Delhi Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
National Insurance Co Ltd vs Yogita Asija & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ MAC.APP. 145/2020 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD .....Appellant Through: Mr. Manoj Ranjan Sinha, Advocate (through VC).versusYOGITA ASIJA & ORS .....Respondents Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYALORDER% 24.02.2026CM APPL. 12451/2026 (corrections/modifications of orders)1. This application has been filed on behalf of appellant/InsuranceCompany seeking modification of order dated 2nd February 2026, to the extent that in paragraph 6 of the said order it is recorded by the Court that the appeal is dismissed.2. Clearly, this is a typographical error since the appeal wasdisposed of in terms of the re-computation set out in paragraph 4 of the said order.3. The application is, therefore, allowed. Accordingly, the saidrectification is incorporated and paragraph 6 will be read as Accordingly, the appeal stand disposed of in terms of the above. Pending applications, if any, are rendered infructuous.4. ...
Mohita Gogia vs Rajat Gogia
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~52&53* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 3277/2023 RAJAT GOGIA .....Respondent + CRL.M.C. 3302/2023 SURENDER KUMAR GOGIA & ANR. .....RespondentCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINORDER% 02.02.2026CRL.M.A. 3465/2026 in CRL.M.C. 3277/2023 CRL.M.A. 3459/2026 in CRL.M.C. 3302/20231. Both the petitions are connected petitions and, therefore, they havebeen taken up together.2. The next date in both the abovesaid petitions is 09.04.2026 but sincethe parties have amicably settled all their disputes, the petitioners have filed separate applications seeking early hearing.3. For the reasons stated in the applications, the abovesaid applicationsare allowed and the dates are pre-poned and, with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, both the matters have been taken up today.4. Mr. Valecha, learned counsel for respondents in both the abovesaidCRL.M.C. 3277/2023 & CRL.M.C. 3302/2023 1matters has joined the proceedings through ...
Mohita Gogia vs Surender Kumar Gogia & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~52&53* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 3277/2023 RAJAT GOGIA .....Respondent + CRL.M.C. 3302/2023 SURENDER KUMAR GOGIA & ANR. .....RespondentCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINORDER% 02.02.2026CRL.M.A. 3465/2026 in CRL.M.C. 3277/2023 CRL.M.A. 3459/2026 in CRL.M.C. 3302/20231. Both the petitions are connected petitions and, therefore, they havebeen taken up together.2. The next date in both the abovesaid petitions is 09.04.2026 but sincethe parties have amicably settled all their disputes, the petitioners have filed separate applications seeking early hearing.3. For the reasons stated in the applications, the abovesaid applicationsare allowed and the dates are pre-poned and, with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, both the matters have been taken up today.4. Mr. Valecha, learned counsel for respondents in both the abovesaidCRL.M.C. 3277/2023 & CRL.M.C. 3302/2023 1matters has joined the proceedings through ...
Khalid Khan vs Narcotics Control Bureau
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 1502/2025 & CRL.M.A. 3453/2026 KHALID KHAN .....Petitioner Through: Counsel (appearance not given).versusNARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU .....Respondent Through: Nemo.CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 02.02.20261. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner at this stage seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the instant bail application.2. Bail application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach the learned Trial Court. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of.3. The next date of hearing i.e., 09.02.2026 stands cancelled.4. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J FEBRUARY 02, 2026/A/RThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/02/2026 at 12:17:31...
Armaan International vs Assistant Commissioner, Cgst & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 4778/2025 ARMAAN INTERNATIONAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Adv.versusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, CGST & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. R. Ramachandran, Senior Standing Counsel.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBREHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAULORDER% 02.02.20261. Since the alternate remedy of appeal is available to the petitioner, we relegate the petitioner to take recourse to such appellate remedy.2. As such, the petition stands disposed of.3. The time spent in prosecuting the present petition shall be considered in the matter of reckoning the issue of limitation.4. Needless to clarify, this Court has not appreciated the merits of the matter.5. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE, J AJAY DIGPAUL, J FEBRUARY 2, 2026/ab/ssThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by...
M/S Sai Communication vs Union of India and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 6847/2021 and CM APPL. 21645/2021 M/S SAI COMMUNICATION .....Petitioner Through: Mr. A.K. Singh, Mr. Kamlesh Kamal, Mr. Gourav Prasad, Mr. Ankit Kumar, AdvocatesversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr Vikrant N Goyal, Advocate.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 02.02.20261. The instant petition is for the following reliefs:a. Pass an order quashing/setting aside the memorandum dated 1st July 2021 and impugned order dated 14.07.2021 bearing file no. C.13011/01/2021 passed by the respondent no. 1 being ultra-virus illegal and un-constitutional. b. Pass a direction that the petitioner shall not be prohibited from participating in any of the bidding process for any of the respondents tender. c. Pass a such other or further order or orders as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.2. The facts of the case, as stated, would indicate that on 23...
