Delhi Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mwo Prakash Chandra Lenka vs Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 502/2026 CM APPL. 2407/2026 MWO PRAKASH CHANDRA LENKA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravi Kumar, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Nirvikar Verma, SPC and Sgt. C. P. Chandan. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA ORDER % 02.02.20261. We have been informed by the counsel for the respondents that the petitioner has been posted at Barrackpur, West Bengal and the petitioner has joined the place of posting. 2. Though the counsel for the petitioner would urge that appropriate would have been that the petitioner is posted at Bhubaneswar, but we have been informed that there is no post commensurating his qualification available at Bhubaneswar, as it is only a selection centre. 3. In view of the fact that the petitioner is posted near to his home State, we dispose of this petition along with pending application.V. KAMESWAR RAO, J...
Raj Kumar Rai Alias Raj Kumar Ray & Ors. vs the State Nct of Delhi and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 02nd February, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 300/2026& CRL.M.A. 1132/2026 & CRL.M.A. 1133/2026RAJ KUMAR RAI ALIAS RAJ KUMAR RAY & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Kajal Rani, Advocate with petitioners in person. versusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR ....Respondents Through: Mr. Raj Kumar, APP for the State with SI Ingkumnaro, PS New Ashok Nagar Advocate for the respondent No.2 (appearance not given) with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Petitioners herein seeks quashing of FIR No.590/2016 dated 17.11.2016, registered at P.S. New Ashok Nagar, for commission of offences under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 2. Petitioner No.1 got married to respondent No.2 on 27.10.2013 as per Hindu rites and ceremonies. Parties were blessed with...
Pradeepa Shivashankar vs Vishal Pal Singh Commissioner of Customs
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 77/2026 PRADEEPA SHIVASHANKAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Swaswank Rai, Mr. Saikat Gangopadhyay, Mr.Himalya Sharma and Ms. Shreya Shankar, Advs. versusVISHAL PAL SINGH COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS .....Respondent Through: Mr. Aditya Singhla, SSC, Ms. Arya Suresh Nair, Adv., CBIC (through v/c) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA ORDER % 02.02.2026 1. Mr. Aditya Singla, learned counsel for the respondent informs that in terms of order dated 30.01.2026 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in modification application bearing no. 6266/2026 filed by the respondent in W.P(C) 11902/2025, the time period for compliance has been extended till 10.02.2026. 2. It is submitted that the petitioner has been asked to appear before the Custom Department on 10.02.2026 for release of the concerned items. The said statement is taken on record. 3. In view thereof, no further orders are required to be passed. 4. T...
Munish Dabas vs Central Board of Direct Taxes & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 75/2026 MUNISH DABAS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Parth Sahrawat, Advocate. versusCENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vipul Agrawal, Sr. Standing Counsel along with Mr. Akshat Singh, Jr. Standing Counsel, Ms. Sakshi Sheriwal, Jr. Standing Counsel, Mr. Gooraang Ranjan and Ms. Harshita Kotru, Advocates for Revenue. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA ORDER % 02.02.20261. During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the respondents submits that the directions contained in the order dated 18.03.2025 passed in W.P.(C) 1333/2025, read with the order dated 22.04.2025 passed in CM APPL.23019/2025 (seeking modification of the aforesaid order dated 18.03.2025), have been complied with, inasmuch as the respondents have issued the process for determining the reward payable to the petitioner, and on culmination of the said process, have issued a sanction order dated 30...
Al Saad Traders Through Its Proprietor Anash vs Commisisoner of Centra ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 341/2026 & CM APPL. 1667/2026 & CM APPL. 1666/2026 AL SAAD TRADERS THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR ANASH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. M. A. Ansari, Ms. Tabbasum Firdause, Mr. Mohd. Imran and Mr. Ahmad Ansari, Advs.versusCOMMISISONER OF CENTRAL TAX & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Samiksha Godiyal, SSC, CBIC with Mr. Tenzing Namgyal Bhutia and Mr. Rithwik Narayanan, Advs.CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL ORDER % 02.02.20261. We see no reason to entertain the present petition particularly when the petitioner has alternate and efficacious remedy. Just because, the petitioner is claiming that financially, he is not in a position to make the statutory pre-deposit of 10 % of the liability at the time of filing of appeal, that by itself will not render the appellate remedy infructuous nor may lead to maintainability of this petition. 2. That being so, th...
