Delhi Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mrs Pawan Jashial vs Khalsa Middle School & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2701/2026, CM APPL. 13071/2026 MRS PAWAN JASHIAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Nikhilesh Ramachandran, Mr. Shubham Seth and Mr. Aditya Krsihnan, Advocates.versusKHALSA MIDDLE SCHOOL & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Akshit Gupta, Advocate for R-6. Mr. Yeeshu Jain ASC with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Ms. Vishruti Pandey and Mr. Sachin Garg, Advocates for R-4, 7.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULAORDER% 26.02.20261. This petition under Articles 226 of the Constitution assails the orderdated 22nd September, 2025, passed by the Delhi School Tribunal (Tribunal), in Appeal No. 34/2020, titled Mrs. Pawan Jashial v. Khalsa Middle School & Ors. whereby the Tribunal upheld the Petitioners removal from service as Yoga Teacher in Khalsa Middle School, Sarojini Nagar, New Delhi.2. Stripped of unnecessary details, the controversy centres on whetherthe Petitioner secured appointment in a recognised aided school on the s...
Ranjeet Jha @ Ganja vs State Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 826/2026 & CRL.M.A. 6343/2026RANJEET JHA @ GANJA.....Petitioner Through: Ms. Sanjana Gupta, Advocate (through V.C.).versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI AND ORS.....Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar Gautam, APP for the State.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINORDER% 26.02.20261. Applicant seeks regular bail in a case arising out of FIR No.1092/2022dated 11.12.2022, for commission of offences under Sections 324/307/506/34 IPC, registered at P.S.Mukherjee Nagar.2. Charges have already been framed.3. As per the prosecution story, on 11.12.2022, two accused (includingthe applicant herein) with one Chunni (since absconding) and one Amit (since deceased) caused serious stab injuries to Ashwani @ Goli and Raja Sisodiya, and also caused simple injuries to two other persons.4. When the applicant prayed for regular bail earlier, such relief wasdenied by the learned Trial Court while also observing that the appl...
Praveen Kumar & Ors. vs Union of India Through the Secretary Ministry ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2746/2026, CM APPL. 13344-13347/2026 PRAVEEN KUMAR & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Abhishek Kumar Tiwari, Advocate.versusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE SECRETARY MINISTRY OFENVIRONMENT FOREST AND CLIMATE CHANGE & ORS......Respondents Through: Mr. Puneet Yadav, Senior Panel Counsel with Mr. Vivek Nagar, GP for Union of India/R-1 to R-3.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULAORDER% 26.02.20261. The Petitioners allege that their retiral benefits, including pensionarybenefits, gratuity and other admissible dues, have not been released to them despite having rendered continuous service with the Respondents for several decade2. At the outset, counsel for Respondents No. 1 to 3 objects to themaintainability of the petition on the ground that the dispute pertains to service matters arising out of employment under the Union of India and its instrumentalities and, therefore, the Petitioner has an effica...
Mohd. Tayyab vs Farheen
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.REV.P.(MAT.) 121/2026 & CRL.M.A. 6446-6447/2026MOHD. TAYYAB .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Parmeet Singh, Advocate.versusFARHEEN .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 26.02.20261. By way of this petition, the petitioner assails an order dated12.01.2026, by which the Family Court has summoned income tax records of the petitioner in proceedings under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.2. Mr. Parmeet Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, contends thatthe said evidence has been summoned at a belated stage, when the matter was scheduled for final arguments. He submits that the grievance of the petitioner is that, if the evidence is to be re-opened, he should also be permitted to place on record a fresh affidavit of assets and liabilities, as the petitioners liabilities have increased since the last affidavit filed by him.3. After some arguments, Mr. Singh submit...
Union of India & Ors. vs Janardhan Singh Rawat
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2700/2026 CM APPL. 13066/2026 CM APPL. 13271/2026 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Raj Kumar, CGSC, Ms Vandana Sachdeva, Mr Ankit Choudhary, Mr Sumit Choudhary and Major Kanika SharmaversusJANARDHAN SINGH RAWAT .....Respondent Through: appearance not given.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORAORDER% 26.02.20261. This petition lays a challenge to the order dated 17.09.2018 whichwas passed almost eight years back. Learned counsel for the petitioners have no explanation for the delay and laches.2. If that be so, this petition is dismissed on the ground of delay andlatches alone. The pending applications are also dismissed.V. KAMESWAR RAO, JMANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, JFEBRUARY 26, 2026rkThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. T...
Balaji Institute of Science and Technology & Anr. vs National Council ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2719/2026BALAJI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY & ANR......Petitioners Through: Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Ms. Priti Kumari, Mr. Pankay Kumar Ray,versusNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION & ANR......Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Rupal, Mr. Hardik Rupal, Ms. Aishwarya Malhotra,CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 26.02.20261. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia seeking the following prayers:- i. issue a writ of mandamus or any other suitable writ ororder or direction to respondents to update the status ofpetitioner institute and display its name in the list/category of recognised institutions for conducting D.El.Ed course with intake of 50 seats (one basic unit) on their official website; and/or ii. issue a writ of mandamus or any other suitable writ ororder directing respondents to inform affiliating Body aswell as Department of Higher Education, Government...
Sh. Suresh Kumar vs Sh. Rakesh Chawla & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 449/2026 & CM APPL. 13336/2026 SH. SURESH KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Krishna Chandra Dubey, Advocate.versusSH. RAKESH CHAWLA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 26.02.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner intendsto file an appeal against the impugned order and, therefore, prays that the present petition be disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.3. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of as withdrawn withliberty as sought, in accordance with law.RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, JFEBRUARY 26, 2026/MR/TPThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/02/2026 at 11:53:40...
Sri Venkateswara Diploma in Elementary Education College vs National C ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2732/2026 SRI VENKATESWARA DIPLOMA IN ELEMENTARYEDUCATION COLLEGE.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Gaurav Arora, Adv.versusNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION & ANR......Respondents Through: Mr. Anuj Kapoor, Mr. Shivom Sethi, Mr. Nandeesh Nanda, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 26.02.20261. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia seeking the following reliefs:- a) Issue a Writ of Certiorari and Quash the WithdrawalOrder dt. 20.05.2025, withdrawing recognition of petitionerinstitution for running the D.EL.ED course from academic year 2025-2026; and;(b) Issue a Writ of Mandamus directing Respondent No.2 toissue restoration of recognition of petitioner institution for D.EL.ED course from Academic Year 2025-2026; and;(c) Issue a Writ of Mandamus enabling the petitioner toparticipate in counselling and admit students for D.EL.EDcourse for Academic Year 2025-2026.And...
Pratap Chandra vs Manish Sisodia
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ LPA 95/2026 & CM APPL. 13029/2026 PRATAP CHANDRA .....Appellant Through: Appellant-in-Person. Mob. No.: 7388988999versusMANISH SISODIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rishikesh Kumar, Ms. Sheenu Priya & Mr. Aman Kumar, Advocates.CORAM:HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIAORDER% 26.02.20261. Heard the Appellant-in-Person.2. This Letters Patent Appeal challenges the judgment dated 17.01.2026passed by the learned Single Judge in an Election Petition, namely, EL.PET. No.1/2020.3. On being pointed out that the Impugned Order is appealable underSection 116A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 before the Honble Supreme Court, the Appellant seeks to withdraw the Appeal.4. Accordingly, the Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJTEJAS KARIA, JFEBRUARY 26, 2026/ AThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Cour...
Ashish Alias Ashu & Ors. vs the State Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 26th February, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 1569/2026 & CRL.M.A. 6350/2026ASHISH ALIAS ASHU & ORS......Petitioner Through: Mr. Bishan Singh, Advocate.versusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR.....Respondent Through: Mr. Raj Kumar, APP for the State with SI Puran Singh and SI Lalbahadur. Mr. Jitender Kaushik, Mr. Deepesh Gupta and Mr. Krishan, Advocates forR-2.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINJ U D G M E N T (oral)1. Petitioners herein seek quashing of FIR No.0586/2019 datedSections 498A/406/34 IPC, along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties.2. Petitioner No.1 got married to respondent No.2 on 12.09.2018, as perHindu rites and customs. There is no child from the abovesaid wedlock.3. However, on account of some temperamental differences, partiesstarted living separately and, on account of matrimonial discord, a complaint was lodged by respon...
- ‹ Prev
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- Next ›
- Last »