Delhi Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Vivek Kumar vs Union of India and Others
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~40 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1358/2026 CM APPL. 6724/2026 VIVEK KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Raghunath Pathak, Mr. Varad Dwivedi, Mrs. Shweta Priya, Mrs. Pratima Singh, Pragya, Advs. versusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anubhav Tyagi, SPC, Mr. Rahul Bhaskar, GP, Mr. Bharat Gautam, Ms. Lipi Garg with Deputy Commandant Devender Singh CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA ORDER % 02.02.2026 1. This is a petition filed with the following prayers: a) Issue a Writ in the nature of certiorari or Mandamus or such other appropriate writ or orders quashing the salary slip (wrongful deduction of Rs. 10,754) for the month of January 2026 issued by Office of Director General, I.T.B.P as arbitrary, illegal and against the policy of l.T.B.P. b) Decide the representation dated 27.01.2026 made to the Respondent I.T.B.P officials. c) Pass any such further orde...
Nakul Chhillar vs State Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~63 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 842/2026 & CRL.M.A. 3330/2026 NAKUL CHHILLAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Hemant Shah, Mr. Saurabh Verma, Mr. Akshay Rana, Mr. Saurabh Pal, Mr. Vishal Mann, Mr. Ojas Kaushik, Advocates.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the State with Ms. Vanshika Singh and Ms. Divya Bakshi, Advocates. SI Ajeet and SI Kulbir, PS-Hari Nagar. Ms. Anjali Sawhney, Mr. Prashant Kumar and Mr. Vaibhav, Advocates.CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE ORDER % 02.02.20261. By virtue of the present petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.458/2023 dated 27.11.2023 registered under Sections 279/337/304A ofThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning ...
Dr. Manglo Rani & Anr. vs Union of India Through Ministry of Housing a ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~91 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1357/2026 & CM APPL. 6723/2026DR. MANGLO RANI & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Karmanya Singh Choudhary, Adv.versusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH MINISTRY OF HOUSING AND URBAN AFFAIRS & ORS. .....Respondenta Through: Mr. Chandan Deep Singh, SPC with Mr. Rishav Kashyap, GP, Mr. Aman Sinha, Mr. Amitabh Pandey and Ms Shambhavi, Advocates for R-1 & 2.CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV ORDER % 02.02.20261. The petitioners grievance seems to be that the regularization of the similarly situated quarters is being permitted by the respondents. Whereas, the regularization of the petitioners quarter has been rejected. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents points out from the order dated 20.09.2022, regarding quarter No.821, Type II, Sector-3, R. K. Puram, New Delhi 110022, that on account of the retirement of the father of the applicant therein, the quarter was regularized. 3. Learn...
Saahil Nayar vs Vermilon Cosmetics Private Limited & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~36 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 36/2026 & I.A. 2676/2026 SAAHIL NAYAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravi Sikri, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Gaurav Goyal, Mr. Deepak Yadav, Mr. Rohit Agrawal, Mr. Nishant Goyal and Mr. Vaibhav Sharma, Advs. Mob: 9899886074 Email: [email protected] versusVERMILON COSMETICS PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Aditya Mukherjee, Mr. Chaitanya Gupta and Ms. Ria Kumar, Advs. for R-1 to 4. Mob: 9780310552 Email: [email protected] CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA ORDER % 02.02.2026 1. The present petition has been filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Arbitration Act), seeking urgent interim measures for protection and preservation of the subject matter of the disputes, arising out of Shareholders Agreement dated 18th March, 2025 and the Employment Agreement dated 18th March, 2025, executed between ...
Kusum Lata Damani vs State Govt. of Nct Fo Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~79 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 872/2026, CRL.M.A. 3484-85/2026 KUSUM LATA DAMANI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mohit Mathur, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vighneshwar, Mr. Deepak Yadav and Ms. Chaitaili, Advocates. versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT FO DELHI AND ANR......Respondent Through: Mr. Raghuinder Verma, APP for the State with Mr. Aditya Vikram Singh, Advocate Mr. Krishan Goenka, Advocate (Through VC). CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE ORDER % 02.02.2026 1. After some arguments, upon instructions, learned senior counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition with liberty to avail appropriate remedies qua the proceedings before the learned Trial Court. 2. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.SAURABH BANERJEE, J FEBRUARY 02, 2026/NAThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the Q...
