Skip to content

Delhi Court February 2026 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Feb 26 2026

Sh Dalip Kumar vs Smt Madhu

Court: Delhi Orders

Decided on: Feb-26-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 4089/2024 & CRL.M.A. 15558-59/2024 SH DALIP KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: NoneversusSMT MADHU .....Respondent Through: NoneCORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 26.02.20261. No one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner, when the matter was taken up for hearing.2. It is already 12.55 PM.3. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter any further.4. Accordingly, the present petition alongwith pending application i.e. CRL.M.A. 15558-59/2024 stands dismissed for non-prosecution.5. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J FEBRUARY 26, 2026/ns/ A.P.This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/03/2026 at 10:41:44...


Feb 26 2026

1 Moon Light Propbuild Private Limited & Anr vs 1 Insolvency and Bankr ...

Court: Delhi Orders

Decided on: Feb-26-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 8428/2021 & CM APPL. 53930/2024 1 MOON LIGHT PROPBUILD PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Ridhima Verma with Mr. Shashwat Tripathi, Ms. Madhu Ayachit & Ms. Aparajita Singh, Advs.versus1 INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY BOARD OF INDIA & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjeev Saraswat, Advocate for R2 and R4.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 26.02.20261. The controversy involved in the instant petition stands covered by the decision of this Court in Anil Goel v. Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India.1 Accordingly, the petitioner is also entitled for the same relief.2. Let the respondents to supply a copy of the reasons for closure of the petitioners complaint.3. Accordingly, the instant writ petition stands disposed of.4. The petitioners thereafter shall be at liberty to take appropriate recourse in accordance with law. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J FEBRUARY 26, 2026/tr/amgOrd...


Feb 26 2026

The Competent Official/Zonal Manager National Textile Corporation Ltd. ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-26-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RC.REV. 172/2022 & CM APPL. 41953/2024 THE COMPETENT OFFICIAL/ZONAL MANAGER NATIONAL TEXTILE CORPORATION LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sonal Kumar Singh, Mr. Ratik Sharma, Ms. Muskan Agarwal and Mr. Yashvardhan Singh Gohil, Advocates.versusDR RENU CHANDANA AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Vatsala Chauhan, Advocate (through Vc).CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMAORDER% 26.02.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present petition under Section 25-B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, read with Section 115 of the CPC, seeks the following prayers: a. set aside the impugned Judgment & order dated 30.09.2021 passed in ARC No. 92 OF 2018 by the Ld. Trial Court; b. pass such other or further orders as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the latter would vacate the subject premise today itself, and see...


Feb 26 2026

Sadar Co-Op. Group Housing Society vs Government of Nct of Delhi and A ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-26-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 9965/2023 and CM APPL. 38423/2023 Date of Decision: 26.02.2026 IN THE MATTER OF: SADAR CO-OP. GROUP HOUSING SOCIETY .....Petitioner Through: Mr. D.K.Devesh and Mr. Jitesh Saluja, Advocates.versusGOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms Avni Singh (Panel Counsel- GNCTD) with Mr Vaibhav Sharma, Advocate.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVJUDGEMENTPURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J. (ORAL)1. A bare perusal of the Impugned Order dated 15.11.2022 passed byrespondent no. 2 would reveal that upon finding the petitioner guilty of causing environmental pollution, a liability has been imposed, to pay compensation of Rs. 1,00,000/-.2. The solitary grievance of the petitioner is that it has not been heardprior to the passing of the Impugned Order which, on the face of it, affects the rights of the petitioner. It contends, that if at all, a liability was to be imposed on it, a hearing should have been of...


Feb 26 2026

Ntpc Ltd vs Ampl Resources Private Limited

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-26-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIBEFOREHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV+ O.M.P. (COMM) 186/2025, I.A. 12141/2025&I.A. 12142/2025 NTPC LTD THROUGH ITS AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE MR. SALIL KUMAR PANDEY REGD. OFFICE AT: NTPC BHAWAN, CORE-7, SCOPE COMPLEX, 7 INSTITUTIONAL AREA, LODHI ROAD, NEW DELHI 110003 .....Petitioner (Through: Mr. Adarsh Tripathi, Mr. Vikram Singh Baid and Mr. Ajitesh Garg, Advs.)versusAMPL RESOURCES PRIVATE LIMITED (ERSTWHILE AMBEY MINING PRIVATE LIMITED) THROUGH ITS DIRECTORS / AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE, REGD. OFFICE AT: 8, AJC BOSE ROAD, CIRCULAR COURT, 9TH FLOOR, UNIT-92, KOLKATA, WEST BENGAL, 700017 .....Respondent (Through: Mr. Udayan Jain, Ms. Kajal Sharma, Mr. Ranjan Mishra, Mr. Harsh Jaiswal, Ms. Amiti Gupta, Ms. Geetika Vyas, and Mr. Sonal Jain, Advs.) + O.M.P. (COMM) 240/2025 AMPL RESOURCES PRIVATE LIMITED THROUGH ITS AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE CIRCULAR ROAD, 9TH FLOOR, 19:43:06 Page 1 of 32 KUMAR KAURAV BLOCK-92, 8, AJC B...


