Delhi Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Naresh Akkepally vs State of Gnct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-03-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 5059/2025 NARESH AKKEPALLY .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Y. Lokesh, Mr. Bibek Tripathi and Mr. Ajay, Advocates.versusSTATE OF GNCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Tarang Srivastava, APP with SI Raj Kumar Singh.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 03.02.2026 CRL.M.A. 3660/2026(for withdrawal) &BAIL APPLN. 5059/20251. The applicant has filed CRL.M.A. 3660/2026 seeking permissionto withdraw the captioned bail application, stating that he wishes to reserve his rights to approach the appropriate Court for relief, at the appropriate stage.2. Having regard to the aforesaid, the application is allowed, and the bail application is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.3. It is clarified that this Court has not expressed any opinion on themaintainability or merits of any application that may be filed by the applicant, which may be considered independently on its own merits and in accordance with law.4. The next date of ...
Mrs. Veena Seth & Ors. vs Ms. Boskey Seth and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-03-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ EX.P. 1/2026, EX.APPL.(OS) 1/2026, EX.APPL.(OS) 2/2026, EX.APPL.(OS) 3/2026 & EX.APPL.(OS) 4/2026 MRS. VEENA SETH & ORS. .....Decree Holders Through: Mr. Atul Bandhu & Mr. Rishabh Bansal, Advocates.versusMS. BOSKEY SETH AND ORS .....Judgement Debtors Through: NemoCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHANSHANKARORDER% 03.02.20261. The present Petition is filed under Order XXI Rule 10 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking execution of the Arbitral Award dated 23.06.2013.2. Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner, on instructions, submits that he seeks to withdraw the present Petition.3. Leave as sought for, is granted.4. Consequently, the present Petition, along with pending application(s), if any, is dismissed as withdrawn. HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J FEBRUARY 3, 2026/JYHThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Por...
Union of India Through Ministry of Defecne vs Naik Dilwar Singh (Retir ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-03-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision : 03.02.2026 + W.P.(C) 560/2026 UNION OF INDIA THROUGH MINISTRY OF DEFECNE .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Gauri Goburdhun, SPC, Major Anish Muralidhar and Major Kanika Sharma.versusNAIK DILWAR SINGH (RETIRED) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Nawneet Krishna Mishra, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORAMANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J. (ORAL) CM APPL. 2759/2026 (Exemption)1. Exemption is allowed, subject to just exceptions.2. The application is disposed of. W.P.(C) 560/2026, CM APPL. 2760/20263. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia against the order dated 28.03.2024 [impugned order] passed by the Armed Forces Tribunal Principal Bench, New Delhi [Tribunal] in Original Application [O.A.] No. 1094/2023 titled as Naik Dilwar Singh (Retd.) v. Union of India and Ors., wherein the Respondent has been granted the Digitally Signed W.P. (C) ...
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -Central -1 vs Sperry Plast Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-03-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of decision: 3rd February, 2026. + ITA 90/2026 & CM APPL. 7272/2026 THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -CENTRAL -1 .....Appellant Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, SSC with Mr. Anant Mann, JSC.versusSPERRY PLAST LTD. .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMARJUDGMENTDINESH MEHTA, J. (Oral)1. The instant appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act 1961(hereinafter referred to as Act of 1961) impugns the order dated 04.06.2025 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench G New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal), whereby the appeal filed by the respondent-assessee was allowed.2. While allowing the appeal, the Tribunal recorded the following findings:-9. During the Remand Proceedings, the A.O. made independent enquiries from the above two parties by issuing notice to them. The notice issued by the A.O. has been duly served and both the parties ...
M/S L and D Jv vs Container Corporation of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-03-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 20.01.2026Judgment pronounced on: 03.02.2026Judgment uploaded on: 03.02.2026+ FAO(OS)(COMM) 10/2026 & CM APPL. 3484/2026 M/S L AND D JV .....Appellant Through: Mr. Sarthak Sawhney, Adv.versusCONTAINER CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. .....Respondent Through: Mr. R. K. Joshi, Mr. Ojusya Joshi and Mrs. Shabnam Joshi, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANJUDGMENTANIL KSHETARPAL, J.:1. The present Appeal, preferred by the Appellant, assails thecorrectness of judgment and order dated 05.08.2025 [hereinafter referred to as the Impugned Order] passed by the learned Single Judge in O.M.P.(COMM) 440/2024, whereby the petition filed by the Appellant under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [hereinafter referred to as the 1996 Act] challenging the arbitral award dated 04.07.2024, passed by the learned Arbitral Tribunal, came to be dismissed.Signing Date:03.02.202...