Alka Bharti vs Karan Sagar
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~5&6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI (5) MAT.APP.(F.C.) 304/2023 KARAN SAGAR .....Appellant Through: Mr. Varun Mittal, Ms. Bhavya Mishra, Advs. versus ALKA BHARTI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sumit Kumar Yadav, Adv. (6)+ MAT.APP.(F.C.) 14/2024 ALKA BHARTI .....Appellant Through: Mr. Sumit Kumar Yadav, Adv. versus KARAN SAGAR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Varun Mittal, Ms. Bhavya Mishra, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK CHAUDHARY HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RENU BHATNAGAR ORDER % 02.02.2026 1. Learned counsel for the parties inform that the matter has been settled between the parties and have already moved the first motion before the Family Court. Hence, they pray to withdraw the present appeals. 2. In view of the above, the present appeals along with pending applications, if any, stand disposed of as withdrawn. VIVEK CHAUDHARY, JRENU BHATNAGAR, J FEBRUARY 2, 2026/bs/smThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can b...
Rohit Jindal & Ors. vs State of Nct Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 449/2026 ROHIT JINDAL & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Ankit Yadav and Mr. Deepanshu, Advocates. versusSTATE OF NCT DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP with Mr. Upasana Bakshi, Advocate SI Mahendra Patel, HC-Somvir, PS-Narela. Respondent No.2 through VC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE ORDER % 02.02.2026 1. By virtue of the present petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.879/2025 dated 26.12.2025 registered under Sections 115(2)/126(2)/117(2)/351(2)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS) at PS: Narela, and all proceedings emanating therefrom since the petitioners and the respondent no.2 have settled all their disputes. 2. The present petition is accompanied by the NOC of the respondent no.2 [Pages 29-30] alongwith the respective proofs of identity of the petitio...
Jaideep Kanojia vs State Nct of Delhi Through Sho Ps Kalindi Kunj
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~51 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 412/2026&CRL.M.A. 3123/2026 JAIDEEP KANOJIA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rishabh Yadav, Advocate.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI THROUGH SHO PS KALINDI KUNJ .....Respondent Through: Mr. Raj Kumar, APP with SI Satyapreet.CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN ORDER % 02.02.2026 1. Since the FIR in question has been quashed in CRL.M.C. 878/2026, learned counsel of the petitioner does not pray for any further relief. 2. In view of the fact that the FIR has been quashed, present application has become infructuous. 3. The application is disposed of as having become infructuous.MANOJ JAIN, J FEBRUARY 2, 2026/sw/pbThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/02/2026 at 12:20:32...
Mohd Sageer vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1351/2026 & CM APPL. 6701/2026, CM APPL. 6702/2026 MOHD SAGEER .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Renu, Ms Mansi, Mr Momin and Mr. Kamlesh Kumar Mishra, Advs. (M: 8851594695) versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ORS....Respondents Through: Ms. Puja S. Kalra, Standing Counsel with Mr. Virendra Singh, Adv. for MCD. (M: 9312839323) Mr. Ravindra Vikram Singh, SPC and Ms. Bhawna, Govt. Pleader for R-3 & 4. (M: 9810994987) Ms. Vaishali Gupta, Panel Counsel (Civil), GNCTD for R-5. (M: 9910623535) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE MADHU JAIN ORDER % 02.02.2026 1. This hearing has been through hybrid mode. 2. The present petition has been filed by the Petitioner Mr. Mohd. Sageer under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, seeking an appropriate writ directing the Respondents to allow the Petitioner to peacefully vend at his vending site i.e., near pavement of Astha Kunj Road, opposi...
Mustaq vs State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi) Through Sho, P.S. Ranhola
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~56 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 434/2026 MUSTAQ ..... Applicant Through: Mr. Rohit Singh, Adv.versusSTATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) THROUGH SHO, P.S. RANHOLA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP with Ms. Upasna Bakshi, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE ORDER % 02.02.2026 CRL.M.A. 3335/2026 (Exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. The application is disposed of. BAIL APPLN. 434/2026, CRL.M.A. 3336/2026 (seeking clarification as to the date of surrender) 3. By virtue of the present application under Section 483 read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), the applicant seeks extension of interim bail granted for a period of thirty days in FIR No.491/2025 dated 25.07.2025 registered at PS.: Ranhola, Outer District, Delhi under Sections 109(1)/191(2)/191(3)/190/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS) and Sections 25/27 of the Arms Act, 1959.This is ...
- ‹ Prev
- 439
- 440
- 441
- 442
- 443
- 445
- 446
- 447
- 448
- 449
- Next ›
- Last »