Delhi Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Mahabir Flex (Actually M/S Mahavir Steel Through Sole Proprietor S ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-03-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 1465/2026 M/S MAHABIR FLEX (ACTUALLY M/S MAHAVIR STEEL THROUGH SOLE PROPRIETOR SH. ANIL JAIN).....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shri Harsh, Adv.versusSHRI RAMESH AND ORS .....Respondents Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTAORDER% 03.02.20261. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner assailing an orderdated 31.05.2023 and order dated 22.08.2023, passed by the concerned authority under the Delhi Shops and Establishments Act, 1954.2. The background of the matter is that there was a dispute between thepetitioner and its employees (the respondents herein) with regard to payment of dues. Consequently, the respondents initiated legal proceedings against the petitioner on 18.01.2021 before the concerned authority under the Delhi Shops and Establishments Act, 1954, North West at Ashok Vihar, Delhi.3. Initially, the petitioner was represented through counsel. However,while the proceedings were ongoing, the concern...
Mr. Sandeep Joon vs State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr. & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-03-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 911/2026, CRL.M.A. 3606/2026 MR. SANDEEP JOON .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Akansha Solanki and Ms. Akshita Sood, Advs. alongwith petitioner in person.versusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP with Ms. Upasna Bakshi, Advocate and Insp. Kuldeep Kumar, PS.: Sarai Rohilla Railway Station. Mr. Deepak Khatri and Mr. A. S. Rajput, Advs. for R-2 & 3 alongwith R-2 & 3 in person.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 03.02.20261. By virtue of the present petition under Section 528 of the BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) the petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.47/2018 dated 20.08.2018 registered at PS.: Sarai Rohilla Station under Sections 363/323 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and all other proceedings emanating therefrom, in view of the Memorandum of Settlement dated 20.05.2025 ...
Babar & Ors. vs the State of Delhi Sho New Usmanpur & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-03-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 892/2026 BABAR & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Zeba, Advocate alongwith petitioners in personversusTHE STATE OF DELHI SHO NEW USMANPUR & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Digam Singh Dagar, APP for the State R-2 in personCORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 03.02.20261. By way of the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIRbearing no. 703/2024, registered at Police Station New Usmanpur, Delhi, for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 115(2)351(3)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (hereafter BNS) and Section 4 of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019.2. The petitioners and respondent no. 2 are present before this Court and have been identified by their counsels and concerned Investigating Officer(IO) from Police Station New Usmanpur, Delhi.3. Brief facts of the present case are that the marriage between thepetitioner no.1 and respond...
Gaurav Kumar and Ors vs the State Govt of Nct of Delhi Through Sho Cri ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-03-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 03rd February, 2026 + W.P.(CRL) 376/2026 & CRL.M.A. 3583/2026 GAURAV KUMAR AND ORS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. R K Gupta with Mr. Rohitash Mishra and Mr. Shubhankar Birla, Advocates.versusTHE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI THROUGH SHO CRIME WOMEN CELL & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, SC with W/ASI Neel Kamal. Mr. Sushant Kumar, Advocate for R-2.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINJ U D G M E N T (oral)1. Petitioners herein seek quashing of FIR No. 022/2024 dated07.05.2024, registered at P.S. Crime (Women) Cell, Nanakpura, Delhi, under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC, along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties.2. The marriage between complainant (respondent No.2 herein) andpetitioner No.1 was solemnized on 01.01.2022, as per Hindu rites and ceremonies. However, due to certain temperamental differences, the parties started living sep...
Sherpal Singh vs D.T.C.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-03-2026
$~R-2&3* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI(2)+ FAO(OS) 419/2009 SHERPAL SINGH .....Appellant Through: NoneversusD.T.C. .....Respondent Through: None (3)+ FAO(OS) 556/2009 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION .....Appellant Through: NoneversusSHER PAL SINGH .....Respondent Through: NoneCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK CHAUDHARYHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RENU BHATNAGARORDER% 03.02.20261. The matter was called out twice in the revised call; however, none appeared on behalf of either of the parties.2. Accordingly, the present appeals are dismissed for want of prosecution.3. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. VIVEK CHAUDHARY, J RENU BHATNAGAR, J FEBRUARY 3, 2026/bs/myThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/02/2026 at 12:52:04...
