Delhi Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jatadhari Mahila Mahavidyalaya vs National Council for Teacher Educati ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2803/2026 & CM APPL. 13564/2026JATADHARI MAHILA MAHAVIDYALAYA.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mayank Manish Adv Mr. Ravi Kant Adv Mr. Vineet Upadhyay, Adv.versusNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION AND ANR.....Respondent Through: Mr. Anuj Kapoor, Mr. Nandeesh Nanda, Mr. Shivom Sethi, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 27.02.20261. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia seeking the following prayers:- (a) quash the withdrawal order dated 31.05.2025 issued by the Respondent No.2 whereby it has arbitrarily withdrawn the recognition of Petitioners D.El.Ed. course from the academic session 2025-26; and(b) direct the Respondent No.2 to issue a communication infavour of the Petitioner thereby declaring it to be an Institution duly recognised for running the D.El.Ed. course; and(c) consequently direct the Respondent No.2 to update itswebsite by displaying the recognized statu...
Rakesh vs Govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2783/2026 RAKESH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Manoj Kumar Sharma, Adv.versusGOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Vaishali Gupta, Panel Counsel ( Civil) / GNCTD, Mr. Siddharth Arora, Mr. Kartik Sharma, Advocates for R-1.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 27.02.20261. The petitioner seems to be aggrieved against the opening of theGovernment Wine and Beer Shop, situated at 15, Main Shivpuri, Patparganj Road, Delhi-110051. According to the petitioner, there are many hospitals, schools, colleges, education institutions, temples, mosques and Gurudwaras which are situated in the same locality and on account of liquor shop situated in the vicinity, the existing rules and regulations stand violated. He submits that the Government Senior Secondary School, is located within 100 meters from the shop in question.2. The grievance of the petitioner will have to be looked into by the...
Kavinder Singh vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2764/2026 & CM APPL. 13469/2026 KAVINDER SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Advocate (appearance not given)versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI& ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Abhishek Mahajan, Advocate for R-1 and R-2. Mr. Chandan Deep Singh, Advocate for R-3. Mr. Rakesh, Inspector, DP Court Cell. Ms. Prabhsahay Kaur, Mr. Aditya Verma and Ms. Anmol Kaur, Advocates for STF. Mr. Kirti Uppal, Sr. Advocate with Mohd. Amanullah and Ms. Vibhuti Sharma, Advocates for R-5.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 27.02.20261. The present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to therespondents no.1, 2, 3 and 4 to take action against unauthorized construction being carried out by the respondent no.5 in property at Khasra No. 127, 138, 139 Main Road, Okhla Village, Jamia Nagar, New Delhi-110025 (hereinafter subject property).2. The petitioner has also filed a civil suit being Civil SuitW.P.(C) 2764...
Portanri Pakyntein vs the State of Nct Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 864/2026, CRL.M.A. 6612/2026; CRL.M.A.PORTANRI PAKYNTEIN .....Applicant Through: Mr. Gautam Panjwani, Mr. Mayank Rana and Ms. Ishpreet Kaur, Advs.VersusTHE STATE OF NCT DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP with Ms. Upasna Bakshi and Ms. Divya Bakshi, Advs. SI- Manish Suhag, PS: Special CellCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 27.02.20261. By virtue of the present bail application under Section 483 of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), the applicant seeks grant of regular bail in FIR No.156/2025 dated 09.12.2025 under Sections Special Cell, Delhi.2. At the outset, this Court finds that the present application seekingregular bail has been filed by the applicant merely five days after facing dismissal by the learned Trial Court vide order dated 20.02.2026 on the same set of facts and circumstances and urging identical grounds.3. As evident therefrom, the said gr...
Prabhu Dayal Public School vs Directorate of Education
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2777/2026 & CM APPL. 13488/2026 PRABHU DAYAL PUBLIC SCHOOL .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Amita Sehgal, Mr. Kartik Kalra, Advs.versusDIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION .....Respondent Through: Mr. Dhruv Rohatgi, PC (Civil), GNCTD, Mrs Chandrika Sachdev, Mr. Dhruv Kumar, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 27.02.2026CM APPL. 13489/2026Allowed subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of.W.P.(C) 2777/20261. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia seeking the following prayers:- (a) Issue a writ of mandamus directing the Respondents to release all pending EWS/DG reimbursements for Academic Years 2016-17 to 2024-25, along with interest;(b) Direct the Respondents to decide the Petitioner'srepresentation dated 03.10.2025 by passing a reasoned order;(c) Direct the Respondents to frame a uniform, time-boundSOP for processing EWS reimbursements for all private un...
Pooja Sharma Bajaj vs Kunal Bajaj
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 350/2026 POOJA SHARMA BAJAJ .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rama Kant Sharma, Mr. Prateek Avasthi, Advs.versusKUNAL BAJAJ .....Respondent Through: Mr. Giriraj Subramanium, Mr. Simranpal Singh Sawhne, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTAORDER% 27.02.2026 CM APPL. 13721/2026 (Exemption)1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The application stands disposed of.CONT.CAS(C) 350/20263. The present petition is premised on allegation of wilful disobedience/non-compliance of the directions contained in the order dated 08.01.2026 passed by this Court in CRL.MC. No. 935/2023. The operative direction therein reads as under:-4. It transpires during the course of hearing that the amount of Rs.25,00,000/- has been paid to the petitioner in terms of direction contained in Paragraph 4(b) of the aforesaid order dated 08.01.2026 albeit with some delay.5. Learned counsel for the respondent submits ...
Harminder Singh vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2782/2026 & CM APPL. 13499/2026 HARMINDER SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. A. K. Sharma, Mr. Shubhanshu Mishra, Ms. Sunita Sharma and Ms. Anushka Sharma, AdvocatesversusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI& ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Meherunnisa Anand Jaitley, Advocate for R-1 to R-4CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 27.02.20261. The present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction torespondent/MCD to remove the status of the petitioners property No.354, First Floor, Nimri Colony, Ashok Vihar, Delhi-110052, being shown as booked on the official website of the respondent/MCD.2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that a speaking order was passed byMCD on 5th February, 2024 in terms of which, the earlier show cause notice issued by MCD was withdrawn.3. Subsequently, this Court had passed an order dated 28th April, 2025 inCONT. CAS(C) 506/2024, noting that the booking of the pe...
Preeti & Ors. vs Priya
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
$~79.* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RFA 200/2026, CM APPL. 13693-13695/2026 PREETI & ORS. .....Appellants Through: Mr. Raj Kumar and Mr. Pramod Singh, Advocates.versusPRIYA .....Respondent Through: Ms. Payal Bahl, Mr. Abhijit Mishra, Mr. Himanshu Tomar, Mr.Vikhyat Gupta, Mr. Prashant jaiswal, Mr. Ram Parvesh Kumar, Advocates. Mr. Abhijit Mishra, Mr. Ram Parvesh Kumar, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAORDER% 27.02.2026 CM APPL. 13694/2026 (Seeking Exemption)1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.2. The Application stands disposed of.CM APPL. 13695/2026 (under Section 5 of Limitation Act on behalf of the Appellants seeking Condonation of Delay of 17 days in Re-filing of RFA)3. An Application has been filed on behalf of the Appellants, seekingcondonation of Delay of 17 days, in re-filing the Appeal.4. For the reasons stated in the Application, the delay of 17 days in re-filing the Appeal, is condoned.5. ...
Super Kumar vs State of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 859/2026, CRL.M.A. 6581/2026 SUPER KUMAR .....Applicant Through: Mr. Apoorv Shankar, Adv. (Through VC)versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP for the State with Ms. Upasna Bakshi and Ms. Divya Bakshi, Advs. SI- Rinku Bhakar, Anit Narnotic CellCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 27.02.20261. As requested, learned counsel for applicant seeks, and is permittedto withdraw the present application along with the pending application therein.2. Accordingly, the present application along with pending applicationis dismissed as withdrawn.SAURABH BANERJEE, JFEBRUARY 27, 2026/AbThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/03/2026 at 10:14:03...
Bls E Services Limited vs Union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision : 27.02.2026+ W.P.(C) 2760/2026 CM APPL. 13464/2026 CM APPL. 13465/2026 BLS E SERVICES LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Naman Joshi and Ms. Amber Tickoo, Advs.versusUNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....RespondentsThrough: Ms. Nidhi Raman, CGSC, Mr. Arnav Mittal, GP and Mr. Zubin Singh, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORAV. KAMESWAR RAO, J. (ORAL)1. The present writ petition has been filed under Article 226 seeking thefollowing reliefs: - a) Quash the Impugned Communication dated 20.02.2026 issued by Respondent No. 2; b) Direct the Respondent No. 2 to treat the Petitioner as having satisfied the Mandatory Eligibility Criteria prescribed under Chapter V, Para 1(I) of the subject RFP; c) Direct the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 to undertake evaluation of the Petitioners Technical Bid under the subject RFP; d) Permit the Petitioner to submit and have its financia...
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »