Delhi Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The Commissioner of Police and Anr vs Amit Gulia and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 26.02.2026 + W.P.(C) 2682/2026 & CM APPL. 13036/2026 THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE AND ANR .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Arti Bansal CGSC-UOI, Ms. Shruti Goel Adv.versusAMIT GULIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr Samarth Luthra, Adv. for R- 1.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANJ U D G M E N T (ORAL)AMIT MAHAJAN, J.CM APPL. 13037/2026 [exemption from filing of certified copy of the impugned order and true typed copies of dim / illegible hand written Annexures]1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. Application stands disposed of.W.P.(C) 2682/2026 & CM APPL. 13036/20261. The present petition has been filed assailing the order dated30.10.2025 (hereafter impugned order), passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi, (hereafter Tribunal) in O.A. No. 334/2023, whereby the O.A. filed by the Respondent/Sh. Amit Gulia w...
Master Lalith Kumar Through His Father Devaraju N. vs Sh. Ashok Kumar ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
$~225 & 226* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 335/2026MASTER HARSHA D.R. THROUGHHIS FATHER SH. SHANKARAPPA D.R. .....Petitioner + CONT.CAS(C) 336/2026(226) MASTER LALITH KUMARTHROUGH HIS FATHER DEVARAJU N. .....PetitionerCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTAORDER% 26.02.20261. The petitioners are minor children suffering from rare geneticdisorders. These petitions allege that the Employees State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) is obligated to provide continuous treatment to the petitioners in view of their condition. It is pointed out that the said obligation clearly flows from the judgments/ orders dated 17.07.2019 inW.P.(C) 8503/2017 and 15.04.2019 in W.P.(C) 1860/2016.2. The petitioners are aggrieved by the fact that, of late, the ESIC hasbeen remiss in providing the requisite treatment and administering the concerned drugs to the petitioners.3. Learned counsel appearing for ESIC fairly submits that ESIC shallcontinue to provide the...
Ashish Upadhyay & Ors. vs the State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 1583/2026, CRL.M.A. 6394/2026 ASHISH UPADHYAY & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Vipin Singh, Advocate. Petitioners (Through VC)versusTHE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & Anr. ...Respondents Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP with the Investigating Officer. Respondent No.2 (Through VC)CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 26.02.20265. By virtue of the present petition under Section 528 of the BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.150/2023 dated 19.04.2023, registered at PS.: R.K. Puram, New Delhi under Sections 498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), and all proceedings emanating therefrom, in view of the Compromise Deed dated 27.10.2025 arrived at between the petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2, which is accompanied by respective proofs of identities.6. Issue notice. Learned APP for the State accepts notice and submitsthat he has no...
Sumit Dass and Ors vs the State Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 683/2026 SUMIT DASS AND ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. S.S. Raghav, Advocate alongwith petitioners in personversusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, ASC for the State with SI Dinesh Kumar, P.S. Kashmere Gate R-2 in personCORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 26.02.2026 CRL.M.A. 6364/2026 & CRL.M.A. 6365/2 (exemption)1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. Applications stand disposed of.W.P.(CRL) 683/20263. By way of the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIRbearing no. 301/2023, registered at Police Station Kashmeri Gate, New Delhi, for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 498A/406/34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter IPC) and the proceedings emanating therefrom.4. The petitioners and respondent no. 2 are present before this Court andhave been identified by their counsels and concerned Invest...
Sitara Singh vs State of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 686/2026 SITARA SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Jitender Tyagi, Mr. Gaurav Bidhuri, Ms. Tabassum, Advs. along with petitioner in person.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr.Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel (Crl) with Ms. Priyam Agarwal, Mr. Aryan Sachdeva, Advs. for the State and SI Kamal Sharma, PS Maidangiri.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJAORDER% 26.02.20261. The present Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 ofthe Constitution of India read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, praying for issuance of a Writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus, directing the respondents to produce Ms.XXX before this Court.2. Issue notice.3. Notice is accepted by Mr.Sanjay Lao, the learned StandingCounsel for the respondent nos.1 to 3.4. The status report filed by the respondent nos.1 to 3 is taken onrecord....
Neelam & Anr vs Ram Swaroop & Anr (ICICI Lombard Motor Ins Co Ltd )
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ MAC.APP. 147/2019 NEELAM & ANR .....Appellant Through: None.versusRAM SWAROOP & ANR (ICICI LOMBARD MOTOR INSCO LTD ) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sandeep Jha, Advocate.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYALORDER% 26.02.20261. No one appears on behalf of appellant.2. From the perusal of the order sheets, it shows that no one hasbeen appearing on behalf of appellant for many dates.3. In view of the same, the appeal is dismissed for want ofprosecution.4. Order be uploaded on the website of this Court.ANISH DAYAL, JFEBRUARY 26, 2026/RKThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/03/2026 at 11:15:11...
Institute of Directors vs Worlddevcorp Technology and Business Solutio ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ FAO(OS) (COMM) 29/2024&CM APPL. 10764/2024 INSTITUTE OF DIRECTORS .....Appellant Through: Ms. Shwetasree Majumder, Ms. Priya Adlakha, Ms. Ruchika Yadav, Mr. Rishi Mishra, Advs.versusWORLDDEVCORP TECHNOLOGY AND BUSINESSSOLUTIONS PVT LTD & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Arun Birbal and Mr. Sanjay Singh Adv. Mr. Saurabh Kansal, Mr. Raghav Vij, Mr Deepak Pandey Advs.CORAM:JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGHJUSTICE MADHU JAINORDER% 26.02.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present appeal arises out of the impugned order dated 11thDecember, 2023 (hereinafter, 'the impugned order') by which the application for interim injunction filed by the Appellant/Plaintiff has been rejected by the Id. Single Judge.3. The competing trade marks/ names in this case are 'Institute ofDirectors' belonging to the Appellant/Plaintiff and 'Directors Institute' belong...
Sarika@Radha@Lovanya T. vs State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 26.02.2026 + BAIL APPLN. 808/2025 SARIKA@RADHA@LOVANYA T. .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Madhupreet Nanda, proxy counselversusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for State with SI Virender, PS Kamla MarketCORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIAJ U D G M E N T (ORAL)1. The applicant/accused seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 72/2021 ofPolice Station Kamla Market for offence under Section ITP Act read with Section 6/17 POCSO Act.2. None appeared on behalf of accused/applicant in the first call. Even inthis second call, arguing counsel for accused/applicant has not appeared. This bail application was listed for the first time before the predecessor bench on 24.02.2025 and remains pending till date. As a part of 179 old pending bail applications, this application also was transferred to this benchBAIL APPLN. 808/2025 Page 1 of 2 pagesSignature Not Verified GIRISH 2.5.4.20=84...
Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd. vs M/S Oceanic Solvent Industries Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P. (COMM) 109/2020 & I.A. 14944/2009, I.A. 20889/2014, I.A. 863/2018 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO.LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Apoorv Sarvaria, Ms. Yashika Sarvaria, Advs.versusM/S OCEANIC SOLVENT INDUSTRIES LTD. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ashutosh Ghade, Ms. Saloni Meshram, AdvocatesCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASADORDER% 26.02.20261. Material on record indicates that the principal amount claimed beforethe learned Arbitral Tribunal is Rs.56,97,143/-. The said amount is below the sum of Rs. 2 crores, and therefore, below the pecuniary jurisdiction of this Court.2. Resultantly, the Petition is returned back to the Petitioner, to enablefiling of the same before the Court of appropriate jurisdiction.3. Needless to state, the time spent from the date of filing of the Petitionbefore this Court till the date of its disposal would be taken into account while calculating limitation.4. The Pet...
Zahida Begum vs ICICI Lombard Gen Ins Co Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ MAC.APP. 252/2019 ZAHIDA BEGUM .....Appellant Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Adv.versusICICI LOMBARD GEN INS CO LTD & ORS .....Respondent Through: Ms. Suman Bagga and Ms. Mouli Sharma, Advs. for R-1.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYALORDER% 26.02.20261. Pursuant to an accident which occurred on 25th October 2013, involvinga motorcycle on which the deceased was alleged to be travelling as a pillion rider and which was allegedly driven by Mohd. Fahim, and insured with respondent no.3, a collision occurred with the offending vehicle/truck, which hit the motorcycle and fled from the spot, resulting in fatal injuries to the deceased Mohd. Nazakat Hussain. An FIR No.259/2013 under Sections Station Garhmukteshwar, Hapur, Uttar Pradesh. A claim petition was filed under Section 163(A) of the Motor Vehicles Act 1988, on the basis that the deceased Mohd. Nazakat Hussain was a pillion rider and, therefore, a third party to the insura...
- ‹ Prev
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- Next ›
- Last »