sudha Banga & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~19&20* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 2nd February, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 4714/2023 & CRL.M.A. 18036/2023 + CRL.M.C. 4717/2023 & CRL.M.A. 18042/2023CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral)1. Petitioner-Anil Mithas has been summoned in two separate complaints i.e. Complaint case bearing No. CC/2457/209 and CC/2461/2019 for committing offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.2. According to petitioner, he had resigned from the Directorship of theaccused Company w.e.f. 01.09.2017 and since the cheques in questions are of year 2018 and 2019, these do not incriminate him any manner whatsoever as, on the date when the cheques were drawn, he was neither the Director nor was concerned with the affairs of the accused Company, in any manner whatsoever.3. Admittedly, he is not even signatory to the cheques in question.4. It is for the abovesaid reasons that these two petitions have been filed Signed By:SONIA CRL.M.C. 47...
Anil Mithas vs Mrs Sudha Banga & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~19&20* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 2nd February, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 4714/2023 & CRL.M.A. 18036/2023 + CRL.M.C. 4717/2023 & CRL.M.A. 18042/2023CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral)1. Petitioner-Anil Mithas has been summoned in two separate complaints i.e. Complaint case bearing No. CC/2457/209 and CC/2461/2019 for committing offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.2. According to petitioner, he had resigned from the Directorship of theaccused Company w.e.f. 01.09.2017 and since the cheques in questions are of year 2018 and 2019, these do not incriminate him any manner whatsoever as, on the date when the cheques were drawn, he was neither the Director nor was concerned with the affairs of the accused Company, in any manner whatsoever.3. Admittedly, he is not even signatory to the cheques in question.4. It is for the abovesaid reasons that these two petitions have been filed Signed By:SONIA CRL.M.C. 47...
Rajat Chakraborty & Ors. vs Government of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 10578/2021 & CM APPL. 7995/2023 RAJAT CHAKRABORTY & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. P.S. Bindra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vinayak Marwah, Advocate.versusGOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, SC (GNCTD) with Ms. Aliza Alam and Mr. Mohnish Sehrawat, Advocates for R- 1. Mr. Mushtaque Ali, DDE Zone-29 and Mr. Tanveer Alam, OSD, Distt, South-East. Mr. Anukul Raj, Ms. Nikita Raj, Mr. Tushar Bhalla, Mr. Naveen, Mr. Vishal Yadav and Mr. Manjeet Goswami, Advocates for R-2 & 3.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULAORDER% 02.02.20261. The Petitioners are teachers and other staff members employed withRespondent No. 2 School, which is managed and controlled by Respondent No. 3 Society. They have approached this Court seeking, inter alia, directions for payment of salary and service-related benefits, deposit of statutory dues, consideration for promotion, and consequential ...
Zreyah Semiconductors Pvt. Ltd. vs Oyo Hotels and Homes Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 19 January 2026Judgment pronounced on: 2/2/26+ O.M.P. (COMM) 249/2023 & I.A. 14284/2025 ZREYAH SEMICONDUCTORS PVT. LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ashish Dholakia, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Gautam Bajaj, Mr. Akash Panwar, Ms. Meghna Jandu, Mr. Lakshay Nagpal & Ms. Saumya, Advs.versusOYO HOTELS AND HOMES PVT. LTD. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sumant Nayak, Mr. Ankit Premchandani & Ms. Smriti Shukla, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGANJUDGMENT1. M/s Zreyah Semiconductors Private Limited has filed the petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short the Act) aggrieved of the arbitral award dated 03.04.2023.FACTS2. The brief facts are that the petitioner is engaged in the businessof manufacturing and supply of electronic components. The respondent is a Private Limited Company engaged in the business of managing hospitality establishments. The respondent placed a Sig...
Babu Ram vs the State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 4158/2025 BABU RAM .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sandeep Kumar, Advocate with petitioner in person.versusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP with SI Panwar. R-2 is present in person.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 02.02.20261. The petitioner has filed this petition under Section 528 of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [BNSS] (corresponding to Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [CrPC]) seeking quashing of FIR No. 250/2011 dated 17.06.2011, registered at Police Station Sultan Puri, Delhi, under Sections 498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [IPC], and all proceedings emanating therefrom, on the ground of settlement.2. Issue notice. Ms. Manjeet Arya, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, accepts notice on behalf of the State.3. The petition is taken up for disposal with the consent of learned counsel for the parties.4. The impugned FIR is registered at...
Sh. Mukul Mittal vs Sr. Superintendent Policy Regional Passport Office
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~J* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIJudgment pronounced on: 02.02.2026+ W.P.(C) 6612/2025 SH. MUKUL MITTAL .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Vibhooti Malhotra, Mr. Bhuvnesh Satija, Mr. Udit Sharma and Mr. Aniket Khanduri, Advocates.versusSR. SUPERINTENDENT POLICY REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ashish K. Dixit, CGSC along with Mr. Shivam Tiwari, Mr. Umar Hashmi and Ms. Urmila Sharma, Advocates. Mr. Sanjay Pal, GP, UOI. + W.P.(C) 701/2025 and CM APPL.34616/2025 NARINDER CHUGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vikas Pahwa, Sr. Advocate along with Mr. Akshay Malik, Ms. Sanskriti Shakuntala Gupta and Mr. Shivanshu Gusain, Advocates.versusUNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Jivesh Kumar Tiwari, Sr. Panel Counsel and Ms. Samiksha, Advocate for UOI. + W.P.(C) 1215/2025 HARDEEP SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Prabhjyot Singh, Advocate.versusDigitally Signed By:ROHIT W.P.(C) 6612/2025 and Connected Matters Page 1 of 31...
- ‹ Prev
- 453
- 454
- 455
- 456
- 457
- 459
- 460
- 461
- 462
- 463
- Next ›
- Last »