Saifi Conveyor System vs Sandeep Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-03-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RFA(COMM) 345/2025, CM APPL. 35836/2025 & CM APPL. SAIFI CONVEYOR SYSTEM .....Appellant Through: Mr. Vikrant Sharma, Adv. Mr. Amit Nahata, Adv.versusSANDEEP GUPTA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Anil Kumar, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKARHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLAORDER (ORAL)% 03.02.20261. There is a delay of 253 days in re-filing of the present appeal.In commercial matters, this Court has held, in Casablanca Apparels Pvt. Ltd. v. Polo/Lauren Company LP1 that delay in re-filing has also to be properly explained. Besides, in Government of Maharashtra v. Borse Brothers Engineers & Contractors Pvt Ltd2, the Supreme Court has held that Courts have to adopt an extremely strict approach while dealing with applications for condonation of delay.2. No doubt, delay in re-filing may be entitled to greater latitude than delay in filing, but there has nonetheless be a semblance of an explanation in the application...
Rohit Dhingra & Ors. vs the State Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-03-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 03rd February, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 920/2026, CRL.M.A. 3633/2026, CRL.M.A. 3634/2026 & CRL.M.A. 3635/2026 ROHIT DHINGRA & ORS. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Krishna Kumar Sharma, Ms. Aishwarya Gogna, Ms. Ritu Tiwari, Ms. Soniya Bajaj and Ms. Ayushma Srivastava, AdvocatesversusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Raj Kumar, APP for State/R-1 Respondent no. 2-in-person SI Nitesh Mahija, PS Sagar PurCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINJ U D G M E N T (oral)1. The present petition seeks quashing of FIR No. 423/2018 dated emanating therefrom, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties.2. Petitioner no. 1 got married to respondent no. 2 on 30.11.2017. However, on account of temperamental differences and certain other reasons, they started residing separately from each other w.e.f. 19.02.2018.3. On account of such matrimonial discord, a complaint was lodged by respondent No.2, which...
Delhi Transport Corporation vs Sher Pal Singh
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-03-2026
$~R-2&3* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI(2) FAO(OS) 419/2009 SHERPAL SINGH .....Appellant Through: NoneversusD.T.C. .....Respondent Through: None (3)+ FAO(OS) 556/2009 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION .....Appellant Through: NoneversusSHER PAL SINGH .....Respondent Through: NoneCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK CHAUDHARYHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RENU BHATNAGARORDER% 03.02.20261. The matter was called out twice in the revised call; however, none appeared on behalf of either of the parties.2. Accordingly, the present appeals are dismissed for want of prosecution.3. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. VIVEK CHAUDHARY, J RENU BHATNAGAR, J FEBRUARY 3, 2026/bs/myThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/02/2026 at 12:52:11...
Kapil Yadav & Ors. vs Uoi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-03-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 8049/2008 KAPIL YADAV & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Prerna Mehta & Mr. Ajay Verma, Advs.versusUOI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, SSC with Mr. Anant Mann, JSC, Mr. Pratyaksh Gupta, JSC & Ms. Lopamudra Mahapatra, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMARORDER% 03.02.20261. The present writ petition has been preferred for the following reliefs:a) issue a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing order of attachment dated 18th December, 2007 in regard to property and premises bearing No.205, Udyog Vihar, Phase IV, Gurgaon (Haryana); b)Issue a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the attachmentorder dated 4th March, 2004 passed by Income Tax Departmentin regard to property and premises bearing No.205, Udyog Vihar, Phase IV, Gurgaon (Haryana); c) Issue a writ in the nature of prohibition restraining respondents No.1-4 from putting the prope...
Amit Sharma vs State ( Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-03-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on : 02.12.2025Judgment pronounced on : 03.02.2026+ CRL.REV.P. 775/2014 AMIT SHARMA .....PetitionerversusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mrs. Kajal Chandra, Ms. Hatneimawi, Mr. Ananyay Bhardwaj and Mr. Suyash Swarup, Advs. For the Respondent : Mr. Raj Kumar, APP for the State with SI Navneet Yadav, PS Connaught Place.CORAMHONBLE MR JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANJUDGMENT1. The present petition is filed challenging the judgment dated05.12.2014 (hereafter impugned judgment), passed in CA No. House Courts, New Delhi upheld the judgment of conviction dated 21.10.2013 and reduced the sentence awarded by order on sentence dated 25.06.2014 in the case arising out of FIR No. 651/2004 (FIR), registered at Police Station Connaught Place. SEHGAL CRL.REV.P. 775/2014 Page 1 of 132. By the judgment of conviction dated 21.10.2023, the learnedTrial Court convicted the petitioner for the offen...
- ‹ Prev
- 437
- 438
- 439
- 440
- 441
- 443
- 444
- 445
- 446
- 447
- Next ›
- Last »