Delhi Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sh Vikash Dabas & Anr. vs Government of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 1435/2026, CM APPL. 6983-6984/2026SH VIKASH DABAS & ANR. .....PetitionersThrough: Mr. Randhir Kumar, Advocate.VersusGOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....RespondentsThrough: Mr. Shashi Pratap Singh, Ms. Shagun Sabharwal, Advocates for R-1 & 2.CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA ORDER % 02.02.2026 1. The Petitioner submits that he was pursuing his remedy under Section 42 of the East Punjab Holdings (consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation Act, 1948) before the Financial Commissioner, GNCTD, in Case No. 15/2020. However, the said proceedings were withdrawn as the land in question came to be urbanised by a notification of the GNCTD, and consequently, the Financial Commissioner ceased to have jurisdiction to adjudicate the dispute. 2. In such circumstances, after making submissions for some time, counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to take rec...
Akhilesh vs State Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~55 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 449/2026 & CRL.M.A. 3440/2026 AKHILESH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Gaurav Tyagi, Ms. Aparna Kaushik, Mr. Deepanshu B., Mr. Jatin Nagar and Mr. Vaibav Tyagi, Advocates.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar Gautam, APP for the State with W/SI Shailja, P.S. Prasad Nagar.CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN ORDER % 02.02.2026 1. Applicant seeks interim bail in FIR No. 289/2023 dated 28.05.2023, for commission of offences under Sections 365/376/506 of IPC, registered at P.S. Parshad Nagar. 2. The reason assigned in the bail application was to the effect that his mother was unwell and hospitalized and in state of coma. 3. However, it has now been apprised that the mother of the applicant has breathed her last, yesterday itself. 4. I.O. is present and verifies the facts that the mother of the applicant has died yesterday, while admitted in the above hospital. 5....
Mr Rajiv Kumar Roy & Ors. vs State of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~109 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 361/2026 MR RAJIV KUMAR ROY & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Janki Raman Jha, Advocate alongwith P-1 to 5 in Person.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel (Criminal) with Mr. Aryan Sachdeva, Advocate. SI Neeraj, PS Saket. Mr. Jitender Mehta, Mr. Lalit Kumar & Mr. Abinav Kumar, Advocates for R-2 alongwith R-2 in Person.CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN ORDER % 02.02.2026CRL.M.A. 3481/2026 (for exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(CRL) 361/2026 1. The petitioners have filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking quashing of FIR No. 270/2025 dated 29.07.2025, lodged at Police Station Saket, New Delhi, under Sections 498A/406 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 [IPC], on the ground of settlement.W.P.(CRL) 361/2026 Page 1 of 6This is a digitally signed orde...
Sh. Hari Om Gupta @Deepak & Ors. vs the State Govt. of N.C.T.of Delftt ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~80 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 875/2026, CRL.M.A. 3496/2026 SH. HARI OM GUPTA @DEEPAK & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. S.K. Dayal and Ms. Deepika Tiwari, Advocates.versusTHE STATE GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP with Mr. Upasana Bakshi, Advocate and SI Vikas Kumar, PS-Kalyanpuri. Mr. Sameer Ahmad, Advocate for R-2 with R-2 in person.CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE ORDER % 02.02.2026 1. By virtue of the present petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.138/2024 dated 14.02.2024 registered at PS: Kalyanpuri, Delhi under Sections 498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and all proceedings emanating therefrom, in view of the Mediation Settlement dated 05.11.2024 arrived at between the petitioner no.1 and the...
Dsk Legal vs Govt. of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~66 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1414/2026 & CM APPL. 6955/2026 DSK LEGAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravi Prakash, Senior Advocate with Ms. Astu Khandelwal, Mr. Yasharth Shukla. Mr. Taha Yasin and Mr. Sahan Ulla, Advs.versusGOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Urvi Mohan, Adv. for GNCTDCORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL ORDER % 02.02.2026CM APPL. 6956/2026 (Exemption) 1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 1414/2026 3. Heard. 4. The challenge is to the order dated 26th December, 2025 on the ground that the same sans raison. We have perused the said order. 5. It is not in dispute that pursuant to the notice dated 30th September, 2025 under Section 73 of the CGST Act, 2017, the petitioner uploaded a detailed reply on 7th October, 2025.This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the orde...
Krishan Agarwal vs Manish Jain and Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~50 & 51 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 250/2026 &CM APPL. 7002/2026 KRISHAN AGARWAL .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Prerana, Advocate. versusMANISH JAIN AND ORS & ANR. .....Respondents Through: None. 51 + CM(M) 251/2026 &CM APPL. 7005/2026 KRISHAN AGARWAL .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Prerana, Advocate. versusMANISH JAIN AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: None.CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA ORDER % 02.02.2026 1. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode. 2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition. 3. Keeping in view the submissions made by the learned Counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J FEBRUARY 2, 2026 v/tpThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the...
Medhansh Enterprises L L P and Anr vs Govt of Nct of Delhi Amd Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~82 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1390/2026 & CM APPL. 6845/2026 MEDHANSH ENTERPRISES L L P AND ANR .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Anroop P. S., S. S. Rana, Mr. Virender Singh & Mr. Gopal Rana, Advocates.versusGOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AMD ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Lall Taksh Joshi & Mr. Sameer Gupta, Advocates for GNCTD.CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA ORDER % 02.02.2026 1. The Petitioner No.1 is the intending purchaser of the land admeasuring Khasra No. 86//13 min (East) (1-12), 86//14 (5-15) & 86//17 (3-16) situated in the revenue estate of Village Khanjawala, Delhi 110081. A document was executed for the transfer of the said land from the recorded owner in the Petitioners favour described as sale deed dated 18th December, 2025 and was duly presented before Respondent No. 1 (Sub- Registrar) for registration. A receipt evidencing such presentation has been issued; however, the document has not been processed ...
M/S Dynamed Equipments vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~60 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1458/2026 & CM APPL. 7111/2026 M/S DYNAMED EQUIPMENTS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Gaurav Bharadwaj and Ms. Garima Bharadwaj, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rohan Jaitly, CGSC, Mr. Dev Pratap Shani, GP, Mr. Varun Pratap Singh and Ms. Yogya Bhatia, Advs. Ms. Shweta Bharti, Ms. Liz Thachet, Ms. Nishi Kashyap, Ms. Nikita Sharma and Ms. Nishi Rathore, Advs. for R-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA ORDER % 02.02.2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks and is allowed to withdraw the present petition in order to file a fresh petition with the relevant documents. 2. At his request, the petition along with pending application is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file a fresh petition in accordance with law.V. KAMESWAR RAO, JMANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J FEBRUARY 02, 2026/rkThis is a digital...
Oyo Hotels and Homes Private Limited vs M/S Karthik Bhavan & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 39/2026 OYO HOTELS AND HOMES PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Paromita Majumdar, Ms. Meenakshi Vimal, Mr. Akash Bhatt and Ms. Riya Sagar, Advocates.versusM/S KARTHIK BHAVAN & ORS. .....Respondents Through: None.CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR ORDER % 02.02.2026 1. The present Petition, under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeks the following reliefs:a) Grant a direction to maintain the status quo with respect to secure and unhindered management and operational control of the subject property situated at W-No. 21, Park Badavne, Shivamogga, Karnataka-577201, India, operating under the brand name Karthik Bhavan, in accordance with the MSA dated 05.03.2025;b) Pass a direction restraining the Respondent, its agents, servants, or any other persons claiming through or under it, from in any manner interfering with, obstructing, or creati...
Ashok Kumar vs Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~88 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 1389/2026ASHOK KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Counsel (Appearance not given)versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Puneet Dhawan, SPC with Mr. Rahul Kumar Sharma, Govt Pleader for UOI. Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Mr. Anshuman Mehrotra and Mr. Nikunj Arora, Advs. for R-47.CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN ORDER % 02.02.2026CM APPL. 6835/2026 [exemption from filing certified copy of the impugned order] CM APPL. 6836/2026 [exemption from filing typed copies of dim, small font size and illegible documents]1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. Applications stand disposed of. W.P.(C) 1389/2026 & CM APPL. 6834/2026 3. Through the present writ petition, the Petitioner assails correctness of the order dated 12.01.2026, passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi, in M.A. No. 2280/2025 in O.A. No. 4762/202...
- ‹ Prev
- 441
- 442
- 443
- 444
- 445
- 447
- 448
- 449
- 450
- 451
- Next ›
- Last »