Bhupinder Pal Singh vs Prem Nath Nangia (Deceased) Through Lrs
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-03-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RFA 87/2026, CM APPL. 5444-5446/2026 BHUPINDER PAL SINGH .....Appellant Through: Appearance not given.versusPREM NATH NANGIA (DECEASED) THROUGH LRS. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Zeeshan Diwan, Mr. Krishna Datta Multani, Mr. Joel James, Mr. Harsha, Ms. Ankita Yadav, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAORDER% 03.02.20261. Regular First Appeal under Section 96 CPC read with Order XLI CPChas been filed on behalf of the Appellant, to challenge the Judgment and Decree dated 05.08.2025 passed by learned District Judge under Order XII Rule 6 CPC whereby the Suit for Possession filed by the Respondent has been decreed.2. The brief facts are that a Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits wasfiled by the Respondent, against the Appellant Tenant. It was asserted that the Appellant was inducted as a tenant in the premises bearing No.J-397, 2nd Floor, New Rajinder Nagar, New Delhi, admeasuring 107.03 Sq. Mtrs. vide a Lease Dee...
Aashutosh Kumar vs Govt. of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-03-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 1474/2026 AASHUTOSH KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhishek Kumar Singh, Advocate.versusGOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain ASC with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Ms. Vishruti Pandey and Mr. Sachin Garg, Advocates for R-1.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULAORDER% 03.02.20261. After making submissions for some time, Mr. Abhishek Kumar Singh,counsel for the Petitioner, seeks leave of this Court to avail appropriate legal remedies against his employer, i.e., Respondent No. 2, by instituting civil proceedings in accordance with law.2. Leave and liberty, as prayed for, are granted.3. It is clarified that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case, including on the maintainability of any such action against Respondent No. 2, if and when filed.4. With the above directions, the present petition is disposed of, along with pending application(s), if any. SANJEEV NARULA, J FE...
Union of India and Ors. vs Ex Sgt Ajay Khurana
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-03-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision : 03.02.2026 + W.P.(C) 587/2026 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Gauri Goburdhun, SPC.versusEX SGT AJAY KHURANA .....Respondent Through: Ms. Deepika Sheoran, Mr. Baljeet Singh and Mr. Abhishek Gahlyan, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORAMANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J. (ORAL) CM APPL. 2887/2026 (Exemption)1. Exemption is allowed, subject to just exceptions.2. The application is disposed of. W.P.(C) 587/2026, CM APPL. 2888/20261. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia against the order dated 20.09.2023 [impugned order] passed by the Armed Forces Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi [Tribunal] in Original Application [O.A.] No. 1267/2019 titled as Ex Sgt Ajay Khurana v. Union of India & Ors., wherein the Respondent has been granted the benefit of the disability element of pension for Diabetes Mellitu...
M/S Mhj Metaltechs Pvt Ltd vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 16(1), Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-03-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of decision: 3rd February, 2026. + W.P.(C) 880/2026 CM APPL. 4297/2026, CM APPL. 6774/2026 M/S MHJ METALTECHS PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhinav Sharma, Adv.versusINCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 16(1), DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Gaurav Gupta, SSC, Mr. Shivendra Singh, JSC, Mr. Yojit Pareek, JSC, Mr. Surya Jindal, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMARJUDGMENTDINESH MEHTA, J. (Oral)1. By way of present writ petition, petitioner has challenged theproceedings that have been initiated by the respondent-Assessing Officer (hereinafter referred to as AO) vide notice dated 20.03.2024 under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act of 1961) so also the subsequent letter/notice dated 17.04.2025, which the respondent has issued.2. While inviting Courts attention towards the notice dated 20.03.2024and the reasons recorded therein, learned counsel for ...
Mukhtyar Hussain vs State (Govt of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-03-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 468/2026 & CRL.M.A.3531/2026 & CRL.M.A. MUKHTYAR HUSSAIN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Arhum Sayeed with Mr. Alizaah Rais, Mr. Rahil and Mr. Jeeshan, Advocates.versusSTATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar Gautam, APP for the State with SI Sachin Kumar, PS Amar Colony.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINORDER% 03.02.20261. Applicant seeks regular bail in FIR No. 490/2023 dated 24.11.2023, under Section 376AB of IPC, 1860 and Section 6 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO), 2012, registered at P.S. Amar Colony.2. The applicant was arrested on 24.11.2023 and is in incarceration since then.3. Charges have already been framed. The victim has, reportedly, already4. Learned Addl. P.P. for the State appears on advance notice and, oninstructions, informs that the prosecution had relied upon the statements of 10 witnesses, however, during the pendency of the abovesaid ca...
- ‹ Prev
- 436
- 437
- 438
- 439
- 440
- 442
- 443
- 444
- 445
- 446
- Next ›
- Last »