Royal Challengers Sports Private Limited vs Uber India Systems Private ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(COMM) 345/2025 ROYAL CHALLENGERS SPORTS PRIVATE LIMITED....Plaintiff Through: Ms. Priya Adlakha and Ms. Urvi Nama, AdvocatesversusUBER INDIA SYSTEMS PRIVATE LIMITED AND ORS .....Defendants Through: Ms. Anu Paarcha and Mr. Avijit Kumar, Advocates for D-1 & 2.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELAORDER% 02.02.20261. Learned counsel appearing for the plaintiff submits that the advertisement, which was assailed in the present suit, has run its course and therefore the suit itself has become infructuous and may be disposed of as such.2. In view of the aforesaid statement and having regard to the fact that learned counsel appearing for the defendants has no objection, the suit is disposed of as having become infructuous.3. The next date i.e. 08.04.2026, fixed before the Joint Registrar stands cancelled. TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J FEBRUARY 2, 2026 AjThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified ...
Satya Prakash Ravidas vs Alakh Niranjan Prasad Singhna & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~J* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment pronounced on: 02.02.2026 + CONT.CAS(C) 685/2025 SATYA PRAKASH RAVIDAS .....PetitionerversusALAKH NIRANJAN PRASAD SINGHNA & ORS. .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 13723/2025 SATYA PRAKASH RAVIDAS .....PetitionerversusTHE ADM DISTRICT SOUTH & ORS. .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 15987/2025 SATYA PRAKASH RAVIDAS .....PetitionerversusTHE REGISTRAR OF SOCIETIES & ANR. .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 16305/2025, CM APPL. 66703/2025, CM APPL. SATYA PRAKASH RAVIDAS .....PetitionerversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 2902/2025, CM APPL. 19993/2025, CM APPL. SATYA PRAKASH RAVIDAS .....PetitionerversusSDM HQ REGISTRAR OF SOCIETIES & ANR. .....Respondents Presence: Mr. Satya Prakash Ravidas, Petitioner in person in CONT.CAS(C) 685/2025, W.P.(C) 13723/2025, W.P.(C) CONT.CAS(C) 685/2025 & Connected Matters Page 1 of 31 Mr. Jayant Bhushan, Sr. Advocate along with Mr. Anil Dutt, Mr. Yogit Mehra, Mr. Paras Choudhary, M...
M/S Eagle Eye Security and Housekeeping Services vs Union of India & A ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 6875/2021, CM APPL. 21760/2021 and CM APPL. M/S EAGLE EYE SECURITY AND HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Jai Savla, Senior Advocate with Mr.Prashant Parihar, AdvocateversusUNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vijay Joshi, CGSCCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 02.02.20261. The instant petition is for the following reliefs:-a. Issue a Writ, order, or direction in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction hereby quashing/ setting aside the order dated 14.07.2021 of the Respondent for cancellation of the GeM contract and blacklisting of the Petitioner; b. Issue a Writ, order, or direction in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction thereby quashing/ setting aside the cancellation request dated 20.07.2021 of the Respondent for cancellation of the GeM contract and the demand that the Petitioner agency should...
M/S Cyber Media Research and Services Ltd vs Currimbhoy Mills Pvt Ltd ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 36/2025 M/S CYBER MEDIA RESEARCH AND SERVICES LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankit Kumar, Adv.versusCURRIMBHOY MILLS PVT LTD AND ANR......Respondents Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJANORDER% 02.02.20261. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 14 and 15 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1986 (in short the Act) seeking to substitute the sole arbitrator.2. Mr. Ankit Kumar, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the notice in the present petition was issued by this Court vide order dated 11.09.2025.3. He submits that the respondents have been served with a notice sentthrough courier. In support of his contention, he invites attention of the Court to Annexure A-13 (pages 11-13 of the paper book), which shows the article sent to the addressee was delivered.4. In that view of the matter, the respondent is taken to have been served. Nonetheles...
- ‹ Prev
- 452
- 453
- 454
- 455
- 456
- 458
- 459
- 460
- 461
- 462
- Next ›
- Last »