Delhi Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bimla Rani Gupta vs Suresh Gupta & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(OS) 360/2019, I.A. 9635/2019 BIMLA RANI GUPTA .....Plaintiff Through: NoneversusSURESH GUPTA & ANR. .....Defendants Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASADORDER% 27.02.20261. On 04.02.2026, learned Counsel appearing for the Plaintiff made astatement that she has instructions to withdraw the present Suit. A lady who had joined the proceedings through video-conferencing that day claimed herself to be the Plaintiff. Since the identity of the Plaintiff could not be verified, this Court was not inclined to accede to the request of the learned Counsel for the Plaintiff and as such, directed the Plaintiff to file an application under Order XXIII Rule 1(4) of the CPC for withdrawal of the Suit along with an affidavit of the Plaintiff. The matter was then adjourned to 26.02.2026.2. On 26.02.2026 there was no appearance on behalf of the Plaintiff and the matter was adjourned to today, i.e. 27.02.2026.3. Today also there ...
Parveen vs State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 1899/2025 PARVEEN .....Petitioner Through: None.versusSTATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for the State with Ms. Puja Mann and Mr. SAndeep Sinhmar, Advs. along with ACP Dr. Garima Tiwari and Insp Vinay KumarCORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 27.02.20261. No one appeared on behalf of the petitioner, when the matter wastaken up. On the last date of hearing also, though this Court was ready to hear arguments, the learned counsel had sought adjournment and appearance was not given by the learned counsel. It seems that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the present bail application.2. Accordingly, the bail application is dismissed for non-prosecution.3. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J FEBRUARY 27, 2026/A/RThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Cou...
Ashish Arora vs State Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 4340/2025 ASHISH ARORA ..Petitioner Through: Mr. Ritesh Oberoi, Advocate.versusSTATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. ..Respondents Through: Mr. Naval Kishore Jha, APP. R2 in person.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 27.02.20261. The petitioner has filed this petition under Section 528 of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [BNSS] (corresponding to Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [CrPC]) seeking quashing of FIR No. 358/2022 dated 19.04.2022, registered at Police Station Rajouri Garden, District West, New Delhi, under Sections emanating therefrom, on the ground of settlement.2. The brother of the petitioner and respondent No. 2 were married on 21.05.2017, but their marriage has since been dissolved by a decree of divorce by mutual consent, passed by the Family Court on 23.12.2024.3. Respondent No. 2 lodged the impugned FIR against her brother-in- law [petitioner herein], as well as FIR No. 575/202...
Raju Kanojia vs State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 2383/2025 & CRL.M.A. 18969/2025 RAJU KANOJIA .....Petitioner Through: None.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahalwat, APP for State with Inspector Sandeep and Inspector Rakesh, PS Vasant Vihar. Muhammad Ali Khan, Advocate for Complainant.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIAORDER% 27.02.20261. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 184/2021 of PS Vasant Vihar for offence under Section 302/307/394 IPC.2. Sine none appears for accused/applicant, matter is passed over.FEBRUARY 27, 2026/as Present: None for the accused/applicant. Mr. Amit Ahalwat, APP for State with Inspector Sandeep and Inspector Rakesh, PS Vasant Vihar. Muhammad Ali Khan, Advocate for Complainant.3. This application was first listed before the predecessor bench on 07.07.2025 and thereafter, it remained pending before different benches and finally as a part of 179 old pending bail applications, it was...
National Highways Authority of India vs M/S Simplex Infrastructure Lim ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P. (COMM) 269/2019, I.A. 9595/2019 & I.A. 5532/2026 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Naman Saraswat and Ms. Neetica Sharma, Advocates (M:9990160938)versusM/S SIMPLEX INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sourav Dutta, AdvocateCORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNAORDER% 27.02.2026 I.A. 5532/20261. The present application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking withdrawal of the present writ petition and for refund of security amount with interest, on the ground of settlement arrived at between the parties.2. It is submitted that during the pendency of the present case, parties herein have arrived at a settlement, and Settlement Agreement has been executed on 21st November, 2025.3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that an amount of Rs. 5.22 Crores has been released to the respondent, as full and final settlement.4. Learned counsel for the respondent confi...
Smt. Bhuvneshwari @ Pinki vs State Govt. of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 1916/2025 SMT. BHUVNESHWARI @ PINKI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Randhir Kumar, Advocate.versusSTATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Priyanka Dalal, APP for the State with SI Rajesh Kumar. Mr. Rajiv Bajaj, Ms. Nandini Singhal and Mr. Naman Arora, Advocates for complainant.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINORDER% 27.02.20261. Applicant seeks regular bail in a case arising out of FIR No.0585/2021 dated 03.06.2021, for commission of offence under Section 302 IPC, registered at P.S. Nihal Vihar.2. The applicant was arrested on 04.06.2021 and is in judicial custody since 09.06.2021.3. Applicant had earlier filed an application seeking interim bail which was later on converted into regular bail application, on the basis of request made by the learned counsel for the applicant.4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that there is no likelihood of trial being concluded in near future and the applicant...
Radico Khaitan Ltd. vs Mohit Petrochemical Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIReserved on: 30.10.2025 Date of Decision: 27.02.2026Judgment uploaded on: 02.03.2026+ C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 131/2025 & I.A. 13752/2025 RADICO KHAITAN LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajshekhar Rao, Sr. Adv., Mr. Anirudh Bakhru, Ms. Ishani Chandra, sMr. Sagar Chandra, Ms. Srijan Uppal, Mr. Abhishek Bhati, Mr. Subhadeep Das and Mr. Ajay Sabharwal, Advs.versusMOHIT PETROCHEMICAL PVT. LTD. & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sudeep Chatterjee, Mr. Rohan Swarup, Mr. Rajit Ghosh and Ms. Aastha Verma, Advs. for R-1. Ms. Nidhi Raman, CGSC, Mr. Arnav Mittal, Mr. Mayank Sansanwal and Mr. Om Ram, Advs. for R-2. %CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORAJUDGMENTMANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J:1. The present petition has been filed for the removal of the entry madein the Register of Trade Marks in respect of Registration No. 4832282 for the Trademark GRAND MASTI in Class 33 under Sections 57 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 (Act of 199...
Anu Mittal vs Mr Kaustubh Goswami
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 2735/2024 & CM APPL. 33804/2024 ANU MITTAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Varun Sharma, Adv. (through VC)versusMR KAUSTUBH GOSWAMI .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 27.02.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the main suit hasalready been dismissed in default and, therefore, he is not pressing the present petition. Accordingly, it is prayed that the present petition may be disposed of as withdrawn.3. Keeping in view of the submissions made by the learned Counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J FEBRUARY 27, 2026/sds/abkThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloa...
Classic Industries and Ors vs M/S J.B. Texmach and Spares Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RFA 407/2022, CM APPL. 38635/2022 CLASSIC INDUSTRIES AND ORS. .....Appellants Through: Mr. Namit Suri & Ms. Surabhi Sinha, Advocates.versusM/S J.B. TEXMACH AND SPARES PVT. LTD. .....Respondent Through: Mrs. Jasbir Kaur and Mr. Manmeet Arora, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAORDER% 27.02.20261. Learned counsel for the Appellants seeks permission to withdraw present Appeal in terms of Settlement dated 13.02.2026 arrived at Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre.2. In view of submissions made, present Appeal along with pending Applications is dismissed as withdrawn.NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.FEBRUARY 27, 2026/R This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/03/2026 at 11:26:17...
Mountain Valley Springs India Private Limited vs Baby Forest Ayurveda ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIReserved on: 19.01.2026Pronounced on: 27.02.2026+ FAO(OS) (COMM) 111/2024 & CM APPL. 33733/2024, CM APPL. 33736/2024 MOUNTAIN VALLEY SPRINGS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED .....Appellant Through: Ms. Swathi Sukumar, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Essenese Obhan, Mr.Neel Mason, Ms.Ayesha Guhathakurta and Ms.Urvika Aggarwal, Advs.versusBABY FOREST AYURVEDA PRIVATE LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS M/S LANDSMILL HEALTHCARE PRIVATE LIMITED) & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr.Jayant Mehta, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Sundeep Chatterjee, Mr.Rohan Swarup, Ms.Tanya Arora, Ms.Aastha Verma, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLAHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MADHU JAINJUDGMENTNAVIN CHAWLA, J.1. This appeal has been filed challenging the judgment dated 15.05.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in I.A. Digitally Signed FAO(OS)(COMM) 111/2024 Page 1 of 31Mountain Valley Springs India Private Limited v. Baby Forest Ayurveda Private Limited (formerly known as M/S L...
- ‹ Prev
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- Next ›
- Last »