Feb 26 2026

Avdesh Yadav & Anr. vs State of Nct of Delhi & Anr.

Court: Delhi Orders

Decided on: Feb-26-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 4052/2024, CRL.M.A. 15436/2024 & CRL.M.A. 15437/2024 AVDESH YADAV & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: None.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr.Manoj Pant, APP for the State. Mr.Sunil Upadhyay and Mr. Mithilesh Kumar Yadav, Advs for R-2.CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 26.02.20261. No one appeared on behalf of the petitioners, when the case was taken up at 01:00 PM. It seems that the petitioners are not interested in pursuing the present petition.2. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Pending applications also stand disposed of.3. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J FEBRUARY 26, 2026/A/RThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/03/2026 ...


Feb 26 2026

Shree Digambar Jain Mandir and Ors vs State of Nct of Delhi and Anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-26-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 4157/2025 SHREE DIGAMBAR JAIN MANDIR AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajbir Singh Sagar, Advocate.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, APP with Mr. Sunil Arya, Advocate and SI Harish Choudhary, P.S. Gandhi Nagar. R2 and R3 in person.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 26.02.20261. The petitioners have approached this Court for quashing of FIRNo. 386/2024 dated 26.07.2024, registered under Section 106(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 [BNS], at Police Station Gandhi Nagar, District Shahdara, New Delhi, on the ground of settlement.2. The impugned FIR pertains to the demise of one Kunal Jain at Shree Digambar Jain Mandir, Gali No. 2, Kailash Nagar, New Delhi [the Temple], on 26.07.2024.3. The FIR was registered upon receipt of information that the parapetof the Temple had collapsed, resulting in injuries to two or three persons. The deceased and his family w...


Feb 26 2026

Dinesh Swami & Ors. vs State Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-26-2026

$~36 & 37 * IN THEHIGH COURTOF DELHIAT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3289/2025 MAHESH KUMAR & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Ria Goyal & Ms. Akriti Mishra, Advocates.versusTHE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Aashneet Singh, APP & Mr. Abhishek Juneja for State with SI P. Buno, PS Madhu Vihar. Mr. Raj Kumar & Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocates for Respondent Nos. 2-5. + CRL.M.C. 3316/2025 DINESH SWAMI& ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Raj Kumar & Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocates.versusSTATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI &ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, APP & Mr. Sunil Arya for State with SI P. Buno, PS Madhu Vihar. Ms. Ria Goyal & Ms. Akriti Mishra, Advocates for Respondent Nos. 2 & 3.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 26.02.2026 CRL.M.A. 14471/2025(for exemption) inCRL.M.C. 3289/2025 CRL.M.C. 3289/2025 &CRL.M.C. 3316/2025 Page 1 of 8 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The applicat...


Feb 26 2026

Mahesh Kumar & Anr. vs the State of Nct of Delhi and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-26-2026

$~36 & 37 * IN THEHIGH COURTOF DELHIAT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3289/2025 MAHESH KUMAR & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Ria Goyal & Ms. Akriti Mishra, Advocates.versusTHE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Aashneet Singh, APP & Mr. Abhishek Juneja for State with SI P. Buno, PS Madhu Vihar. Mr. Raj Kumar & Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocates for Respondent Nos. 2-5. + CRL.M.C. 3316/2025 DINESH SWAMI& ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Raj Kumar & Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocates.versusSTATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI &ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, APP & Mr. Sunil Arya for State with SI P. Buno, PS Madhu Vihar. Ms. Ria Goyal & Ms. Akriti Mishra, Advocates for Respondent Nos. 2 & 3.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 26.02.2026 CRL.M.A. 14471/2025(for exemption) inCRL.M.C. 3289/2025 CRL.M.C. 3289/2025 &CRL.M.C. 3316/2025 Page 1 of 8 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The applicat...


Feb 26 2026

Amit Kakkar vs Directorate General of Health Services Govt of Nct of D ...

Court: Delhi Orders

Decided on: Feb-26-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 8973/2025 and CM APPL. 38316/2025 AMIT KAKKAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shivam, Advocate.versusDIRECTORATE GENERAL OF HEALTH SERVICES GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mrs Avnish Ahlawat with Mr Nitesh Kumar Singh, Ms Aliza Alam & Mr Mohnish Sehrawat, Advs. for R1. Mr. Kapil K. Nayyar, Advocate for R2.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 26.02.20261. The petitioner is being extended appropriate treatment by respondent no.2. The said position is not disputed by the petitioner. At this point of time, there does not remain any unresolved grievance.2. The petition is therefore disposed of. Pending application also stands disposed of.3. Liberty stands reserved to take appropriate action in case subsequent cause arises. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J FEBRUARY 26, 2026 tr/amgThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Po...


  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial