Delhi Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
T D Arora & Ors. vs Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3392/2021, CM APPL. 10326/2021 and CM APPL. 41130-41131/2025T D ARORA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Himanshu Upadhyay and Ms. Usha Yadav, Advocates.versusNCT OF DELHI & ORS......Respondents Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 26.02.20261. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners seeks liberty towithdraw the instant petition.2. Liberty, so prayed for, is granted.3. The instant petition stands dismissed as withdrawn along with allpending applications.PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, JFEBRUARY 26, 2026Nc/ksrThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/02/2026 at 12:59:14...
Smt. Usha Devi and Ors vs Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on : 29.01.2026Pronounced on : 26.02.2026Uploaded on : 26.02.2026+ FAO 112/2021 SMT. USHA DEVI AND ORS .....Appellants Through: Mr. Rajan Sood, Ms. Ashima Sood, Ms. Megha Sood, Advocates.versusUNION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIJUDGMENT1. The present appeal is filed under Section 23 of the Railway ClaimsTribunal Act, 1987, assailing the judgment/order passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal, Principal Bench, Delhi titled as Smt. Usha Devi & Ors. v. Union of India.2. Vide the judgment dated 21.05.2019 in Case no. OA-IIu/GZB/2017/144, the Tribunal dismissed the claim application on the ground that the deceased was not proved to be a bona fide passenger and that the alleged incident was not an untoward incident as defined under Section18:23:15 FAO 112/2021 Page 1 of 6123(c)(2) of the Railways Act, 1987 (hereinafter referred to as Act). ...
Mala Lama vs State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 1193/2025 MALA LAMA .....Petitioner Through: None.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for the StateCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIAORDER% 17.03.2026CRL.M.A. 8070/2026 (For rectification of order dated 26.02.2026)1. In the name of rectification of order dated 26.02.2026, what issought by the counsel is to mark his appearance on behalf of complainant de facto in order dated 26.02.2026.2. Since there is no way to ascertain presence of the counsel on that dayand there is no adverse order against the complainant de facto, coupled with the fact that none appears today also in support of the application, the application is dismissed.GIRISH KATHPALIA, J MARCH 17, 2026 rsThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Serv...
Aatmnirbhar Infratech Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. vs Yash Pal Batra and Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ARB.P. 371/2024AATMNIRBHAR INFRATECH PVT. LTD. AND ANR......Petitioners Through: Mr. Rohit Kumar Singh, Mr. Akash Kumar & Mr. Mahender Rathour, Advs.versusYASH PAL BATRA AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Neeraj Malhotra, Sr. Adv. with Mr. R.P Agrawal, Mr. Chandan Kumar Jha & Mr. Nimish Kuma Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHANSHANKARORDER% 26.02.20261. Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners, on instructions,seeks leave to withdraw the present petition in view of the disputes between the parties having been amicably resolved by way of a Settlement Agreement dated 24.02.2026.2. A photocopy of the said Settlement Agreement has been handedover across the Bar and is taken on record.3. In view of the aforesaid, the present petition, along with allpending application(s), if any, stands dismissed as withdrawn.HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J.FEBRUARY 26, 2026/v/krThis is a digitally sig...
Anand Gaur vs Suman @ Maina
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 184/2020 ANAND GAUR .....PetitionerversusSUMAN @ MAINA .....RespondentCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMAORDER% 26.02.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present petition under Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt ofCourts Act seeks the following prayers: i. Initiate appropriate contempt of court proceedings against thecontemnor for disobeying the joint statement made, on and orderdated 15.10.2019 by the Hon'ble.Court of Dr. Sudhir Kumar Jain, Principal Judge Family Courts, Rohini Delhi in HMA No. ii. Any other orders which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper be passed in favour of the applicant and against the contemnor;3. None appears on behalf of the petitioner.4. There was no appearance on behalf of the petitioner on the last dates ofhearing, i.e., 01.11.2023, 24.04.2024, 21.08.2024, 04.12.2024, 23.07.2025, 24.11.2025 as well.5. In view of the a...
Ion Exchange (India) Ltd vs IIC Ltd. & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P.(I) 2/2020 & I.A. 15508/2025, I.A. 32517/2025 ION EXCHANGE (INDIA) LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Aaditya Vijaykumar and Mr. Naman Garg, AdvocatesversusIIC LTD. & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vivek Jain, Ms. Aastha Tiwari, Mr Sunny Verma, Advs. for R-4.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASADORDER% 26.02.20261. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission to withdraw thepresent petition.2. Permission, as sought for, is granted.3. The petition is disposed of as withdrawn, along with pendingapplication(s), if any.SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J FEBRUARY 26, 2026 S. ZakirThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/03/2026 at 11:20:35...
Master Devarsh vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on: 22nd December, 2025 Pronounced on: 26th February, 2026 + W.P.(CRL) 1092/2019, CRL.M.A. 11985/2019, CRL.M.A. CRL.M.A. 4984/2023, CRL.M.A. 8835/2023, CRL.M.A. MASTER DEVARSH Son of Ms. Sapna Jain Resident of: 253, SFS DDA Flats, Mukherjee Apartment, Dr Mukherjee Nagar, Delhi-110009 minor. Through his mother Ms. Sapna Jain as Next Friend .....Petitioner Through: Mr. K.K Manan, Sr Adv along with Mr. Ajay Kumar Agarwal, Adv, Mr. Sachin Jain, Ms. Uditi Bali, Adv, Mr. K.S Choudhary, Adv, Mr. Lavish, Adv and Ms. Tanya, Advocate.versus1. UNION OF INDIAThrough Ministry of Home Affairs (Through its Secretary) 10, Janpath Road, North Block Central Secretariat, Janpath Road Area, Motilal Nehru Marg Area, New Delhi 1100012. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE Delhi Police Headquarters, MSO Building, Indraprastha Marg IP Estate, New Delhi-1100953. GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI Through Secretary W.P.(CRL) 1092/2019 & Connected matter Page 1 of 18 Delhi Secret...
Kanta Devi & Anr. vs Commissioner of Police & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 4667/2025 KANTA DEVI & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Counsel (Appearance not given)versusCOMMISSIONER OF POLICE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: NoneCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 26.02.20261. By way of the present petition, the Petitioners seek to challengethe final order dated 22.09.2023, passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi [hereinafter referred to as Tribunal], wherein the Original Application filed by the Petitioners (Applicants before the Tribunal), seeking compassionate appointment of the Petitioner No.2, came to be dismissed.2. In order to comprehend the issue falling for consideration of this Court, the relevant facts are required to be noticed.3. Late Sh. Bhoora Singh, the husband of the Petitioner No.1 andthe father of the Petitioner No.2, passed away in December, 2015. Prior to his demise, on 27.05.2015, he was declar...
Kamal Kumar & Ors. vs Shri Lal Bahadur Shastri National Sanskrit Unive ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5305/2025 KAMAL KUMAR & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Pranjal Abrol, Advocate (Through video conferencing)versusSHRI LAL BAHADUR SHASTRI NATIONAL SANSKRIT UNIVERSITY .....Respondent Through: Mr. Vibhakar Mishra, Ms. Anushka Mishra and Ms. Sumedha Singh, Advocates (Through video conferencing)CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 26.02.20261. Counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition as the petition has become infructuous.2. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn. AMIT BANSAL, J FEBRUARY 26, 2026 dsThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/03/2026 at 13:14:46...
State Trading Corporation of India Ltd vs Mr Madan Mohan Sharma & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ LPA 483/2023, CM Nos.30906/2023 & 30907/2023 STATE TRADING CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD.....Appellant Through: Ms. Pragya Puri, Advocate.VersusMR MADAN MOHAN SHARMA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Dhruv Malik, Mr. Shiven Verma, Mr. Rudraksh Mathur, Advocates for R-1 to R-4. Mr. Bhagwan Swarup Shukla, CGSC With Mr. Yash Baraliya, Advocate.CORAM:HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIAORDER% 26.02.2026 CM No.30908/2023 (for exemption)1. Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The Application stand disposed of. LPA 483/20233. The learned Counsel for the Parties have stated that in terms of thejudgment dated 25.04.2023 impugned in this Letters Patent Appeal, theamount has already been paid to Respondent Nos. 2, 3a, 3b, 3c and 4. Further, we have been informed that in respect of Respondent No. 1, the principal amount, as contained in the judgment dated 25.04.2023 passed by the learned Single Judge, ha...
- ‹ Prev
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- Next ›
- Last »