Delhi Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rukhsar vs the State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
$~1&2* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 27.02.2026 + BAIL APPLN. 995/2025 & CRL.M.A. 7545/2025 (stay) RUKHSAR .....Petitioner+ BAIL APPLN. 999/2025 & CRL.M.A. 7570/2025 (stay) KHUSHBOO .....PetitionerCORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIAJ U D G M E N T (ORAL)1. The accused/applicants seek anticipatory bail in case FIR No.BAIL APPLN. 995/2025 & 999/2025 Page 1 of 3 pages2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638,Signature Not Verified KATHPALIA serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.02.27 16:58:57 -08'00'2. I have heard learned counsel for accused/applicants and learned APPfor State assisted by IO SI Sandeep.3. Broadly speaking, according to prosecution case, three transgendersassaulted the victim transgender with dandas causing an injury above right eye to the victim. Furth...
Babu Ram vs Union of India and Ors. & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of decision: 27th February, 2026+ W.P.(C) 3330/2021BABU RAM .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Meghan Paul, Mr. Vikas Malik and Mr. Rohit Singh Negi, AdvocatesversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Bhagwan Swarup Shukla, CGSC with Mr. Jiniya Saha and Mr. Pradyumn Singh, Advocates for UOI Mr. Gaurav Bahl and Mr. Gokul Sharma, Advocates for R-5CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALAMIT BANSAL, J. (Oral)1. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking arefund of a sum of Rs. 64,446/-, which was paid by the petitioner to the respondent no.5 hospital for his treatment. A further direction is sought with regard to the respondent no.1 to adhere and implement the Cashless Treatment Scheme in Emergency (CTSE) Policy formulated on 14th July, 2016 and 24th January, 2017.2. Brief facts relevant for deciding the present writ petition are as under:-i. The petitioner, who was a former employee with the ...
Khushboo vs the State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
$~1&2* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 27.02.2026 + BAIL APPLN. 995/2025 & CRL.M.A. 7545/2025 (stay) RUKHSAR .....Petitioner+ BAIL APPLN. 999/2025 & CRL.M.A. 7570/2025 (stay) KHUSHBOO .....PetitionerCORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIAJ U D G M E N T (ORAL)1. The accused/applicants seek anticipatory bail in case FIR No.BAIL APPLN. 995/2025 & 999/2025 Page 1 of 3 pages2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638,Signature Not Verified KATHPALIA serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.02.27 16:58:57 -08'00'2. I have heard learned counsel for accused/applicants and learned APPfor State assisted by IO SI Sandeep.3. Broadly speaking, according to prosecution case, three transgendersassaulted the victim transgender with dandas causing an injury above right eye to the victim. Furth...
Ram Kumar Pathak vs Shashi Devi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 06.01.2026Judgment pronounced on: 27.02.2026Judgment uploaded on: 27.02.2026+ CRL.M.C. 1143/2019 & CRL.M.A. 4453/2019 RAM KUMAR PATHAK ....Petitioner Through: Mr. A Mishra, Mr. Ravi Pal, Mr. Sahil and Mr. Nidish Gupta, Advs.versusSHASHI DEVI & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Mayank Mehandru, Ms. Charu Tandon, Mr. Raghav Tandon, Mr. Nikhil Kharaliya, Ms. Diksha Jaspal and Mr. Ashutosh Singh, Advs. for R-1.CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAJUDGMENTDR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J1. The present petition has been filed seeking setting aside of theorder dated 28.01.2019, passed by the learned ASJ-03, KarkardoomaCourts, North-East District, Delhi [hereafter Sessions Court] in Crl. Revision No. 63/2018 as well as the summoning order dated 26.05.2018 passed by the learned MM, North-East District, Delhi [hereafterSignature Not Verified CRL.M.C. 1143/2019 Page 1 of 16Magistrate] in the complaint filed...
Gaurav Tyagi vs Shalu and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.REV.P. 354/2024, CRL.M.A. 8049/2024 GAURAV TYAGI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. S.K. Chaudhary and Mr. Sumit Sehrawat, Advocates.versusSHALU AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Avtar Singh, Advocate.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 27.02.20261. Considering the parties are in litigation before the learned FamilyCourt and the order impugned is only an interim order, as also since much water has flown since the passing of the impugned order, without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties learned counsel for the parties agree that the present petition can be disposed of with a direction to the learned Family Court to dispose of M.P. No.209/2020 as expeditiously as possible.2. Accordingly, the learned Family Court is requested to dispose of theM.P. No.209/2020 on or before 31.12.2026 after concluding the evidence therein and hearing the parties therein. Needless to say, the parties shall not...
Shri Vinod Kumar Pathror vs Union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIReserved on: 27.01.2026Pronounced on: 27.02.2026+ W.P.(CRL) 923/2022 SHRI VINOD KUMAR PATHROR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Aniteja Sharma and Mr. Arijit Singh, Advs.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Amit Tiwari, CGSC with Mr. Ayush Tanwar, Ms. Ayushi Srivastava and Mr. Arpan Narwal, Advs. for UOI. Mr. Aditya Singla, SSC, CBIC with Mr. Shreya Lamba, Adv. for R-2.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJAJUDGMENTNAVIN CHAWLA, J.1. The present Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 ofthe Constitution of India, seeking the quashing of the detention orderbearing F. No. PD12002/02/2017- COFEPOSA dated 02.01.2018, issued by the Joint Secretary to the Government of India, COFEPOSA Unit, Central Economic Intelligence Bureau in the Department ofDigitally Signed W.P.(CRL) 923/2022 Page 1 of 21Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of ...
XXXX vs State and Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 2219/2024 XXXX .....Petitioner Through: Counsel (appearance not given).versusSTATE AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP for the State along with SI Sheetal and SI Annu. Mr. M.L. Chaudhary, Adv. for R-2 toR-4.CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 27.02.20261. The learned counsel appearing for respondent nos. 2 to 4 has movedan application for cancellation of anticipatory bail, granted to the accused in the present FIR.2. At this stage, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seekspermission of this Court to withdraw the instant petition.3. Accordingly, petition is dismissed as withdrawn.4. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith.DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, JFEBRUARY 27, 2026/A/GJThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downlo...
Puneet Dewan vs Delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
$~75-76* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2757/2019 & CM APPL. 12773/2019 PUNEET DEWAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Bharat Bhushan, Mr. Partik Ahlawat, Mr. Rohit Dhamija, Advs.versusDELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY .....Respondent Through: Mr. Animesh Kumar Gaba, Mr. Shiva Khandelwal and Mr. Jatin Sharma, Advs. + W.P.(C) 6454/2019 & CM APPL. 56507/2025 SHEFALI TRIPATHI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Bharat Bhushan, Mr. Partik Ahlawat, Mr. Rohit Dhamija, Advs.versusDELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY .....Respondent Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 27.02.20261. None of the parties has any objection to me hearing the present matter.2. These are writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia seeking the following respective prayers:- W.P.(C) 2757/2019 a) issue a suitable writ, order or direction for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent to allow the petitioner to apply for membership in Sir...
Supreme Infrastructure India Ltd. & Anr. vs Union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5694/2023, CM APPL. 22328/2023 and CM APPL. 28049/2023SUPREME INFRASTRUCTURE INDIA LTD. & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: None.versusUNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Pratima N Lakra CGSC with Mr.Shailendra Kumar Mishra and Mr.Abhishek Sharma, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 27.02.20261. None is present on behalf of the petitioners.2. The instant petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution. Allpending applications also stands disposed of.PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J FEBRUARY 27, 2026 Nc/ksrThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/03/2026 at 11:44:17...
Ravissant Private Limited vs Anil Kumar Jain Silver & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(COMM) 318/2025 & I.As. 9099/2025, 9100/2025, 9104/2025 RAVISSANT PRIVATE LIMITED .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Pravin Anand, Mr. Dhruv Anand and Ms. Nimrat Singh, Advocates.versusANIL KUMAR JAIN SILVER & ANR. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Sandeep Chilana and Ms. Ipsita Kataky, Advocates for D-1.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGHORDER% 27.02.20261. This suit is instituted on behalf of the Plaintiff seeking decree ofpermanent injunction restraining the Defendants and all others acting on their behalf from applying or causing to be applied to any article/products, Plaintiffs registered designs bearing Nos. 267811, 287465, 297913, 297914 and 297915 and/or any fraudulent or obvious imitation thereof so as to amount to infringement of Plaintiffs registered designs, amongst other reliefs.2. During the pendency of the suit, parties were referred to the DelhiHigh Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre vide order dated 07.08.2025, wh...
- ‹ Prev
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- Next ›
- Last »