Delhi Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
City Convent School & Anr. vs Council for the Indian School Certificat ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2109/2022 & CM APPL. 6067/2022CITY CONVENT SCHOOL & ANR......Petitioners Through: Mr. Anukul Raj, Mrs. Nikita Raj, Mr.Tushar Bhalla, Mr. Naveen, Mr. Vishal Yadav,Mr. Manjeet Goswami, Advs.versusCOUNCIL FOR THE INDIAN SCHOOL CERTIFICATEEXAMINATIONS.....Respondent Through: Mr. Shoumendu Mukherji, Ms. Megha Sharma, Mr. Aniruddha Ghosh, Ms. Surabhi Tuli Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 02.02.20261. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia seeking setting aside of the order dated 15.12.2021 issued by the respondent.2. The brief facts are that one Mr. Rajesh Kumar Upadhyay executed aTrust Deed dated 30.08.1999 in the name and style of National Education Foundation trust (NEF).3. Mr. Rajesh Kumar Upadhyay incorporated another family privatetrust in the name of NIIT JEE, i.e. petitioner No. 2, vide Trust Deed dated 04.07.2008.4. An amendment was carried ou...
Pawan Kumar vs Sandeep Goel
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~52 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 02nd February, 2026 + CM(M) 252/2026PAWAN KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Pallav Arora and Mr. Apoorv Kataria, Advocates. versusSANDEEP GOEL .....Respondent Through: Mr. Shiv Charan Garg, Mr. Imran Khan, Ms. Jahanvi Garg and Ms. Aarushi Jain, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA ORDER (Oral) Rajneesh Kumar Gupta, J. 1. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode. CAV 57/2026 2. As the learned Counsel for the Respondent has appeared, the Caveat stands discharged. CM APPL. 7013/2026 (for condonation of delay) 3. The present application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking condonation of delay of 18 days in refiling the present petition. 4. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay of 18 days in refiling the present petition is condoned and the ap...
Union of India and Ors vs Sgt Rajesh Kumar Singh (Retd.)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~61 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 02.02.2026+ W.P.(C) 1459/2026 & CM APPL. 7113/2026 CM APPL. 7114/2026UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr Anshuman, SPC and Mr. Vaibhav Sood, Adv.versusSGT RAJESH KUMAR SINGH (RETD.) .....Respondent Through:CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORAMANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J. (ORAL)CM APPL. 7114/2026(for exemption) 1. Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. The application is disposed of. W.P.(C) 1459/2026 & CM APPL. 7113/2026 3. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 21.04.2023 [impugned order] passed by the Armed Forces Tribunal Principal Bench, New Delhi [Tribunal] in Original Application [O.A.] No. 1115/2022 titled as SGT Rajesh Kumar Singh (Retd.) v. Union of India & Ors., wherein the Respondent has been grantedSignature Not Verified Signe...
Shri Bhagwan Projects Pvt Ltd vs C S Construction Co Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~47 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ARB.P. 208/2026 SHRI BHAGWAN PROJECTS PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. S N Pandey AdvocateversusC S CONSTRUCTION CO PVT LTD .....Respondent Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD ORDER % 02.02.20261. The present Petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 has been filed by the Petitioner for appointment of an Arbitrator to adjudicate upon disputes between the parties. 2. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present Petition with liberty to take such steps, as may be available to the Petitioner in accordance with law, including filing of a Suit. 3. Leave and liberty, as prayed for, is granted. 4. The Petition is disposed of as withdrawn, along with the pending applications, if any. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not made any observations on the merits of the case.SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J FEBRUARY 02, 2026 RahulThis is a digital...
Raju Mahto vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~76 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1401/2026 & CM APPL. 6872/2026 RAJU MAHTO .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Alok Raj, Advocate.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sahaj Garg, SPC with Mr. Deepansh Sharma, G.P. for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA ORDER % 02.02.20261. The Petitioner, a visually impaired (blind) person, is presently employed as a Junior Clerk with the East Central Railway, Dhanbad Division. He applied for recruitment to the post of Probationary Officers/Management Trainees for the vacancies pertaining to the year 2026-27. 2. The recruitment notification provided for reservation in favour of candidates belonging to the Other Backward Classes (OBC) as well as Persons with Disabilities (PwD). The Petitioner applied under the OBC (Non-Creamy Layer) category and also claimed the benefit of reservation as a visually impaired candidate. He appeared in the preliminary as well as the main exa...
Nipa Jain (Prop. of M.S Tijil Interiors) vs Sunil Dutt Pokhriyal & Anr ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ARB.P. 215/2026 NIPA JAIN (PROP. OF M.S TIJIL INTERIORS) .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravi Kumar and Mr. Abhishek Kumar Singh, Advocates. versusSUNIL DUTT POKHRIYAL & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Nemo.CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR ORDER % 02.02.2026 1. The present petition has been filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking the appointment of Sole Arbitrator for the purpose of resolution of disputes inter se the parties in terms of the Agreement dated 08.04.2024 as executed between the parties. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner on instructions, states that he would like to withdraw the present petition to take such steps as are available to him under law. 3. Liberty, as sought for, is granted. 4. Accordingly, the present petition along with pending application(s), if any, stands dismissed as withdrawn.HARISH VAIDYANATHAN...
Smt Vimalaben a Soni Ptc College & Anr. vs National Council for Teache ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~71 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1404/2026 SMT VIMALABEN A SONI PTC COLLEGE & ANR......Petitioners Through: Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Ms. Priti Kumari and Mr. Pankaj Kumar Ray, Advs.versusNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rupal, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH ORDER % 02.02.20261. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following reliefs:- i. issue a writ of mandamus or any other suitable writ or order or direction to respondents to update the status of petitioner institute and display its name in the list/category of recognised institutions for conducting PTC (CP/Ed) Course with intake of 50 seats (one basic unit) on their official website; and/or ii. issue a writ of mandamus or any other suitable writ or order directing respondents to inform affiliating body as well as Department of Higher Education, Government of Gujarat commun...
Ravi Kant Attri and Ors vs Registrar of Societies and Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~93 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1378/2026 RAVI KANT ATTRI AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Sangeeta Singh, Advocate.versusREGISTRAR OF SOCIETIES AND ORS .....RespondentsThrough: Mr.Santosh Kumar Rout, Advocate for R-BOB.CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV ORDER % 02.02.20261. The instant petition is for the following reliefs:- a) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction thereby directing Respondent No. 1 (Registrar of Societies, GNCTD) to ensure the immediate conduct of free, fair, and transparent elections of the Managing Committee of Shri Sanatan Dharma Radha Krishna Mandir Sabha (Regd.), in accordance with the registered Bye- laws and the Societies Registration Act, 1860. b) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction thereby directing Respondent No. 1 (Registrar of Societies, GNCTD) directing the last duly elected Managing Committee of the mandir ...
Shri Ashok Arora vs Shri Rajender Singh
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~43 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 245/2026, CM APPL. 6685/2026 &CM APPL. 6686/2026 SHRI ASHOK ARORA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Harsh Vardhan Singh, Advocate.versusSHRI RAJENDER SINGH .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA ORDER % 02.02.2026 1. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode. 2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition with liberty to avail appropriate remedies in accordance with law. 3. Keeping in view the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is disposed of as withdrawn, with liberty as sought, in accordance with law. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J FEBRUARY 2, 2026/nd/ikThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order i...
Mohd Asim & Ors. vs State of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~78 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 340/2026 MOHD ASIM & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Petitioners with their counselversusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, ASC for the State with Mr. Aryan Sachdeva Advocate along with SI Kriti Singh. R-2 with her counselCORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA ORDER % 02.02.2026 CRL.M.A. 3304/2026 (exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. Application stands disposed of. W.P.(CRL) 340/2026 3. By way of the present petition, the petitioners are seeking quashing of FIR bearing no. 282/2024, registered at Police Station Welcome, Delhi for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 498A/406/34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter IPC). 4. The petitioners and respondent no. 2 are present before this Court and have been identified by their counsels and concerned Investigating Officer (IO) from Police Station Welcome, Delhi.This is...
- ‹ Prev
- 445
- 446
- 447
- 448
- 449
- 451
- 452
- 453
- 454
- 455
- Next ›
- Last »