Shri R J Patel College of Education & Anr. vs National Council for Tea ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~60 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1368/2026 SHRI R J PATEL COLLEGE OF EDUCATION & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Amitesh Kumar Ms. Priti Kumari Mr.Pankaj kumar ray, Advs. versus NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Adv Mohinder Rupal Adv Hardik Rupal Adv Aishwarya Malhotra Adv Tripta Sharma CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH ORDER % 02.02.2026 1. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following prayers:- a) issue a writ of mandamus or any other suitable writ or order or direction to respondents to decide the representation submitted by petitioner with consequential direction to restore recognition of B.Ed course with intake of 100 seats (two basic units); and/or b) issue a writ of mandamus or any other suitable writ or order or direction to respondents to update the name of petitioner institute in the list of recognized institutions...
Gauri Kansal (Minor) Through Father Anil Kansal vs Govt. of Nct of Del ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~69 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1396/2026, CM APPL. 6864/2026-EX. & CM APPL. 6863/2026 GAURI KANSAL (MINOR) THROUGH FATHER ANIL KANSAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Varun Mittal, Adv. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ran Singh Kadian, Adv. for R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH ORDER % 02.02.20261. Mr. Mittal, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action incorporating additional pleas. 2. Granting the said liberty, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 3. Consequently, all pending applications are disposed off accordingly.JASMEET SINGH, J FEBRUARY 2, 2026/rrThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/02/2026 at 12:39:27...
Bhagat Singh & Ors. vs State Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~59 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 02nd February, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 864/2026 & CRL.M.A. 3425/2026BHAGAT SINGH & ORS. ....Petitioner Through: Mr. Naveen Kumar, Advocate.VersusSTATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Raj Kumar, APP for the State with SI Nitesh. Mr. Mehtab Singh, Advocate for R-2 along with respondent No.2 in person.CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral)1. Petitioners herein seek quashing of FIR No. 0413/2024 dated 13.07.2024, registered at P.S. Sagar Pur, for commission of offences under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC, along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 2. Petitioner No.1 and respondent No.2 got married on 07.07.2018, as per Hindu rites and ceremonies. 3. The marriage took place in Delhi, however, on account of some temperamental differences, they both started living separately w.e.f 06.08.2021. 4...
Shripal Singh vs Union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~54 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1430/2026 SHRIPAL SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Himanshu Gautam and Ms. Niharika Punn, Advs. versusUNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Abhishek Yadav, SPC and Mr. Sarthak Rana, GP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA ORDER % 02.02.2026 1. This petitions has been filed with the following prayers:- a) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of certiorari thereby quashing and setting aside the order dated 18.06.2025 to the extent it requires the Petitioners to submit documents qua their retiral benefits at the age of 57 years. b) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the Respondents to allow the Petitioners to continue in service till 60 years of age alongwith all consequential benefits. c) Issue any other suitable writ, order or direction as this Honble court may deem fit and proper und...
Jaswant Singh vs State of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~64 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 354/2026 JASWANT SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shannu Baghel, Mr. Aakash, Mr. Saksham Kumar and Mr. Ganpat Ram, Advocates.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, ASC with Mr. Arjit Sharma and Ms. Sakshi Jha, Advocates. SI Vinod Kumar.CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN ORDER % 02.02.2026 1. Petitioner seeks quashing of orders dated 30.08.2024 and 18.09.2024 whereby his prayer for premature relief did not find favour by the concerned Sentence Review Board (SRB). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that one of the reasons assigned is that a blind man had been murdered. He states that the SRB did not consider the fact that his co-convict, who was also facing similar allegation and had been held guilty for committing murder of same blind person, was granted remission by them, in the same meeting. 3. However, after hearing arguments for some ...
- ‹ Prev
- 448
- 449
- 450
- 451
- 452
- 454
- 455
- 456
- 457
- 458
- Next ›
- Last »